The Forum > Article Comments > The debasement of public debate > Comments
The debasement of public debate : Comments
By Ken Macnab, published 24/8/2011There is an obligation on all involved in the public debate to moderate their language, to desist from exaggeration and to disavow symbolic or real physical violence.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Page 5
- 6
-
- All
My layman's interpretation is the debasement of public debate comes partially from a growing disatisfaction with politics and politicians and media concentration on the game of politics and very little on the policies. How many people would know the achievements of this government in many areas which are drowned out with the 'nonsense' end of politics and a good story with mystery and intrigue such as the Craig Thompson affair, the convoy rally, what Abbott said about this or that,the anti-gay hate rally at Parliament house etc.
Media thrives on blood and gore not on straight pieces and the public could put a stop to it. Who buys these papers or listens to the shock jocks?
Is it that you feed bananas you get monkeys or that monkeys want bananas so you feed them. I don't possess the powers to work it out but I reckon the media helps shape societies as much as many protest-too-muchers claim they are only reacting to demand.