The Forum > Article Comments > Hate speech laws serve a purpose > Comments
Hate speech laws serve a purpose : Comments
By Dilan Thampapillai, published 12/4/2011Racist speech should be curtailed so as to give liberty to others.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Page 4
-
- All
The poor actually form a highly diverse group. Many poor people work full-time at unskilled jobs that will never pay much - domestic cleaners, dishwashers, sweatshop labourers and so on. Many live in areas of chronic unemployment such as depressed rural regions or decaying urban neighbourhoods where industries are in decline. Many have only recently become poor, and most don't stay poor for long. Each year, about one-third of the nation's poor families manage to climb out of poverty, only to be replaced by newcomers. And of course some of the poor form an underclass who are trapped in long-term poverty.
Some people believe that the poor are in poverty because they are "idle" and prefer to live on "handouts." This view is fervently held even by people who don't know poor people, and have never tried to raise a family on welfare payments, and haven't the faintest idea what poverty is really like. Opinion polls repeatedly show large sections of the population favouring cuts in welfare spending, or favouring plans to "make welfare recipients go to work."
These attitudes bear little relationship to reality. According to the Australian Bureau of Statistics more than 60 percent of welfare recipients are children, aged people, disabled. Most of the rest are mothers with young children, and less than 3 percent are able-bodied men, most of them unskilled workers in areas of high unemployment.
Other myths abound - that welfare recipients are mostly foreigners or black - (nearly two-thirds are locals and white): that they have many children (most have two or fewer) and that they are on welfare
indefinitely (most receive it for less than two years) and that welfare is a terrible burden on the taxpayer. Welfare represents 2 percent on the federal budget.
There are few complaints however, about how the country pays out far more in "handouts" to the nonpoor than the poor. This fact generally escapes attention because the benefits take the form of hidden subsidies or tax deductions rather than the direct form of cash payments.