The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > Article Comments > Police state: indefinite detention > Comments

Police state: indefinite detention : Comments

By Bruce Haigh, published 29/5/2012

Australia's detention policy has effectively picked sides in the political dispute in Sri Lanka.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All
http://www.dailypaul.com/235730/hillary-clinton-admits-the-us-government-created-al-qaeda Yes Hillary said that the very people they supported in Afghanistan to fight the Soviets and the ones they are fighting today.

The Mujahideen were the "data base" of Al Qaeda assets.Al Qaeda are a controlled opposition force of the CIA to premote their Middle East destabilisation process to give empirical US Military Industrial Complex reason to invade where ever they wantin the ever widening "war on terror" fraud.

Quite a few yrs ago they estabished the concept of "home grown terrorists" to include us and the Patriot Act,Preventative Dentention,National Defence Authorisation Act and our Sedition Laws are all about eliminating the rights of the individual.Govts cannot protect us from danger by having total power over us.Our Govt then then becomes our oppressor.

Now we are war mongering over Syria and accusing Assad of being backed by Al Qaeda.
Posted by Arjay, Wednesday, 30 May 2012 6:17:29 AM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
<< this amounts to indefinite detention>>

Anyone who believes that “this amounts to indefinite detention” is also likely to believe that there are fairies at the bottom of the garden.
What it is likely to mean –and this should be of major concern to the Australian public – is that after a period of detention (and, after the publicity has died down) those persons who have failed on account of being security threats and will quietly released into the community.

a la the case with “failed” Iranian asylum seekers-see below:
“More than 40 per cent of asylum seekers who arrived by boat in the past year were Iranians and, of the ones assessed, about two-thirds have had their application for refugee status rejected.Because Iran will not allow Australia to send the Iranians home, Immigration Minister Chris Bowen faces the choice of locking them up indefinitely, releasing them into the community or attempting to reach agreement to transport them to a third country…These are people who are not regarded as refugees…Asked if releasing failed asylum seekers into the community was an option, Mr Bowen said: "Yeah. And that would be on some sort of bridging visa which would be to say, 'when we are able to return you to Iran, then you would be returned'."
http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/more-than-a-thousand-iranians-risk-languishing-for-years-in-detention/story-e6freuy9-1226180501361

'when we are able to return you to Iran, then you would be returned'."
ROFL

A police state? Nah! more like a wimp state!
Posted by SPQR, Wednesday, 30 May 2012 10:25:27 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy