Runner... you DO realise that lesbians can bear children, right? They are, in fact, biologically speaking, women.

Jon J

'They are, in fact, biologically speaking, women.'

I would of thought you were defeating whatever point you are trying to make. The design of the female body was very well thought out by the Designer.

It may reassure you to know, runner, that all my lesbian friends agree completely with you.

>>The design of the female body was very well thought out by the Designer.<<

Whoever (or whatever, they're not much fussed which) designed the female body, did a damned fine job of it.

>>Whoever (or whatever, they're not much fussed which) designed the female body, did a damned fine job of it.<<

Nonsense. I'll agree that they (or it, I'm not much fussed either) succeeded in making it look fantastic, but good aesthetics do not automatically equate to good design.

A simple example is the adjacent placement of the the trachea and esophagus. There is no biological imperative which necessitates that they be located next to one another. But because they just happen to be right next to each other, lots of people die untimely deaths when they choke while eating.

If God is the Designer, He is a pretty crap engineer for a being who is supposed to be all-powerful.

Cheers,

Tony

Tony

'If God is the Designer, He is a pretty crap engineer for a being who is supposed to be all-powerful.'

Yea I am sure you could of done better Tony. I don't think you know how idiotic you sound

I think you may have missed the point, Tony Lavis.

>>A simple example is the adjacent placement of the the trachea and esophagus. There is no biological imperative which necessitates that they be located next to one another<<

As far as I am aware, these are identically positioned on men and women. The design work that my lesbian friends had in mind lies elsewhere on the female body.

A fact that did not escape runner's notice, of course. You can tell by the way he studiously avoided correcting the flaw in his own argument.