The Forum > Article Comments > Debate on Australia's presence in Afghanistan? What debate? > Comments
Debate on Australia's presence in Afghanistan? What debate? : Comments
By George Venturini, published 29/10/2010On Afghanistan history suggests caution while the law says 'No'.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- Page 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
-
- All
Thank you, Dr Venturini, for your insightful analysis.
For me, at least FOUR big lessons here:
(i) all wars have unintended ( invariably negative) consequences;
(ii) the gift of “democracy” cannot be imposed by force;
(iii) cultural transformation of a traditional society to accept our values is the impossible dream/fatal conceit of armchair generals, politicians, etc; and
(iv) if national foreign policy is driven by so-called “ethical/moral” considerations (as are all crusades, especially the first) one ends up in a mess. If Afghanistan, then why not Somalia, or any number of other countries?
Bismark got in right when he refused to "sort out" the Balkans of his day. “I shall remember them in my prayers,” he said, “but will not leave the bones of a single grenadier in the Balkans.”
Rudyard Kipling’s (satirical/not patriotic?) poem, The Young British Soldier, got it right too, especially its last verse:
When you're wounded and left on Afghanistan's plains,
And the women come out to cut up what remains,
Jest roll to your rifle and blow out your brains
An' go to your Gawd like a soldier.
Go, go, go like a soldier,
Go, go, go like a soldier,
Go, go, go like a soldier,
So-oldier _of_ the Queen!
Magna est veritas et (hopefully) praevalebit.
Alice