The Forum > Article Comments > The beatification of John Henry Newman > Comments
The beatification of John Henry Newman : Comments
By Simon Caterson, published 16/9/2010There are few religious thinkers more influential today than John Henry Newman, at least in the English-speaking world.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- Page 2
- 3
-
- All
Cardinal Newman, eh. On the way to becoming ratified as a saint. Hmmm.
To an outsider, the "justification" seems horribly thin.
That's not of concern to anyone except the church itself, of course.
But it is interesting to speculate exactly why the process is becoming increasingly reliant upon what can best be described as "third-party" miracles.
There was a time when it was essential that the candidate had been eaten by lions (St. Ignatius), peppered with arrows (St Sebastian) or at the very least, beheaded (St Alban).
(If you chose to martyr yourself as a team - as did the "Forty Martyrs of Sebaste" - you don't get to be a saint. Despite the fact that you were first stripped naked and frozen overnight, then burned in the morning. There's no pleasing some people, is there?)
Over the years the qualification requirements became increasingly... detached, shall we say, from the individual concerned, and the process now seems to rely on reports of "successful" invocations.
To an impartial observer, this might seem to provide the congregation with a far less potent symbol through which their faith is personified. Which is I guess progress, after a fashion. And quite typical of the times in which we live, too.
But no matter.
For me, Newman deserves to be canonized on the strength of "Gerontius" alone, for inspiring Elgar to write some of the most passionate life-and-death music, ever. Right up there with Mozart.
Nice one John.
Incidentally, does anyone know of someone who has been scratched from the waiting list? Or do they just hang around, as it were, until sufficient miracles are recorded?
Just interested.