The Forum > Article Comments > Move all asylum-seeker processing onshore > Comments
Move all asylum-seeker processing onshore : Comments
By Beth Doherty, published 15/11/2010People who review what can be life or death matters must consider the basic rules of Australian law
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Page 5
-
- All
Posted by Liz45, Wednesday, 1 December 2010 3:55:41 PM
| |
@King Hazza.
What about the Boers then,they have a compatible culture. It's estimated that 600,000 White South Africans live in abject poverty, Pretoria has several large refugee camps where Whites live in extreme conditions, where children and the elderly are starving to death. The UN has listed the Afrikaners as being at risk of Genocide yet they are not eligible for asylum in the West. http://afrikaner-genocide-achives.blogspot.com/2010/03/racist-to-feed-poor-whites-anc.html Posted by Jay Of Melbourne, Sunday, 5 December 2010 10:19:23 AM
| |
Does anyone here agree that having foreign companies managing our immigration detention system is a bad thing for Australia?
SERCO, G4 and MSS are among the most corrupt companies in the world, SERCO was asking for cash kickbacks from it's suppliers in the UK, MSS has been investigated for hiring unqualified guards to work at the Darwin detention centre, G4 have a terrible record on human rights. SERCO is making big money from asylum seekers, would anyone here countenance the possiblity that such an insidious Globalist entity could be funding and equipping people smugglers on one end to supply their private prisons with "Clients"? The "Refugee Industry" is just that it's a privately run, for profit migration business hiding behind international law and UN treaties. Post processing these migrants are passed on to privately run settlement and welfare groups, taught English by the private sector, trained in job skills by the private sector, housed, advised,educated and integrated by private companies. Posted by Jay Of Melbourne, Sunday, 5 December 2010 10:29:37 AM
|
Australia has committed to upholding International Laws re asylum seekers - we should uphold that commitment or have the guts to withdraw. But no, we boast of our commitment to democracy etc, and then act against it. Anyone has the right to seek protection from persecution or fear of torture or death.Howard turned back SIEV X and that resulted in the deaths of 353 people, mostly women and kids.
Is that what we stand for? I hope not!