The Forum > Article Comments > Backs to financial future > Comments
Backs to financial future : Comments
By Greg Barns, published 30/11/2010Australia is looking decidedly protectionist and xenophobic about Chinese investment.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Page 4
-
- All
Posted by Divergence, Sunday, 5 December 2010 1:45:06 PM
|
The ordinary person cares little about the size of the whole pie if his own slice has grown no bigger, may even be shrinking, and no longer has a cherry on top. The bulk of Americans have experienced stagnant real incomes since the 1970s, with all the benefits of economic growth and increased productivity going to to top. See
http://www.epi.org/analysis_and_opinion/entry/jobs_with_good_benefits_increasingly_scarce/
For Australia see
http://vinnies.org.au/files/VIC/SocialJustice/Reports/2005/2005May30-IncomeInequalityReport-National.doc.pdf
http://www.bnetau.com.au/blog/aussierules/yes-the-rich-are-getting-much-richer/5879
Australia is still a less unequal place than the US, but a modest rise in income and cheap manufactured goods don't make up for skyrocketing utility bills and housing costs in the cities (nearly tripled since 1973 in terms of the median wage), shrinking block sizes, permanent water restrictions, more crowding and congestion, overstretched infrastructure and public services (due to the enormous population growth forced on us by the globalisers, together with their reluctance to tax), more casualised and precarious work, etc.
When Bob Hawke and Paul Keating were introducing their reforms, they used to talk about "bringing home the bacon", that the reforms might be painful, but would pay off for ordinary people in the end. Politicians can no longer talk that way with a straight face. The previous era of globalisation in the early 20th century ended with a popular backlash. Lets just hope that this time, it won't take bloody rioting or Anarchist bombings.