The Forum > Article Comments > Argumentum ad hominem > Comments
Argumentum ad hominem : Comments
By Jennifer Wilson, published 1/2/2011Writing is a creative act between the writer and the reader. Ad hominem comment threads brutalise that relationship.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 8
- 9
- 10
- Page 11
-
- All
But just to put my 2 cents' worth in, we all at various times hold to illusory notions, and these illusions can easily be transformed into delusions. For example, for most of human history, people have had the illusion that the sun rises in the east, as the earth revolves towards the east. Most of us have acted as if this illusory perception was correct, i.e. acted on a delusion. It does not necessarily mean that we and our ancestors have been delusional. merely that with the best 'science' around and with no particular malice aforethought, we have acted as if this delusion was true, even testable. No big deal: once the illusion is explained, most of us become aware of our mistaken notions. Those who persist in a mistaken belief and act on it, are indeed delusional. It would not be an ad hominem attack to say so.
Popper wrote a lot about the impossibility of justifying a belief, and the need to test and to try to falsify them instead. To the extent that I accept a belief which has been falsified unbeknownst to me, I may be harbouring an illusion, and if I act on it, then I am acting under a delusion. But I am not necessarily thereby delusional. If someone points out my delusion, that is not an ad hominem attack: it is a critique of my mistaken belief and quite justified. If they declare that I am thereby delusional, then yes, it may be. If I persist in the belief knowing of the critique, then yes, I am delusional, and it would not be an ad hominem attack for anyone to say so: it would be quite justified.
2 cents: time's up.
Joe