No, Proxy. I'm talking about heterosexual marriage.
In my experience sex was more frequent both before
and after it.

How can extramarital sex be "de rigueur" in gay marriage
in Australia, when gays can't marry in this country yet?
You just made that up, didn't you?

This marriage thing –

A contract between two people which gives you certain rights in law and property division if the contract is dissolved or one person dies?

This also gives any children the couple has a legitimate status in society?

There is the choice to have some religious ceremony if they choose to at “wedding” time but they can have a ceremony anyway whether legally marrying or not?

Couples of the same gender can and do raise children here, they can also adopt and foster children from birth to 18 years old. From this I gather the law has no objections to them being a parenting couple.

And I understand that some are specifically worried about their anuses and diseases associated with them but that unmarried people can get theses afflictions as well?

What is the main objection in allowing two adults the choice to legally marry?

Society has no business sanctioning reproductively unnatural relationships which artificially create children for the sole satisfaction of the participants only to deliberately forever deprive those same children of their birthright of a mother and a father.

It appears, unfortunately, that we already tolerate this practice.
This does not mean that we should give it the imprimatur of the state.

This is tantamount to society deliberately robbing children of their natural birthright.

Homosexual "marriage" is not a human right, it's an inhuman wrong.

Agreed Proxy. Robbing children of fathers seems to be a cottage industry in Australia. Feminists are creating a stolen generation.

Jewely: “What is the main objection in allowing two adults the choice to legally marry?”

Well, you don’t reward dysfunction. Then again, I understand that some people hate fathers raising children, because of psychological issues. And I wonder: Do two wrongs ever make a right? The argument seems to be, “Yeah, we stuff up kids, so let’s stuff up a few more, to fit in around the lives of adults.

HB:”Well, you don’t reward dysfunction. Then again, I understand that some people hate fathers raising children, because of psychological issues. And I wonder: Do two wrongs ever make a right? The argument seems to be, “Yeah, we stuff up kids, so let’s stuff up a few more, to fit in around the lives of adults.”

We don’t drown our retarded or crippled people at birth. We allow all people with genetically carried diseases etc to marry and breed. Our society accepts all forms of mutation, physical and mental deviations from what we consider the norm.

Why does a father raising children have any psych issues involved?

But if you are suggesting that this father issue is wrong then why aren’t you in favour of a child being raised by two fathers?

What is a child’s natural birth right?

Who is being stolen?