The Forum > Article Comments > Flood management is not mostly about grand engineering schemes > Comments
Flood management is not mostly about grand engineering schemes : Comments
By Chas Keys, published 12/2/2013We need to stop trying to 'flood-proof' Queensland: it simply can't be done.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- Page 2
-
- All
Saying something can't be done when we've never ever tried, shows sheer lack of applied intellectual acumen!
Statistically, for every one dollar spent on mitigation, four are saved on recovery outlays.
And as one poster pointed out, we've simply replaced what was lost, when we should have spent additional money on raising road and rail links, and replacing bridges that wash away, with tunnels that don't; and, putting levy banks around towns that then turn them into Islands, whenever floods come again, etc/etc.
The Clarence flooded recently, and the levy banks built around Grafton, some years ago. Against the wishes of a small but very vocal minority, who like Chas, said it can't be done; have since paid for their seemingly modest outlay, many times over!
The floods destroy quite massive areas of the marine and estuarine environment.
And outlays for modest upland mitigation work, would provide nothing but benefit, and nothing but win/win outcomes in both wet and dry times.
No, we can't flood or drought proof Australia, but we can and should mitigate against some of the very worst outcomes!
If only to actually reduce the massive and endlessly repeated recovery outlays.
Rhrosty