Rhrosty,
Right, so you'd be happy with the idea of two wealthy White homosexual men adopting a young Aboriginal boy would you?
Thought not.
You talk about choice yet assume that single parents,addicted or otherwise poor people can't change or mature and that their kids should be given away to "good" people.
We've been down that road and it was a disaster. Shame on you.

Jardine,
Yeah it is stupid, the whole thing is a load of crap,"LGBTIQ" is really just "L", do we really believe that suddenly the "system' is going to start treating men, homosexuals, queers and sexually ambiguous people as equals, it is to laugh.
Gay men are waking up to the fact that to the Feminist run welfare state they are still just disposable men like the rest of us and unless they submit to what women want and "play nice" they are going to be kicked to the kerb.
I highly recommend the works of Jack Donovan on men's issues and as my current favourite Youtube pundit "Stardusk" says, we need to get into the habit of thinking of ourselves as men, not gay men,straight men, black men,White men old men or young men but just men, when that happens we'll be getting somewhere.

There have been a few posts above suggesting that Blaise is not the editor of Conjugality. Not sure why this should be an issue. People have been known to change things in their organisation and not on their website, and if you were really interested in the truth you'd do a bit of research before making the accusation. Which is what I've done.

Seems, after you search Google for "conjugality blaise joseph" that you can easily establish via a Mercator.Net tweet that he became editor on April 3, 2013.

Blaise is an uniformed, indoctrinated religious zealot.

His post proves the point above.

Do I give a hoot about what my neighbours are doing in THEIR bedroom next door, no not at all, none of my business.

Are they raising children, why yes they are. Funny considering both of them are women.

No problems encountred.

Despite all of this physical evidence, the minority religious fervour continues to perpetuate "so called evidence" whereby children raised in same sex unions are at some sort of disadvantage.....sorry all the scientific evidence shows the opposite.

Discrimination is a terrible thing, perhaps those posting should walk the streets, meet the people living this life and realise that it matters little as to what is purported to be 'married' and what really transpires as true love and the care they provide to 'their' children whether by adoption, congenial surrogacy or whatever, get real and learn that you don't own or rule "Marriage", history demonstrates that marriage is a union, whether it is between a man and woman, woman, woman or man, man is irrelevant.

Wake up and smell the roses, most of us have moved on.

Dogma (particularly from the Catholic Church) is now so irrelevant it is beyond a joke.

Show some compassion and give humans a chance, then again, your biase, blinkered view will curtail any opportunity for this to happen.
Happily married man with two beautiful children (undoctinated or course)....Geoff

What next ? Same sex marriage for asexuals !

Well said, Geoff of Perth.
Same sex marriage will eventually be legal here, regardless of any silly religious arguments.

Will it's introduction change anything?
Not really...it is just another nail in religion's coffin.