The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > Article Comments > Comparisons between US and Australian retailers: some facts > Comments

Comparisons between US and Australian retailers: some facts : Comments

By Saul Eslake, published 25/1/2011

Why should Australian consumers should be forced to pay higher prices for a narrower range of inferior products.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All
Otokonoko,
I wouldn't consider it a good thing for Australia if more is purchased online. It simply means that more is imported, and I wonder how much tax is paid to the Australian government by offshore companies that sell online.

As a teacher you would also know of the number of teachers who tell their students to "get it from the internet".

This then trains generations of students to not develop anything, but to get it from somewhere else, and that other place is normally outside of the country.

On Australia Day, there isn't much left in Australia that could be called Australian, and personally I don't believe teachers and various members of government departments should be paid taxpayer funding to have a holiday on Australia Day.
Posted by vanna, Wednesday, 26 January 2011 6:58:12 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Fair enough, vanna. While I don't fully agree with you, you're certainly entitled to your opinion.
Posted by Otokonoko, Wednesday, 26 January 2011 1:58:12 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
And a fifth point... we are a more sexist nation.

Look around the better retail space in Sydney. You see Fashion, fashion, shoes, cosmetics, foodie shops, jewlery, chocolate shops, stupidly expensive trophy-child fashion shops, etc... All female indulgences.

Almost nothing 'basic' and nothing indulgent for men. All female stuff and all empty of customers and yet profitable - which means vastly overpriced.

If women spend so much time shopping, why aren't they any good at it? Men pay less for suits, for car repairs, for hair cuts... pretty much everything men buy they get for less.

The old saying goes, "Men earn the money, women spend it" and this is especially true in Australia. Our Child support payments (almost all are payments from deds to women) for example are the most generous (to the women) in the World.

Retaillers know that to get women, you have to indulge them. Shopping is an 'experience'. What does that mean? It means suck-up to them. Shopping is therepy because people are paid to tell you how beautiful you are, how good your taste is, how special this coffee is.

Advertisers don't waste their time targetting men. Advertising is an emotional medium. Good advertising attaches emotions and attractiveness to a product. But men just aren't very susceptable to this sort of stuff. We buy stuff that's good, and is a good price. We're more rational, less emotional. And that's a good thing.

Every ad on TV that shows men and women with some sort of story (and that's nearly all of them), they show the same thing. They show the woman to be in control, clever, sassy, or simply exploitative. While the man is stupid, lazy. Or the opposite, where the man is a loyal hardworking servant mistreated by the woman, or even assaulted and abused by her.

Women spend so much effort shopping, why are they so bad at it?
PartTimeParent@pobox.com
Posted by partTimeParent, Sunday, 30 January 2011 9:02:53 PM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Another reason I believe is the Australian retailers' propensity to turn some international brands, particularly US ones, into premium items even when they are not.

A case in point, Polo Ralph Lauren. In the US this brand is relatively run of the mill. Found in all the chain stores, often on discount tables their clothing as pitched as stylish but relatively low cost. A typical business shirt might cost USD$30-$40. In Australia however, Myer, DJs etc all have turned it into a premium brand. t is featured with special sales areas, special signage etc and therefore charging upwards of $140 for the same shirt. My US friends always snicker when they come to Aus and see the price differential.
Posted by Innovation9, Thursday, 3 February 2011 3:32:37 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
One other point.

I note that Gerry Harvey, the owner of Harvey Norman, is one of the most vociferous anti-online buying voices in this country.

He is also a billionaire.

How can he have the slightest credibilty therefore to demand we pay GST online because local retailers are hurting? Perhaps if he dropped his prices we might buy more.

Oh no that would mean his net worth would drop so it will never happen
Posted by Innovation9, Thursday, 3 February 2011 3:36:33 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy