The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > Article Comments > Greek-Macedonian name issue myths debunked > Comments

Greek-Macedonian name issue myths debunked : Comments

By Sam Vaknin, published 10/1/2011

Greece is in complete economic turmoil, but it still finds time to bully its small neighbour over the use of their historic name.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. All
While I can understand how the name issue could be seen as petty (after all, nations can call themselves what they want), I can also understand where the Greeks are coming from. The Greeks are quite proud of their ancient Macedonian heroes, Philip and his son Alexander (the Great). Ethnically, there is a link (however tenuous) between the present-day Greeks and these ancient figures; the Slavic Macedonians can't say the same. Furthermore, that ethnic link is a sort of in-between stage - if they cannot lay claim to the glories of Macedonian civilisation, what claim can they make on Aristotle, Plato et al? The flag issue was similar - the old Macedonian flag used an ancient Greek symbol. In essence, the Greeks object to the appropriation of their history by people they see as having no right to claim it.

This was explained to me by a Greek lady a fair few years ago, and may (or may not) represent popular opinion in Greece rather than any official stance. The frosty reception afforded to the Macedonians by the crowd at the Athens Olympics suggests that it is indeed popular opinion.

On the other hand, the area currently occupied by the F.Y.R.O. Macedonia was, in the main, a part of ancient Macedonia - a name given to the area by the Greeks. Does the name belong to the people or to the place? It seems a bit rich that the Greeks would name a place, then retract naming rights when they no longer live there. Why aren't they pressuring the Egyptians to rename Alexandria?
Posted by Otokonoko, Monday, 10 January 2011 11:13:58 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
The ancients Greeks didn't regard the Macedonians as Greeks,rather as semi-barbarians with a veneer of Hellenic culture.That is,until Alexander's conquests--everbody loves a winner.
Posted by mac, Monday, 10 January 2011 2:21:42 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
if the EU allows Macedonia in, why not Moldova, Ossetia, Nagorno-Karabakh and Abkhazia as well?

There are certain conditions that have to be met first, like inflation brought under control and some semblance of economic advancement, but if
the prospective new candidate is not as yet ready, then why rush membership?

If Turkey can be put on hold, the same ought to apply to other countries who are still not quite ready as yet.
Posted by SHRODE, Monday, 10 January 2011 3:30:21 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy