The Forum > Article Comments > Good mail on privatisation > Comments
Good mail on privatisation : Comments
By Mikayla Novak, published 26/10/2012In countries such as Germany, Malaysia and the Netherlands the government post offices have been either partially or completely privatised, mainly through the public offerings of shares.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- Page 2
-
- All
It has been plagued by a series of managements who under weasel slogans such as “do better” have done Australia Post over big time.
In early 2011 it was decreed from above –without consultation –that it would implement a late fee for all of its credit account customers.It sent out ONE poorly written flier to all customers telling them of this intention.Of course most customers claimed either, never have seen the flier, or, not to have understood it.And after months of having its phones clogged with customer complaints and a huge loss of goodwill, it backpedaled and waived the fee.
( I haven’t heard what happen with the thousands of compliant customers who paid the fee – it is likely they were never advised that they paid a fee that later most were exempted from ).Heads should have rolled at high levels thick and fast over that shemozzle.
Similarly, in early 2011 AP found itself in a position –due to the failure of recent management *initiatives* – where it could not even *ask* its Licensed Post Offices to pay their bills. The bills sat uncollected for months --how much revenue was lost during that debacle no one knows.
And recently, it centralized much of it finance operations into Melbourne. As a result a large number of NSW positions were lost.
It offered redundancies –and many of the best left.Those who didn’t were guaranteed the same pay and gradings for doing half their previous work. The former NSW finance positions that were transferred to Melbourne are now largely held by contractors from the subcontinent (So much for putting Australia/Australians first!)
It would be better for all if Aust Post was privatized . Leastways then its top management roles might be filled on the basis of ability and not, as seems all too often the case, on the basis who the contenders know in parliament.