The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > Article Comments > Calculating the true cost of global climate change > Comments

Calculating the true cost of global climate change : Comments

By John Carey, published 19/1/2011

Researchers disagree about what the economic costs of climate change will be over the coming decades.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5
  7. 6
  8. Page 7
  9. All
I think the cost of climate change will be subdued by the employment it will create. More and more car makers are putting out electric cars, which is good to see. A new breed of battery is in motion, and with far less weight. We need the carbon tax to push inavation along.
Hopefully get off oil altogether for consumers. This will leave oil for the manufacture of specific plastics.
Posted by 579, Friday, 21 January 2011 3:29:03 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Thanks Rich2. Yeah, the energy does get sucked out by the antics of some. I don't know if it's worth it, there's more important things in life, imo.

Not it seems for Leo, his life's mission. Google him - "Leo Lane" + "climate" and wallah - you can see he chants his rabid mantra all over the place. Roaming the blogosphere in Quixotic zeal as an apostle to the Bob Carters and Ian Plimers of the world - home spun messiahs to anyone associated with the Lavoisier Group (another interesting Google term to search).

Like you, I give more credence to scientific organisations and research institutions. For some inexplicable reason, I can't help but feel vested interests and big mining are out to screw - the Earth literally and us metaphorically :(

.

Leo darling,
Overturned, set aside, sent back to the drawing boards ... whatever.

At the end of the day it didn't matter that the Supreme Court said justice wasn't served by the findings of the President of the Tribunal ... the mining industry and State government wanted that Coal mine extended regardless of the Supreme Court, and it was.

The case was not reheard, despite the successful appeal.
Posted by bonmot, Saturday, 22 January 2011 8:32:00 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5
  7. 6
  8. Page 7
  9. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy