The Forum > Article Comments > Tourism's long green miles > Comments
Tourism's long green miles : Comments
By Ross Elliott, published 27/8/2012If even letting some mountain bikes and horse riders re-enter our national parks draws criticism, what hope is there for developing new product for the industry state-wide?
- Pages:
-
- 1
- Page 2
-
- All
< Because, at the end of the day, there’s no ‘industry’ in a wide expanse of sandy beach. There’s no ‘industry’ in a rainforest. The ‘industry’ bit of ‘tourism industry’ means businesses which employ people to take money off tourists who need places to stay, to shop, to eat and to be entertained and educated about the places they visit. Without that, we can have all the natural attractions in the world but still find our tourism industry struggling. >
This is terribly off-track, Ross. We have well and truly exploited our beaches and rainforests for tourism!
Crikey, how much more development would you want? And what new attractions could you possibly promote?
What would you achieve by putting a tourism development out there next to the beach in the middle of the Cooloola National Park that we haven’t already got on the Sunshine Coast or Fraser Island? Or in the rainforests in Wooroonooran NP that we haven’t already got around Cairns or Cape Tribulation?
I wouldn’t have a problem with the bit of very ecologically well executed development in national parks, if it had a significantly large appeal for visitors, good education value, and could provide funding for better management of the park. But I can’t see that, even if this sort of thing was done to the max, that it would reinvigorate Australian tourism.
Maybe it is time to realise that we’ve maxxed out our tourism industry and to just accept it as it is.