The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > Article Comments > Charity, celebrity and the corporate condonation of child sexual abuse > Comments

Charity, celebrity and the corporate condonation of child sexual abuse : Comments

By Jocelynne Scutt, published 19/11/2012

Adult failures to be responsible.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All
Oh come on Squeers, you can't be serious?
Are you suggesting that incidents of child abuse would have been much less if only the mothers hadn't missed 'knowing' about it?

What a disgusting thing to say!

Paedophiles are very clever at covering their tracks and at ensuring that children keep their mouth's shut.

In cases like the many Priests implicated in sexual abuse, and the JImmy Saville allegations, where were the father's of all the kids involved? How come they didn't 'know' that their kids were being abused?

That question is just as ludicrous as your comment...
Posted by Suseonline, Monday, 19 November 2012 9:54:50 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
"Are you suggesting that incidents of child abuse would have been much less if only the mothers hadn't missed 'knowing' about it?"

Not only that, Suseonline. I'm saying that it would be much less if women "acted" on their "knowledge" instead of denying it.
My own mother was turfed out by her mother when as a child she told her that her stepfather had "misbehaved". Her mother refused to believe it and the stepfather went on to misbehave with two sisters as well.
I know of other instances and believe it's extremely common for women to turn a blind eye--hopefully less these days.
It beggars belief that with over 300 Savile victims no one came forward till now. More likely some were successfully muzzled (paid off).

I don't say fathers aren't also to blame, though in most cases mothers are the primary carers. Indeed all too often the fathers or brothers or cousins are the abusers and the mothers "their" protectors.

Child molestation is not a one on one crime between abused and abuser, it's environmental, incestuous and even social in terms of power matrices and emotional dependencies.

Women have a unique perspective on male sexuality, which despite a veneer of "respectability" is clearly voracious. Many men simply can't help it and the women in their lives have had to learn a degree of tolerance in order to serve their own "perceived"best interests.

The Savile case might be a high-profile instance of celebrity, but rather than sensationalising it we should acknowledge that sexual abuse is banal, endemic and effectively authorised.
Posted by Squeers, Tuesday, 20 November 2012 6:59:49 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy