The Forum > Article Comments > Australia’s two-party system has past its use by date > Comments
Australia’s two-party system has past its use by date : Comments
By Ian Marsh, published 14/10/2010It’s the system stupid: why Australia’s two-party system has past its use-by date.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Page 4
-
- All
//Yes Al. A wolf in sheep's clothing. Took me awhile to get it with my aging eyes, but tell me exactly how that relates to the Greens please?//
It relates to the Greens probably more than any other group.
"how"? simple.. they are globalist socialists, posturing themselves as "caring environmentally aware peaceniks"
I.e..wolves in sheeps clothing.
The Greens leadership HATE Christians and the church.. I'm not saying 'dislike'...I'm saying HATE.
There responses (or lack thereof) to 24 questions addressed to them by the Christian lobby makes it abundantly clear as does their militant anti Christian anti Church attempts to remove exemptions from the discrimination act for Church schools.
NOW..see this:
http://www.starobserver.com.au/news/2010/07/06/christian-brethren-challenged/27716
WayOut claims the Christian Brethren resort owners discriminated against them because of their sexuality when they refused to accept a booking for their camp in June 2007.
The group is challenging religious exemptions included in Victoria's Equal Opportunity Act.
http://www.saltshakers.org.au/component/content/article/85-front-page-news/703-church-camp-loses-discrimination-case
the judge DISMISSED the evidence of CYC's 'expert witness' because she thought he was 'biased' toward the CYC cause!
And said that the group could have their private religious views but still had to allow this group access to the campsite - CYC was fined $5,000.
This is just the latest in an increasing incidence of discrimination cases taken against Christians...
NOWWWWWW see THIS!
PEEL HOTEL COLLINGWOOD.
http://www.justusboys.com/forum/showthread.php?t=161522
Victoria Civil and Administrative Tribunal president Cate McKenzie said that allowing straight men and women into the club could defeat the intent of the club to appeal to male homosexuals. "This would undermine or destroy the atmosphere which the company wishes to create," McKenzie said.
So much for EQUALITY before the law.