Poirot mon amie, the dots ... yes.

Cohenite and his troop helped support/fund Monckton's recent Autralia visit. Surprised?

It's too hard to work out who started slagging who first, but a number of you are at it. I'll delete the next person who is abusive to someone else on this thread. You might try discussing the article instead of arguing about personalities.

Hi Graham,

Yep...been trying to discuss the issues. cohenite seems to regard every link I include as the last refuge of an "idiot"....and now apparently I'm an idiot whatever I do.

I'm not phased, however, that particular form of abuse is a tad vacuous and lacking in creative verve.

I've been verballed; everytime I call somebody an idiot I give salient, cogent reasons for doing so.

I guess my dander is up because I find it incomprehensible that anyone could argue in support of AGW science when, as the 2nd release of emails plainly shows, the AGW scientists privately admit their science is wrong, inadequate, hopeless and, as one said, crap. Yet publically they say the science is settled and allow witless/duplicitous governments to introduce profoundly destructive policy on the basis of this failed science.

The word for this is not idiot, which still applies to anyone who argues in favour of this 'science', but hypocrite.

For a slightly more detailed analysis of how the AGW science is wrong as conceded by the AGW scientists see:

http://www.abc.net.au/unleashed/3707172.html

Anthony (I mean cohenite) - why not just link to the web-site?

Here, let me help:

http://climatesceptics.net/author/anthony-cox/

ssssshhhhh cohers, just between you and me ... science is never settled.

One problemo, some people take that statement out of context - as they do with certain emails.

Some people do it unintentionally, for they don't know any better.

Some people do it intentionally, for scurrilous and nefarious reasons.

Most people know who the idiots are Anthony, and Poirot is not one of them.

Typical bonmot; anonymous disciples of the AGW scam patronising sceptics and legitimate commentators.

I notice you didn't provide any detail as to how there was any taking out of context, an argument which is the last refuge of AGW scammers; the AGW scientists are hypocrites and so are you.