The Forum > Article Comments > Selectivity in schooling does not deliver > Comments
Selectivity in schooling does not deliver : Comments
By Chris Bonnor, published 12/7/2010We must not allow our schools to be agents for any social and academic apartheid.
- Pages:
-
- 1
-
- All
- Pages:
-
- 1
-
- All
Still banging on this old drum?
I notice that your title is "Selectivity in schooling does not deliver", yet nowhere do you actually try and back this up with any references and data.
Public selective schools were implemented in recognition that the existing public school system, which even to this day resists streaming children, was not catering for the handful of high flyers. The result of which was in many cases terminal boredom, misbehaviour and under achievement.
From what I have read, the private and selective schools have delivered a veritable bounty of intellectual super stars. However, this has had the unfortunate effect of giving the impression of public schools as the intellectual also rans.
The question of the huge migration from public education is also about the obvious improvement in results seen by individual children when moved to independent schools. As in the article most parents of private school children are middle class, the fees demand considerable sacrifice.
Chris Bonner and other crusaders against elitism often miss the obvious. With a powerful teachers union, archaic teaching methods and promotion based on length of service, the public schools desperately need fixing.
The solution is to fix the lame ducks, not to hobble the high fliers.