The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > Article Comments > Loneliness, depression and Olympic fairy-tale endings > Comments

Loneliness, depression and Olympic fairy-tale endings : Comments

By Kay Stroud, published 7/8/2012

It's hard to win, but even harder to lose.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All
David G,
agreed, though I'd settle for just bringing the super rich down to Earth.

DavidF,
The main change I have in mind is erradicating extreme disparity, mainly extremes of wealth vested in individuals, which I can find no philosophical or rational defence for. There ought to be a limit to how much money, ergo power and influence, any individual can amass. I agree with your sentiments and don't presume to prescribe any "ideal" society. in fact don't believe it's possible to achieve one; the human condition will always be prey to natural hardship and contingency, no matter how well organised. Your Stoic dictum, WMTrevor, prepare for the worst, seems much more rational to me.
Nevertheless, putting a cap on wealth would effectively change the world. I don't argue the wealth should be redistributed either; the furphy of higher living standards, unearned, for all. What's wrong with an elegant sufficiency for all? Welfare and consumerism make us artificially-remote from the kind of exigency that drove our biological and social evolution, thus we grow fat and complacent, and/or disturbed.
And yet we're so conditioned to this "natural" order of things (the filthy rich are not only condoned, they're given credit for the comparative prosperity we all enjoy. As if insatiable greed and self-interest are the only productive "values" to base political economy on) that such perfectly reasonable observations are deemed "radical".

Changing the subject, I recently opined that the arts should not be supported by government coffers. It's a conflict of interest; the Arts are meant to be avant garde. But neither should sport be subsidised by the taxpayer. The sporting elite are also co-opted, through the wealth and fame they amass, to support hegemony.
Posted by Squeers, Tuesday, 7 August 2012 1:50:35 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Dear Squeers,

I agree with putting a cap on wealth. In fact, I agree entirely with your post.
Posted by david f, Tuesday, 7 August 2012 2:13:41 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
"Research is showing that loneliness and depression can't be changed by so-called 'happy pills'."

Except when it can, as with thyroid deficiency, which produces depression and paranoia and can be cured by a daily tablet. And loneliness can be addressed by finding company. 'Spirituality' is well down the list of effective treatments for just about anything.
Posted by Jon J, Tuesday, 7 August 2012 4:13:31 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy