The Forum > Article Comments > The myths of recovery > Comments
The myths of recovery : Comments
By Edward Blakely, published 7/2/2011Based on his experience in post-Katrina New Orleans, Ed Blakely offers advice on the myths to avoid in disaster recovery.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- Page 2
-
- All
You are the first person I know, who has suggested that Brisbane is in Victoria, but perhaps it floated down there, on the last flood, without me noticing. God knows you're welcome to it as far as I'm concerned.
Still, seeing as how Queensland, [or WA], supplied the foreign exchange used to pay for your white goods, cars & stuff, I don"t see why we shouldn't get a commission on your spending of it. We subsidised Victoria for long enough, when we had import duty protection of southern manufacturing industry. I wish we still did actually.
Ibbit, it is one thing to run a levy around a country town. Building one on $2000 an acre paddocks is not too expensive.
Building levies on waterfront mansion row, on land worth half a million a meter, even if it does flood, is a bit different. It is probably unaffordable.
Assistance in moving all the timber homes, that can be loaded on a truck, & moved to higher ground, would be better.
Nothing should be mandatory however. There have been many people interviewed on air, who just want to get "home" as quickly as possible. They are frightened their neighbourhood will die, if it takes too long.
Provided these people don't want tax payer subsidies, & are prepared to take their chances on the next flood, they should be allowed to do so.