David
So what? That doesn't establish any argument against free trade. Obviously you didn't read the article. You're just re-circulating the same old fallacies.

Besides, the increasing clientele of Vinnies doesn't prove there's too much free trade, it proves there's not enough, otherwise you're back to the fallacy of asserting that we'd all be better off if free trade was abolished, and the whole economy was centrally planned.

You have not even begun to deal with the issues.