The Forum > Article Comments > A win for Big Bureaucracy > Comments
A win for Big Bureaucracy : Comments
By Adam Creighton, published 19/7/2011The new programs and qangos spawned by the carbon tax betray a government deep in the pocket of Big Bureaucracy, with a blithe disregard for public money.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- Page 2
-
- All
It is not just about the size of government but what services are being provided. The plethora of new government agencies to deal with climate change and energy is OTT when these functions could easily be dealt with within relevant existing portfolios. A climate change division could easily service the needs equally as well as a whole department with it's own bureaucratic infrastructure and extra costs.
However, to propose that AGW was a conspiracy of big bureacracy is stretching the truth just a bit. Much of the response by government was from growing pressures from the public and increasing evidence by scientists. Indeed ignoring climate change was as much of a vote loser as taking it on board, in the end the government had to make a choice. Howard did the same thing and went for an ETS at the end of his leadership.
The Public Service is too big, of that there is no doubt and alarmingly much of it is at the middle to top end, not at the service delivery end where services are often declining to the public. The current Clayton's Efficiency Dividents are contributing to the problem as politicians wipe their hands of it once they gain brownie points for 'reducing' government. It is a joke.