How many remember the peer review that the IPCC censored out at the last minute from its 1995 Report, the treachery that led to the birth of THE CON OF THE 20TH AND 21ST CENTURIES?

Was it not an IPCC lead author who inserted strong endorsements of man-made warming in place of a consulting scientific reviewer approved statement, “none of the studies cited above has shown clear evidence that we can attribute the observed climate changes to the specific cause of increases in greenhouse gases... no study to date has positively attributed all or part of the climate change observed to man-made causes"?

Thanks to the socalled climate scientists who unquestionably accepted that IPCC propaganda (or should that be 'litany of false claims') , and despite the many brave scientists who went out of their way to point out that there ís no scientific evidence to justify such action, we are on the verge of being sentenced to many years of hard labour (pardon the pun) by way of the passage of the Carbon Tax Bills.

There has been a litany of false claims leading to the vote today on carbon tax, tricky claim of 'carbon pricing'. The false claims are incredible. Water cooling towers belching steam have often been shown visually in 'news' reports while the same news dialogue is about carbon emission.

The vote today is not really about false claims, it is about lies and deceit.

Today it will become clear whether or not the integrity of the Parliament of Australia has been compromised.

JF Aus, how can you compromise that which does not exist?

Good point Hasbeen.

Bravo Graham Young for posting this article. I don't necessarily agree with Marohasy, but I'm all for open discussion and debate. I've emailed WWF asking they respond to this article at this thread. We need to hear their perspective. I've also asked them for the best evidence of damage to the reef from agriculture.

I would like to see a debate on this topic on the ABC. Q&A would be a good forum but pick a Monday when Tony Jones is on vacation. He is too just too biased.