The Forum > Article Comments > The Great Global Warming Blunder - Review > Comments
The Great Global Warming Blunder - Review : Comments
By William Briggs, published 3/12/2010Feedback is where the real climate science debate occurs, and this book is a must-read contribution.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 8
- 9
- 10
- Page 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
-
- All
It only stands to reason what man is doing is the global culprit, Who can say increased co2 is not responsible for increased cancer and asthma.
Posted by 579, Tuesday, 7 December 2010 4:44:49 PM
| |
Eerrrrrmmm, you do know that burning Coal does actually increase asthma, throat cancer and lung cancer? This is a SIGNIFICANT cost to society, but the coal companies 'externalise' their costs to us the taxpayers. Nice of them hey?
Posted by Eclipse Now, Tuesday, 7 December 2010 4:48:23 PM
| |
As the article "What happened to the 'warmest year on record': The truth is global warming has halted" by David Rose
(see: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1335798/Global-warming-halted-Thats-happened-warmest-year-record.html#ixzz17PTNhzJR) indicates, the warmists have raised their level of alarmism to influence the Cancun conference Posted by Raycom, Tuesday, 7 December 2010 10:55:43 PM
| |
"Read carefully with other official data, they conceal a truth that for some, to paraphrase former US VicePresident Al Gore, is really inconvenient: for the past 15 years, global warming has stopped."
Yeah Raycom, you've got us convinced. (Nudge nudge wink wink). Tens of thousands of scientific temperature stations around the globe can't be relied upon, decadal trends can't be read, and one slightly cooler El Nino year undoes all the warming we've seen in previous years — that of course we can't be sure of because somehow the author waves a magic wand and makes the hottest decade on record disappear. No really, climatologists must be shaking in their boots! While the temperature records confirm that the GLOBAL temperature keeps rising, all that extra energy in the atmosphere is melting glaciers. Check this photo from NASA (given poor Raycom thinks the Met is in a conspiracy). http://climate.nasa.gov/stateOfFlux/index.cfm Then click through the rest of the photos under that one. Hopefully SEEING is BELIEVING (since the scientific data is not enough for some here). Posted by Eclipse Now, Wednesday, 8 December 2010 8:10:39 AM
| |
Oops... I of course meant to say slightly cooler La Nina year. Haven't had enough coffee yet. But basically the above post from Raycon is complete and utter denialist rubbish. "No warming for 15 years" my left buttock! The temperature records say otherwise.
http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Temperature_record Posted by Eclipse Now, Wednesday, 8 December 2010 8:32:11 AM
| |
Warmists appear to be in permanent eclipse.
Even the Royal Society acknowledges that since 1910, temperature increases have occurred in only two periods, namely from 1910 to 1940 and from 1975 to around 2000. It never ceases to amaze how warmists attribute such temperature rises to anthropogenic carbon dioxide emissions. They work on the basis that if you say something often enough, people will believe you -- unfortunately, the gullible fall for that sort of brain washing. Despite such august bodies as the IPCC searching for over 20 years, no one has been able to table scientific evidence that proves that global warming has been caused by anthropogenic gas emissions. The IPCC has used its socalled climate models as an effective means of alarming the media, parliamentarians, and others. As these models have not been validated -- even the IPCC acknowledges this -- they cannot be relied on for predictive purposes Posted by Raycom, Wednesday, 8 December 2010 10:43:58 AM
|