The likes of Jennifer Wilson PhD will be having us emulate Britain where:

Homosexual men are preferred candidates for fostering pubescent boys and are not called to task for sexually abusing their charges because that would be "discriminatory"
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-480151/Gay-couple-left-free-abuse-boys--social-workers-feared-branded-homophobic.html

People should not be excluded from adopting children just because they are sex offenders. That would be discrimination.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/law/2010/nov/30/sex-offenders-adoption-children

Normal couples with a long history of fostering children are banned from looking after children if they refuse to homosexually indoctrinate them
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/8096785/Christian-couple-who-cannot-accept-homosexuality-challenge-their-fostering-ban.html

Look at all the good work social justice activists are doing in the United Kingdom Jennifer.

Why don't you go over there instead and give our children a chance at a normal life?

"I do wish you'd read first, then expostulate."
-woulfe

Ah, I think I see the source of the confusion: you appear to be confusing polygyny with polygamy - google it. Polygyny without polyandry is obviously inequitable.

"Anal sex is the sine qua non of male homosexuality."
-Proxy

No, it isn't, and we've already covered this subject. Sophistry - the first refuge of the idiot.

"What is weird is people who practise this particular perversion calling those who point to it as being weird and anally fixated."
-Proxy

Look, are you trying to insinuate something?

"Thanks Proxy for being a voice of reason."
-runner

Gold! Pure fcuking gold! I nearly fell off my chair laughing, runner. You win my 'Sarcastic Remark of the Month' award.

GAY SUPPORT for DERBY COUNCIL.

Ben Summerskill, Stonewall chief executive, said: “Too often in fostering cases nowadays it’s forgotten that it is the interests of a child, and not the prejudices of a parent, that matter.

INTERESTS of the CHILD.. yes.. unTIL a gay couple start abusing that child....

"The sexual orientation of the men was a significant cause of people not 'thinking the unthinkable'.

"The sexual orientation of the men was a significant cause of people not 'thinking the unthinkable'. (from Proxy's link)

THEN.....it's 'ok'....

The idenftiable inversion of values...where good is now 'evil' and evil is now 'good'.... is almost complete.

Herbert Marcuse, if it were possible, is rejoicing in socialist utopia with a very self satisfied look on his deathly face.

//The conclusion reached is that the realization of the objective of tolerance would call for intolerance toward prevailing policies, attitudes, opinions, and the extension of tolerance to policies, attitudes, and opinions which are outlawed or suppressed//

When you see this happening b4 your very eyes... are you still blind to it?

Honestly..it's time for conservative Christians AND socially conservative atheists to join forces, stand up and politically FIGHT against this increasingly all pervading manifest evil

<<How fragile is the institution of marriage that its proponents must circle their wagons against any and every perceived threat?>>

How fragile is the “gay” position when it must be reinforced by grossly inequitable actions such as taking children away from their natural mothers because the mothers no longer embrace lesbianism?

We can look forward toward more of this form of “social justice” as homosexual activists further embed themselves into positions of power, aided and abetted by their unthinking supporters.

Same sex "marriage" will lead to further social injustice.

Nice work, all you supporters of the homosexual agenda who haven't thought through the implications.