Two Justices of the Victorian Supreme Court of Victoria, both living in the inner suburb of South Yarra, took to walk home after work. A couple of drinks at Young & Jackson and a walk of about two miles across the parks adjacent the Royal Botanic Gardens was just what they needed to restock their energies and gather a smile for their wives.

It was the last of the December sitting, it was awfully hot and the beer too cool to be left alone.

The policeman who noted the two pushing each other and being disorderly enough to be locked for the night took charge of the show.

The Park Street Police Station was just about a quarter of a mile away and its cell was ready.

Two or three ours after, their sanity restored, our heroes called for the man in charge of the station, disclosed their identities and told him that they had the power to hold Court anywhere any time.

The man had to agree.

In the improvised Court one of the two occupied the Bench and the other the Dock.

You are charged with being Drunk and disorderly. Guilty or not guilty?...Guilty!

Very well; you are fined ten Shillings.

The judge fined gets to the bench and the other to the dock and the same rigmarole.

You are charged with being Drunk and disorderly. Guilty or not guilty?...Guilty!

Very well Sir; you are fined five Pounds.

Out of the nick: “I fined you ten shillings. Why did you charge me five pounds?”

“It was too much”

This story was from a Supreme Court Judge of great humanity who knew that nine tents of what we call Justice is revenge or social Darwinism.

If you think that Supreme Court judges drink at Young & Jackson then you are deluded.

lets have a go at...""Constitutional Legalism’.
Difficult concept""

but basiclly an instrument of incorperation
a trust document...creating a new corperation
owned by the crown..[by the buy the ctown isnt hrh]

this document was then presented to 'the people'
[to wit to the legal 'imbisiles']..who by taking up the offer[to vote]
created trustees..to govern over them..[and them alone][to wit the legal imbisiles;..now wards of the state]

lets recall when geo wrote the sailing orders
for the first invasion fleet[arther phillip]

where he wrote[page 14]
''...you are to endeaver...byevery possable means..to open an intercourse with the savages[struckout]..natives,..and to conciliate their affections

ENJOINING all our subjects..to live in amity and kindness with THEM

AND if any of our subjects shall wantomly destroy them...or give them..UNNESSisary interuption...in the excersize of their several occupations..IT IS OUR WILL AND PLEASURE..that you do cause such offenders to be bought to punishment..according to degree of offence..""

however [pre this joseph banks had allready poisend the 'natives'
by leaving behind smallpox infected blankets..then returning home
with the huge boast of 'terra nullious'[to wit empty land]

so the kings decree had little actual worth

thus of more value
is his secret orders

first commision
dated 12 oct 1786..[page 4]

''and where it belongeth to us
the right royal perogative..to have the custody
of idiots and their estates..and to take the proffits thereof..for our own use...finding them nessisities

and also to provide for the custidy
of lunatics and their estates..WITHOUT taking the profits thereof
to our own use..

of note is the order
on page 1...directions from time to time
ACCORDING TO THE RULES and diciplins..OF WAR

from beginning to end
our keepers of the family trusts
have systematicly abused their trust

David Jennings,

You are correct. The watering hole must have been the Melbourne Club.

its a shame there is so little intrest
in the constitutional aspects of this global fraud..

so i will fill in a few basics
australia is an incorperated corperation

the first corperation was the dutch east india company
the clever dutch invented central banking and corperations
they further invented promise notes via issuing shares in the corperation

next came a convicted scots gold trader[convicted of murder]
by the name of law...[think of all them law maxims]
relise they are talking about mr john law
[not the law]

he educated himself of this grand dutch larceny..[where corperate fiat paper promises suberted the state authority and credit in gold coin]

he took the sceme to france..[where that king had gone broke
and began his own trading scam..by issuing his own paper shares
gaining the royal licence..[fiat;..meaning by decree]..of printing endless paper promises..

anyhow long story short
he went bust

and in time all ponzy scemes go bust
but if your clever enough,..you got enough assets to get onto the next ponzie sceme..[then in time we come to enron..[who also went bust]..but not before making heaps..and enritching many

including george busche
ya think its a co-incidence that 911 destroyed
all the enron evidence
and that the boss died before going to trial?

bah why bother
you are all going broke
and the same scam will in time begin again

just because your too darn enron
the clever guys in the room

who trippled the price of water/power and invented limits on downloads

anyhow the scam finally gets made illegal
in just over a year..when govts globally finaly realise serving their people is their only trust..and re nationalises every public asset you clever guys ever stole[and then some]

so live it up big boys
one more year
max