The Forum > Article Comments > Selective conscientious objection > Comments
Selective conscientious objection : Comments
By Kellie Tranter, published 3/9/2010Every aspect of war, from our involvement as a nation to the rights of conscientious objectors, should be debated in Parliament.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Page 5
- 6
- 7
-
- All
I was going to mention Zimbabwe myself - and if you refer back to an earlier post of mine on this thread, it will become clear that poor old Zimbabwe only qualifies for one "preventive war" characteristic in that it is virtually defenceless - however it's not important enough to be worth the trouble of intervention and there is no real way available at present to portray it as an imminent danger to our survival.
Dear rpg,
I agree with you that it is extremely poor tactics to bury your planes in the sand - makes taking off really difficult, lol.
Furthermore...ho hum...I do not hate America. I'm interested in it (as I am in may countries) It's always the same old argument - or lack of it. I criticize a certain administration flying the U.S. banner, in line with my moral judgment, and am daubed with a "You hate America" accusation. Empty rhetoric as far as I'm concerned.
Dear David f.
That is interesting - what a valuable insight for your wife (and perhaps for all of us one day).Is it not possible for her to try and have it published in the future? Viewpoints such as hers are so important from an historical angle.
Your point about the emancipation of women prior to the first war is well made. Many people would be surprised to learn such things as they tend to lump all Middle-Eastern countries together in that regard.