The Forum > Article Comments > Shipping pollution is not a solution > Comments
Shipping pollution is not a solution : Comments
By Chris Lewis, published 28/6/2011China emits 50 per cent more carbon to produce similar products to the West - that's why a carbon tax is currently a bad idea.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Page 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
-
- All
Posted by TrashcanMan, Thursday, 30 June 2011 11:27:56 AM
| |
Hey trashcanman,
Can you explain the current extremely cold winter? None of your 'warmist rump' mates nor your 'thousands' of consensual scientists appears to want to do that. In fact you and they are all busily avoiding even talking about it. And that's a fact. And you say I've a closed mind! hahahah Oh and don't misquote me. I don't think the science is 100% wrong. I'm on the public record as agreeing the climate has been warming. It's where you and your consensual scientists maintain it's never going to cool again that I think is 100% wrong. Posted by imajulianutter, Thursday, 30 June 2011 2:29:12 PM
| |
imajulianutter:
<Can you explain the current extremely cold winter?> As Squeers says above, <to require global warming to follow a constant trend pattern is naive in the extreme>. Nevertheless, Candide has offered you one excellent explanation for seemingly anomolous weather. I'm afraid climate science, like most complex science, is often counter intuitive. In fact your "common sense" isn't worth a cracker. Posted by Squeers, Thursday, 30 June 2011 2:43:44 PM
| |
imajulianutter,
Global warming gives rise to volatile and unusual weather events - not to distinctly "warmer" weather. You appear to be displaying poor form, even for a nutter, striding around OLO claiming offence, while behaving in a provocative manner yourself....100% lowbrow. Posted by Poirot, Thursday, 30 June 2011 2:44:20 PM
| |
nutter
http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?article=12254#211545 You really are becoming quite obnoxious. Posted by bonmot, Thursday, 30 June 2011 3:10:38 PM
| |
"Global warming gives rise to volatile and unusual weather events - not to distinctly "warmer" weather. "
Just what hard evidence can the brainwashed/warmists produce to support this AGW weather variability claim, when even the IPCC does not give credence to a linkage between anthropogenic CO2 emissions and extreme weather events? Posted by Raycom, Thursday, 30 June 2011 3:45:19 PM
|
First you say:
"Global warming, settled climate science and the negative effects of human CO2 emmissions is just a giant load of crap."
Then you fill the rest of the discussion with statements about how open minded you are. Your assertions against AGW fly in the face of overwhelming scientific evidence which no reputable scientific organisation in the world rejects. Studies have shown time and time again that the majority of scientists agree with the science.
True, it may turn out that the science is wrong, although this seems incredibly unlikely. The risk, however, of ignoring the scientific advice and inaction are far too great.
But you claim that the science is definitely, 100%, without a doubt wrong, i.e. "a giant load of crap".
Open minded? Your mind is barely ajar