The Forum > Article Comments > A better democracy? > Comments
A better democracy? : Comments
By Dilan Thampapillai, published 14/8/2012A liberal democracy doesn't require an unbridled amount of free speech
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Page 5
-
- All
Posted by KAEP, Friday, 17 August 2012 9:42:09 AM
|
Australian citizens will be less likely to call each other names and less likely to cynically sue those namers for racism if they aren't cooped up in OFarrell chicken cages along New Parramatta Rd Human Sewer developments.
The big losers in this country are:
*Citizens breathing gender altering car fumes at every peak hour period
*Drinkers of infectious Desal waters because the owners are cutting corners due to big losses
*Natural ecosystems like the Barrier Reef and Roxby Downs that
*Endangered species, looked after into extinction by double dealing mining companies that own enough media propaganda to make a pogram look like a conservation Spree.
Australia was never going to carry more than 20 million people democratically. Its the lack of water and the lack of big mountain ranges and the lack of free energy from overt Geological activity that determines this.
Its politicians with foreign plans in their ears and foreign meanness in their Ponzi scheming hearts that need changing for better democracy.
Australian's of true heart and mind must stop overpopulation and where it already exists Immigrants must pay $300K infrastructure levy in a HECS like scheme to ease social pressure. Stop dehumanising Australia, its ecosystems and its citizens. These iniquities are not modern, smart or hi tech. They are as unsustainable as the Reichstag policies of Germany and the Communist pogroms of Russia from whence they gain their OFarrellesque inspiration.
And Note: We are NOT America. The Big Immigration outcomes of the US will not follow here. We Don't have the Rivers or Mountains or other required natural capital and no amount of foreign investment will change that for the better.