The Forum > Article Comments > Populate or perish? > Comments
Populate or perish? : Comments
By Richard Denniss, published 5/5/2010Some proponents of rapid population growth do rely on more nuanced economic arguments than simply saying bigger is better.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- Page 2
-
- All
Skilled migrants get visas on the basis of their skills; there is no follow up research to show that they actually get employed in their skill areas. (For many years I worked to get skilled migrants into employment - on average I estimate that fewer than 20% are actually employed in their skill area.) If Australia invites people to come here to work and gives them visas on the basis of those skills then natural justice would suggest that we have an obligation to get them into a job.
On the flip side of the coin we need to acknowledge that many skilled migrants come from underdeveloped countries; countries where those skills are in high demand - if we are really serious about making poverty history then we would not be plundering developing nations - they need those skilled people to build up their economy.
The final point that needs to be made is that skilled migration makes governments lazy; no need to plan for the future, no need to ensure that there is training to meet future needs after all if we run short we can always go overseas for our skills.
People concerned about population might like to visit this site and join up:http://www.stoppopulationgrowthnow.com/