The Forum > Article Comments > Australia's diplomatic pragmatism > Comments
Australia's diplomatic pragmatism : Comments
By Kellie Tranter, published 5/12/2012Australia's stance is not about diplomacy, and it's not about pragmatism: it's about taking sides for reasons unconnected with what's in issue.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- Page 3
- 4
-
- All
What we have witnessed, ever since the 1947 UN resolution creating the state of Israel, is the progressive theft of Palestinian land, and in the case of the Golan Heights, annexed in 1981, of Syrian territory.
The Israeli government talks about the "peace process" but I am far from the first to note that this process is wholly one as defined by them. It does not really envisage an independent Palestine state and those who persist in thinking that a two state solution is ever within their purview are simply deluded.
Even the ineffectual Ban Ki-Moon said that the latest settlement plan was the death knell of the two state solution. Of course there are the ritual noises of condemnation about those settlement plans. It won't make a blind bit of difference to the Israelis, any more than widespread condemnation, UN resolutions or the findings of the World Court have deterred them from earlier settlement building encroaching ever more onto Palestinian land.
Their arrogance and intransigence will ultimately lead to the destruction of the Zionist state. They will only have themselves to blame.