JOM:

True; although my point was somewhat of an aside, it is relevant and fits well-enough here!

not altruism.
Jay of Melbourne,
do you mean such as the australian version of altruism when after donating you hasten to the tax deduction form & then recommend yourself for a hero parade with a medal for everyone to see what a fantastic philanthropist you are. Yes a very noble attitude indeed way more genuine than a Wilders who expresses an inconvenient truth.

Diver and JOM, We are supposed to live in a free country. If it is apparently OK to say anything you like about Christians and Jews, why is it not OK to say what your like about Islam?

Islam is a missionary religion, (think Christianity 14th century and before) Gert is simply pointing out, that Muslims want to improve the west by converting us all to Islam.

I grew up in Melbourne which was more multicultural than anywhere else on the planet long before the word was invented. The assumption Australia has always operated on is, that the second or third generation of each wave of migrants would be indistinguishable from anyone else. They would adopt the general Aussie disdain for religion and adapt their culture to blend in. This does not appear to be happening anymore. I am not sure this is a good idea.

Diver as to your comments about the southern province of Thailand being seeded to Malaysia, great idea. As long as we get Constantinople back, it is after all on the European mainland and serves as a reminder of the invasion of Europe by the Turks.

Jon R,
I'm not saying that there is no problem with Islam and people from predominantly Islamic societies but I'm beginning to think we need to formulate a new, biologically based way of defining ethnicity, we really need to look at bloodlines and family trees rather than overly broad genetic studies , and outdated notions of race or nationality.
Cosmopolitanism can't work with large numbers of highly ethnocentric groups and the way proponents of mass Third World immigration assess the biological fitness of particular immigrant groups or clans (ie ignoring it altogether) is causing too many problems.
Even if proponents of a more hard edged form of Eugenics are over ruled in the short term they should still speak out, change doesn't come if people remain silent.
The point I often make is that if the Andalusian emirate had triumphed back in the day Europe would still have had a Renaissance and an industrial revolution and Africa and the Middle East would still be backward, restive and dangerous places, this debate about Islam is really about reproductive habits and ethnic fitness, not so much ideology

is really about reproductive habits and ethnic fitness, not so much ideology
Jay of Melbourne,
CHRIST !

Individual.
So it is, some tribes, clans and ethnic groups are unfit to emigrate, a group with a tendency toward a sub 70 IQ or a congenital disorder exacerbated by inbreeding or whose reproductive habits produce very large families has no future in a Western country and will only be a burden to others.
Similarly family groups who exist in the third world as bandits or gangsters have no business here,the Chaouk and Haddara families for example should never have been allowed into this country.