The Forum > Article Comments > Getting rid of Bashar Assad won’t end Syria’s civil war > Comments
Getting rid of Bashar Assad won’t end Syria’s civil war : Comments
By Gary Gambill, published 9/5/2013To hear Obama administration officials talk about the Syrian civil war, you'd think it all hinges on the fate of one man.
- Pages:
-
- 1
-
- All
- Pages:
-
- 1
-
- All
One wonders for example how the author can write about Syria without reference to Seymour Hersh's important piece published in 2007. Or how he can write without referring to Israel's longstanding role in destabilisation, including but not limited to the illegal occupation and annexation of the Golan Heights.
Or how he seems completely unaware of basic tenets of international law that Obama frequently parrots and then ignores, as Richard Falk tellingly analysed in a piece in Al-Jazeera published on 8 May 2013.
Perhaps the author could expand his reading to Robert Fisk and Pepe Escobar (the Independent and Asia Times respectively) for an insight into the current war. It may come as a surprise, but most of the so-called rebels are foreign sourced, financed, armed and trained by the US, UK and their Gulf and Turkish proxies. They do not have the remotest interest in a "democratic" Syria.
The real situation is both more complex and very different than this article would have us believe. A resolution of the problem is not helped by Australia, in its usual gutless manner and notwithstanding membership of the Security Council remaining absolutely silent (as does the author) on the latest acts of blatant international terrorism and breaches of international law by the regime in Tel Aviv.