Belief trumps evidence every time. I give up. There's no point in offering scientific rationality to someone who is, at base, irrational.

Nicco-

A rather glib and superficial wiping of 800 scientific papers don't you think? Not a single scientific criticism of any paper provided. Also, a strange comment about a religious site which mentioned the papers. Some very weird sites believe in AGW too. Isn't that irrelevant? The reference to a religious group makes me suspect you are a Left wing conspiracy theorist.

Again you discount the other side of the argument while claiming a 'lively debate' is occurring in 'mainstream science'. References or Links to these 'debates' please?

You seem to be able to name(and disregard) Scientists who you claim to have been "discounted by mainstream Science". Please name the three or four Scientists who you believe are the major contributors to mainstream Climate Science?