The Forum > Article Comments > Nuclear energy - a game changer? > Comments
Nuclear energy - a game changer? : Comments
By Phil Sawyer, published 23/7/2010Whichever political party dares to play the nuclear energy card could win the election.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- Page 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
-
- All
Are you proposing genocide as a solution to global warming? :)
Loxton,
Hot rocks geothermal has yet to produce a single commercially viable plant in the world. It also uses vast quantities of fresh water (3x that of a nuclear or coal fired station)
The US builds the most expensive nuclear power stations because each one is individually designed and approved. The French system of building standard units comes in at less than 1/2 the cost of the Americans.
King Hazza,
Hazelwood power station burns about 85000 tonnes of coal a day in 8 boilers/ turbines compared to a single closed cycle nuclear unit. The vast quantities of coal handling, ash, abrasion and corrosion mean the maintenance and running costs are orders of magnitude higher.
The unit cost of uranium is a fraction of the cost of coal.
Sir Vivor,
The modern containment vessels can withstand a direct strike by an Airbus.
Multiple bombs would have to take out various levels of safety protection before there would be danger to the public.