Sign InThe Forum > Article Comments > Accessions to power: are women prime ministers different? > Comments
Accessions to power: are women prime ministers different? : Comments
By Jocelynne Scutt, published 29/5/2012What gives fuel to the notion that the Prime Minister's position is untenable, when she won the caucus vote in June 2010 and February 2012?
- Pages:
- ‹
- 1
- 2
- Page 3
- 4
- ›
- All
No.
Posted by McCackie, Wednesday, 30 May 2012 5:53:52 PM
| |
Yes Hasbeen, it's frightfully difficult subject matter but some of us struggle through.
Posted by whistler, Wednesday, 30 May 2012 6:39:24 PM
| |
"she has in achieving the extraordinary reforms and brilliant economic management she and her colleagues have, if exhibited by members of her own."
You are obviously delusional. Posted by cohenite, Wednesday, 30 May 2012 6:59:23 PM
| |
Thanks for your insightful and succinctly argued repost cohenite, touché!
Posted by whistler, Wednesday, 30 May 2012 7:22:05 PM
| |
If Jocelynne can't see that it is Labour that is toxic she should go back to the drawing board. Ms Gillard along with Ms Bligh and Ms Keneally lead a party of very suspect characters. Look at the number of court cases and gaoling of ex Labour Ministers albeit state. Then we have MsGillard protecting trade unionist with at the leat questionable characters.Stop crying wolf and open your eyes.
Posted by runner, Wednesday, 30 May 2012 7:32:29 PM
| |
"Then we have MsGillard protecting trade unionist with at the leat questionable characters."
Ms Gillard has her own 'trade unionist' skeletons: http://tex2.parliament.vic.gov.au/bin/texhtmlt?form=VicHansard.dumpall&startpage=52&origquery&query=%28+data+contains+%27ALLAN%27+or+data+contains+%27ALLAN%27+%29+and+%28+members+contains+%27ALLAN%27+or+members+contains+%27ALLAN%27+%29&db=hansard91&dodraft=0&speech=10321&mem_selected=LEIGH&activity=Grievances&title=AWU%3A+funds&date1=28&date2=February&date3=2001 Posted by cohenite, Wednesday, 30 May 2012 7:35:54 PM
|
