The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > Article Comments > Defending without an attacker > Comments

Defending without an attacker : Comments

By Matt Elsbury, published 26/4/2013

Perhaps we should cater to another societal group in a similar way, and establish White Fear Day.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. All
Do-gooders, what's up ? Lost your nerve to contradict old Vlad ?
Posted by individual, Tuesday, 30 April 2013 6:16:04 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Blah blah blah.

The irony of your irony is that your proposed White Fear Day would be *illegal*, because people like you have made it a crime.

You could not have any event or organisation for Whites only, whether serious or tongue-in-cheek, positive or negative in tone.

No White Fear Day, No White Love Day, No Whites Are Sexy Day, No White Brains Trust, No Blondes Have More Fun Day, No White Art Appreciation Society.

And God forbid should you want to focus on anything related to White *men*! (unless you're demonising or ridiculing them).
Sorry, no White Men's Fitness Centre.

Strange how the lauded "diversity of views" cannot include anything pro-white or pro-men.

No attack?
Australian-born Whites were 90% of the population in the 1940s.
Now it's less than 60%.

If that happened by stamping skulls instead of stamping passports, you'd call it what it is: genocide.
Posted by Shockadelic, Wednesday, 1 May 2013 1:11:43 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy