The Forum > General Discussion > Islamic riot
Islamic riot
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 103
- 104
- 105
-
- All
Posted by rehctub, Saturday, 15 September 2012 4:09:02 PM
| |
rehctub, Gee, I didn't think that add for CareerOne job search above your post would upset you so much. Is CareeOne run by the Muslims? LOL.
Posted by Paul1405, Saturday, 15 September 2012 5:18:05 PM
| |
The police should have video cameras out let them protest BUT any form of anti social behavior of a criminal nature GOOD BYE after conviction first plane home
Posted by Philip S, Saturday, 15 September 2012 5:21:56 PM
| |
Phillip S, Whats this Namby Pamy Land stuff about waiting for a "conviction". Soft bleeding heart liberalism no room for such tripe in our society. I say hang em high then pluck their eyes out, No that's too good, hang em high, pluck their eyes out and THEN send em to bed without any supper! That 'ill teach em, don't mess with OZ.
Posted by Paul1405, Saturday, 15 September 2012 6:00:14 PM
| |
rehctub:
This my friend is probably only the beginning! We are about to sow the reward of our apathy by kow-towing to the UN and the oligarchs who are pulling the strings of the puppets. These people who are currently rioting across the globe are simply RADICALS who look for any excuse to persue their agenda. The move-makers have provided that excuse, so now we all have to suffer the cosequences. I would warn people everywhere that the only sure-fire way to STOP this religous zeal is to ban ALL forms of religion to the inside of the homes. This of course is disaster for the Churches, but they have had a good run, for a very long time! I hope that ALL the do-gooders and the bleeding hearts across the western world realise and accept the monstrosity that they have helped to create, by their pushing for a never-ending stream of humanity, to this and many other countries across the globe. I do believe that this has all been part of a well-ordained conspiracy to create the type of situation that is just starting here in our country, as we read. The "Arab Spring" participants have been aided, abetted and supplied with arms and munitions by some of the UN member nations, designed to overthrow "tyrannical" rulers and replace them with leaders "friendly to US" thus putting more eastern countries under the covert control of the good ole sheriff of Wallyworld. It is now imperative that the ongoing riots be handled with extreme firmness and the authorities arrest and deport immediately any active rioter who is a known Asylum Seeker, or of that extraction! Citizens are being warned to stay out of the Sydney CBD, so these malcontents are already holding us hostage to their religous mania. We must fear that what has happened before can happen again, and that us the "Infidels" can be about to become modern victims of the Saracen blade, unless sanity prevails, which is highly unlikely! Posted by Crackcup, Saturday, 15 September 2012 6:13:36 PM
| |
We just do not need this !
It was a deliberate finger up at us. They knew such a behaviour is offensive and unnecessary. There is a behavior problem that seems to be inbuilt to moslems. People with behaviour problems usually over react to anything that they do not like or which offends them. If this is what is going to happen everytime something happens in the world that they do not like, then it is well past time that they leave. Posted by Bazz, Saturday, 15 September 2012 6:14:21 PM
| |
Reality check folks
Indonesia, our most important neighbour, with ten times our population and a rapidly growing economy, is also the world's largest Muslim country. In the not too distant future Indonesia, not Australia, will be calling the shots in this part of the world. So get used to treading carefully when it comes to Islam. Posted by stevenlmeyer, Saturday, 15 September 2012 7:21:14 PM
| |
Some more footage shot by a mate of mine:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QJAp4eBV720 He's saying that Socialist Alternative were involved and were directing people to the protest and egging them on, the Commies actually recognised him as a Nationalist and attacked him, but he lost them in the crowd and ran behind the Police line. According to my source the Muslims just attacked Police straight away, there was no peaceful protest at all, they were there looking for a fight. Posted by Jay Of Melbourne, Saturday, 15 September 2012 8:33:22 PM
| |
Socialist Alternative support violence, they were definitely involved and were seen provoking violence and revving up the protestors:
http://www.sa.org.au/index.php?option=com_k2&view=item&id=7491:police-brutalise-peaceful-muslim-protest-in-sydney&Itemid=391 Posted by Jay Of Melbourne, Saturday, 15 September 2012 8:39:43 PM
| |
If I were an Egyptian Christian I'd definitely be making plans to make tracks.
This from American ABC Egypt's Christians Anxious, Anticipate Troubles http://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory/egypts-christians-anxious-anticipate-troubles-17241741#.UFRZZI0gdqI >>Christians gathered Friday in front of a Cairo cathedral holding signs denouncing a film that mocked the Prophet Muhammad* amid fears that Muslims will take out their anger on Egypt's minority community. The country's 8 million Coptic Christians were already feeling increasingly cornered amid the rise to power of hard-line Islamists in Egypt following the ouster of Hosni Mubarak. Now U.S. authorities have identified a self-described Coptic Christian living in California as the key figure behind the inflammatory film, and the community at home fears it will bear the brunt of the blame. "We are afraid the anger will engulf us," said Monier Hanna, a 58-year-old Coptic government employee who says he saw two unveiled Christian women being harassed over the movie by Muslim men in his middle-class district of Helwan on Thursday. "They were telling the women they are responsible for the film," he said. Mira Girgis, a 23-year-old Copt and recent college graduate, said she feels insecure. "I can't go to church alone; my brother must be with me. I can't go out at night. When I return from work, a male — either my father or brother — must be waiting for me at the subway station," she said. "Being a Christian ... is hard in Egypt in these conditions." A Christian journalist, Caroline Kamel, wrote in the Shorouk daily Friday that she and her family came under attack at a bus terminal in Cairo and another city over the film. "Am I supposed to ... apologize for stupidities of others just for the mere fact that we share the same religion?" she said.>> *I doubt that will help them. Posted by stevenlmeyer, Saturday, 15 September 2012 8:45:54 PM
| |
This all adds fuel to the argument that we, the people, need more say as to how this great nation of ours is managed.
At some point, immigration laws must change to the point of only allowing people to move to Australia, who want a better life, living as Australians. A must is, that as a condition of entry, they must leave thier baggage behind. What comes next, terrorisim? Their here, courtesy of our pro multicultural governments, they are simply awaiting their turn to become martyrs. Multiculturalism has been a dismal failure in other countries, we are only just beginning to realize that I'm afraid. I have nothing against any culture, so long as they don't bring thier baggage with them. Posted by rehctub, Saturday, 15 September 2012 9:59:49 PM
| |
Steven,
I've been wondering about that angle from the start, this film was apparently shot portraying a different story then re edited and re dubbed to it's present form, it's been online since July and now the alleged "Christian" film maker is being questioned by U.S Police for possible parole violations. The guy might just be a nut or an internet troll but whatever the case he's playing with fire, if he's a really Middle Eastern Christian he would have had to have known what the consequences of his actions would be. I don't know if you're a fan of the show Deadwood but as Al Swearengen might say, "This sort of thing fires up the Hoople Heads". Posted by Jay Of Melbourne, Saturday, 15 September 2012 10:51:31 PM
| |
Send them home?
Oh, of course, there are no Muslim Australians. They're all illegal immigrants... Posted by StG, Saturday, 15 September 2012 10:56:37 PM
| |
The film, like those cartoons a while ago, was made with the knowledge and deliberate intention of deliberately provoking a violent response.
Congratulations to all those involved. Posted by wobbles, Sunday, 16 September 2012 12:53:24 AM
| |
Well rehctub, if they want to be martyrs they should start this cr4p out of the city. Try it out here & they wont find a nicely cowered population that they have in their country of origin, or our inner cities.
These people are pretty tough when they only have women & children against them, or odds of 10 to one, but they run like sheep when faced with any real opposition. I wonder if we have any pollies with enough guts to ban men wearing dresses, with rags on their heads? Posted by Hasbeen, Sunday, 16 September 2012 1:18:46 AM
| |
What is happening is rage for the sake of rage. It makes Muslims feel good; it gives them respect they cannot get other wise. It is easier for Muslims to do rage than to question the Quran and hadith. It is easier for a Muslims to deny reality than be honest about Islam and its teachings. Because Muslims cannot reflect on Islam, there is no hope for change or peace.
The big issue -- one that Muslims will not touch -- is that the material for these anti-Islam movies comes directly from the Quran and especially the hadith. If critics of Islam want to paint Islam, Mohammed and Muslims as violent and evil, they simply dig up passages from Islam's own writings. Muslims refuse to consider any criticism, of Islam, even when those criticisms are reasonable. Why don't Muslims condemn the verses in the Quran that teach hate and violence against others? Why don't they denounce the verses that say "Muslims are the best of peoples" and "Non-believers are lower than animals"? Oh no, instead it is always about Muslims, their rights and any imagined offense. They want us to ignore all the evils they do, particularly where they dominate. . Some one should tell Muslims that respect is a two way street. I refuse to believe that Muslims in Australia, the US or Europe are any different from their brethren in Islamic societies. If Muslims could, if we let them, they would destroy the very foundations of Western civilization (freedom of speech, religion, equality and separation of religion and state). They cannot live in peace, in numbers, with non-Muslims. Any country that accepts Muslims immigrants is asking for trouble, hate and violence. There is no hope for peace. Our values are different. It is gonna get ugly. I have been saying this here at OLO for about 8 years, and nothing has changed. The future will not be nice. Posted by kactuz, Sunday, 16 September 2012 3:19:02 AM
| |
http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/society-and-culture/an-open-letter-20120915-25ziq.html
Good one Kaktuz, as a racist, yes PC brands me one the link I post brands me one, consider. Every single time something like this takes place those from within the Muslim community say this is wrong BUT. Facts, even America can not be held to account for this film, it was in all probability a few idiots maybe not even American. And who ever it was the real crime has come from the Muslim community world wide. Do not, as PC did, in Crunulla, force the blame on us! From within this community we will see we are inflicting pain on every one trying to fix the un fixable. I again challenge MUSLIM MIGRATION until that community learns to live in ours. Posted by Belly, Sunday, 16 September 2012 5:19:39 AM
| |
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/national/tony-abbott-wants-taji-out/story-fndo317g-1226474896149
Sorry about the spelling Kactuz. This link is for me historic, I support the words of Tony Abbott. And while not for the first time, deeply question my party. How and why did we let this pork chop in? Do you see the call for the end of western civilization? In this thread Paul puts his view, about standard from the greens, others warn WE/US should prepare to bend not the increasing Muslim population. Remember Cronulla? do you see the same faces who claimed to own that Beach, assaulted lifeguards, called women sluts?, in Hyde Park yesterday. Tell me it is not all, I know that! Tell me first what is different? did we riot when piss Christ was put as art? Attempts to call genuine fear and disgust at these foolish folk insulting our world are out of step with reality. No God should be reason for hate. Posted by Belly, Sunday, 16 September 2012 5:53:31 AM
| |
As a nation, we are detiriating day by day, mainly due to our softly softly approach to most things over the past few decades.
In fact, if we continue the politically correct path, being ever so careful not to step on ones dick, who knows where we will end up. Our forefathers fought to save our country, however one has to question why, when all that has happened since that attack on Darwin is either the selling off, or taking over of us as a nation. In fact, give it another seventy years, many will be confused as to what we actually stand for. With the likes of this rubbish and our peacfull invasion from illegals, I am afraid the time has come for someone to take out that big stick and save the Australia that those diggers faught so hard to save some seventy odd years ago. Otherwise, they faught and died for nothing. Posted by rehctub, Sunday, 16 September 2012 6:26:20 AM
| |
Those who look at the thread, name us red necks and flee.
First look at the protesters who yesterday took the chance to protest/riot. Look at the reasons they did so. And at the very insignificant reason they acted. Hear the crys of the American family who morn today, for what? Did you hear the interviews? to a woman in head cover *have you seen the film?* No she said! Sign behead all who insult the prophet? And do you, yes you, personalty believe in any God? In this God? Have I the right to demand no God have any thing to do with this hate? Posted by Belly, Sunday, 16 September 2012 6:40:49 AM
| |
Why some Australian Lebs give Rami a bad name:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gv6-tsV5Xj0 Muslim condemns Sydney protests: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RQUNOZaOPF0&list=UU8aEAyryaSz9TS4bP9Pbyrg&index=1&feature=plcp Posted by Jay Of Melbourne, Sunday, 16 September 2012 6:44:35 AM
| |
yes belly..i agree..this is not..*of/for nor by god
but the oppiosite.. god kis good/life as opposed to death cults that want alllife dead or subserviant its deliberatly trying to set up armogeddon by division/dire-version THESE DECIEVED FOOLS REALLY WANT ALL OF US DEAD..BUT THEM* but that isnt religion..as we see in this tread..anti social socialists..set up the play..so too..the other minour end*time sects get it in your head folks some fools REALLY REALLY*..want an end time.. and will do all needed to make things look worse to look bad.. \ [or rather muslims look bad... as if no one notices..cauise they been waiting watching for their oppertunistic action..plus the instant reaction like a wave. .much like a mossad op.. efficient..influential/affective/all pervasive yeah its a few nutters..sent out to restrict freedom of speech further..restrict internet.acces..etc etc.. if you think its not linked lo0k at the langauge used hangem high..couge out eyes..etc..so sad BUT cant you feel..the de-mans demon/yearning to drink bloodlust? inspiring their words some of the words used..in these pages alone..is provocative/biased but its our right to stand speak..not kill nor provoke.. but your cure..is worse than the disease! sue youtube./. for the damages www.gilad.co.uk/writings/israel-the-day-after.html Gordis is tormented by polls.. that suggest that the centrality of Israel within Jewish American life..is declining... Apparently, a recent survey suggests ..continued Posted by one under god, Sunday, 16 September 2012 7:17:11 AM
| |
that 50 percent of young Jewish Americans ..35 years old and younger)..would not see the destruction of Israel as a ‘personal tragedy’.
why? John Hopkins study confirms Europeamn Jews are Khazars. The question of Jewish ancestry..has been the subject of controversy for over two centuries..and has yet to be resolved...The “Rhineland Hypothesis”..proposes that Eastern European Jews/emerged from a small group of German Jews..who migrated eastward and expanded rapidly. Alternatively,..the “Khazarian Hypothesis”..suggests that Eastern/European..descended from Judean tribes..who joined the Khazars,..an amalgam of Turkic clans..that settled the Caucasus in the early centuries CE..*and converted to Judaism in the 8th century. The Judaized Empire..was continuously reinforced with Mesopotamian..and Greco-Roman Jews..until the 13th century. but so much..is planned for long term advantage..like destroying the 'maccabees'..[read iranians..is ancient blood fued]..but only to\..*the seminte line of judism.. why destroy..by self- destruction,..for non/semite..not jew but just talking about jew..raises the ire/complaint.. but heck..im a jew..AND IM ABORIGONAL..i met many muslim first aussies..! and im not saying go there..nor stay away but come in peace/. ./leave your gun..in the homeland of war..come into jeruseallothem..in peace..love of bother in thy heart.. http://whatreallyhappened.com/ http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2011/11/neoconservatives-planned-regime-change-throughout-the-middle-east-and-northern-africa-20-years-ago.html all creation..belongs to god you want to own it all..make your own! http://www.blogtips.com/2012/09/decentralized-internet-being-built-to.html peace not pieces Posted by one under god, Sunday, 16 September 2012 7:18:46 AM
| |
If I were 40 years younger & know what I know know I'd become a brain surgeon specialising in lobotomy. I'd never be out of work just treating our present Government.
Posted by individual, Sunday, 16 September 2012 7:32:36 AM
| |
what we are seeing is a topic that moved fast..from its posting..late yesterday..to the same commenting through the night
its now up to our sunday media..to clear this up and for xtians..to more than ever get over creed/greed/fear and love each other.. even if it kills them..they dont fear death..death has no sting..because we are spirits..having a life 'expiernce'..before picking our role for eternity that we love and hate haunts us for eternity this is a combined attack..led by athiests..and anti love the only cure is truelly to LOVE OTHER* unite the christs divided house unite the messengers of gnosis house//peace be upon them all unite..behind a shield of love be revealed by your love charity to other unite not for you..but him ..you claim to represent..by grace/mercy re-presnt >>..the gift* charity as love to other brother not bother dont be ammoung those needing to explain to god/..the good LIFE GIVER* why you took ..an others life? or didnt try tyo stop that the bible says will KILL/ MURDER two thirds iof not cut short cut it off at the knees now the stars of media/sharon..cause they mention both of you thus you sit dead..waiting what..to turn off the machine..AT EGSACTLY..the right moment..to distract from what army getting it on iran..? then global war when us gets into the lies then the war monger end ytimer? or the corperate cocconut..peascernick ion the inmside..assasin by choice/presidential order or the other maybe end time..CHRISTIAN but to which twisted creed of the most holy christ peace be upon him or the civil riots via diebolt fraud in the voting machines.. or the uk riots..yet islamic riot great excuse for racists..to do thier plan Posted by one under god, Sunday, 16 September 2012 7:42:21 AM
| |
Makes great news doesn't it?
Cameras scanning signs about beheadings, an apparently violent angry crowd - throwing things at police - how many in the crowd exactly? 100? The cameras don't scan the speakers asking the protesters for calm, or even people amongst the group trying to do the same. That's not news. I'm not condoning any form of violence - be at at protests, football matches, of political rallies. However, I still feel that we can't blame the actions of a few on the many. And I do question the agenda of those that came prepared to obviously cause trouble - when the speakers kept asking for calm from the crowd (as reported in The Sydney Morning Herald). Still, I guess - presenting images of signs about beheadings fits in with some people's images of Islam. It conjures forth images of women behind veils, of adulterers being stoned, of thieves having their hands cut off, of public floggings and executions, of martyrdom in holy wars, and, in extreme cases, of political fanaticism exemplified in aircraft hijackings and terrorist bombings. This picture is rather distorted, but it is based on what is newsworthy rather than what is typical. Posted by Lexi, Sunday, 16 September 2012 8:11:56 AM
| |
I think that right now the Islamic community as indeed every other religious community, has a perfect opportunity to rid themselves of their fanatically destructive elements. Many of these rioters are on video & one leader has actually said he had recognised some on TV.
So, all you religious communities show your integrity & your commitment to integrity now. Openly EXPELL those rioters from your places of worship. Do that & your communities will be bee seen in the light you want to be seen in. Posted by individual, Sunday, 16 September 2012 8:26:56 AM
| |
Thank you, Lexi, for your call for calm and your sensible admonition that we not cast blanket blame on all Muslims. Religion has no boundaries. Sadly, neither does fanaticism.
Before we continue bemoaning the fate of ‘our great nation’ (rehctub), can we pause for a moment to look at the bigger picture? The timeline (in brief from Wikipedia): <<Months after it was shown once in a Hollywood theater, two film trailers were released on YouTube, in July 2012. The trailers were dubbed into Arabic, and then spread by Egyptian American blogger and Coptic Christian Morris Sadek. On September 8, 2012, a two-minute excerpt from the film was broadcast on Al-Nas TV, an Egyptian Islamist television station. Violent protests against the film broke out on September 11. The protests spread to Libya, Yemen and other Arab and Muslim nations over the following days, included the 2012 diplomatic missions attacks, incorporating an attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, Libya, that resulted the deaths of U.S. Ambassador Christopher Stevens and three other Americans. The film has sparked protests around the world.>> The film was written, produced and directed by individuals who all used pseudonyms to hide their real identity. Why? And why the release on Islamist TV just prior to the anniversary of 9/11? Hardly coincidental. The question we should be asking is who stands to gain the most from spreading Islamic unrest, in the ME and around the world, AT THIS TIME? - The Republicans and their supporters worldwide, 6 weeks before the US election? - Israel, smarting from US refusal to take immediate military action against Iran? - Iran, struggling under imposed international sanctions? - Syria, embroiled in civil unrest? - Opponents of the Arab Spring? - Coptic Christians and their supporters seeking to stir the pot? Pick any one of the above and you’d be close. The one certainty is the country with the least to gain by the unrest at this time is the US. This ‘stunt’ could well cost Obama the election and take us all a step closer to war in the ME. Posted by scribbler, Sunday, 16 September 2012 8:33:20 AM
| |
Lexi I've spoken to someone who was there, it was over 300 people by his estimation and there were no "calls for calm" and there was no peaceful protest, they saw the Police, they attacked, it was as simple as that. At least we know whose side you're on Lexi.
Lexi these are dumb Arabic hoodlums, street crims and bikies, they're "Muslim" when it suits them, watch the Rami videos I posted, at least he's honest about some of his people, I won't even say it's a minority because it's not, this is how they think and act everywhere. Dearborn Michigan: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3EA4zr7xLyk Notice the same stupid haircuts as the Sydney mob, same clothes, same attitude, same blind aggression for no reason. Lexi this might send a shiver down your spine: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=irmX_Uii758&feature=related This is from London, do you go out and join with your commie mates and join in these types of events Lexi? The socialist alternative was front and centre in the Sydney event: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ekysuei-c-Q Posted by Jay Of Melbourne, Sunday, 16 September 2012 8:37:34 AM
| |
Lexi: I know that you mean to be the voice of reason, considering all sides of the argument, or in this case the rioting, BUT the images that you speak of are representative of the teachings of the Quiran, beliefs that these people live and die for!
There are obviously a lot of problems within the teachings of Islam, as is indicated by some devotees who claim that their religion does not believe in or advocate violence against another human being, whilst at the same time we hear others screaming "Death to the Infidels!"....this like many other forms of religous fervour needs to be subjected to very close scrutiny and cleaned up before we are all embroiled in another Crusade. We don`t hear the Catholics,Presbyterians,Baptists or similar religous groups advocating death or violence against members of other faiths for feigned infringements of the rules, so why should we as a so-called civilized society have to accept it from these malcontents? I think that our Government should heed the warnings coming from "real Aussies" and cease allowing all the world`s garbage to fill our country with racial violence and contempt for our way of life, simply because Australia has been known to be a believer in the policy of "fair go"!....what about a "fair go" for us and our families and their families in years to come? Stop the rot now,... before it is too late! Posted by Crackcup, Sunday, 16 September 2012 8:53:10 AM
| |
Lexi, this is no time for your bleeding heart approach, it is time for action.
It was eledged that some 7 odd abettors in Malisia used inhumane practices, 7 of 77, the government shut the whole show down. I am afraid it's time to shut this rubbish down. If I had my way I would get rid of the lot of them. As racist as that may be, it would solve the problem. Terrorism in Australia is a ticking time bomb, just waiting to explode. I say, remove the cause, as prevention is always better than cure. BTW, I saw people in the crowd trying to instil calm as well. Posted by rehctub, Sunday, 16 September 2012 9:10:55 AM
| |
Rechtub,
Islam is not the problem, it's so called "Muslims", Islam is a military doctrine which was used by Arabic colonists across the globe, these Lebanese thugs are not colonists, most of them were born here, if they see themselves as Australian then they have no business with Islam. There is no "moderate" version of Islam, only violent and non violent methods of spreading it's message, these kids are violent by nature so they are attracted to Islam when it's teachings are acted out in a violent way, the rest of the time they couldn't be bothered, it's too much reading and they're too dumb to understand the finer points of scripture anyway. Scribbler, Cui bono? Exactly right,it's alleged that the state agents and provocateurs known as "Socialist Alternative" were at the centre of the outbreak of violence, I've witnessed this with my own eyes in other circumstances, they instigate and direct violence against Police and encourage the "Hoople Heads" in the crowd to do the same. One time I saw them encouraging two obviously mentally handicapped men to give "Hitler Salutes" for the cameras at an anti racism rally. Posted by Jay Of Melbourne, Sunday, 16 September 2012 9:32:08 AM
| |
Butch, Belly and Kactus,
I agree with you blokes, now what action to take? Firstly most of the protestors are Aussie born, so they cannot be deported, probably second or even third generation. Changes are needed to the immigration act so we can discriminate and stop those groups from coming here that have shown us they cannot/will not integrat. Action has to be political. To enable this, the agreement that the major parties have about not questioning, discussing or campaigning about immigration issues MUST be torn up. Let us see what the major parties can alter their policies to and go from there. If we can discriminate about alien cultures in immigration we can then prevent muslims, or any other groups, from coming here. The we can toughen up our citizenship requirements and the laws regarding deportation. Our aim should be for a cohesive society. We have an election coming up soon so now is the time to lobby the major parties about change and not simply accept their tut,tutting. Change must begin with the politicians in Canberra. Posted by Banjo, Sunday, 16 September 2012 9:39:54 AM
| |
The moslems display all the characteristics of people with a behaviour problem.
They over react to fancied insults or decisions that they do not like. I suspect that it is related to their genetics and to their inbreeding by cousin marriage. It would explain many things including the high rate of genetic faults in babies born at Auburn Hospital. See Dept Heath report to NSW parliament in Hansard. Likewise report to UK parliament from Midlands Heath Dept. People with behaviour problem become obsessed with ideas like support of particular sporting clubs or in this case religion. They often over react to any situation. The first thing that should be done is to ban cousin marriage. Posted by Bazz, Sunday, 16 September 2012 9:45:56 AM
| |
It's "mankind" who has the "behavioural problem".
I'm going to sit next to Siddhartha and listen to the river. Posted by Poirot, Sunday, 16 September 2012 9:52:14 AM
| |
Lexi my sweet, it really is time to grow up.
Hiding your head in the sand so as not to see what is before your eyes is a mugs reaction. It is this mugs action, or the attempt to buy Muslim votes that has brought us this problem, & hiding it won't fix it. Remember when 4 of these curs jumped out of a car, & attacked my son, while he was simply walking home in Sydney. With their cries of get whitey they were out to injure. If a couple of cars of people driving by had not stopped & chased them off he would be dead or a vegetable now. This stuff is going on all the time, & doesn't even make the news. This could be by design, but is probably just too common to be newsworthy. The longer we wait to sort this lot, the greater price we will pay to do it. Posted by Hasbeen, Sunday, 16 September 2012 10:18:55 AM
| |
Belly and Butch,
To be critical of a persons behaviour, a religion or culture is NOT racist. Dont let anyone argue that it is. Posted by Banjo, Sunday, 16 September 2012 10:30:33 AM
| |
Identify those who punched first, take them all to an isolated island along with the morons who made the video & those who distributed it.
Problem half solved. the second half will depend on the reaction of what transpires after the first half. Btw. it's not as outlandish as you might think at first. There are plenty islands around Australia where this experiment could be tested. A Navy boat full of prototype National Service people could keep an eye on it all. Posted by individual, Sunday, 16 September 2012 10:33:34 AM
| |
Remember 1 thing these are the same religion (or lack of it) that are coming on the boats as refugees and most boats have 95% men. I have said before this is possible a deliberate action by Malaysia and Indonesia to undermine Australia.
They can stop most of them coming if they want to by introducing visas for them and return tickets and most important a few questions when they arrive. The know they are not going home after a holiday they are going to Australia. The more that come the weaker Australia gets and more bankrupt. Posted by Philip S, Sunday, 16 September 2012 10:34:12 AM
| |
The police should not have used the dogs they did not clear them fast enough.
INSTEAD I propose the police have a new recruit PIGS (real ones) now if they are real Muslims they will soon run from a pig. Posted by Philip S, Sunday, 16 September 2012 11:11:19 AM
| |
Some are quick to find excuses
Scribblers says: <<The question we should be asking is who stands to gain the most from spreading Islamic unrest, in the ME and around the world, AT THIS TIME?>> Then proceeds to list off the usual suspects: The Republicans, Israel, opponents of the Arab Spring and Copts (the latter is particularly *insensitive* given that the Copts have borne the brunt of Islamic discrimination and terrorism for a millennium). The only ones she misses are the Elders of Zion! The real question here is NOT WHO sought to provoke, but WHY were/are so many easily provoked. Why were so many –who had not even seen the film – so willing to vent their fury on society. One of the corner stones, the defining qualities, of our pluralistic (postmodernist) society is that peoples beliefs are open to challenge. Once again we are being given a wake-up call that in many cases it is not our values that attract people to our shores. Scribblers also gives us a timeline for the lead up to the troubles: <<Months after it was shown once in a Hollywood theater, two film trailers were released on YouTube, in July 2012.>> A more informative timeline might have started like this: 637 the Muslim conquest of Jerusalem 711 - 718 the Muslim conquest of Spain 1453 the Muslim conquest of Constantinople And Scribbler strains credulity by asking : <<The film was written, produced and directed by individuals who all used pseudonyms to hide their real identity. Why? >> WHY! Um, please read up on what befell Salman Rushdie , Dutch film director Theo van Gogh and what was planed for those behind the Danish cartoon Posted by SPQR, Sunday, 16 September 2012 11:22:24 AM
| |
@ Poirot ,
<<I’m going to sit next to Siddhartha and listen to the river>> Alas, mediating peacefully by the river will not save you when the jihadis come … "The Mussalman invaders sacked the Buddhist universities of Nalanda, Vikramshila, Jagaddala, Odantapuri to name only a few. How the Buddhist priesthood perished by the sword of the Muslim invaders has been recorded by the Muslim historians themselves. http://www.hinduwisdom.info/Islamic_Onslaught6.htm But you might be lucky, Poirot, one might spare your life and make you his fourth wife…hmmm, on second thoughts you might be better off with the death option. Posted by SPQR, Sunday, 16 September 2012 11:23:37 AM
| |
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/nation/sydney-protests-have-damaged-australias-multicultural-reputation-barry-ofarrell/story-e6frg6nf-1226475010678
Another link. And yes from the other side of politics than mine. He in this matter has my support. I admit, in an effort to be kind, nice, even handed, my party, SOME of its supporters, often, overlooks the national feelings on this issue and yes others, boat people. Kid your self, but you are trying to paddle up a water fall PC an in my view evil thing! Haunts us even here. I will just bet, as he MUST, our Host Graham is concerned. Will we go too far. Will some ill-equipped to find a balance push us to the wrong headlines, even see, and it has taken place the lifeblood advertising away. Let us not do that. But too let us not cringe in the corner. If we, the contributors to OLO, marched yesterday in the heart of once moderate Egypt, or any Muslim City. Chanting the filth of yesterday, holding signs asking for the be heading and for respect for CHRISTIANITY? We would now be dead, the women raped first. Care to say it is not true? Posted by Belly, Sunday, 16 September 2012 11:24:53 AM
| |
I've been sitting here trying to think of the best
way to reply to those who think I'm looking at things through "rose-coloured glasses." I don't think that's what I'm doing. I simply don't believe in blaming an entire group of people for the actions of a few fundamentalists in their group. I'm not condoning the violence by any means. I am against violence - and the breaking of our laws - no matter who does it - and I do believe that people who break our laws should pay the penalties for doing so. What I am trying to avoid here though is making generalisations about a religion that I don't know that much about - and how many of us really do? What's on the news and in the papers - does often not portray the reality of things as we know. And, fundamentalists exist in all religions not only in Islam. Anyway, this protest has been condemned by Muslim Leaders in Australia and I can only trust that this will discourage the fundies from taking this sort of violent action in the future. It has done a great deal of harm to whatever cause they thought they were protesting. Posted by Lexi, Sunday, 16 September 2012 11:42:14 AM
| |
Thanks for the advice, SPQR.
I was referring to Hermann Hesse's Siddhartha...all he needed (in the end) was a river. All I'm seeing here - and in the riots -and in the world - are insecure bickering humans...such is life. Posted by Poirot, Sunday, 16 September 2012 11:47:14 AM
| |
Calm your farm Belly, nobody is going to get into trouble.
Premier O'Farrell is stil trying to say that this is a "minority" of Muslims and that multiculturalism is the key to our success, both of which are such blatantly stupid ideas that it's sure to reduce normal people's opinion of his administration even further. The phrase "Diversity is our greatest strength" was a talking point invented for a specific "Anti Racism" campaign by the Israeli lobby group the ADL in the U.S.A, it was then adopted by America's political caste after it was written into a speech for Bill Clinton. The problem is that people like the Premier keep repeating what is obviously a dumb idea which has no basis in fact and is contradicted at every turn by what any normal person observes in their daily life. Muslims don't believe in "diversity" and how, pray tell does diversity factor into their colonialist military doctrine called Islam, you're either a Muslim or you're not in their view. O'Farrell has no choice but to repeat these stupid platitudes, he's stuck between a rock and hard place on this issue because there are a lot of misinformed people who are less intelligent than he but who nonetheless vote for him and they really believe in this "diversity" foolishness. Posted by Jay Of Melbourne, Sunday, 16 September 2012 11:51:16 AM
| |
SPQR,
Actually, contrary to your assertion, I am not trying to find excuses for the outbreak of violence following the release of the film on Islamic TV. I am trying to understand the motivations behind such a deliberate move. Naturally, this begs the question: who has the most to gain? Perfectly reasonable, I would have thought and I fail to understand your rancour. By not taking into consideration the reliance by whoever backed the YouTube clip upon the radical element of Islam to rise up in protest, we are only seeing a tiny part of the picture. Of course, for those who only want to use the riots as an excuse to rant about the genetic inbreeding of Muslims (Bazz), the terrifying influx of ‘illegal’ male boat people – clearly a no-so-subtle move by Indonesia to undermine our wonderful country – (Phillip S), advocate violent punishments against all and any such protests (individual), cast blanket blame on all Muslims for the actions and incitements of a radical element (Jay of Melbourne), call for legal discrimination against Muslims in this country (Banjo), differentiate between ‘real Aussies’ and those Islamic usurpers (crackcup) and bemoan the deterioration of ‘our great nation’ by allowing Islam a place in ‘our’ society (rechtub), then anything I say or any questions I ask will have no effect. C’est la vie. My biggest concern about some of the views expressed here is that if Sydney had experienced no riots, this thread would probably never have started, even though the same violence is simmering world-wide. To restrict our views to only what happens on our doorstep is really alarming. To quote Beryl Bainbridge: “If you hold an object that close to your eyes, you shut out the rest of the world”. That said, thanks for taking the time to respond. Posted by scribbler, Sunday, 16 September 2012 11:53:03 AM
| |
A crowd of Union members dressed similarly blocking access to Grocon chanting slogans!
A large crowd of people with funny hats, painted faces, similarly dressed sitting/standing around a large lawn shouting and chanting slogans at a two groups of thugs fighting over a ball. A crowd lead by men who wear dresses and wearing funny hats that protect paedophiles consider women as second class congregating and chanting slogans. A crowd of lefties meeting in a big conference centre dressing similarly chanting slogans. A crowd of righties meeting in a big conference centre dressing similarly chanting slogans. I could go on but I think I have illustrated my point. These as well as the so called Islamic riot are an exercise by those who desire power, influence and reward from the ignorant and gullible. The reality is there is no God of any franchise. There are no photos, recordings or documentaries. We do know God has a penis as most of them are referred to as “he”, which suggest they are invented by a males. I can’t imagine what he would do with it. The propaganda says even Mary was a virgin. Perhaps there is a Mrs God or perhaps God has a same sex partner. I believe we can reduce the problems the above and other example not mentioned by: Ignoring them. Removing their tax free status. Not subsidising them. Not accepting any form of violence or intimidation. Removing advertising as a tax deductable expense. Reduce your ignorance and gullibility. Don’t seek power. I wonder if god could be a rich lawyer or wears buggie smugglers. Posted by Producer, Sunday, 16 September 2012 12:02:53 PM
| |
Quote: Anyway, this protest has been condemned by Muslim Leaders in Australia and I can only trust that this will discourage the fundies from taking this sort of violent action in the future.
Muslim leaders always condemn this type of behavior, every time it happens, time after time (wink) (wink) (giggle) (ha ha ha) They are laughing at us and not even behind our backs. Instead, ask a Muslim leader to condemn the hate and violence in the Quran. Ask a Muslim leader to condemn the evil actions of their dear Prophet. Ask a Muslim leader to not just condemn the legal and cultural discrimination practiced against non-Muslims in Islamic societies, but to actually do something about this - but don't hold your breath. The only thing that will discourage these so-called fundies (and the so-called moderates that support them) is to ship their collective arses back to Islamland Posted by kactuz, Sunday, 16 September 2012 12:17:47 PM
| |
scribbler:
I disagree with totally on this issue! We should concentrate on our own country and our own internal problems, and every other country in the world should do the same. For too long now various countries have interfered with the performance and occurrences within other countries, (there are usually vested interests behind it), and more likely than not the interferance is of a covert nature to alter the political balance accordingly. Nationalism in Australia has generally been lacking for quite some time now, and it is time that we Aussies became a little introverted and exercised some of the fervour exhibited by other nations on a regular basis, instead of simply cheering a winning football team, or applauding a victorius Olympic competitor! This is the cement that bonds a nation together, Nationalism, the taking of pride in one`s own country, flag and symbolism! I may live to see the day when Australia will have a national leader with outstanding intestinal fortitude and the ambition to genuinely improve the internally perceived concept of a free and democratic country beholden to no one. I may live to see the day when this national leader will stand up and make a regular speech to the nation, applauding the successes of the achievement of loyalty, at the same time castigating those citizens who defame or bring disrepute upon this country. This would require a leader of vision, strength and most of all...honesty! The time has arrived whereby we as a nation have to forego the tugging of the forelock, cast off any perceived loyalties to other nations, nations who consider Australia to be simply another source of cannon-fodder for exotic forays into their own national endeavours! Posted by Crackcup, Sunday, 16 September 2012 12:33:09 PM
| |
Scrib, Do you want to understand the motivations behind these riots?
It is power! It is because Muslims need rage and it gives them respect. This is not really about a stupid film, but a chance to be angry and to show that anger. That rage may not impress your or me, but it makes our mealy-mouthed, weak-legged, pee-in-their-pants leadership in government, the media and academia tremble. "Oh my, we have offended those pure, suffering Muslims. How horrible we are! Let us grovel and maybe, oh maybe, they will love us!" To our leaders, our rights and traditions are of no importance compared to the hurt feelings of Muslims. There will be more and more of this, and it is all Muslims, not just the so-called fundies. As I have said before, the radicals attack and kill, but the moderates make excuses and pretend this has nothing to do with Islam. This will not end well. Blood will flow. Posted by kactuz, Sunday, 16 September 2012 12:34:12 PM
| |
My post here at OLO, 2005
http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?article=3447&page=0#9922 I have serious doubts if there is even a "moderate" Muslim majority. It seems that 'extremist' Muslims persecute and kill, while 'moderates' make excuses, saying it has nothing to do with Islam and Muslims. Islam is intolerant and promotes hate. Period. Or maybe it is just coincidence that almost all Muslim countries are major human rights abusers, that women, minorities and other religions are oppressed. No wonder they want to come to the West - and when they arrive in numbers in a Western country, they bring their intolerance and violence with them. The issue of rape is old. Do a Google search for "rape", "Muslims" and the name of any country in Europe (or Australia). Islam is what Muslims do, not what they say. The same is true for Christianity and Buddhists and every other religion. It must also be said that Islam is what Muslims do where they dominate, not where they are a minority. I don't even believe that Muslims want honest dialogue. They want to set rules so they are exempt from criticism, and cannot be offended. Well, If Muslims have a right to be offended by what people say about their religion, I have a right to be offended about what Muslims do to women, or to other religions where they dominate. I am offended by a belief that calls itself a "religion of peace" and then immediately starts making threats (ask Irshad Manji or Hirsi Ali!). I am offended by a religion that states that "there is no compulsion in religion" on a web page, and on the same page says that any Muslim leaving Islam should be put to death. I am offended by people that say Mohammed was a shining "example", and do not consider *people murdered, robbed, tortured, raped and enslaved by islam's prophet (*edited for length) The fact is that the "muslim" problem is not going away. Within about 5 years it will become a major social issue, and people will get hurt, unless Muslims change and become tolerant. That probably won't happen. Posted by kactuz, Sunday, 16 September 2012 12:45:30 PM
| |
Well it would seem the actions of the intolerant have given the intolerant on OLO a call to action. Fear is playing its part in both the initial protests and the responses.
The promise of what my country is and will be in the future will be flagged in its responses to this issue. Many of the post above are touting regressive, violent, nationalistic, racist solutions but are born from fear and ignorance. My love of this country lies in my belief that we are far better than that. Time will tell if that faith is well founded. I hope for all of us it is. Posted by csteele, Sunday, 16 September 2012 1:12:55 PM
| |
@Producer,
Was intrigued by your suggestions. <<I believe we can reduce the problems the above and other example not mentioned by: Ignoring them. Removing their tax free status. Not subsidising them. Not accepting any form of violence or intimidation. Removing advertising as a tax deductable expense. Reduce your ignorance and gullibility. Don’t seek power.>> For this lot: -Removing their tax free status. -Not subsidising them. -Removing advertising as a tax deductable expense. The Humans Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission would like to know who you mean by “them” and “their”? And, for these two: -Not accepting any form of violence or intimidation -Ignoring them. I would like to know how you reconcile the two. I mean,I envisage it would work something like this:The Harbour Bridge suddenly disappears in a puff of smoke and we say “I’m not going to be provoked …I will ignore that” And,as to these two: -Reduce your ignorance and gullibility. -Don’t seek power Siddhartha and the ghosts of 10,000 Buddhist monks want to know why their great wisdom didn’t blunt the swords of their jihadi murders? Cheers @Scribbler << I fail to understand your rancour.>> Rancor? Hardly …more like good natured incredulity. After all –unless I am mistaken – you were implying on an earlier thread that all such woes were the result of the West interfering in the Middle East—prior to that all was bliss. Posted by SPQR, Sunday, 16 September 2012 1:28:28 PM
| |
*I'm going to sit next to Siddhartha and listen to the river.*
Well Poirot, that is exactly why I live out in the country, far from the maddening crowds. *racist solutions but are born from fear and ignorance.* Well no Csteele, it just ain't that simple. I challenge you to do what I did, go through the history of islam and understand what it is all about and what the different branches of it, actually believe. On any objective analysis, I concluded that it is a violent religion by nature, as distinct from say Budhism, it is also divisive. So where Islam goes, trouble usually follows. That is just the reality of it, suck it up Posted by Yabby, Sunday, 16 September 2012 1:45:52 PM
| |
I'v just received a detailed eyewitness account form a comrade who was right in the thick of the melee, I won't post it all because it's too long but here is the core of his comment:
"Whatever calmer elements existed (and they did, there were lots on the sidelines) the greater mass went to join the fracas. It was the women and children and those who obviously didn't approve who kept out. There were children yelling things and carrying placards. And frankly, I was there (redacted). I was right there when it kicked off. I was always going to be -- as I had to pass through there to get to my gym. Which I did. Heh. I could put it in a nutshell: I reckon there's a persuasive core of this community that really wants to get the nod from the brothers overseas -- kind of like an Aussie chapter of the Hells Angels wanting to impress their big brother in America." Posted by Jay Of Melbourne, Sunday, 16 September 2012 2:04:03 PM
| |
Well scribbler, I offered my suggestion of the cause of the riots as
I have seen behaviour problems and I can see how similar the behaviour of individuals in the crowd was. I can see that their religion is the "prompter" of the behaviour. Genetic mental problems are consistent with behaviour problems. That is why I suggest it as a cause of the problem. Frankly when generation after generation you have cousin marriage you are dead certain to be laying up problems for future generations. Politicians are afraid to tackle this problem by making a law against cousin marriage because it might offend moslems. What puzzles me is that being an agricultural society originally they should have known better. The reason they promoted cousin marriage was to keep land in the family. There are better ways of doing that. Posted by Bazz, Sunday, 16 September 2012 2:25:09 PM
| |
And Producer, all those you mentioned have one thing in common, they are no threat to our society, nor would I suspect you would find a terrorist among them, nor did they hold placards suggestion anyone be beheaded.
This is a sicko culture and to think our powers to be have let them just waltz right in and start practicing their rubbish hear. I still say, get rid of them. Posted by rehctub, Sunday, 16 September 2012 4:08:50 PM
| |
Dear rehctub,
you say to get rid of them? How do you suggest we do that? Who exactly do we target out of the group? Do you know how many Muslims there are in this country? Any idea of the stats? Compare that number with how many were there protesting. And how do we select the ones to ship back - and where to - if they are Australian citizens? Or are second and third generation Aussies? Posted by Lexi, Sunday, 16 September 2012 4:15:58 PM
| |
Dear Lexi,
You ask how and whom? You silly duffer, I'm sure Butcher could find a few cattle cars from the 'decimated' live cattle trade and combine that with Bazz's expertise in genetics I'm sure a final solution could be organized. Just leave it to those two and we will be in safe hands, you don't need to worry your silly head about it any longer. Posted by csteele, Sunday, 16 September 2012 4:39:49 PM
| |
csteele I can only read a single line of yours.
And no other poster, see I remember tens of time you did as Kactuz says, said it is wrong BUT! Kactuz has it right read the manual for murder they worship. Who do we blame for these international riots? Murders, be aware some who post here do not have other than others interests in mind. The real loss is to the good and honest Muslims, yesterday, todays blindness from those not condemning it, will take 20 years to undo. Yet more, it is just the start in those 20 years we will suffer far worse in the name of a God? read the koran! We must confront a truth we have imported trouble extreme action alone can fix this, pay them to leave. Posted by Belly, Sunday, 16 September 2012 5:47:02 PM
| |
You have to hand it to the folk who made that movie, though, don't you. If in fact there is a movie - as far as I am aware, there is only a fourteen-minute "trailer".
It was clearly designed to create exactly the violent confrontations that we have seen. The religious fanatics have been encouraged, in the crudest and most transparent manner, to protest "blasphemy", which has in turn given the xenophobes full licence to vocalize their "towelheads go home" mantra. Perfect. Both sides are demonstrating that they are so gullible, that such a nakedly blatant attempt to stir up trouble has been so wildly successful. And the filmmaker meanwhile sits behind his defence of "freedom of speech", knowing full well that the objective was not to exercise that freedom, but instead to make sure extremists on both sides of the religious fence react to the dogwhistle, and go for each other's throats. So, credit where credit is due. Whoever is behind the "movie" has quite cynically exploited the credulity of bigots on both sides, and even now is probably giggling hysterically at how stupid and easily led people can be. Posted by Pericles, Sunday, 16 September 2012 6:38:08 PM
| |
Dear Yabby,
You write “On any objective analysis, I concluded that it is a violent religion by nature” and “So where Islam goes, trouble usually follows. That is just the reality of it,”. Yet when one looks at the history of the 20th century with Christians delivering the Holocaust and the genocidal mass slaughter in the Yugoslav conflict which was well into the later half of that period, all within 'modern' Europe, then any objective analysis hardly puts Islam at the head of the pack on the violence score. I consider both Christianity and Islam as the bastard children of Judaism with all the insecurities implicit in that relationship. I think there was a very real fear dictating the movement of European Jewry after WW2 and their ultimate infliction on the Palestinians, you tell me who they feared the most in making that decision. Dear Pericles, Here is the TYT take on the matter. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9dqHt6gsoxU&list=UU1yBKRuGpC1tSM73A0ZjYjQ&index=31&feature=plcp And an update. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F1LU7t3mSHo&list=UU1yBKRuGpC1tSM73A0ZjYjQ&index=11&feature=plcp Not that I agree entirely with Cenk but he does give an American perspective that is instructive though slightly unrealistic. Posted by csteele, Sunday, 16 September 2012 7:02:40 PM
| |
An interesting observation Pericles and one that I ponder about
sometimes. I don't claim to have all the answers. OTOH I did read up a bit of evolutionary psychology and they claim that tit for tat is in fact the best strategy in life. Turning the other cheek is a dismal failure. It didn't work to well for the Jews, during WW2, for instance. My answer is to live in the country. You people can fight it all out in the cities.I frankly don't think too highly of my species. Posted by Yabby, Sunday, 16 September 2012 7:04:36 PM
| |
*with Christians delivering the Holocaust and the genocidal mass slaughter in the Yugoslav conflict*
Hang on Csteele, you confuse racism and tribalism with religious hatred. I don't think that Hitler read the bible and interpreted it as that he should wipe out the Jewish race. There is a great book by Ali Dashti, a Persian who grew up attending the Madrasses etc, but who eventually became a journalist. He wrote a book called "23 Years", about the historical life of Muhammed. He asked for the book to be translated into English and published, after his death, which it was. Muhammed was a very smart fellow, but he didn't get too far preaching at first. So he formed an army and all those in his army were to believe in his religion too. They started by raiding camel trains, but before long they grew larger and larger and soon were taking over whole countries. Muhammed had two sides. One moment he could preach peace and love, the next he preached war. Dashti examines all this. I suggest you perhaps read it, to further understand what is happening globally and why. Its orgins are quite clear. Posted by Yabby, Sunday, 16 September 2012 7:42:07 PM
| |
How many people have actually seen this Utube movie the Islamists have killed innocent people over? Maybe a lot of young computer nerds who spend hours watching politically extreme videos.
I’ll bet most of middle Australia and America haven’t even seen the second-rate, trashy, movie. It would be too boring to interest them. What about the Christian religion and the “ Di Vinci Code” movie, which was actually a real movie seen on the big screen by a huge percentage of people in many countries and was disliked by the Christian church but it certainly didn’t result in people being killed. It was also a widely read bestselling book. Again no bloodshed by the Christians. This shows how far the Christian religion has come in being able to accept criticism and questioning without murder as compared to the Moslem religion. If the Moslems are so blessed by God, then how come so many of these Moslem countries are so overpopulated, poor and miserable compared to the abundance, freedoms and great way of life in Western countries? Looks to me as though God has blessed the Western countries not the Moslem countries. Isn’t that obvious. Posted by CHERFUL, Sunday, 16 September 2012 8:34:18 PM
| |
Those rioting are just following the example of their prophet. Those with Christophobic natures continue to lump the two together. Secularism with its death culture has far more similarities to Islam than Christianity.
Posted by runner, Sunday, 16 September 2012 10:35:17 PM
| |
"Christians" had nothing to do with the so called "Holocaust" apart from opposing it, that's pretty much the most ignorant thing I've seen posted here in recent times, Fascism and NS is explicitly Pagan, you know, Pagan as in Rome?
Posted by Jay Of Melbourne, Sunday, 16 September 2012 11:12:33 PM
| |
Dear Yabby,
Reading is indeed instructive for the most part. Could I suggest you put Mien Kampf on your list. "Hence today I believe that I am acting in accordance with the will of the Almighty Creator: by defending myself against the Jew, I am fighting for the work of the Lord." Hitler So enthusiastically received was the book in Christian Germany that its sales made Hitler a millionaire. And I don't think it was a coincidence that after the Yugoslavian conflict Serbia was the first country in Europe to pass a law mandating Creationism be taught in schools. Dear CHERFUL, Yes let's take abundance as a measure of God's blessings. United Arab Eremites, Qatar and Saudi Arabia swimming in oil, incredible wealth, site of the holy city of Mecca. Poverty rates far less than the Christian USA, far less of their citizens behind bars, better health outcomes, huge foreign workforces doing all the crap jobs. If you want to worship the God of wealth bow Eastward my friend. Dear runner, Christians worship the sign of a death device and you have the temerity to call Islam a death culture? Posted by csteele, Sunday, 16 September 2012 11:41:25 PM
| |
Sending people "home" is definitely not an option for those born here, and probably not an option for those with citizenship, despite hysteria from both sides.
We have existing laws where the guilty can be judged and punished. Also, history easily shows that Christianity - despite having a 300 year head start - has a vastly higher body count when it comes to killing people. Posted by wobbles, Monday, 17 September 2012 2:11:40 AM
| |
Quote: Christianity has a vastly higher body count
Well, maybe, but only if you restrict your data in both time (history) and space (geography) and accept the political to be the same as religious (not always true for the West, but a given for Islam). Consider the conquest of India by the religion of peace. A common number given is 80 million Hindus dead. Then there are the Buddhists, whose civilization had once extended from China to Afghanistan. For all purposes, all Buddhists west of the Ganges River were exterminated by the followers of Mohammed (then people wonder why people in Burma don’t like Muslims!) Here is a link about India about the magnitude of Muslim atrocities: http://www.voiceofdharma.org/books/siii/ch7.htm Do Muslims talk about this? No, of course not. Morality and forgiveness are for silly infidels. Muslims never talk about the evils they do or the barbaric acts of their dear prophet (“A noble example”) It would be wise to remember the words of historian Will Durant from his 1935 book The Story of Civilization: Our Oriental Heritage (page 459): “The Mohammedan Conquest of India is probably the bloodiest story in history. It is a discouraging tale, for its evident moral is that civilization is a precarious thing, whose delicate complex of order and liberty, culture and peace may at any time be overthrown by barbarians invading from without or multiplying within.” Did anyone else notice the sign the little 5-6 year old Muslim boy was holding in the Sidney protests? You know, the one saying to “Behead those that insult Islam.” How cute! Posted by kactuz, Monday, 17 September 2012 2:39:06 AM
| |
http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/politics/the-incredible-muslim-hulk-proves-to-be-no-friend-of-islam-either-20120916-260e8.html
An other red neck link? If you want, Sydney morning Herald. Every word true. We will see much more be insulted by our own even more often. See we dare to be us. Dare to use our freedom not as a weapon but to defend our selves from those who do. Those linked as csteete has told us to the Community that did this. Still will not enter the debate, what would be our fate, if we, any of us, marched in any Muslim country. Throwing rocks and bottles at police. How likely we would take our children to such events? A focus on education to hate and no real chance to consider the rest of the worlds rights. A need to be upset with such a pettiness? In time we will know we imported trouble, A blindness hiden within a faith that questions the faiths worth and those that see only our faults. Posted by Belly, Monday, 17 September 2012 4:56:54 AM
| |
http://www.smh.com.au/nsw/muslim-group-refuses-to-condemn-rioters-20120916-260mj.html
Yes another link. But this time from within the Muslim community. I saw the close to lie, we see many in defense of these folk. Christianity has its dead its child molesters, but only the Blind can say the world wide HATE generated over so little is not separate. Be firm, be honest but be aware,the very left will side even with mass murderers ,for much the same reason these poor fools shoot their own feet. To let them selves think they are part of a crowd. Last link? came to from within this community. The real hope comes from here, unfortunately hidden under the *it was wrong but* lie We teach Evolution, but in the case of this faith let SOME from with in it question our rights in a country that gave them a home. Say if you want less than the truth, I am wrong. But we would not be welcome in the country they come from and not safe for sure. Be aware! This faith thrives on lies. Posted by Belly, Monday, 17 September 2012 5:29:28 AM
| |
Well said, Kactuz
<<Consider the conquest of India by the religion of peace. A common number given is 80 million Hindus dead. Then there are the Buddhists, whose civilization had once extended from China to Afghanistan. For all purposes, all Buddhists west of the Ganges River were exterminated by the followers of Mohammed (then people wonder why people in Burma don’t like Muslims!) Here is a link about India about the magnitude of Muslim atrocities >> http://www.voiceofdharma.org/books/siii/ch7.htm For too long the true history of Islam has been suppressed. Wobbles, <<We have existing laws where the guilty can be judged and punished>> What’s the betting that we will soon start hearing from the usual sources: SBS/New Matilda/ABC, that the outbreak in Sydney was provoked by a police overreaction and entrenched racism in the force. Posted by SPQR, Monday, 17 September 2012 6:51:16 AM
| |
Islamic riot, Just another example of the stupidity of religions and how the superstitions of the devotees leads to outrages behavior. History is littered with the most grotesque and barbaric acts that mankind can inflict upon his fellow man, all in the name of god. All those who "believe" are to some degree, more or less, infected with the cancer of intolerance, hatred and loathing, it all goes hand in hand with the nonsense we call religion, be it Islamic, Christian or what ever brand you want to put on it. Religion, born in the dark ages and unfortunately has not as yet been consigned to the dust bin of history. I thank god, I am an atheist.
Posted by Paul1405, Monday, 17 September 2012 7:11:27 AM
| |
the stupidity of religions and how the superstitions of the devotees.
Paul1405, Considering that most of these crapheads are australian born it is actually a sad & sombre reflection of the education system which has been pushed & pushed & promoted to saturation point at every election since I can remember & I can remember back to McMahon's Government. Is this the result of the great education they receive & have access too ? I tell you why it is so. Kids get educated but they're not made to use their brains & learn because their teachers are just as simple. The other factor is the "successful" multicultural society here. Those who still insist that we should just let everyone who comes by boat into Australia. Well, you have been told by many countless times. Can you still not see ? The rot has started. Our TV is not helping either. The Law too is responsible for much of what's developing. Posted by individual, Monday, 17 September 2012 7:37:46 AM
| |
@ Individual,
<<Considering that most of these crapheads are australian born it is actually a sad & sombre reflection of the education system>> They need not have gone through the state education system . We now have any number of Islamic schools. And a teacher from one such school was recently killed in Syria (guess what sort of world view he’d have been espousing!) http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/nation/sydney-sheik-killed-in-syria-an-extremist/story-e6frg6nf-1226455271345 http://www.smh.com.au/nsw/sydney-sheikh-killed-in-syria-reports-20120821-24k0 @ Paul, Now, it’s easy to damn every one else’s sacred cows, but what of your own -- do you damn this holy roller also? http://tinyurl.com/9777x52 Posted by SPQR, Monday, 17 September 2012 8:01:51 AM
| |
SPQR, The TEA Party that is some kind of religion, made up of the extreme right christian lunatic fringe. Bought your 'protest' shirt yet. What hate message does it carry this week Ha Ha.
Posted by Paul1405, Monday, 17 September 2012 8:14:10 AM
| |
Kactuz; I read the link you gave, interesting.
http://www.voiceofdharma.org/books/siii/ch7.htm Where it was enlightening was that it puts the Pakistan/India problem into an historical context. It is interesting that the repercussions of a 14th century invasion can still echo down the centuries and result in a nuclear standoff. Should that not be a warning to us here & today ? Posted by Bazz, Monday, 17 September 2012 8:32:01 AM
| |
I believe that we can go on all, day every day, ranting and raving about a problem that we simply should NOT have!
It is time to examine the hard cold facts pertaining to these people. Are they the type of people that we really need in this country? Their religous and traditional ways are so much different to ours. Here, if people don`t want to join a Church or a religion, then so be it. There is no pressure applied to compel them to become a member of a faith, by coercion or the use of violence, so why should we allow these people, who have vastly differing religous principles, and in our eyes are simply religous zealots, who according to our standards practice stone-age traditions and habits, populate our shores? It is far too easy for Asylum Seekers to gain Australian Citizenship, and nothing disgusts me more than seeing an ethnic jibbering in their own language whilst waving a Naturalization Certificate,....the piece of paper that legally prevents them from being deported, regardless of whether they have even committed the most loathsome crime! The fabric of our way of life is NOT being accepted by these people, they are simply using it as an excuse to escape from their own "traditionally impoverished" way of life, to set up camp here amongst us, while continuing their own traditional religous way of life and getting all the benefits of the Australian citizenship, and having paid not one cent in tax towards that entitlement! This has to STOP now, before we are all compelled to conform to the Islamic ways in our own country and before we go broke paying for the mounting debt that has been created. If we do NOT heed the warning that this little movie "escapade" has created for us as a society, then we will perish under the weight of the Muslim population! Posted by Crackcup, Monday, 17 September 2012 8:54:34 AM
| |
Great comment here on the topic. Puts it all nicely into perspective about what the protests are really about.
http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/opinion/politics/the-incredible-muslim-hulk-proves-to-be-no-friend-of-islam-either-20120916-260e8.html Posted by StG, Monday, 17 September 2012 9:11:15 AM
| |
im seeing the old ones
the last leaseholders over these lands..sitting talking.. saying the ame things ..your all saying here...so they get police to shoot you..EURIKA* yes send the boat people home netherlands please..go hkme you brits exiles from your own HOMES this place is hell..it bel;ongs to satan we eecided..to send ..all of you home..or we do what you did to us sounds really xtian dont it one good student dont validate a good school nor nessesarilly a good teacher..would you be judged by the sins of your father? get over it..every ennnemy i sat down and talked with tried to know..became a life long friend we shared the same passions, ,for good or ill..we bought out the passions in each other..made us both better..[aty being ourself..than we were ourselves being..individually. or some thin like that Posted by one under god, Monday, 17 September 2012 9:13:54 AM
| |
Go monkeys go!
Pericles I tip my hat, I don't think there is much more to add. Except that it might be a good day to be listening to Ray Hadley today for the comedy value. That was a great article by Walleeeeeed Belly. I like that guy for some reason. Posted by Houellebecq, Monday, 17 September 2012 9:15:18 AM
| |
note to belly..i see that they go to their friday night
much like a unionist going on strike..leaving the union meeting all fired up yes govt should outlaw gatherinjgs ohh howard allready did..juliar aint recinded \nor reversed the trend..to fire up a mob..unions do it all the time.., pot kettle mr bell you been in the midst of a mob a unionists..a few times i hazard and lest we forget warfie murder..better or worse..is where we come from bomb them back to the stone age and the greens saying jonnie was weak so jonnie went to war..juliar hasnt bought them home stop dropping bombs on folks and they wont be set off to anger as easy CLEARLT THEY ARE UNDER FIGHT..or flight now who set that up? for what to make some more NIPS krauts..gooks,,.to go to war on these '10 beast.. by killing 10 million of them that LOOK the same..in the jewish armogeddon WHERE DOES THIS HATE END go home whitie! go home palistein go HOME TAMAL-IES..but wait they got no home just war war monger/COLONISERS to busy..LOOTING AND PLUNDERING IT..yeah dont worry be happy here come armogeddon and you guys set the beat..beating the drums of murder Posted by one under god, Monday, 17 September 2012 9:23:52 AM
| |
Csteele, the Nazis were not exactly religious. They also tried to
kill communists, marxists, gypsies, British, Russians and anyone else who might stand in their way. The Jews were seen as a race, not as a religion and were despised because of their business practises, more than anything. All this is quite different from Islam, where for instance Ayatollah Kohmeini and others made it quite plain that Islam was in fact a violent religion. Why you have such trouble with understanding the reality of that and try to go into denial about it, beats me. Posted by Yabby, Monday, 17 September 2012 9:33:17 AM
| |
im not picking on a cheerfull quote/;;''If the Moslems are so blessed by God,..then how come so many of these Moslem countries are so overpopulated, poor and miserable compared to the abundance, freedoms and great way of life in Western countries?""
oh dear clearly your from a single family never known the joys of family..even on a bombed out ruin and a dirt floor they wash 5 times a day we wash maybe twice..or hide under powerfull bad oder covering as if our poop dont stink..i live in suburbia,..it take 20 minutes by car to get anywhere they live cheek by jowel..everyone knows everyone they tak at least 5 times a day..we last talked 9 weeks ago yeah their barbarians we adicts at watchinbg ammuasment..and other sex reoplacemengts..and they dont take any drugs we lorded over by drunks/lawyer's but back to your...?..opinion ""Looks to me as though God has blessed the Western countries not the Moslem countries. Isn’t that obvious."" yes it is..i see you really beliueve things are more important than living beings..WITH PASSIONS..not dulled by drugs this is where your drug war on drug USERS reveals the truth were just too stoned,,to care..so the drug lord cia..rendition drugs globally its them giving them money legalise drugs..by whole sale off farmers not criminals payiong for covert wars..on dug funbing..which is the whjole reasion behind the drug war but also keep us in the labling mode thatys not a man..thays a druggie a nip a louse jap or a pew-tred whitie..ITS ALL THE SAME DIVED AND LOOT* colonisers stealing that not theirs if usa thinks its going to get gold yet again..when it kills the gold hoarders..give the gold to the poor..not bombs Posted by one under god, Monday, 17 September 2012 9:39:05 AM
| |
Kactus, Your 2005 post was spot on and I will save it for future reference.
It is now obvoius that the attacks on US embassies was planned and the riots about a film are only an excuse to show their disdain and contempt for our western civilization. We have welcomed all cultures into Aus and these riots show us just how much some appreciate it. They have no interest in our country and only contempt for our society. There is evidence aplenty that we need to stop the immigration of those who refuse to integrate and this measage must be made clear to Canberra. Forget the illogical ideology of multiculturalism and work toward making a cohesive community. These muslim rioters are third generation Aussies who have been indocrinated by their parents, as the pic of the child with the placard shows. They begin the hatred in the cradle. We cannot deport them, but we can stop more entering which is the message that has to be taken to Canberra. Posted by Banjo, Monday, 17 September 2012 10:40:40 AM
| |
PM calls Islamic protest ‘un-Australian’. Will that's what the headline says, with quotes, but I think the actual quote was, in reality land, 'Not the Australian Way'.
Apparently correct quoting is out of fashion with 'journalists', or more likely sub-editors are actually monkeys. But it does bring me back to a time, when a father figure of the right, one John Winston Rodent Howard, was hated by the left for his 'Un-Australian' bandying, while the right accused them of being 'Howard haters'. The right must have been right, as there is not even a hint of discontent with Ms Gillard bandying it about, whistling to the same dogs. Now, when will the left denounce the 'Un-Australian' bandying Gillard? Or would that be misogynistic? Posted by Houellebecq, Monday, 17 September 2012 10:52:18 AM
| |
Anyone been to the TEA Party (Australia) web site, like these religious fools they are caught up in a mind set of hateful bigotry. An off shoot of the US party of the same name, feeding on peoples fears and insecurities, doing their best to insight division in the community. Naturally this mob hold strong religious views, all part of their negative "program". Their aim is control of society something akin to National Socialism but with a religious flavor.
Posted by Paul1405, Monday, 17 September 2012 11:15:50 AM
| |
We were equally disgusted with the CFMEU thugs in Melbourne recently.
Every group has thugs. The only thing that i did not like was the lady spokes person who was on Radio National the next day. She keep saying that "the Muslim community don't support their actions..it is against the teaching of the Koran"...She said this about 20 times and she missed the point. We dont care if the actions are against the teaching of the bible or playboy. They are against the law and what she should say is that they are "unacceptable in Australia, our home as they are against the law." They need to understand that when someone is killed or raped we dont say that their action is against the 10 Commandments. Get religion out. Any one who breaks the law should cop it and anyone who lives here needs to understand that they buy into a "contract of citizens" that rides above all religions. Yes and the Catholic Church and all of their priests need to understand this! We need to be FANATICALLY anti-fanatical. We need to get this citizens contract clear. Posted by complex, Monday, 17 September 2012 11:30:05 AM
| |
Neither is acceptable behaviour for protest in a democracy, but we have forgotten that there is precedence of course… But in a true Australian way, deserving of the capital 'r' in Riot.
Those returned soldiers in Queensland knew how to do it properly with the Red Flag Riots. (I'm ignoring the Newcastle Star Hotel riot on the basis it was legitimate because it involved a pub – and a song was written about it.) Posted by WmTrevor, Monday, 17 September 2012 12:14:39 PM
| |
Well you Politically Correct, Greenie, Do-Gooders, this is your thanks, and, you are campaigning for more of the same people to be let loose in Australian Society.
I'm waiting for all the do-gooders on this Forum to come in & make excuses for the riots. Crying that it's all the fault of Australians racism. NO MORE MUSLIMS! & those here that have not got Citizenship, straight back to where they came from. Posted by Jayb, Monday, 17 September 2012 12:36:25 PM
| |
Right on cue, Jayb : )
This should have been called "The No More Muslims" thread. Pericles called it accurately. Posted by Poirot, Monday, 17 September 2012 12:47:31 PM
| |
The funny thing about this situation.
The film that they are protesting over portrays Mohammed as he actually was. He was a warlord with absolute power over his subjects. He married a six (some say 9) year old girl. Held numerous executions. Anybody that doubted that he was talking to Allah (God) was executed. Posted by ponde, Monday, 17 September 2012 12:59:01 PM
| |
Quote: “The only thing that i did not like was the lady spokes person who was on Radio National the next day. She keep saying that "the Muslim community don't support their actions..it is against the teaching of the Koran"...She said this about 20 times”
Oh? It is against the teachings of the Quran, is it? Well, well. Maybe she should actually read the Quran before saying such BS. There are several hundred verses in the Quran that teach hate and violence toward non-Muslims and about twelve that say somewhat nice things about us. Guess which they quote to us? Here are just a few of the heavenly treasures that Allah sent down to Mohammed… these include verses that tell Muslims to not be friends with those evil non-Muslims (3:28; 5:51), verses to attack and kill others (2:286; 3:148, 47:35; 9:73; 9:123; 48:29), and verses that say infidels are stupid and evil (3:110-111; 25:44; 8:55; 98:6; 2:171) and so on… Maybe these are harmless sayings, with no consequence, or maybe they explain the almost universal hate, discrimination and violence against non-Muslims in Islamic societies – and the antagonism against non-Muslims in host countries where Muslims have migrated to flee from the problems they have created in their own societies. Then they come to the West and they bring their vile prophet in their hearts. What could go wrong? Does anybody think that these people are going to get kicked out of the mosque? Next Friday they will be praying in the front row, their rear-ends higher than the rest, farting on our values and traditions. Posted by kactuz, Monday, 17 September 2012 1:03:01 PM
| |
Another post from 2005, after the London bombings. Irfan, a Muslim writer here at OLO, said I was a “hater”. My response:
Irfan… You think I hate you? If you want to find hate, look at Muslim web sites or Imams throughout the Islamic world. Try to understand that if a person does not agree with Islam and argues against it as a belief, it is not hate. This is called “freedom of speech” because of “differences of opinion”. What I feel towards Muslims can best be described as “despair”. As for Islam, the proper word would be “contempt”. I dislike it as a belief; but even that is not the problem. The issue is not bad theology but that Islam is dangerous to the health of progressive societies. Have you ever asked yourself what is wrong with Islam? Why do Muslims have so many problems other groups or religions don’t seem to have? Google “Muslims” “Europe” and “crime” or “rape” or substitute any other country. Have you ever seen a Buddhist having to say “Buddhism is a religion of peace”? Why is crime among Hindu immigrants a small fraction of that among Muslims in England? Do you ever wonder why so many Muslims want out of Islamic countries? Remember those poor 400 souls that drowned off Australia several years ago… They were from every Islamic country on the map. Tell me, Irfan, do you have a clue? As Muslims move to the West they use our freedoms to subvert our institutions. I quote Tony Parkinson (The Age): “The compact under multiculturalism is that each community within a society must have the freedom to sustain its own identity, traditions and culture. But there is a quid pro quo and that involves universal acceptance of a broad system of shared values…. Multiculturalism is at a moment of truth. The drift from melting-pot altruism into salad-bowl separatism has morphed into something more sinister: the existence within Western cultures of a hostile religious sect that renounces absolutely the principles on which our societies are structured.” http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?article=3651&page=0#10907 Posted by kactuz, Monday, 17 September 2012 1:14:12 PM
| |
poirot,
I reckon you are wrong. If there was the remotest suggestion of a conspirosy, Arjay's radar would have picked it up. Has pericles taken over from Arjay as our conspirosy theorist? Nah, the muslims have just used the film as an excuse to vent their hatred again, just like they did with the silly catoons. We should not have to put up with it, but it is our fault, we should choose our immigrants more carefully. Posted by Banjo, Monday, 17 September 2012 1:18:47 PM
| |
They really love us....
Take a look at this: http://www.muslimsrise.com/flyer.html Look at the posters... Read the text... Watch the videos... Quote: In this volatile and fast changing political climate, Hizb ut-Tahrir Australia will convene its major annual conference to address these uprisings, what the potential results are, the method for true Islamic change and the false ideas and approaches that will lead only to failure. Hizb ut-Tahrir Australia invites you to join us in not only looking at the Muslims world of today, but in casting our eyes forward and looking towards the Muslim world of tomorrow under the shade of Islam insha Allah. And they tell us these people contribute to Australia and enrich our lives.... This is how they repay kindness. Now we know why the riot ended so quickly -- they had to make it to the conference. Posted by kactuz, Monday, 17 September 2012 1:25:23 PM
| |
Csteele
(First let me say my assertion was in response to the moslems that said our dead were going to hell whereas their dead were going to paradise.) when I said “abundance, freedoms and great way of life in Western countries?” I was not talking soley solely about wealth, I was also talking about enlightenment and freedoms in Western cultures. I for one would not like to be a woman in Saudi Arabia, although I think they are better than some moslem countries. Women in these countries are just used as birthing incubators for men and don’t have much freedom to choose otherwise. The moslem leaders ignore the fact That human overpopulation is the driving force behind most of the worlds discontent and environmental troubles. Like the extinction of lions and tigers and green house gases. Overpopulation is also driving starvation and ethnic genocide resulting in the millions of refugees in the world. Their attitude is, don’t worry Allah will fix it all. Maybe Allah is waiting for them to show some sense and lend him a practical helping hand in fixing it themselves, considering the contraceptive pill, plus other methods have been available for at least 40years. Do they ever consider that Allah may wonder why they are so foolish in destroying the earth that can’t support these big populations? I think the riots in Sydney and around the world are driven by fear. Fear of the truth. A lot of people in history have not wanted the truth to be the truth, even the Christian church in earlier times when they locked up the fellow who dared to say the earth wasn’t flat but round. But the truth, is the truth, is the truth, no matter how much people may not want it to be. Posted by CHERFUL, Monday, 17 September 2012 1:35:35 PM
| |
This thread was posted at 4.09 PM on the 15th. I have only just received it at 7.30 on the 17th. That's why I'm a bit late with my input. 16 pages of reading to do. I'm only half way through reading as yet.
I see the Do- gooders have come to the defence of the rioters already. I suppose Lexi & co were in the mob chanting their support too. The excuse that this is only the fanatic fringe does not wash. All Muslims believe that Shari a is the only Law they are willing to acknowledge. That being peaceful only applies to Muslims not to Infidels. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=maHSOB2RFm4 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QGVLKW7ixjU&feature=relmfu http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3yNrxYewhi0&feature=related http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LvhDoFDGq6M&feature=related http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZvHt94EGrac&feature=related The last one is Muslims plan for Australia. Interesting. I know you won’t waste your time watching these Lexi. You have said you won’t watch anything that disproves your arguement. Posted by Jayb, Monday, 17 September 2012 1:42:00 PM
| |
UnderoneGod
“yeah their barbarians we adicts at watchinbg ammuasment..and other sex reoplacemengts..and they dont take any drugs” Excuse me!, but those from Moslem religions are known for the fact that they rape every woman from other areas in sight,every time they commit ethnic violence. Maybe they would do better to watch sex and allow more sexual freedom in their countries so they wouldn’t be so rabid. How much rape actually goes on in Moslem socities?. If you ask me it is probably open slather, because they know it is the poor little girl or woman who will be killed or punished and not them, and so women probably have to keep all the rapes quiet. Open slather. They don't have date rape in Moslem societies they have State rape, because of forced marriages and no justice for victims or rape. As for the Tamils. You can’t blame the colonialists for them. These people are fleeing a tribal War they fought in Sri Lanka, to separate that country into 2 countries.(a separate state). The Tamils immigrated to Sri Lanka from India at least a couple of centuries ago and then eventually decided they wanted a piece of that country for themselves. The Sri Lankan indigenous population endured a 20year gorilla war fought by these Tamil Tigers before they finally routed them in recent times. Poor Tamils my fat fanny. Probably get stoned to death for saying my fat fanny in public in an Islamic country. Grow up Islamic fundamentalists. Why are you so afraid of sex, didn’t Allah create your sexual organs. Did he make a mistake in doing this? Posted by CHERFUL, Monday, 17 September 2012 1:59:57 PM
| |
several people minninizing the fact that 25 of our fine police were assaulted. They also excuse union thugs when they do the same thing but castagate people who hold up signs protesting against a deceitful tax. The left are blind to their own anger/violence.
Posted by runner, Monday, 17 September 2012 2:01:25 PM
| |
Banjo,
My point being that it's humans who have a steak of insanity running through them. Good old "group-think" - anything that pushes the "hysteria" button gets things moving to a greater or a lesser extent - to a greater extent in the riot - to a lesser extent on this thread. Driven by fear mostly.... Posted by Poirot, Monday, 17 September 2012 2:34:07 PM
| |
This whole thing is sick now you have an 8 year old girl getting up in front of the Sydney conference spewing out this.
Quote "urged all Muslim youth to fight for the restoration of the Islamic caliphate, a single global government for all Muslims established under strict sharia law" ALSO Quote "she yearns to once again live under the banner of (the Islamic state)" I will gladly send Juliar an email saying she can use my taxes to pay for this girl and her family to go home where the parents originally came from. $10 says they would not go Posted by Philip S, Monday, 17 September 2012 2:36:54 PM
| |
URL for story
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/nation/girl-8-calls-on-islamic-youth-to-back-jihad/story-e6frg6nf-1226475239074 Posted by Philip S, Monday, 17 September 2012 2:37:55 PM
| |
Islam as a general rule does not advocate democracy.
This is because they do not make a distinction between religion and politics. Religion is politics and politics is religion. The aim is to establish the Caliphate over all the world or whatever part they can dominate to enable sharia law to be implemented. The Caliphate is a religious government. So when a moslem swears allegiance to Australia in a naturalisation, ceremony they do not mean it. It is just a means to an end. They pay taxes and obey the law (mostly) only because they have no choice, while they await the caliphate to be established. Posted by Bazz, Monday, 17 September 2012 2:45:46 PM
| |
Just a general comment on Semitic peoples…………they are not good neighbours when they achieve critical mass. Most Semitic people come from the Middle East, with the exception of the few that travelled to Europe over a thousand years ago, the best known of these groups are the Ashkenazi Jews.
Semitic tribes, and they are still tribes, embrace a culture whose rules were laid down over two thousand years ago. They fight amongst themselves as much as they struggle against outsiders and tribal group thinking pervades the society. I recall how the European Jews who inherited Israel in 1948 violently protested when Ethiopian Jews tried to immigrate to Israel. Later it was the Russian Jews who did not fit the bill and were and still are ostracized in Yiddish and Orthodox Israel cultures. In most Semitic nations you have a culture divided, even the Mohammadans who never kicked off until 700AD found a divider for their new societies….Sunni or Shia. The point is that the Arab brother is only a brother if he is on your team, if not you can kill him, and they do regularly. So the expectation that they will accept an infidel or adopt the infidel’s culture or rules is post grad dreamtime. TBC Posted by sonofgloin, Monday, 17 September 2012 3:04:01 PM
| |
Please do not recount to me about the Arabs or Jews who you have know for decades and they are ordinary folks, like yourself, because you are naively wrong. They are ordinary folks, but there is one major difference. You can never be like them because as they perceive it because you are not from their tribe, and as simplistic as that sounds it is fact and the primary fact that gives them their identity as a people and you are totally alien to it.
Multiculturalism has failed, but a multinational society that primary adheres to one culture but with grafts from the home country added works beautifully and enriches the host culture. We have seen it in the New World Countries such as America, Canada, and here in Australia. I have the vaguest of memories of the post WWII immigration intake, it was the first time I heard Australian spoken with an accent, except at the local Chinese restaurant. Then the supposedly dreaded hordes from South East Asia and Vietnam invaded us and became great citizens, who embrace Aussie culture while keeping their roots. Then we imported the Muslims, the Semites, and we received exactly the afore described cultural character traits that sees chaos and upheaval as the norm rather than co existence. But it is a critical mass thing, they will wait before becoming vocal and demanding, it's starting now. Posted by sonofgloin, Monday, 17 September 2012 3:04:10 PM
| |
Hi Lexi,
Thank you for your post, it sort of sums up ... I don't know .... a certain perspective ? I was intrigued by your comment: "presenting images of signs about beheadings fits in with some people's images of Islam." It does indeed. So why were such posters being carried, some by children ? As you elaborate: "It conjures forth images of women behind veils, of adulterers being stoned, of thieves having their hands cut off, of public floggings and executions,of martyrdom in holy wars, and, in extreme cases, of political fanaticism exemplified in aircraft hijackings and terrorist bombings." Yes, indeed they do. And do these terrible things happen ? Yes ? No ? And who does these terrible things ? Are Muslims forced or brainwashed or tricked into doing these things by the US ? Or do some quite devout Muslims do these terrible things of their own free will ? With respect, Lexi, you left out the Khalifa, the yearning for a Caliphate, the fusion of 'church' and state, the Will of Allah enacted on Earth, in every country if possible, and a return to seventh century society, with (one presumes) modern technology, camels plus air-conditioning. And regrettably, dear, when the Caliphate is imposed, unless you and I agree to convert, we will have to be extracted, subtracted from the ideal society. [Sounds a bit Stalinist, don't you think ?] In other words: Beheaded. Yes ? No ? Islam as a religion of peace ? Yes, indeed, for believers. For others, well, ..... Peace be with you, Lexi, with equality and justice for all :) Joe Posted by Loudmouth, Monday, 17 September 2012 3:17:18 PM
| |
tacit cak tire/quote..
..""Here are just a few..of the heavenly treasures that Allah sent..down to Mohammed…these include verses..that tell Muslims to not be friends..with those evil non-Muslims(3:28;""... LET NOT..'the believers'..TAKE FOR FRIENDs or helpers.. [as in a mate or serrvant.. ie ..UNBELIEVERS OVER BELIEVERS*"" yes i agree thats racist but heck we got mates/rates.. let ye without sin not cast stones so lets go to 5:51), """OH YOU WHO BELIEVE>>DO NOT TAKE..*the jews/xtians.. ..for friend/protector"" ""you will learn in time NO ONE protects"" it all sounded so mean ..but really its just insider trading help friends..BEFORE ..not ..NOT FRIENDLY* but back to the cak to us.. """than the rest, ""farting on our values and traditions. Posted by kactuz, Monday, 17 September""... yeah i feel the love MATE* peace not pieces IF WE GO TO ARMOGEDDON..at least base that on truth you decieve me... mate..once ...twice shame on you* i know ye by your words your works cant be much better cheerrs big ears Posted by one under god, Monday, 17 September 2012 4:13:10 PM
| |
Dear CHERFUL,
Gee whiz now you really have got yourself in a lather. Bile and invective have seen truth shown the door? Fear and ignorance were not good enough for you so you thought outright racism was the ticket? Well lets do a little de-constructing shall we. You said; “Women in these countries are just used as birthing incubators for men and don’t have much freedom to choose otherwise.” The countries I mentioned were Saudi Arabia (fertility rate – 2.26), Qatar (fertility rate – 1.93) and United Arab Emirates (fertility rate – 2.38). Compare that to Israel with a fertility rate of 2.67, markedly higher than the other three. Okay lets put that down to plain old ignorance. This one is racist claptrap though; “but those from Moslem religions are known for the fact that they rape every woman from other areas in sight,every time they commit ethnic violence” Who was it who set up the rape camps in Bosnia? It was the Christians you clown. Actually that's probably a little harsh, you certainly are not as bad as some of the knock-kneed types posting here but that is hardly something to be proud of. What if we dial it back a touch and you tell me whether or not you thought a protest of any kind was permissible over the film? If so what is the form it should have taken? Posted by csteele, Monday, 17 September 2012 4:36:22 PM
| |
csteele again showing his deceit and distortion
'Who was it who set up the rape camps in Bosnia? It was the Christians you clown. ' No doubt endorsed by Jesus csteele. What you conveniently ignore that many Muslims also label you 'Christian' simply because you are from the West even know you hate the freedom bible beleiving Christians have given you. Posted by runner, Monday, 17 September 2012 4:54:54 PM
| |
Good afternoon to you all...
I'm beginning to think Topics of this kind amount to a 'Health Hazard'. I don't know about many of you good people, but these issues do tend to make me just a little angry and very sad. One soul who kindly offered a solution herein, stated inter alia '...send 'em back from where that came from...'. A great idea except, some of the most violent among them, were actually born here. And others, you can't send them back, because their country of origin won't have them. So what do we do ? There's a nice place by the seaside, at Malabar. With ample sea breezes, and quite close to the City and all amenties. So why don't we simply lock them up. Lock them up for a long time. Trouble is, to find a Magistrate or Judge with sufficient 'ticker' to do this, that's the real trick, unfortunately. Perhaps we should meekly, just surrender the country to them. Apparently, one was quoted as saying '...soon we'll own you all...' or similar words. Anyway, I'm sure one of our fine, erudite, and immensly strong politician's will come along and protect us all. I wonder ? Posted by o sung wu, Monday, 17 September 2012 5:14:08 PM
| |
Sonofgloin,
There's actually a formula or a sort of program worked out regarding Muslim colonisation, that's what these guys with the beards and robes are after all, they're not here to "enrich" our lives or share what we have, they are a vanguard. http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2054258/posts Don't worry so much about the violent protests, be concerned about the non violent protests and activism, we all know who was acting out on Saturday, Lebanese "Gangsta" youths who wouldn't be able to tell a sura from a submarine. It starts with ten, then it's a hundred and then you have thousands of Muslims on the street as they did in Ukraine last month: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OzxrXsow4Dk The problem is that our current crop of politicians are too weak and cowardly to stand up to accusations of "Racism", they'll give in to this "minority" of Muslims, they always give in to minority groups. Posted by Jay Of Melbourne, Monday, 17 September 2012 5:20:48 PM
| |
csteele,
This is not about a past history of inhumanity that you want to justify as your distorted posirion. It is about a current group of malcontents not knowing how to voice opposition by the intelligent use of words.They use violence against our police as a form of justification of their cause against the Coptic Christians, which they do against the innocent Copts in Egypt. Posted by Josephus, Monday, 17 September 2012 5:25:29 PM
| |
Remember the true left are involved too.
And ignore them, they betray us. Let us look, what was the film/trailer? junk of little interest, much worse appears in Muslim sites aimed at us, their western hosts. Why has it spread so fast, the pork chops wanted it to, even put in it their own dialects. What has it got to do with America, Australia, Germany? NOTHING. They want confrontation, they thrive on being the victim, even if it is only in the empty space between their ears. This country must stop the UN experiment, the spread the problem all over the world to fix it. Their belief and ours their culture and ours are not ever going to work together. They do not want it to they want to rule. Tell me, both sides of politics in the western world are saying it this world wide event, staged savagery is unacceptable, why are some trying to bury it l8ike a dog on a beach? Pay for one way tickets home to all who want it and take not one more in ever. Posted by Belly, Monday, 17 September 2012 5:30:55 PM
| |
Well as some seem to be advocating we could get ultra-nationalistic about this. China over the last couple of days seems to be a good place to see how to do this properly. Lets take the law into our own hands.
http://imgur.com/a/Y7oIp It is just a pity more Muslim countries don't make cars for us to smash and burn, and what is the Sushi shop equivalent? Perhaps the local kerbab kiosk? Damn frustrating isn't it. I know, the Mosques seem like the best place to start. Flaming torches tonight? Pathetic. Posted by csteele, Monday, 17 September 2012 6:05:08 PM
| |
Belly,
The "Left" will stand and fight on the side of the Muslims against their own people, Socialist Alternative have already called for their members to unite with Muslims against "Racism" and Police brutality, they copped some flak for their initial report but now thy've published this unhinged call to arms/rant. http://www.sa.org.au/index.php?option=com_k2&view=item&id=7493:why-we-stand-with-muslim-protesters&Itemid=393 In the U.K the Leftist group UAF mobilises gangs of ethnic youths to do battle with what they call "Fascists", white football firms, Nationalists like the BNP and NF and even harmless conservatives. I doubt we'll see a "Muslim" terrorist attack in this country but I expect to see a resurgence Leftist terror of the sort we saw in the 1970's with the Red Army Faction, IRA, PLO, ANC, Revolutionare Zellen etc. These Lebanese, Somali and Afghan immigrant "Yoof" are not good prospects for the Jihadis, they're to dumb and unreliable but they'll make perfect little street fighters and rioters for Leftist groups and Black Bloc formations. Posted by Jay Of Melbourne, Monday, 17 September 2012 6:05:43 PM
| |
Definitely not the Australian way. Real Aussies riot over dodgy umpiring decisions.
Cheers, Tony Posted by Tony Lavis, Monday, 17 September 2012 6:09:00 PM
| |
Csteel, a valid point, demonizing a culture for their differing social standards is wrong, as is forcing your culture over anothers culture is wrong, and that is what the agenda is regarding the Muslims. What is ludicrously wrong though, is a targeted victim defending the Muslims right to attempt it, any advocacy of Muslim migration is a naïve ideological perspective.
About the Muslim by boat influx and the mindset of the Aussie advocates. It is similar to the Stockholm Syndrome, but rather than forming an interpersonal relationship, advocates of Muslim migration have formed an ideological social stewardship with the young wolves wearing life jackets, unlike the women and children they sail and sometimes sink with, and that is an observed fact not a demeaning comment. The male is king in their culture, should be that way here...lol. A mosque in every third suburb is a reality in Europe, Muslims have and will outbreed the Europeans and it is only two generations in....I don't want my children to be a minority to a doctrine written two thousand year ago where public beheadings and stoning carried out by the clergy is happening as we speak. I don't want a doctrine that has overseen the stagnation of the Middle East over the past 1500 years emerge as a world dominator because of the ridiculous number of children these tribal women pop out. TBC Posted by sonofgloin, Monday, 17 September 2012 6:12:58 PM
| |
The only mitigating circumstance I can entertain regarding the humanitarian issues of Middle East is that the west has exploited and manipulated it since the first oil exploration contract was signed. We backed tyrants against the people choice of tyrant. The passage of commerce came before the welfare and betterment of the people, and that is the West’s fault.
To be precise it is the fault of global financiers and the west has recently become a victim of their greed as the Middle East has. But Muslims in numbers change the dynamic….their way or ongoing hostility, that is their credo and if you don't understand that you are hopelessly judgment impaired. Western women who advocate Muslim migration should spend a year in any of the Middle East countries, at pleb level. I have two sisters, who are nursing sisters, and both spent over a decade working in Middle Eastern hospitals. They regularly gave me a firsthand perspective of what it is like to wear the full covering everywhere except in their units the hospital and other Western compounds. They were regularly stopped in the street when they ventured to the supermarket. Often pulled over when in taxi’s by mosque guys on motor scooters who identify them as Christian or Caucasian and their MANY run ins with the Religious Police, again a bunch of yobbo's from the local mosque....I wouldn't want to be a woman there......and some want that here. Posted by sonofgloin, Monday, 17 September 2012 6:13:06 PM
| |
Dear Josephus,
What is my distorted position? I'm seething the video was put out in the first place. I'm also seething that a group of malcontents in Sydney escalated a protest injuring police. I am disgusted that a young child should be holding up placards calling for beheadings. But I will not allow this events to be used by others to heighten racial tensions in my country without a response from me. Ratcheting this up is only going to mean more social division. These are our citizens and our problem. How our country handles this and how it lives up to the kind of values I believe we stand for is hugely important to me. It should be for you too. Posted by csteele, Monday, 17 September 2012 6:21:25 PM
| |
csteele writes
'These are our citizens and our problem' Yes created by those blinded to the ideology that has stuffed many countries in Europe by demonizing anyone who spoke the truth. We know its our problem created by the apologist for a religion with a history of causing havoc everywhere it is allowed to. Posted by runner, Monday, 17 September 2012 9:29:57 PM
| |
csteel: These are our citizens and our problem. How our country handles this and how it lives up to the kind of values I believe we stand for is hugely important to me. It should be for you too.
Ahh, csteel, how I do love you. Now please enlighten the rest of us as to just what your solution would be for this situation. Please don't tell us it's not your job. As you have said, "These are our citizens and our problem." So you have made this your problem too. Your ideas would be most enlightening, I'm sure. Then we all could discuss it over a glass of fine whine. Posted by Jayb, Monday, 17 September 2012 9:53:57 PM
| |
*to a greater extent in the riot - to a lesser extent on this thread.
Driven by fear mostly....* Oh I am not so sure of that, Poirot. More like it was just a quiet newsday and no other interesting threads on OLO :) I don't think that you need fear wearing a burqa just yet, but there is no doubt that if Australia imports lots of migrants from Islamic countries, the outcome will be quite different then if they came from say Buddhist countries. Given that I am an open critic of the Catholic Church, I see no reason why Islam should somehow be excempt from the discussion. We give Runner a fair bit of stick over his religion, but if he were to walk around Sydney with his kids carrying posters that we should be beheaded for criticising Jesus, I am sure the debate would be pretty lively too! I cannot be expected to respect what people believe, but simply their right to believe it Posted by Yabby, Monday, 17 September 2012 9:57:10 PM
| |
As I recall, the previous government took the word Multiculture out of the Immigration portfoilio, and was just going to let the ideology of MC die out. The current PM has raised the issue publicly a couple of times but there has been a lack of public interest. These riots will further deminish public support for MC ideology.
So I am looking forward to a change of government and see MC dead and buried. Then work on the introduction of selective immigration, which excludes those groups that have shown us they cannot/will not integrate. I would also like to see immigration reduced to net zero, but with big busness donating to both major parties, that will not be forthcoming. I goes without saying that tough enough policies will be implemented to stop the illegals. Usually nothing comes quickly in the political world and I have been an advocate against MC for 30 years, so a win there would be welcome. The election is only about 13 months away. With luck we will survive till then. Posted by Banjo, Monday, 17 September 2012 11:04:42 PM
| |
It's pretty sad to see that the only dissent against those opposed to Islamic colonisation has been reduced to "Well Christians are worse!", it really goes to show that all this drama, all the anti racism, the Anti White, anti Australian, pro immigrant screeching has been for nothing.
I shows that when confronted with reality the reality of a mother in Hijab taking happy snaps of her toddler holding one of those behead the unbeliever signs the "bleeding hearts" just have nothing to back their case for "tolerance", all they can do is say "Christians caused the holocaust and srebrenica!" http://fbcdn-sphotos-e-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash3/582420_10151014458245044_73712388_n.jpg Posted by Jay Of Melbourne, Monday, 17 September 2012 11:16:34 PM
| |
"Some" of you people seem incapable of understanding that the VAST majority of Muslims worldwide, and in Australia, are NOT Muslim fundamentalists.
Until very recent centuries, fundamentalist Christianity was just as evil and cruel and violent and controlling as fundamentalist Islam. It took fundamentalist Christianity several hundred years to transform itself and become more civilised. Traditional fundamentalist Muslim regions, by chance, were originally not part of the industrial revolution, and thus missed out on the benefits of a MUCH better and freer life over the past several hundred years. It took us hundreds of years to free ourselves from fundamentalist Christianity, and we can't expect fundamentalist Muslim regions to do in decades what took us hundreds of years. Most Muslims in fundamentalist regions have fundamentalism FORCED on them. Most of them utterly despise and detest ancient Sharia law .... it's hard for a person to object or speak out when you're faced with the point of a gun, the end of the whip and daily, rigid control. The VAST majority of worldwide Muslims in all free countries, are EXACTLY the same as anyone else in their countries, except they are Muslims, and they hold many diverse opinions on all subjects .... just like the Christians, atheists, Jews, Buddhists, agnostics etc in the same countries. The ignorant amongst us love to demonise Muslims in general, based on the actions of a tiny, fundamentalist Muslim minority. Typical Aussie paranoia. Yep, we get this paranoia with EVERY generation .... anti Greeks, then anti Italian, anti Arab, then anti Oriental, then anti African, now anti anything remotely Muslim. Luckily "most" Aussies are not like this, and have more brains, more maturity, more intelligence and more humanity. Posted by DiamondPete, Tuesday, 18 September 2012 12:59:48 AM
| |
Diamond,
It may be a "tiny, fundamentalist Muslim minority" that does this, but they do it with the board consent of the majority. Look at Islamic societies, if you have doubts. And it is not forced, it is part of their culture. From their mother's milk, the hatred is fed to them, they go from holding "behead signs" to sermons about evil infidels to riots in the streets and some go on to do just what Quran 9:111 tells them to do. Look it up! Tell me, Diamond, have you ever sat down with a Muslim and asked them about the hate and anger in the Quran? Have you ever asked a Muslim to justify (or apologize for ...) the attacks and murders Mohammad did on innocent peaceful people? I have, and I cannot get a straight, simple answer. It seems that Muslims have no notion of morality as we understand it; and that if Mohammad did it (murder, torture, rape, plunder, killing, etc.) it can't really be condemned, only excused or ignored. And these are Muslims in the West, the ones you say are "EXACTLY the same as anyone else". Sure they care, except that Christians, atheists, Jews, Buddhists, agnostics will condemn murder of innocents, rape, torture and enslavement of men women and children, no matter who does it. Try to get a Muslim to condemn these actions when done by their dear prophet, their great moral example if they want to get to paradise (that is directly from the Quran, in case you don't know). Oh, by the way, the Quran permits murder, rape of captives, plunder and slavery. As to torture, it even gives specific hints on how to do it. Stop making excuses for ignorance and evil. Where do you think the people who make the stupid video got their material, duhh? Posted by kactuz, Tuesday, 18 September 2012 1:45:23 AM
| |
CSteele, so you were offended by this stupid video...
Fine, but please tell me if a you are offended by people that honor and love a man that did so many vile deeds? Are you offended by evil, or does it depend on who is doing the evil? Mohammed did about 50 raids on his neighbors, going out to plunder, kill, capture and enslave men women and children (raping the females, of course). This is a man that fought about a dozen battles of which only 1 1/2 were defensive (the Battle of the Trench and the Battle near Medina). Do you think it is OK for a people to pretend that these things didn't happen or that they are not significant? Are you offended by the hate and discrimination against non-Muslims in Islamic societies, or is that just "part of their culture" and move along? So you are offended by anti-Muslims videos but not the actual accounts of violence that the filmmakers use, from Islam's own sources? An old man taking a little girl from among her friends when playing with dolls to have intercourse is fine, but mentioning it in a video offends you. I think I have said enough. Posted by kactuz, Tuesday, 18 September 2012 2:04:36 AM
| |
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/bringing-dark-ages-to-the-streets-of-sydney/story-e6frf7jo-1226476162765
Morning Kactuz, glad to see I am not the only insomniac. My link is well worth the read. The video is was always will be a childish/feeble thing of no value. Some one took the thing converted it to a weapon, from within the Muslim world? And bought it to the attention of a world uninterested. It is zero, nothing, nil, compared to the HATE generated on ten thousand anti west pages you will find if you only look. csteele? read past blind support, past references to anti Lebanese posts. Above all, with or without this film all this HATRED towards the west, is and has been building up,for centurys. At least we get now to see it, and we have been warned. We saw such warnings, and such crawling denial in the years before ww2. It is not extreme, not racist, to demand and end to importing racial and religion enclaves to our country. Remember, no way around it,we could never say such in the country's these poor unfortunate slaves of a God that is no God come from . Posted by Belly, Tuesday, 18 September 2012 2:42:36 AM
| |
The post by Kactuz proves my point. There's people here who have NO concept whatsoever of the difference between violent, fundamentalist Islamic law as practiced in certain geographical locations and the remaining VAST MAJORITY of conventional Islam as practiced by Muslims in EVERY remaining country in the world. People like Kactuz "believe" fundamentalist Islam is supported by the "broad consent" of the world's Muslims. Why? ...... Too much right wing, shock jock radio? Not well read? Limited experience with "real" Muslims from all over the world? Anti religious bigotry? Readiness to believe anything that supports an already held opinion? Uneducated Aussies like this are a minority in our community.
The Christian scriptures are JUST as full of uneducated, ancient evil and violence as the horrid Quran ... a fact totally and willingly ignored by Kactuz. The riot on the weekend was utterly condemned by a huge plethora of Aussie Muslim organizations and representatives ... a fact totally and willingly ignored by Kactuz. Kactuz likes to "imply" that most Muslims support fundamentalism, because that supports his inaccurate and bigoted anti Muslim stance. Fundamentalism is condemned week after week, month after month, year after year by Aussie Muslims in Mosques, homes, schools, press releases etc etc .... it doesn't make headlines, and doesn't even get printed in the right wings press, and CERTAINLY never gets an airing by the right wing shock jocks and TV shows that people like Kactuz listen to and unquestioningly believe Most Aussies understand that Australia over the past century, and especially post WW2, has been built on racial, religious, sexual, educational, political and economic DIVERSITY. We are not a mono culture at all. The bigots want a return to the Aussie mono culture of the 1800s (when we told the blacks what to do and believe, and if they objected violently enough, we killed them). Radically anti Islamic Aussies are just as bad, dangerous, intolerant and divisive as fundamentalist Muslims. The 2 most violent religions throughout history, by FAR, have been fundamentalist Christianity and fundamentalist Islam. They have BOTH been scourges on decency, tolerance and humanity. Posted by DiamondPete, Tuesday, 18 September 2012 4:05:13 AM
| |
*The Christian scriptures are JUST as full of uneducated, ancient evil and violence as the horrid Quran*
Careful there, Diamond Pete. By calling the Quaran horrid, you too could be seen as insulting the prophet, so according to those posters being carried by the children, your head should be on the chopping block too. I think it's really going to be up to the Muslim community to bring their religion into line, so that adherants can live in freedom loving societies such as ours.The global violence which has broken out over a video, tells me that is has a long way to go, to get to that point. Posted by Yabby, Tuesday, 18 September 2012 5:24:56 AM
| |
One solution is to ban the Muslim faith in Australia. If they wish to be practicing Muslims, we won't stop them, they just have to find somewhere else to do it.
Now if they don't like it, tough, this is Australia after all and it is very clear that this is one race that do not want to be Australians. After all, we locked one of our own (non Muslim) up for allegedly training with Bin Larden. We can ban a fishing trawler that threatens no lives, we can ban the live export of cattle, so why can't we ban this? Let's face it, multiculturalism has failed most everywhere else, so why flog a dead horse. Posted by rehctub, Tuesday, 18 September 2012 5:35:17 AM
| |
Diamond Pete,
All you defenders of Islam can do is say "Christians are worse!", so you don't really have a reasonable argument to put forward in this discussion, do you? We don't care what happened 800, 500 or 200 years ago, we live in 2012, we're talking about what's happening now. Pete can you explain to me how having Muslims among us is going to make our children safer, healthier and richer? Posted by Jay Of Melbourne, Tuesday, 18 September 2012 6:37:30 AM
| |
its interesting to note the true believers beingh true to their 'belief'
happy holy day..[or so i gather from qanda http://www.jewfaq.org/holidayg.htm SUkkot: This festival of booths commemorates the Biblical period of wandering in the desert, and is commemorated by building a temporary shelter (called a sukkah, usually rhymes with "book a") in the yard and eating meals in it. Some spend considerable time in the sukkah, even sleeping there. Sukkot begins on the fifth day after Yom Kippur, in late September or October, and lasts for 7 days. From the perspective of the Bible and Jewish law, this holiday is every bit as important as Passover, Rosh Hashanah and Yom Kippur, but most American Jews don't see it that way. About 10% of Jews do not work on the first two days of this holiday (one day for some branches), end quote anyhow we know all working..or not would love the spirit of this diss course*..who owns the media again? THERE IS NUTHIN LIKE RIOTS IN THE STREETS to gain censure over the www..conveniant aint it,,just as govt wants more powers cant yoiu lot think..this IS organised..for maximum strength laws..cause now ewe frightend..did not the christ say FEAR NO EVIL where you are there too am i Posted by one under god, Tuesday, 18 September 2012 7:40:26 AM
| |
Whoa! Enough is enough! This has gone on for far too long!
It is quite obvious that the majority of posters to this thread do not want anymore Muslim/Asylum Seeker/Boat people, but instead of saying so outright, everybody seems intent upon venting their spleen in alternate posters direction! What we ALL, who are against the continuation of this "invasion", should demand of our politicians, is that the whole issue be put to the voters at the coming Federal Election in the way of a Referendum, ....a simple YES or NO vote! We have to demand that we the people do NOT have to aquiesce to the insanity of the UN Conventions, which are telling us that we HAVE to accept ALL the impoverished people across the globe! We do NOT want the installation of a MUSLIM "Inquisition" that orders the beheading of "blasphemers" for perceived insults against a mythical foreign God! We the people have the right to decide our future, the future of our country and the future of our chidren, not a bunch of self-interested broken-down politicians who languish on the seats of the UN Assembly ! Posted by Crackcup, Tuesday, 18 September 2012 8:57:25 AM
| |
"hysteria"...to a lesser extent on this thread.
Posted by Poirot, Tuesday, 18 September 2012 9:01:49 AM
| |
Her her crackup, I started a thread recently alomg the same grounds, our rights as tax payers, the providers of all funds our governments spend/waste. Do we need more say.
I have often thought it would be good to pay all taxes to a high profile law firms 'trust account', in trust, for the governments. Then, when they fix things up, we release the funds. No splash, no cash. The harsh reality is, if we comtinue our softly softly approach and dont take serious action, we will simply run out of funds. Our states are already rethinking the GST because our funds just don't spread far enough anymore, thanks in large to the non local crap we are throwing money at most with no end in sight. Posted by rehctub, Tuesday, 18 September 2012 9:27:17 AM
| |
yep..the demonic autocrazey continues
just as pirates of old..voted 51%=captain.. democracy..the majority lord if over the statistical minority.. even if we have to cut slice and dice great countries into little fiefdumbs..the right majority will pick winner and looser it dont work..its all on to big a scale get back to local govts..that serve their duties..,locally no international stage.. no un..or eu of public servants..ego forum..but true respresentitive memberships proportuinate to the intrests we send them there to protect.. anyhow..the timming of al this is conveniant watch for the closing time press releases.. if i know guilelard..5 pm friday and the system belongs to terroists capitalising in ..on social/capitalism..where you take the bonus..we bear the risk that needs eyes in every letter an ear in EVERY conversation.,.where a device is..there is big bother why cause we rioted in the streets so unionists bikies muslims..cant complain out loud..ever more* Posted by one under god, Tuesday, 18 September 2012 9:56:33 AM
| |
Crackup,
I doubt if there is a stronger opponant to the illegals here on OLO than myself. I oppose them, not because they are mainly muslim, but because they are con artists, liars and cheats that gate crash our country. We may have to wait for a change of government until tough enough measures are put in place to deter them from coming. Now I have not looked at the figures for some time but you may find far more muslims enter by the normal immigration channels. The DIAC website has the figures if you look, but only on countries. You may have to then decide if they are likely to be muslim. I am pleased to see that I am not the only one now recomending that we not allow further muslim immigration. I see the call coming now from various quarters. It will be a long drawn out fight to get the government to stop allowing entry of those groups that will not integrate and some of these groups could include non muslims. Problem is that both major parties are committed to high immigration and allowing all cultures to enter. Posted by Banjo, Tuesday, 18 September 2012 9:58:59 AM
| |
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/national/video-of-8-year-old-jihad-girl-urging-islamic-uprising/story-fndo317g-1226476305453
Link is self explaining, Diamond Pete not buying your contributions. For just a minute let me play Devils advocate. It is true, can not be other, not all Muslims think like that. And true too many have gone out of their way to say so. We are seeing some of us, me included being a bit offensive. Now for the real me. Any one else seen the sorry BUT? IN EVERY SORRY? Can we get it past our Sydney event, and see it took place in many country,s? MURDER TOO? We will confront a truth one day, a primitive hate carried from hundreds of years ago, fueled by orders from a God that never existed, demands we too find that God or die. Read it in their holly book see it increasingly in our streets world wide. Given a chance most Australians would pay them to leave. Posted by Belly, Tuesday, 18 September 2012 11:51:42 AM
| |
rehcub: I have often thought it would be good to pay all taxes to a high profile law firms 'trust account', in trust, for the governments.
You want to WHAT! Within 12 months they would have gone bankrupt & disappeared overseas with all the money never to be seen or heard of again. rechub: One solution is to ban the Muslim faith in Australia. It's the only solution, & I said that 40 years ago. Underonegod. To tell you the truth mate, I haven't understood a thing you have posted. Have you taken your pills today? Banjo: I doubt if there is a stronger opponent to the illegal’s here on OLO than myself. Yeah! Get outta me way mate. DiamondPete: "Some" of you people seem incapable of understanding that the VAST majority of Muslims worldwide, and in Australia, are NOT Muslim fundamentalists. There is no such thing as a moderate Muslim. Scratch a Muslim, "The video, the cartoon", & you'll find a fundamentalist. Please watch the youtube videos I posted earlier, then you will understand. Of course csteel, Arjay, Lexi & others of their ilk won't view them. They might learn the truth of exactly what this situation is. Just in case you can’t find them, here they are again. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=maHSOB2RFm4 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QGVLKW7ixjU&feature=relmfu http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3yNrxYewhi0&feature=related http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LvhDoFDGq6M&feature=related http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZvHt94EGrac&feature=related Runner: 'Who was it who set up the rape camps in Bosnia? It was the Christians you clown. Ah Yes, but Greek Orthodox Christians! Also you have to understand the exact nature of the conflict in the Balkans. You have Royalist Christians/ OPD’s/ Greek/Albanian Orthodox & Royalists Sunni/ Shiite Muslims, Communist Catholic & OPD’s, Communist Greek/ Albanian Orthodox , LMP/Labor/Greens equivalent of all of the previous. & they have all really, really hated one another for centuries in an area about 200 by 75 kilometres. Most of this area is still living in the 16 century without electricity. This area doesn’t count in the debate. Posted by Jayb, Tuesday, 18 September 2012 12:09:46 PM
| |
Someone mentioned having a referendum at the next election. Spot on.
The Question. Should Australia ban Muslim immigrants? Yes or No. I believe the result would be a resounding, "Yes", & that's exactly why they won't do it. I notice Canada is revoking Citizenship of people who were refugees , gained citizenship but have returned to fight against the West & people who have committed major crimes. It’s a solution we should be adopting in Australia. Not ho harp on it again. I make no apologies. When anyone comes to Australia they sign a form with their Visa & tick a box in the Customs declaration that they will not claim Asylum. If they do then they can be shipped straight back without delay & no recourse to lawyers. Posted by Jayb, Tuesday, 18 September 2012 12:18:11 PM
| |
Jayb
'Runner: 'Who was it who set up the rape camps in Bosnia? It was the Christians you clown. ' Ok joker which tennet of faith are the followers of Christ using here? Some are a bit slow to get it. I would of thought you would know better Jayb. Posted by runner, Tuesday, 18 September 2012 1:05:10 PM
| |
Dear Diamondpete,
I agree. In fact there is little to distinguish between the levels of intolerance shown by the thuggish elements in the crowd over the weekend and the likes of characters as Jayb. Hatred and intolerance need to be exposed and challenged at every opportunity. We need to be vigilant in recognising the toxic mix of fundamental religion combining with American gang culture, but also about recognising fear and hate mongers attempting to wrap themselves up in our flag. Dear kactuz, Do we really need to roll out the early marriage caper again? Here is a picture of Isabella marrying Richard II when she was six, more than half a millennia after Aisha. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Isabela_richard2.jpg While they may be repugnant to us today these marriages were done as a matter of course to combine families and extend influence. Why are you so fixated on it? Dear runner, You might get Jayb to explain others on the list of Christian organisations like the KKK on more topically Joseph Kony. Kony is a premillennialist steeped in Christian end times theology. “Kony believes in the literal protection provided by a cross symbol and tells his child soldiers a cross on their chest drawn in oil will protect them from bullets.” “Kony insists that he and the Lord's Resistance Army are fighting for the Ten Commandments. He defends his actions: "Is it bad? It is not against human rights. And that commandment was not given by Joseph. It was not given by LRA. No, those commandments were given by God."” “According to Francis Ongom, a former LRA officer who defected, Kony "has found Bible justifications for killing witches, for killing [those who farm or eat] pigs because of the story of the Gadarene swine, and for killing [other] people because God did the same with Noah's flood andSodom and Gomorrah."” Are you a premillennialist runner? Posted by csteele, Tuesday, 18 September 2012 1:44:04 PM
| |
http://islamcommentaries.com/prayers.htm
I wish to asure every one who looks at this link not all Muslims think like this. Just their Holly men preaching from the holly places. Takes courage to read, but informative. And it is today not hundreds of years ago csteele Posted by Belly, Tuesday, 18 September 2012 1:52:02 PM
| |
Runner,
Yes, the Serbs(whiteish Europeans), did kill as many darker- featured,Bosnian(muslim Europeans), men and boys as they could, because these are the future potential territorial warriors, who could ultimately wrest control of those areas from Serbian control. I am not saying it is not horrific,(don't shoot the messenger), I am just saying that this is what territorial males do,(across every species), kill or drive off potential male threats to territorial control. They most often rape all the women they can because this intergrates the bloodline and so avoids territorial future civil wars. Not that the men are consciously aware of this as they commit the atrocity, they are just following their biological territorial instinctive programming to impregnate as many females as they can. Sorry, blame biological programming not me. The whitish Europeans(Serbs) had the same done to them in earlier centuries in Europe, they were nearly wiped out by the Islamic forces that overran Europe at different times.(the Ottoman Empire for one). No doubt suffering similar violence and rape. Gradually the white Europeans, (like Putin, the Germans the Serbs etc) as the centuries past, re-established themselves and control of major territories once again in Europe. These wars like the Bosnian war haven't just happened recently, they have been being fought across Europe between tribes for centuries. Have a look at the Chechnya war in Russia, between the white Russians(predomiantly Christian)and the darker-featured muslim Chechnyans, who want a Separate state free from Russian rule. And Putins people, who do not want to surrender what they see as Russian territory to the Islamists. Journalists in Russia who report truthfully on Putins crackdown on the Chechnyan situation are killed. We need to study these wars from away back in time to get a full picture of the neverending tribal wars across Europe. See the whole history of them. Posted by CHERFUL, Tuesday, 18 September 2012 2:13:47 PM
| |
CS, Roll out anything you want. If it is evil, I will condemn it. Period. Richard marrying Isabella at that age is wrong. Got that? Bad. Bad. Bad. I can, will and have condemned colonialists, slavers, exploiters, crusaders, soldiers, Americans, British, Aussies, Muslims, David, Peter, Paul and Mary, Bush, and BugsBunny for vile actions. For me, good and evil are absolute, with little gray area.
That “others did it, too” doesn’t work with me. I have no problem condemning evil. Good people do not have separate values for A and B, good for me, bad for ye. Now let’s talk about Muslims and their values. Case 1. Quote: Narrated Abdullah Ibn Abbas: A blind man had a slave-mother who abused the Prophet…. So he took a dagger, placed it on her belly, pressed it, and killed her. A child who came between her legs was smeared with the blood that was there. When the morning came, the Prophet was informed about it… Thereupon the Prophet said: Oh be witness, no retaliation is payable for her blood. (Abu-Dawud, Book 38: 4348) Case 2. Quote: We went out with Allah's Messenger on the expedition to the Bi'l-Mustaliq and took captive some Arab women; and we desired them, for we were suffering from the absence of our wives… So we decided to have sexual intercourse with them but by observing 'azl (coitus-interruptus). But we said: We are doing an act whereas Allah's Messenger is amongst us; why not ask him? So we asked Allah's Messenger and he said: It does not matter if you do not do it, for every soul that is to be born up to the Day of Resurrect will be born (Sahih Muslim, Book 8: 3371) Got that? Murder and rape. Now do you think that Muslims will condemn Mohammed for his evil deeds? Good luck, I have asked about this dozens of times, but evidently it is a very complex moral questions and Muslims can’t figure out if these are really evil. By the way, will you and Diamond condemn this evil man for these actions Posted by kactuz, Tuesday, 18 September 2012 2:25:19 PM
| |
csteel: Hatred and intolerance need to be exposed and challenged at every opportunity. We need to be vigilant in recognising the toxic mix of fundamental religion combining with American gang culture, but also about recognising fear and hate mongers attempting to wrap themselves up in our flag.
You mean, "Us", the people that are challenging the racial hatred of the Islamists. I don't hate anybody. I don't have a religion, not even athiest. I do regognise the Christian Teliban as being just as evil as the Islamic Teliban. Yes Kony & all his associated type are evil & I do condem them as well. Fear, yes I am afraid & you should be also. My bet. You havent watched any of the youtube videos I posted & you win't will you. Same excuse as you gave before & No guts. These are the people you support against,"us". Posted by Jayb, Tuesday, 18 September 2012 3:11:40 PM
| |
FYI;
The reward for killing Salmon Rushti has just been increased to $3 Million. Posted by Bazz, Tuesday, 18 September 2012 3:15:45 PM
| |
http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/
Yet another challenge. The link has the exact words and prayers of this religion. Worth a look Posted by Belly, Tuesday, 18 September 2012 3:58:48 PM
| |
http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/politics/multiculturalism-still-has-a-long-road-to-travel-to-reach-all-20120917-262gf.html
Surely only the blind will not agree with this. The failure of 1970,s on, Lebanese Muslim Migration is it plain sight. We will suffer much more from second and third generation Australians badly educated and badly bought up at home. By parents we never should have taken in. Posted by Belly, Tuesday, 18 September 2012 4:16:02 PM
| |
CHERFUL
I am not disputing your claims that tribal groups including Serbs, Aboriginals, football teams rape for various reasons including those you mention. The use of the word Christian is one conveniently used by those with Christophobic natures who kno very well that these people act in contradiction to the teachings of Christ in contrast to those who act violently in line with the teachings of their prophet. It is a very convenient ways to depict all beliefs being of the same value. Secularist are the worst at this kind of deceit as shown by Csteele in his rants. By the way Csteele Are you a premillennialist runner? I have no doubt Christ will return as the mockers increase and Israel's haters band together. At the exact point I don't know. I suspect strongly Christ will take His people out before the nukes explode. For me the most important point is to be ready spiritually. Endless debate on whether Christ comes pre, mid or post tribulation lead nowhere. Posted by runner, Tuesday, 18 September 2012 4:25:36 PM
| |
runner,
...been noting all day you trotting about OLO accusing fellow posters of "Christophobia", deceit, etc...in a very unChrist-like way. Nothing changes. As an example of Christ's humility and wisdom, you fail miserably. Just once I'd like to see you impart some good will amid your righteous indignation and cease impugning others with vile epithets....as in "...Secularists are the worst at this kind of deceit as shown by Csteele in his rants." Posted by Poirot, Tuesday, 18 September 2012 4:39:59 PM
| |
Hi C. Steele,
And there I was, violently worshipping Richard II all my life, and now you've gone and spoiled it for me :( We can play this silly game of "tu quoque" till the cows come home. There's always someone worse. NEITHER Muhammed OR Richard II or Kony are admirable for their behaviour. To point the finger at Person A doesn't somehow cleanse Person B. As a Marxist-atheist, religion has little attraction for me, except for the mild defence that some of them may provide some sort of moral framework. And God does tend often to have the best tunes, or at least some pretty good ones. But the fact remains that Islam is a violent, intolerant religion, with little going for it that isn't done better by other moral frameworks, Buddhism, Judaism, even to a point Christianity. I don't agree with Andrew Bolt to call for the beheading of all those who call for the beheading of all those who insult the prophet, but i can see his point: how does one tolerate the intolerant in a just society ? Cheers, Joe Posted by Loudmouth, Tuesday, 18 September 2012 4:57:45 PM
| |
Poirot
'As an example of Christ's humility and wisdom, you fail miserably. ' As the judge of all that is decent thanks for that all wise and knowing Poirot. Thankfully its not you I am trying to impress. Posted by runner, Tuesday, 18 September 2012 5:29:51 PM
| |
runner,
Christ set a pretty good example in his interactions with his fellow man. Surely it's not a matter of "impressing", but merely emulating. Posted by Poirot, Tuesday, 18 September 2012 5:57:02 PM
| |
Dear Joe (Loudmouth),
How does one tolerate the intolerant in our society? One simply takes no notice of them. They usually don't represent the mainstream. Unless they break the law of course. Then they're tried according to the law. Or, if they happen to be wanting the top job in politics - then one simply doesn't vote for them. Posted by Lexi, Tuesday, 18 September 2012 5:59:06 PM
| |
It's perfectly reasonable to suggest that Australian born Muslims who want to practice their religion in an assertive and aggressive way should go to live overseas and do so, going back to the "mother country' or to one which meets your personal tastes and standards is an Australian tradition. If it's viewed as healthy for white Australians to go abroad to "find themselves" and broaden their minds then it's going to do those guys with the Beards and robes and Aussie accents no end of good, right?.
Posted by Jay Of Melbourne, Tuesday, 18 September 2012 6:09:35 PM
| |
Runner you give evidence that it is not only SOME Muslims who are to be watched.
You in no way, remind me of the loving Christ I once followed. You however fit well with those who forced me to rethink my belief. Posted by Belly, Tuesday, 18 September 2012 6:20:05 PM
| |
So the question must be asked, why?
Why on earth did our past leaders allow these radical groups in? For me, it just adds fuel to the suggestion that our strings are being pulled from somewhere other than our own leaders. We must stand up for the sake of our children, their children and thier children's children. Enough is enough. I suggest two options. 1. Ban Islamic worship in Australia, total! 2. If anyone wants to follow this religion, find somewhere else to do it. We must claim Australia back before there's nothing worthwhile saving, otherwise it may well be us on that leaky boat, and good luck finding somewhere with the soft, compassionate approach that we have, not to mention the perks. Posted by rehctub, Tuesday, 18 September 2012 6:27:47 PM
| |
Dear Loudmouth,
I only raised the matter of early marriage after the matter it was posted for a second time on this thread to justify the making of the film. My point is that it is difficult to nearly impossible to judge religious leaders from our modern perspective. I totally reject the unspeakable horror of slavery and am deeply grateful that a small group of Quakers strove to rid the world of this scourge. Am I about to condemn Christ for his admonishing the slave to obey his master? Hardly, even though I find it a reprehensible sentiment. It was a reality of the time therefore it goes through to the keeper in my opinion. Others may well disagree. We can really only judge them by what we know of the times, how those around them acted and what was the moral standard of the society in which they dwelt. When you say “But the fact remains that Islam is a violent, intolerant religion, with little going for it that isn't done better by other moral frameworks, Buddhism, Judaism, even to a point Christianity.” Yet it isn't a fact and if we look at the mote in our own eyes the history of Christianity, especially in the 20th Century, has no comparison. As much as the likes of runner try to disavow how Christian Europe treated the Jewish people during WW2, how Christian Serbs slaughtered and raped tens of thousands of Bosnia Muslims, how the Rwandan Christian clergy preached hate and genocide from the pulpit while Muslims open their homes to terrified and fleeing Tutsis, the facts speak for themselves. Perhaps it might be an idea to let them do so here. Posted by csteele, Tuesday, 18 September 2012 6:53:35 PM
| |
csteel: Isabella marrying Richard II when she was six, more than half a millennia after Aisha.
I'm doing my Genealogy. You would be surprised at the amount(In Europe)of people that were married very young, both males & females. The Stewarts were very good at wife exchanging. The number of brothers & sisters & half brothers & sisters that were married. So that sort of thing wasn’t unusual. Mostly for Alliances & passing family heritage along. In the Middle East though it was because of Venereal Diseases that the men married very young girls.(virgins & clean) So steelie what did you think of the youtube videos, or haven't you watched them yet. Do you support what they are saying? Posted by Jayb, Tuesday, 18 September 2012 8:29:12 PM
| |
http://www.smh.com.au/nsw/its-our-shortcoming-we-have-not-really-engaged-with-these-individuals-20120918-264uf.html
Another link. But first let us look again at the drivers for this thread. *Our dead are in Paradise yours are in hell!* If we said that? Is it not pure hate and based on religion and bigotry. We are offended by Sydney but must not ignore it has been world wide, and death and destruction along with pure hatred. Kactuz has put the truth before us, this is an every day part of life for many, the bigotry the hate, and a privative need to place a God that is no God on a pedestal, above us all, us more than any. The Middle ages haunts us still folk far different than us, on ourside at least ,the other? maybe still the same. Did wrong,gee consider csteele has to hark back to then! to decry our concerns. We in increasing numbers only look at any yesterday to confirm our fears. REMEMBER lies are an ak47 in this community, called for in a HOLLY BOOK. Hence the we are sorry but,but but nothing, this will increase not decrease, yes some Muslims will stand with us. Some will in time, risk death, think about that, by leaving this twisted faith. But a poor if at all educated enclave who hates us and every one,who regard women as property will haunt us and we must one day confront it and the lies. Posted by Belly, Wednesday, 19 September 2012 5:44:00 AM
| |
It is worth remembering that the latest "riot" is far from an isolated incident:
“A riot by Muslim youths in Auburn last week was organised via Facebook, police believe. The troublemakers used the social networking site to flash up inflammatory references to police and rally their friends for a confrontation.One update identified police as ‘non-believers’ who were raiding a ‘brother's home’. More than 150 people gathered in Cumberland Rd, Auburn, on Tuesday night, forcing police to call in 100 officers, the riot squad and a helicopter.” http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/facebook-website-used-to-drum-up-auburn-rioters/story-e6freuy9-1225772429876 “Radical Islam has shown its distasteful side. The Carnita Matthews case escalated from a simple traffic fine to a public show of needless aggression.Herald Sun Digital Pass. The preposterous excuses and Pythonesque theatrics of Carnita Matthews and her very vocal supporters outside a Sydney court this week would be comic, if they weren't so threatening.” http://www.heraldsun.com.au/opinion/we-need-to-stop-islams-ugly-voice/story-e6frfhqf-1226080251177 “Roy Yaghi, 33 and Jamie Grover, 27 were gunned down execution style as they sat in a ute parked outside what police have described as a known "drug house" at South Wentworthville on Thursday night…They were taken to Westmead Hospital in a critical condition and died soon after… riot police were called to the hospital on Friday to calm distraught family members demanding access to the victim's bodies, Mr Scipione pleaded with those in the know to break the criminal code and contact police.He described the "wall of silence" surrounding western Sydney's criminal network “ http://www.dailyexaminer.com.au/story/2012/09/01/we-will-look-after-you-scipione A Sydney man who was held down on his bed and whipped up to 40 times by strangers had recently converted to Islam and was reportedly being punished for drinking. http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/intruders-whip-silverwater-man-31-for-drinking/story-e6frf7jo-1226097080261 Posted by SPQR, Wednesday, 19 September 2012 6:20:10 AM
| |
http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/society-and-culture/hes-my-brother--why-angry-muslim-youth-are-protesting-in-sydney-20120918-264l1.html
This link, after reading it twice, tells me PC is in control of some thoughts. It for me, without fear or favor, says our next export market, properly funded and thought out, should start with this well meaning Gentle man and those he defends. A prime example of it was wrong now lets drop it and talk of the past. Forget 9/11 talk of the murders you do not us. Harsh, red neck, yes I am guilty but lets be fair dinkum these folk are unwelcome by most. Posted by Belly, Wednesday, 19 September 2012 6:24:59 AM
| |
its about giving the impression..we need tougher laws
nuthin like a good riot,..to stop..ANYONE 'rioting'../yes unionists and greenies too! just like bullies love power lawyewrs love laws..yes sure the law say you canyt front run..but! here is a trust..loophole..so you canm become one of them 47%..mitt rummny is talking of.. no one should be allowed to record private stuff and put it on line..like who wants to see her majesties boobie WE NEED TOUGH LAWS..so our delicates stay in the clossit or about being able to mention facebook in court as a source or trakiing flaash traiter traders..or following the money as well as the authority that released it or about forcing us to beg more..be watched more so ther big still get their bonus and bailout and we swill still get.. the shaft for stealing a loaf..in ol blarney..you get sent to the land of oz for stealing govt own money system you get bailout/bonjus..new trusts to hide things in so you too can become the 47%..not paying any tax thanks be to the family trust..let him who bear benifit..bear the burden Posted by one under god, Wednesday, 19 September 2012 8:45:51 AM
| |
It is always interesting to see what types crawl out from under their rocks on threads such as these.
Dear Jay of Melbourne, You wrote; “Some more footage shot by a mate of mine: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QJAp4eBV720 He's saying that Socialist Alternative were involved and were directing people to the protest and egging them on, the Commies actually recognised him as a Nationalist and attacked him, but he lost them in the crowd and ran behind the Police line.” Your mate goes under the nickname of 'SussToTheJew' on the White Pride website www.stormfront.org where the main topic of conversation seems to centre around who they need to get rid of first; jews; muslims or nergos. He posts his video here; http://www.stormfront.org/forum/t913464-4/ What name to you use on this site? Galactica71? Be that as it may you appear to be embellishing when you said “ the Commies actually recognised him as a Nationalist and attacked him”. His account seems to differ somewhat, “When I was trying to access my camera on this Android phone, there was a SA antifa standing next to me who spotted the swastika screensaver on my phone and started calling on his phone. Then him and another followed me through the thick Muslim crowd trying to film me. That was just before the first police lines were attacked.” He further states; “These Muslims are using any jew excuse to take over. I'm starting to think a certain man was right in his actions.” Who do you think your mate was referring to and do you agree with him? You and your ilk thoroughly disgust most thinking people, the poison you are so determined to spread through our communities needs to be resisted at every turn. This is Australia mate and just as we are not an Islamic state neither are we the Third Reich. A lot of Australians gave up their lives ridding the world of the Nazi scourge yet you lot have the swastika as your screensavers? As to other posters here do you ever stop to think of the bedfellows you are keeping? Posted by csteele, Wednesday, 19 September 2012 10:39:27 AM
| |
csteele,
Honest to God, you are my hero! Posted by scribbler, Wednesday, 19 September 2012 10:56:35 AM
| |
'Runner you give evidence that it is not only SOME Muslims who are to be watched.
You in no way, remind me of the loving Christ I once followed. You however fit well with those who forced me to rethink my belief.' and yet you are only to happy to back the trade union movement full of thieves and thugs. No logic Belly. At least you admit that Christ is loving. Posted by runner, Wednesday, 19 September 2012 11:17:22 AM
| |
Dear runner,
Then you really should practice what He teaches. Posted by Lexi, Wednesday, 19 September 2012 11:57:08 AM
| |
Dear csteele,
The following two websites may be of interest: http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/politics/the-incredible-muslim-hulk-proves-to-be-no-friend-of-islam-either-20120916-260e8.html And: http://www.abc.net.au/lateline/content/2012/s3592170.htm Posted by Lexi, Wednesday, 19 September 2012 12:01:32 PM
| |
I have searched everywhere for this video. Can anyone give me a link please. The one on Utube is only a trailer of a trailer, about 2 minutes.
Csteel, have you watched the Utube videos I posted? Has anyone watched the videos I posted? Does anyone have a comment on them? Or, Is this a case of, "Don't wanna go there"? Posted by Jayb, Wednesday, 19 September 2012 1:46:36 PM
| |
scribbler,
"csteele, Honest to God, you are my hero!" Yep. You'd be battling to find a more balanced and reasonable poster on OLO than csteele. Cheers Posted by Poirot, Wednesday, 19 September 2012 1:58:16 PM
| |
*Honest to God, you are my hero!"
Yep.* That is what those female groupies normally say, when they throw themselves at another stoned rock singer :) Posted by Yabby, Wednesday, 19 September 2012 2:14:42 PM
| |
Suck it up, Yabby : )
You think scribbler and I are teenage groupies? (How about if I add that I think you're reasonably balanced as well - IMO : ) Posted by Poirot, Wednesday, 19 September 2012 2:34:59 PM
| |
JAYB
Go to You tube and enter Sam Bacile or the innocence of Muslims. The video is as stupid as the protestors and as we are for letting Muslims settle here. The behaviour of Muslim Lebanese in Sydney with their insurance fraud, car re-birthing, drugs and drive by shootings is an indicator of the future. As Muslim numbers increase so will their demands to behead and punish those who lampoon or ridicule their so called prophet. Posted by SILLER, Wednesday, 19 September 2012 3:51:03 PM
| |
Hands up the Six people in Australia who have actually seen this video.
Excluding the fellow who made it,(who was an Egyptian immigrant,}and the moslem extremists who passed it around the world to incite their fellow moslems. There is actually no involvement by the people of Australia or any Western person at all. So the moslems are basically demonstrating against something stirred up by themselves. duh? Posted by CHERFUL, Wednesday, 19 September 2012 4:36:56 PM
| |
@ CSteele fanclub,
<<CSteele, Honest to God, you are my hero!>> A friend recently told me some good advice –here’s the background. Peter and Fred have a mutual friend John. Now John had a cat which he absolutely adored, took it most everywhere with him. But, one day John had to make a quick trip overseas and needed to leave his cat in Peters care. Unfortunately, when Peter was busy the cat wandered-out onto the street and was skittled. When John called home and asked how things were, the first thing Peter said was:“Aw, your cat got run over”. Needless to say John was shattered.Later Fred counseled him saying: “When you have bad news about someone’s love object you cannot just blurt it out. You really need to slowly build up to. In the case of the cats death you should have lead into it with a line like ‘One day your cat was out walking on the roof…’” So with that in mind: “One day CSteele was out walking on the roof…” It was back in June 2011, and a certain woman ,who had a string of traffic offences was stopped by a traffic officer. She accused the officer of threatening & abusing her –and laid formal charges. The officer might well have been in deep swiss it had not been for the lucky event that he had video taped the entire incident. And the vid showed the only one screaming abuse had been the woman.Under normal circumstance the woman might –having made false charges – herself faced some sort of sanction.But she was able to hide behind her veil, literally. No one could positively identify her. CSteele was in the forefront of voices on OLO echoing the woman charges --–and she made no step-down when the truth came out. When drones zap Al Quaeda honchos, CSteele is foremost in her criticism And when there is any criticism to be leveled at Israel, CSteele is amongst the most strident So it would seem it aint only Jay of Melbourne, who harbours a dark side! Posted by SPQR, Wednesday, 19 September 2012 5:03:30 PM
| |
Oh, SPQR, that's okay. I used to enjoy pottery way back when, so I don't have a problem with feet of clay.
By the way, that joke of yours about the cat is very old. Last time I heard a much better rendition was 25 years ago in the film 'Capricorn One'. All the best. Posted by scribbler, Wednesday, 19 September 2012 5:36:00 PM
| |
In saying that the Christians were guilty of the Holocaust. It should also be noted that the Arabs collaborated and plotted with the German leadership, lending them help and support in their persecution of the Jews. There is evidence of this collaboration and also pictures taken of these Arab leaders with Hitler at the height of the war.
That is why the British were in military control of Palestine when the war ended, they regarded the Arabs as having sided with their enemy Hitler. When the Jews were given a homeland in Israel by the British, the Palestinians and Arabs didn’t like It. Much the same as a lot of Australians don’t like all these Moslems being allowed into Australia. When the British pulled out of Palestine, at least 3 Arab nations raced over and attacked the new Jewish nation. It was called the Six Day War. The Jews having just been through one annihilation, were armed and ready. They won the war in six days. It was then they took some of the disputed territories. Probably as a buffer zone between Israel and Palestine and the Arab states. There is no answer to the Israel, Palestinian question. They both need the land and resources for their evergrowing populations. It is literally a fight for survival on both sides. Posted by CHERFUL, Wednesday, 19 September 2012 6:29:21 PM
| |
Dear CHERFUL,
I recommend that if you haven't read the book, "My Israel Question," by Antony Loewenstein then you should. It is a searching discussion from a significant Jewish voice in one of the most important debates of our times. Interesting read. Posted by Lexi, Wednesday, 19 September 2012 6:45:22 PM
| |
LOL Lexi
The one thing Lowenstein isn't is a "significant Jewish voice." Meanwhile the French satirical magazine, Charlie Hebdo, has published a new Muhammad cartoon. It apparently features a turbanned naked Muhammad "exposing his posterior to a film director." See: http://www.news.com.au/world/french-magazine-charlie-hebdo-publishes-nude-cartoons-of-prophet-mohammed/story-fndir2ev-1226477532876 and http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503543_162-57515536-503543/french-leaders-fret-over-new-mohammad-cartoons/ Charlie Hebdo was firebombed last year so let's congratulate the brave editor. It is thanks to people like him that freedom of speech survives. Would that Australian editors were that bold Posted by stevenlmeyer, Wednesday, 19 September 2012 7:53:04 PM
| |
LOL
I read that one of the rioters charged was recognized by some kids. Turns out he is, or was, their school bus driver. He must not be a parent, as he would know not to say or do anything in front of the kids that you don't want repeated. Tickled my sence of humour. Posted by Banjo, Wednesday, 19 September 2012 8:05:01 PM
| |
Dear Scribbler,
Thank you but rather than any real research it was a fortuitous and largely accidental cross-link that landed the White Power association, though the internet really is a two edged sword. As Cenk from The Young Turks points out our 'village idiots' who once only had a village wide impact now have a world wide audience. Dear Poirot, Thank you for the sentiment. While I might have hoped to have been included among the more measured posters on OLO in years gone by I am now finding myself constantly battling the impulse to wring necks and that is not a good sign. I acknowledge I have probably been on OLO too long and those with whom in the past I took the time to engage in reasoned debate have been replaced by a new flock and my ability to observe the niceties has unfortunately waned. I have been re-reading the thread SPQR mentioned. While I stand by everything I posted, indeed even with a little pride, it is hard to go past my words to Belly; “You keep banging on about the ALP and the Green/left, time to drop it mate and realize you belong to the GOB party (Grumpy old bastards). Don't fret because I will be joining you in the not too distant future, I am already showing signs of it now.” http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?discussion=4525&page=0 Dear SPQR, I have actually had that particular thread thrown at me on a number of occasions. The stance I took seemed to upset quite a few people, just not sure why. If you wanted to be a little more specific in your case that “she made no step-down when the truth came out.” I am happy to answer the charge. Dear Lexi, Thanks for the links, all good stuff. I was watching the one of Rami posted by JoM earlier http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gv6-tsV5Xj0 and I couldn't help be struck by his call for his compatriots to go to TAFE. Given the decimation of this institution by state governments on the Eastern seaboard I do wonder what the long term ramifications will be. Posted by csteele, Wednesday, 19 September 2012 8:25:18 PM
| |
Dear stevenlmeyer,
Actually one thing Antony Lowenstein is, particularly in the Australian context, and that is a significant Jewish voice. I would venture for many Australians who take any interest in the issue he would stand as one of if not the most prominent and recognisable Jewish figures in our country. Would you care to name another? You might want to get chauvinistic about it and say within the Australian Jewish community he doesn't rate as highly and that is fine but I'm choosing in include the whole country if that is okay. As to the matter of cartoonists the pressure not to publish can be brought to bear in many different ways. Michael Leunig relates; “As far as I remember, I have not done a cartoon about Israel for about a year, unless you count the ones about Iraq. Cartoonists are very reluctant to go near this prickly subject because there can be a large personal cost. One New Zealand cartoonist recently lost his job over such a cartoon, which I think is a terrible shame.” http://www.leunig.com.au/journal/journal_one.php Mike Evans was that cartoonist. He was awarded NZ top cartoonist twice and his cartoons were very telling, especially those that got him sacked. This one I found the most powerful. http://cosmos.ucc.ie/cs1064/jabowen/IPSC/maps/malcolmEvans10.gif The rest can be found here. http://cosmos.ucc.ie/cs1064/jabowen/IPSC/php/map.php?mid=101 As an ordinary Australian I'm hard pressed to find a sack-able offence among them. Can you? Many may well remember the cartoon of Leunig's that was rejected for publication by the Age newspaper. http://tinyurl.com/8oq647q May I echo your sentiment “Would that Australian editors were that bold” Cont... Posted by csteele, Wednesday, 19 September 2012 10:39:35 PM
| |
Cont...
I suspect that circumstance is the primary difference between methodologies of Jewish and Muslim extremists when addressing things they find offensive. The 'Jewish Lobby' to which Lowenstein refers has a powerful influence both within our media and our halls of power. The need to protest in our streets has been made largely redundant by the exercise of that power. It is a similar paradigm to what occurred in Israel/Palestine where the Jewish leadership was able to forego terrorist acts when they gained enough military might to prosecute its objectives through more 'normal' and accepted (but no less devestating) means. Indeed the same paradigm continues with its conflict with Hamas. Home made rockets compete with Howitser shell and missiles fired from Apache helicopters. Does anyone really think Hamas wouldn't give up firing their rockets in a flash if given access to similar weaponry to target the Israeli leadership? Not I. Dear CHERFUL, That was the same narrative I accepted for nearly 3/4s of my life so I can't be too harsh. Perhaps with more reading you might see things in a different light, who knows. A question for you though. Did the ethnic cleansing of Palestinians start before Israel was attacked or after? Posted by csteele, Wednesday, 19 September 2012 10:41:21 PM
| |
Interesting that the same right-wing Dutch newspaper that published the troublesome Mohammed cartoons had earlier refused to post a cartoon of a crucified Christ with a suggested erection because "it may be offensive to some people".
Posted by wobbles, Wednesday, 19 September 2012 11:40:14 PM
| |
For all those looking for political, legal or military answers to the problem of radical Islam as a supposed solution - such will never work. The answer lies within their own religion - they follow an Arabian war lord in his passion, attitudes, teachings and activity.
Their claim even at the riot was they respected Jesus. This claim is a distortion of the fact, as Jesus teachings, attitudes and actions in no way was respected by them. When Jesus was reviled he did not respond, even in self defence. To break the nexus of their attitudes the only way is for them to deal with what they claim they do respect and it was certainly not the chatacter of God as Jesus expressed. Forgivness and love for every man, even passionatly caring for the well beiing of ones enemy is the attitude Jesus lived. This attitude is the only possible breaking of political and personlal hostility held by these tribal radicals. Examine the heart of the matter, even how we perceive what has to happen. All those throwing political and military verbal bombs at the situation will never move from behind their bunkers. Posted by Josephus, Thursday, 20 September 2012 1:33:56 AM
| |
http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/politics/victimology-airbrushes-oppression-against-own-20120919-266wc.html
It is apparent from the posting of the same links over and again in this thread some come only to post. Not to read the posts of others. And in not looking at other links, within reason, we do not get the full picture. Of how the country is feeling. Credit when it is due,csteele took the time to , in my opinion, unmask a true extremist, I had suspected such, been victim of that person, but only csteele took the work on. I however know,and we all should, ordinary mums and dads, Liberals voters, Labor, greens, too share the concerns, radical if you wish, about a growing hatred of us, from within the Muslim community. And Highlighted by the Lebanese section. Posted by Belly, Thursday, 20 September 2012 3:59:52 AM
| |
I am not withdrawing my praise csteele however once calling me that would have shaken you.
It remains an insult to my parents distance not age prevents the shaking. You how ever have conned some, not me, you are an apologist for all things middle east. On record here defending them and proven lies. I doubt you are a balanced person and doubt too you are ever offended by their actions even beheading. Jay of Melbourne has contributed some rubbish and insults, but is not unlike you a radical in sheep,s clothing. I agree with yabby, HATE ME FOR IT! but in some things womens mother instincts overrule common sense. Hasbeens son being bashed is an every day some times every hour event. We do no favors to us- or the trouble makers by ignoreing extremes. If answers come it will be after open and honest two sided talking about the reality of this issue. May you find a middle path extreme ones lead no place. Posted by Belly, Thursday, 20 September 2012 4:15:10 AM
| |
When you have an Australian born Muslim, claiming to be an Aussie, and rightly so, yet growing up to hate Aussies, you know you have a problem.
This also proves that it's not the people that are the problem, it's the beliefs of their religion that is the problem, because after all, nobody, Australian or otherwise, is born to hate, they are tought to hate. Therefore, the only way to solve this, is to ban the religion, including the likes of the burka, here in Australia. People have to choose between their Muslim religion, or Australia, but they simply can't have both, as they (thier leaders) are incapable of protecting us Aussies and our peaceful way of life. Posted by rehctub, Thursday, 20 September 2012 5:36:17 AM
| |
@ CSteele,
On the subject of cartoons & unfavorable media portrayals.Take a geeza at this lot and then tell me if it is not a teensy-weensy bit hypocritical for you and those you have allied yourself with to get offended with unfavorable media portrayals [and it is well worth remembering too that most of the examples cited are NOT from fringe media but from mainstream sites] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rXYR1u0RRxE http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yw2EisVqKZ4&feature=relmfu http://www.adl.org/main_arab_world/arab_media_portrayal_jews.htm http://www.palwatch.org/main.aspx?fi=786 "Let he who is without sin, cast the first stone"[those who you have allied with need to take this literally] Posted by SPQR, Thursday, 20 September 2012 6:55:10 AM
| |
Rechtub I share your concerns on this issue.
But believe banning the religion is unfair to those we never will have a problem with. I however am constantly and forever concerned at such as csteele. So very many of us make comment that ARE not related to truth. A history of very near, anti Australian middle thought, and opinion, runs in csteele,and some who support,him? I am not yet convinced it is a he. Can normal folk ignore both the unacceptable actions of the rioters, around the whole world, and the insignificance of the idiotic film. At present the Royal family is haunted by the topless photo scandal. Yet are WASPS running a muck in the streets? A SECTION OF THE world wide Muslim community, is anchored in a faith that is not we are told Islam. Why then is it increasingly hard to talk of it? Why are we not looking at how very small the insult and how dreadful the reaction? Why are we not being honest enough tosay this is unacceptable in any country? Posted by Belly, Thursday, 20 September 2012 7:31:51 AM
| |
"Those you have allied yourself with..."
Nice (shallow) one, SPQR...shades of Georgie Bush - "If you're not with us, you're against us"? I believe csteele tries to discern the hypocrisy in all of this - something akin to Michael Leunig's sentiments in the link: "...Well, my work is usually humanistic, so in a universal sense it can be safely assumed that I'm deeply reluctant about anybody's violent policies and deeds. Political cartooning is particularly interested in the phenomena of our hypocrisy and is not so much concerned with decrying the obvious conventional devil, but with revealing that there is a bit of devil in all of us....When you're alone on the receiving end of such malice and loathing you get a privileged insight into what lies beneath the surface of our "civilised" society. The Cronulla riots are only a small part of the mosaic..." But carry on, SPQR. Some minds are only capable of skating on the surface. Posted by Poirot, Thursday, 20 September 2012 8:29:54 AM
| |
The cartoons published by moslem media are far worse than the cartoons
published in the west. So what are the moslems complaining about ? Perhaps the solution might be to publish thousands of cartoons made to annoy moslems and so make the whole subject a joke. A cartoon war if you like, it would be better than what we have now. Posted by Bazz, Thursday, 20 September 2012 8:55:25 AM
| |
SPQR: Take a geeza at this lot and then tell me if it is not a teensy-weensy bit hypocritical for you and those you have allied yourself with to get offended with unfavourable media portrayals
You won't get Ali bin csteel to watch anything that shows her jihad friends in a bad light. I posted some Utube links showing what their plan is for the world, but she won't watch them or comment. I have watched all the links posted here. There is some terrifying stuff. Especially the children on Arab TV. These children grow up & come to the West with intent. Ali bin csteel & friends support them. I think that all jihadists should be removed from Australia regardless as to whether they were born here or not. Nothing to do with Hate, just safety. Posted by Jayb, Thursday, 20 September 2012 9:06:50 AM
| |
"....Ali bin csteel..."
(Jayb, no doubt, considers that a spectacular trump line - Da Da!) Pathetic..... If you guys weren't so typical of certain "limited" mindset, you'd be hilarious. As it is you're all boringly predictable. Posted by Poirot, Thursday, 20 September 2012 9:19:10 AM
| |
@Poirot,
<<I believe csteele tries to discern the hypocrisy in all of this>> You and I must be reading a different CSteele When you read this (and other writings) from CSteele: <<Michael Leunig relates; “As far as I remember, I have not done a cartoon about Israel for about a year, unless you count the ones about Iraq. Cartoonists are very reluctant to go near this prickly subject because there can be a large personal cost. One New Zealand cartoonist recently lost his job over such a cartoon>> Do you not see an implication that Israel & Jews are a protected species: that they are getting a level of protection that Islam/The Arabs don't receive. That being the case, it was quite proper for me to point out that in large stretches of the world where Israel and Jews generally, are the preferred game. And it is particularly pertinent given that those elements who are most aggrieved by the recent film are those most active in pushing the anti-Jewish agenda. Posted by SPQR, Thursday, 20 September 2012 9:33:54 AM
| |
@Poirot(2)
<<The Cronulla riots are only a small part of the mosaic...">> It’s funny, but hardly unexpected, that whenever those on the left bring up (their iconic example of WASPs acting badly) the “Cronulla riots”, they never, ever, refer to the “retaliation” which was more long lasting and more violent than the initial “riot”. <<groups armed with baseball bats …more than 40 cars… and drove down to the beaches “to get revenge”[1] with many of the cars ending up in Maroubra …A local of Maroubra reported that each of the cars that arrived was “full, you know had four passengers”[1] The convoy, of 100 to 200 people,[18][20] was reportedly armed with bars and bats, knives, machetes and guns.[1][18][21] The group assaulted several people, knocking one unconscious and threatening another with rape.[1][18][20] They also damaged between 60 and 100 cars, setting at least one on fire.[1][21] Police in riot gear moved to contain the violence and the crowds responded by throwing bricks and glass.[21][22] Residents reported that in some streets “every car”[23] had had their windows smashed, with glass covering the streets.[23] Police also confiscated 40 iron bars and arrested 14 people.[18][24]”>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2005_Cronulla_riots <<...shades of Georgie Bush>> And I see you are still harping on about George W. I thought the blow-up doll of Georgie I linked you to would sate all your desires --perhaps, you really needed a blow-up CSteele doll. Posted by SPQR, Thursday, 20 September 2012 9:36:29 AM
| |
SPQR,
I don't recall a link to a "blow-up doll" of George W....? However, you did link to a voodoo doll of him. (If you recall, in reply I inquired if you had a link to an SPQR voodoo doll - although you haven't got back to me on that one. I understand, though, if you've switched allegiances to the blow-up variety : ) Posted by Poirot, Thursday, 20 September 2012 10:07:16 AM
| |
@Poirot,
<<If you recall, in reply I inquired if you had a link to an SPQR voodoo doll - although you haven't got back to me on that one. >> Aw gosh, on short notice this is the best I can come up with :http://www.stardoll.com/en/dolls/21/Ashton_Kutcher.html If you imagine a merging of Albert Einstein and Ashton Kutcher (and please resist the obvious quip) that is SPQR. Posted by SPQR, Thursday, 20 September 2012 10:24:40 AM
| |
SPQR,
Things are looking up. Albert Einstein was a true humanitarian, a humble and very wise man. Posted by Poirot, Thursday, 20 September 2012 10:50:51 AM
| |
Poirot: (Jayb, no doubt, considers that a spectacular trump line - Da Da!)
Yes, an intended one. Da da! Though I suspect very, very close to the truth. Does she & her ilk worry me. Too right, because the PC crowd seem to support them against ordinary Australians. If ever they do take control, & the PC crowd have to convert or get beheaded, they will say, (as the old Viet Cong do in Vietnam now,) "This is not what we fought for. We were duped." Poi rot, have you watched any of the Utube videos SPQR & I have posted. No? I didn't think so. Posted by Jayb, Thursday, 20 September 2012 11:39:45 AM
| |
I notice the Lady's are backing csteele.
And inferring we mear males are dead heads. I remember too the police officer wrongly charged with asulting a Muslim convert and the grubs and thugs who formed a chain around the court. Csteele support them, even when lies had been proved. A PC like, well it is PC cloud is trying to force us to be silent. To forget the murders the signs world wide. Tells us we are bigots but not the mother of the behead sign. Not the our dead are in paradise yours are inn hell. We victimize the poor folk. NO WE DO NOT! Never be blinded by such . It will be mostly the men who march off to defend our right to live, to worship or not,to live in the enemy of Islam, a democracy. Posted by Belly, Thursday, 20 September 2012 11:44:55 AM
| |
Belly,
"And inferring we mear males are dead heads." No-one is attempting to silence you. You and the others are reacting in a typical human manner to a "perceived" threat from without. You are all, in fact, fueling each others' fear and animosity in a mildly hysterical fashion...nothing new there - it's a very human and tribal response. Michael Leunig is right that [the riot(s)] "....are only a small piece of the mosaic..." Posted by Poirot, Thursday, 20 September 2012 1:52:18 PM
| |
*You and the others are reacting in a typical human manner to a "perceived" threat from without*
I guess it could be said that you Poirot, are arguing in a typically human female fashion too, as I happen to perchance reread David Buss's "Human Mating Strategies", as I was cleaning up. Being feminine, your fight or flight response would be switched to flight, running behind some male for protection, should a "threat" ever get too close. Meantime, turning the other cheek is a dismal failure in nature. Csteele meanwhile believes in his Kumbaya culture, thinking that reason will solve everything. Sadly that is not so, with deeply engrained religious beliefs. The biggest killers of muslims are in fact other muslims who have a different intepretration of their holy book, no matter what is reasoned. Therin lies the problem and therefor my comment, that wherever Islam goes, trouble surely follows. If Muslim migrants had been say Buddhist migrants, we would not be having this discussion.There is really no good reason why the obvious should not be stated. Posted by Yabby, Thursday, 20 September 2012 2:09:45 PM
| |
Yabby,
"Csteele meanwhile believes in his Kumbaya culture, thinking that reason will solve everything. Sadly, that is not so, with deeply ingrained religious beliefs..." You may be right about that: http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2005/oct/07/iraq.usa It's fascinating how you and a few others turn this whole argument on the matter of gender...and even more fascinating that those of us who are labelled as being in the "feminine" camp are lambasted for appealing to "reason" instead of bellicose hysteria. Just goes to show what savage beasties humans are beneath the facade of culture and "civilisation". Posted by Poirot, Thursday, 20 September 2012 3:38:31 PM
| |
Well yes Poirot, I know I am right about that and yes, civilisation
as its called, is just paper thin. It doesen't take much to go back to the laws of jungle, as we saw when New Orleans was flooded. I also think that there is nothing wrong in pointing out the dangers of religion, of whatever brand it is. It took the secular world hundreds of years of battle , to free itself somewhat from the shackles of the Catholic Church. They did not achieve it by turning the other cheek. Pointing out the problems of Islam, is indeed a topic that should be debated, without being accused of islamophobia or hysteria. We really should not need to repeat this stuff again, in the Western World. Posted by Yabby, Thursday, 20 September 2012 4:00:50 PM
| |
Poirot I greatly admire you.
But as I live and breath will not let the feminine defense tactic stop me thinking as I want to. Be there and done that, the crying, begging ,the whole pack. No way ever again. I would be the first to defend a MUSLIM woman child or man in trouble. But know almost every one of them would walk past me in the gutter. I am not blind we will see more, even hate to say it terrorism here,now SOME leaders say no more the mentally challenged will switch tactics. I want to see real true accountability from these haters of me and for that matter you. I reject your opinion of me in this matter as PC out of control. Posted by Belly, Thursday, 20 September 2012 4:36:58 PM
| |
Belly,
By all means, think as you want to - no-one is stopping you. "...feminine defense tactic....crying, begging, the whole pack..." Why thank you, Belly. "But know almost every one of them would walk past me in the gutter." Oh, you know that do you?...and, of course, you would protest at the generalisations of the rioters - yet you feel justified in generalising in reference to them "...walk past me in the gutter." - you mean something like Westerners do to the people subsisting on Western streets? "...of these haters of me..." Who's that then, Belly? Posted by Poirot, Thursday, 20 September 2012 5:02:36 PM
| |
Poirot,
you're starting to sound more & more like an illegal fundamentalist boat people person without papers. Posted by individual, Thursday, 20 September 2012 6:07:06 PM
| |
And you're sounding exactly like individual.
Another dazzling example of profound analysis. I agree with Yabby that we should discuss problems associated with religion. That should preclude - one would hope, in a civilised society - recourse to gross emotive conjecture and petty sloganeering such as your blather above, individual. Posted by Poirot, Thursday, 20 September 2012 6:23:07 PM
| |
Poirot,
let's face it, you're running low on valid points. Is your lack of foresight preventing you from seeing the big picture ? Go out & experience the real world for a week. It'd do you good. Posted by individual, Thursday, 20 September 2012 7:23:42 PM
| |
Csteele <That was the same narrative I accepted for nearly 3/4s of my life so I can't be too harsh. Perhaps with more reading you might see things in a different light, who knows.
A question for you though. Did the ethnic cleansing of Palestinians start before Israel was attacked or after?> Csteele, I actually contemplated that very question whilst watching Q&A(Questions&Answers) on TV the other night. This very subject was being discussed. I concluded that I do not actually have any factual information on that. I did hear of a few Suicide bombings including a school bus, before Israel built the wall. However I always have believed that the human race is territorially aggressive and it wouldn’t actually surprise me if maybe the Jews did discriminate against the Palestinians. Maybe there are books or stories as you say that I have not come across as yet. I do however have an open mind on the subject,if I can be informed of truthful incidents that happened before Israel was attacked by the Arabs. As I have said before, I really don’t think there is a right or wrong in this Israel, Arab question, it is just that humans like animals need territory and territorial resources to survive and they have proven over and over again throughout history that they are territorially aggressive,(commonly called racism)and will kill over control of land and countries. The Jews are just as capable of territorial aggression,(racism),as the Arabs. As are we all. Biological surivival instinct, but how to come up with answers to dampening down that aggression and living together peacefully is the question? We will never find the answer whilst deluding ourselves that we are sweet little unagressive human creatures,very holy and incapable of violence. Christian and Jew and Islam. Best face the truth of our real Human nature and try to find solutions from that point of view. Difficult in the extreme. Especially with different religious ideologies to increase the divide. Posted by CHERFUL, Thursday, 20 September 2012 7:55:33 PM
| |
GrahamY was messaged when this thread first started - it can be viewed as a very ugly thread.
Indeed, it is bringing out some very ugly responses and some valiant replies. To what end? Whilst I assume Graham is moderating the comments, I also assume there are other 'powers that be' who will also be watching. Sure, butcher's thread is achieving a high 'hit' rate - is it good for OLO? Perhaps, but perhaps not. Posted by bonmot, Thursday, 20 September 2012 8:20:46 PM
| |
bonmot,
this might actually be a perfect time to say goodbye to this thread. It's degrading by the post to the same level as the subject of the thread. Posted by individual, Thursday, 20 September 2012 9:14:15 PM
| |
Dear Belly,
It is difficult for me to convey how deeply disappointed I was to read your post where you stated; “But know almost every one of them would walk past me in the gutter.” If your anger towards me in any way contributed to your making it then I am sorry. Dear CHERFUL, Thank you for your post. You have couched the Israel/Palestine conflict in terms of striving for territorial gains on a couple of occasions. One of the most alluring approaches to the issue is to simplify it since it seems to defy rational contemplation. It took some Jewish writers to prompt me to explore things more deeply. One of the great human abilities is to feel empathy, to be able to see things from another's perspective. I don't think we employ it nearly often enough. Posted by csteele, Friday, 21 September 2012 12:56:58 AM
| |
"The cartoons published by moslem media are far worse than the cartoons
published in the west." Really? I don't think I've ever seen one. Posted by wobbles, Friday, 21 September 2012 2:09:10 AM
| |
Bonmot you although not always friendly to me are in my view one of the top five posters on this site.
I would not place myself in the top 20, as I tend to say it as I think, often harshly. But can you justify asking for free speech, this subject, to be curtailed? What subjects are out of bounds. How do we address those problems. Are the actions of SOME in this riot unacceptable? Is there a chance the often stated hate against us is true in some cases. csteele I do not hate you, I dislike you, in you I see, and if you can prove me wrong serve up the humble pie I will eat it. *A standard issue Green woman/man* , Muslim defender at any cost. Long weary of words smiths who call truth lies who condemn one side who refuse to even consider the middle path. csteele no God exists,to fix this problem, words never will. We need to stop pandering to ANY CREED. Stop defending this middle ages hate,too. You in every post infer my words are baseless and yours right. I will not bend to such , a person who both over values their views and under values others is worse for it. I know, have seen it, in some city streets some would walk on me to get past. Posted by Belly, Friday, 21 September 2012 5:07:46 AM
| |
Wobbly said;
"The cartoons published by moslem media are far worse than the cartoons published in the west." Really? I don't think I've ever seen one. One of the posts here a couple of days back had links to some of them. Also some Utube videos. Pretty horrid stuff really. Much worse than anything about moslems published in the west. I think they could be found by google without difficulty. Posted by Bazz, Friday, 21 September 2012 8:21:20 AM
| |
I don't think I've ever seen one.
Wobbles, I didn't know you were blind, my apologies. There was one particular picture where a child held up a sign for all those who offended islamists to be beheaded. That's quite a lot more radical than some cartoons. Posted by individual, Friday, 21 September 2012 12:44:03 PM
| |
Wobbles: I don't think I've ever seen one
This was posted by SPQR: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yw2EisVqKZ4&feature=relmfu. A beautifully made cartoon aimed a children. Lots more as well. please take the blindfold off before watching. Posted by Jayb, Friday, 21 September 2012 1:21:05 PM
| |
In defence of those Muslims who cut the throat of an American Jew, because he was both.
Who Murdered near 3.000 in the twin towers who included Muslims. Who hate non-Muslims world wide. And SOME of the true trouble making radical idiots who hate us but live a mungst us. I wish to say I am sorry. Sorry your hate, un-concern for the laws of your hosts, the rights of them too, and the rights of your Children to grow up in this country with freedom of choice. I can not agree your faith should be banned or your relatives stopped from coming. But I do demand an end to threats and demands that we change, not you. I warn the mother instict may blind SOME of our women, but not as many men. IF wea ll become soft history shows you will get harder to live with. Posted by Belly, Friday, 21 September 2012 3:00:09 PM
| |
You're probably right, Belly.
We are a complementary species after all...and us women folk (excluding csteele coz he's a bloke) need our blokes for physical protection against "the other side's blokes", because blokes tend to physical violence as a way of solving disputes or imposing belief systems. Not always, of course, but often that's the way it is. So, yup, we depend on the "unsoftness" of you men and your attitudes to protect us from the same traits in the men who would threaten us...seems to be a pattern there, although I can't quite put my finger on it. You'll have to excuse my silly feminine idea that perhaps we could all attempt to find some common ground - if we really try. Sheesh, with our over-sized neo-cortex and accompanying intelligence, is it too much to ask that we use it? Perhaps somewhere down the evolutionary track we might make some headway....although I presume we'll send ourselves extinct before that day comes. Posted by Poirot, Friday, 21 September 2012 5:01:09 PM
| |
Ah Poirot, we love you just as you are :)
The thing is, a test of your method is there for all to see. Now be honest, despite your best intellectual efforts, do you think that you have changed Runner's religious beliefs one little bit over the years? Now why do you think that the same effort would change the minds of hard line Islamic fundamentalists? I read somewhere that the trouble came from the Wahabi extremists who have settled in Sydney. These are people who learned to hate from when they were little kids. These were the people bearing the signs " we will go to paradise, you will go to hell". These were the people bearing the sixth pillar on their chests. Quite honestly Poirot, no matter how smart you are, I don't think you will change such engrained extremist beliefs, for its not about reason, its about fanatical dogma. The only way to deal with them, is from a position of strength. Personally I am intolerant of the intolerant. Posted by Yabby, Friday, 21 September 2012 5:48:20 PM
| |
Hiya, Yabby,
Yes, I do see your point. For instance,I sometimes marvel at runner's rock-solid insistence that evolutionary theory is a fraud. Just as an aside, my cousin who was an outstanding student, who became a teacher and is now a health educator completing a PhD, became a Christian nearly thirty years ago. I was talking to her one day when she first began nursing, and was shocked when she mocked evolutionary theory...I mean I was gobsmacked given her antecedents and the turnaround in her thought processes. Posted by Poirot, Friday, 21 September 2012 6:09:46 PM
| |
Yabby,
Poirot, I think it is reasonable to talk use the term "evolution denier" in the same sense we use the term "Holocaust denier." I'm not suggesting a moral equivalence between the two. But I don't know how else to describe them. Like Holocaust deniers, evolution deniers use all kinds of rhetorical tricks, outright lies and pseudo-science in order to mislead people. Posted by stevenlmeyer, Friday, 21 September 2012 7:06:14 PM
| |
Viruses evolve
and become stronger than the measures used to treat them last time. Hence the everchanging flu vaccine. Didn't they find a treatment at one point for Aids based on the fact that viruses can mutate and evolve? They trick the virus into mutating by changing the body's defences with some kind of medicine or medical procedure and then when the Aids virus mutates, they let the body's defence system change back to the way it was again. Although it doesn't cure the virus it keeps it in a form of limbo where it can't become completely dominant over the body's defences. Don't ask me the details, it was just an interesting program I watched on Television a couple of years ago. There certainly exists a form of survival of the fittest on the planet but I still wonder about the presence of the more intelligent apes and orangatans and why they never evolved into humans. Posted by CHERFUL, Friday, 21 September 2012 8:41:23 PM
| |
stevenlmeyer
your conclusion is foolish. The holocaust happened. Humans were created. Only indoctrination blinds you of the obvious. Posted by runner, Friday, 21 September 2012 10:41:27 PM
| |
All ideologies and that includes religion should be open to scrutiny and debate. Even more so, light should be thrown on any fundamentalism, where-ever found. This is not racism.
csteele has an avuncular affection towards Islam and Middle Eastern peoples (except Israel, of course). Islamic peoples, all 1.6b of them are victimised by the 13m Jews worldwide, but especially by Israelis (7m - of whom some 70% are Jewish). csteele, ol' bean, You write of the ills of censorship ... I agree. You will be delighted to know that the PC crowd have been overtaken by the initiative of Muslims in Britain. Wondering why the news, especially of the BBC and other media, was so skewed, these facts emerged. In Britain media is self-censoring itself when is comes to criticising Islam and by extension the Middle East. Fear is actually shaping media policies; and Islamist violence underpins BBC self-censorship. In an interview with BBC Director General, Mark Thompson, during the University Oxford project, Free Speech Debate, admitted that the Salman Rushdie was “an absolute watershed,” ... then there was 9/11. Furthermore, confessed: "A threat to murder … massively raises the stakes." Adding: "'I complain in the strongest possible terms' is different from ... 'I complain in the strongest possible terms and I'm loading my AK47 as I write.'" freespeechdebate.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/Mark-Thompson-on-the-BBC-religion2.pdf#page=6 Freedom of Speech is wonderful ... It just depends on whom is yelling the loudest Posted by Danielle, Friday, 21 September 2012 10:42:56 PM
| |
Poirot,
My mother defined the word 'chivalry'. She said it was a word to describe the male instinct to protect women from all other men, but themselves. Posted by Danielle, Friday, 21 September 2012 10:50:21 PM
| |
Hi Poirot,
I have a warped admiration for your ability to divert discussion away from the main topic. I'm sort of making a study of how you do it so often. Brilliant. Now back to the topic: should people, of whatever background, be allowed to throw a tanty and break the law ? No, I don't think so. Should people be allowed to shout out "Feck Australia !" and stay in Australia ? I'm not so sure. They always have choices - to stay here and submit to the laws associated, more or less, with equality and democratic society - or to go back to some ancestral homeland, perhaps Lebanon or Syria, and face the current slings and arrows of such vibrant and active communities. I recommend that they immerse themselves in Australian society, polity and mores, good and bad, and join the rest of us in keeping 'church' and state separate. Cheers, Joe :) Posted by Loudmouth, Friday, 21 September 2012 11:14:16 PM
| |
Loudmouth (of strawman fame : )
Yes, I agree you have a warped something-or-other....acctuuallly I was replying to Belly's hobby-horse that womanish/feminine views were misguided on this subject. Danielle, Your mother was obviously a wise woman : ) Posted by Poirot, Friday, 21 September 2012 11:40:20 PM
| |
Poirot,
Indeed. I always enjoy your comments here immensely. Everyone else does to; you have a great fan base. You manage to slip in those witty few words and someone comes a cropper ... As mentioned before, we may not always agree, but I always respect - and am invariably amused - by your offerings. A breath of fresh air! Posted by Danielle, Saturday, 22 September 2012 1:11:14 AM
| |
If freedom is the goal, then it's absolutely essential that religion, any religion, be kept 100% separated from governance ... ALL governance.
Current "fundamentalist" Islam is JUST as evil, violent, intolerant and controlling as mainstream Christianity was until a few hundred years ago. While current mainstream Islam, which is over 90% of Islam worldwide, is much the same as current Christianity, meaning it's "relatively" intolerant and "relatively" controlling while still bowing (often with protest) to the secular laws of the land. Religious belief, by it's very nature, encompasses various degrees of intolerance and attempted control (just look at the far right wing Christian movement in the USA, they are true nutters, and should they ever gain "real" governance, then the USA can kiss goodbye to true freedom). Eventually, and it will probably take several thousands of years, science will likely have all the answers that explain existence. Then, humanity will look back at religious belief as an ancient curiosity that demonstrates lack of knowledge, lack of education, primitiveness, superstition and an often inhumane and sometimes brutal tool for control. Posted by DiamondPete, Saturday, 22 September 2012 3:11:04 AM
| |
Dear Danielle ol' celery stick,
Work has been rather consuming but I felt it necessary to find time to answer your post. Burton Joseph died a little over two years ago. He was a lawyer and a Jew. Burton's parents ran a business looking after Jewish cemeteries. Skokie is a suburb in Illinois and in 1977 one in six among its large Jewish population was either a Holocaust survivor or directly related to one. The National Socialist Party of America decided to march through Skokie. Their pamphlets announcing the event included images of swastikas reaching out to throttle Jews and emboldened type announced “We are Coming!”. Understandably many civic and private organisations attempted to block the march. Burton Joseph was instrumental in convincing the American Civil Liberties Union to take the case to defend the right of the NSPA to march. They won. Burton Joseph is one of a considerable number of Jewish people such as Noam Chomsky who inspire me and influenced my world view. I understand and admire their positions which they adopt despite, although I prefer to think because of, their Jewishness. I have greater difficulty understanding why someone like stevenlmeyer would be mixing it with the likes of Jay of Melbourne on a thread such as this, but accept my probable sin of over-romanticizing. I read things like “But know almost every one of them would walk past me in the gutter.” as pre-cursive and disturbing, especially as the author claims to represent middle Australia. While certainly not claiming any moral equivalence between Skokie and Sydney, the position that the protests about the film are an assault on our free speech almost demeans the notion. Anything short of violence was exercising of the very right we say we are trying to defend. Freedom of expression is a vital defence against tyranny and as such is too important just to play lip service toward. It shouldn't take an Australian Burton Joseph for us to realise it. Posted by csteele, Saturday, 22 September 2012 3:49:58 AM
| |
http://www.smh.com.au/nsw/disunity-not-anger-is-muslim-dilemma-20120921-26c4m.html
I am having fun with the links. Not my words but links to? MAINSTREAM THOUGHT! Yet so badly have I blotted my copy book some refuse to read them, but finding SOMETHING in them post them here again and again. I am unconvinced csteele is a bloke. Think this link, truly, explains why we are hearing so many different views from this community. Now the big hurdle. Poirot, know how you girls get in the corner getting in to the plonk talking about the men? We do it too! about you women. Thanks for the difference mother nature you non existent old girl! Thanks too for the bloke who speaks woman, even if he is only useing that skill, for sure as many women speak bloke, until his wallet is empty. Thanks for the mother instinct, too,even when it gets it wrong. As women say men have faults men know it is two sided. Yet you cannot live without them. And in some cases with them! Lady,s know I love all women, even the poor soles walking two paces behind a fat man in a dress who regards them as property. Posted by Belly, Saturday, 22 September 2012 5:45:00 AM
| |
We are simply treating the symptom and not the cause.
The symptom is the violence, the cause is the religion. Just remember, nobody is born to hate, they are taught to hate. If the riots get ugly, as suggest this weekend in the likes of Melbourne, I say, that's it, time to rid OUR NATION of this crap. Muslims either choose Australia or their religion, but they can't have both, not here. After all, this is Australia we are talking about! Posted by rehctub, Saturday, 22 September 2012 6:39:17 AM
| |
Belly,
You're the one who first decided to split this discussion down gender lines. Do I appear to you like a woman who congregates "...in the corner getting into the plonk talking about men"? Surely, in that case, I must be frequenting the wrong forum. "...for sure as many women speak bloke until his wallet is empty....even the poor soles walking two paces behind a fat man in a dress who regards them as property." You're a charmer this morning, Belly. I'll just add....that if I was walking behind "a fat man in dress", I'd make bloody sure I was more than two paces behind him - so he wouldn't hear the sound of my mirth. Danielle, Merci beaucoup : ) Posted by Poirot, Saturday, 22 September 2012 8:44:37 AM
| |
>>I have greater difficulty understanding why someone like stevenlmeyer would be mixing it with the likes of Jay of Melbourne>>
What on Earth are you talking about? For the record I agreed with Burton Joseph at the time and said so. It earned me considerable brickbats. I'm actually old enough to remember these incidents. And I have also fought for the right of Australia's Gerald Toben to propagate his Holocaust denial views. As I have stated numerous times on these boards the right to free speech is not restricted to the right to say things that meet with my approval. It includes the right to say things that I find abhorrent. Apart from EXPLICIT incitement to violence NARROWLY DEFINED I think people should be allowed to say pretty much what they like. There should be no such thing as a right not to be offended. I have expressed these views many times both on OLO and elsewhere. Posted by stevenlmeyer, Saturday, 22 September 2012 9:20:15 AM
| |
Nice try, Poirot :)
Now back to topic. Steven, I fully agree with you, that the right to free expression necessarily includes the right to say and write things that we might disagree totally with. This may even include inciteful expressions such as "Feck Australia!" provided they are not accompanied by the throwing of bottles or bashing of police with poles. So on the one hand, free speech must include the right to offend, but on the other, it should not incite violence, such as "Behead all those who insult the prophet." Such a banner in the hands of a child should invite enquiries by child welfare authorities. The Australian has two terrific articles today, on pages 15 and 16, one by the brilliant and courageous (take note, Poirot) Ayaan Hirsi Ali. As the first article notes about the issues facing all of us, in relation to the Muslim Brotherhood [and by implication, many other Islamist organisations]: "For them, a rightfully ordered Islamic world satisfies the laws God decreed for the faithful in the Koran, and these are closed to the slightest modification, his words unalterable forever." The writer goes on: "Obedience is the demand placed on the faithful, with the death penalty obligatory in cases of disobedience. Scholarship long ago took the mystique of divine revelation out of the Christian bible, but nothing like that has been done with the Koran. Like communism, Islam is an ideology with no conceivable half-measures." I would disagree slightly on that last point: there are strands of communism which are much more libertarian, free-thinking if you like, which put humans before models, practicality before Utopias - Erich Fromm's democratic socialism, for example. And of course, there still are backward Christian sects who rely on revelation, groups which Poirot, to be consistent, would have to defend. But the gist is that, in modern societies, based on the rule of law and human equality, and the infinitely correctability of everything, there is no role for pre-feudal philosophies, to fix everything in place forever. Joe Posted by Loudmouth, Saturday, 22 September 2012 9:57:27 AM
| |
Loudmouth,
I'm not averse to discussing the subject of any thread. (my initial contribution to this thread was dismay at mankind's penchant for aggression) I am, however, averse these days to interacting with "you" - having been the recipient repeatedly of your targeted animosity. It seems increasingly likely that when I go promenading down OLO's shady avenues, that you'll spring out from behind a tree and throw a rhetorical pie in my face....simply because you enjoy lobbing them in my direction. Mostly when you address me lately you are extremely antagonistic and often belligerent. That is not the action of someone who wishes to debate the issue. It is the behaviour of someone whose only object is to goad and provoke a fellow poster. Perhaps it's time to find another hobby. (Btw, I expect you'll have much fun pulling apart my earlier "promenading" metaphor....go for it!) Posted by Poirot, Saturday, 22 September 2012 11:06:44 AM
| |
Ahh, hum, gee, not sure I should speak.
Ah, well OK but forgive me, did I see an insult or two aimed at us men, from about the start of the thread. A bit of condemnation for?, well saying what I think. Is it wrong to do that. Many say things here I do not believe but being upset, convinced an element in the Muslim community are bad for this country. Being the racist male pig I am, well not actually, I think Rechtub has every right to be as upset as he is. But is on the wrong track wanting to outlaw the creed or its practice. So placing myself, not on the edge but squarely in the middle of Australian mainstream thought. Saying get the dresses of get the atitude packed away, give us the respect you demand of us. And know the film was not reason to get back in to the dark ages, a short trip for SOME of you, or go. Then know I am not moving on this issue. Posted by Belly, Saturday, 22 September 2012 12:07:56 PM
| |
Poi rot:
It seems increasingly likely that when I go promenading down OLO's shady avenues, that you'll spring out from behind a tree and throw a rhetorical pie in my face....simply because you enjoy lobbing them in my direction. Mostly when you address me lately you are extremely antagonistic and often belligerent. That is not the action of someone who wishes to debate the issue. It is the behaviour of someone whose only object is to goad and provoke a fellow poster. Perhaps it's time to find another hobby. Dito Jayb Posted by Jayb, Saturday, 22 September 2012 12:37:17 PM
| |
The thing is Csteele, there remains one major unresolved issue
between the Islamic world and the Western world. The Islamic world wants us to respect what they believe and deny us free speech, with threats of violence if we do not accept their terms and conditions. So violent has been their response, that even Pakistanis are dying, as buildings are burned down. So in essence, they want to deny you the very thing that you seem to be fighting for. We can only be expected to respect peoples right to believe whatever they want, not whatever they believe. Otherwise we really would be in trouble, if we would be denied the right to say what we think about the Catholic Church or any other church, whilst these religions would go on preaching their dogma with impunity. Some Christians as well as Islam, become highly political and ride on the back of religion to achieve their political aims. That makes politics rather one sided, if one cannot express what one really thinks, about the opposition and their claims, every time they quote from their holy book. This core issue remains largely unresolved, so disputes will continue. Posted by Yabby, Saturday, 22 September 2012 1:32:47 PM
| |
Another nice try, Poirot :)
Now back to topic: How to resolve the dilemma of people being able to integrate into a relatively modern, relatively democratic, society when they may instead still be immersed in revelatory-religious, inegalitarian, static and male-centred ideology - even when they have also sought to come to Australia, or to stay here in the country of their birth, precisely because of its freedoms, its modernity, and its free-and-easy, up yours, nature. No doubt we all have a lot to learn about how to get on with each other, but we must surely start - and finish - on the basis of the rule of law, equality of the sexes, and an awareness of rapid change. Things will never be the way they were, neither for ultra-conservative Khalifists nor for diehard Liberal voters, nor for that matter, for Stalinists. Feel free to discuss, Poirot :) Cheers, Joe Posted by Loudmouth, Saturday, 22 September 2012 1:49:48 PM
| |
I know Muslims who are genuinely horrified at what has occurred in Sydney. The state, as do the the Imams in my area, that they are "Australians first, and Muslims second."
Knowing the interfaith community to which Muslims contribute, I have no doubt as to their sincerity. Does anyone know of the Council for the National Interest, Melbourne? "Australia Censors Free-speech" (this article carries a link to Council for the National Interest "Secret Saudi Funding of Radical Islamic Groups in Australia" which might explain some of the extremist elements being witnessed) http://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/3358/australia-geert-wilders This body has produced a report is well referenced, so seems to have a degree of validity. Somewhat worrying, the report states that Sheik Halili (yes "the cat meat" one) of Lakemba Mosque is being challenged by a fundamentalist who wishes to take over Halili's position. Posted by Danielle, Saturday, 22 September 2012 1:50:02 PM
| |
Why don't these Muslims do what Christians do when insults are thrown at their faith?
Pray like mad for the offenders' souls. At least one could, perhaps, observe one spark of good out of this :-/ Middle Eastern Muslims, who otherwise would be killing each other ... so regularly, and in such numbers, such news is now tedious ... perhaps are showing some sort of cohesion. Well maybe ... It depends upon which particular Allah or Mohammad has been insulted. Posted by Danielle, Saturday, 22 September 2012 2:05:09 PM
| |
Csteele, ol' bean, ol' chum,
You have stated that your embrace the ideology of Political Correctness. How does that equate with freedom of speech? I do enjoy your peons to self-worth ... Have you written your obituary yet? I hazard that this will be released on your demise - (hopefully, many years yet down the track) in serial form. Posted by Danielle, Saturday, 22 September 2012 2:20:35 PM
| |
Yabby: The thing is Csteele, rather one sided, ...................
if one cannot express what one really thinks, about the opposition and their claims, every time they quote from their holy book. Thank you Yabby I have tried to get that very message across many times but seemingly I get ignored. Danielle: Somewhat worrying, the report states that Sheik Halili (yes "the cat meat" one) of Lakemba Mosque is being challenged by a fundamentalist who wishes to take over Halili's position. That's frightening. What's next, a fully blown terrorist Imam? The Muslim people in your area may be horrified about the demonstration but they still are working for an Islamic Caliphate in Australia. See the link below. http://www.hizb-australia.org/events/item/372-khilafah-conference-2012 On Danielle post here is another post from the same Organization. It's something I have asked on OLO many times & been denigrated for it. http://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/3354/muslim-protests A Muslim asks the same question. Posted by Jayb, Saturday, 22 September 2012 2:22:28 PM
| |
I see a very basic and clear ignorance from "some" people on this thread. Some people STILL, in these enlightened days, refuse to accept the HUGE differences between Islam and "fundamentalist" Islam.
Rioters, murderers, terrorists and Islamic bigots are still referred to as if they are mainstream Muslims. The MAJORITY of Muslims live in first world countries and stable countries, and are no more dangerous than Christians. Some people here need to drop their anti Muslim bigotry, stop listening to the right wing shock jocks and gain a more educated and tolerant world view. Posted by DiamondPete, Saturday, 22 September 2012 2:50:12 PM
| |
IM ASKING
WHO FIRST USED THE WORD *RIOT* a busted window..bruised pride no deaths..no ripping up roads to throw no petrol bombs..no busted shop windows.. RIOT what rot! that Is ..*the lie >>..right there! who first called it ...*A RIOT*>>!? Posted by one under god, Saturday, 22 September 2012 3:02:42 PM
| |
Pete, I am the first to agree that not all Muslims are bad people, in fact, the bad ones make up a small percentage.
However, they, good or bad have chosen to follow their leaders, not ours. So in my opinion, this means that their leaders have a duty to make sure that their people follow our rules. Obviously, they (the Muslim leaders) have failed and, if they are incapable of controlling the violent actions of their people, their people should either stop following their leaders, or leave. The Greeks, Chineese, Italians, poms etc etc that we have accepted here have one thing in common, they are not taught to hate, nor do they provided thier little kids with placards suggesting beheading. And remember, while not all Muslims are terrorists, you can pretty much guarantee all terrorists are Muslims. To risk letting just one extremist potential terrorist into our great, peace loving nation, is ome risk too many in my view. Posted by rehctub, Saturday, 22 September 2012 3:43:05 PM
| |
Diamond Pete,
This news report may be encouraging, along the lines that you are talking about: http://au.news.yahoo.com/a/-/world/14921240/libyan-protesters-eject-militants-from-benghazi-4-killed/ Is that the sort of thing you mean ? Cheers, Joe Posted by Loudmouth, Saturday, 22 September 2012 3:46:11 PM
| |
DiamondPete: The MAJORITY of Muslims live in first world countries and stable countries, and are no more dangerous than Christians.
What planet do you live on. Saudi Arabia/Iraq/Lebanon/Iran/Pakistan/Egypt/Palestine even Turkey/Albania/Bosnia are not 1st world countries. Apart from the major cities most small towns don't have electricity or paved roads. None of them are what anyone would call stable. Most of the people in the countryside still live very basic 16th century lives based on 16th century customs. They still practice bride stealing, etc in some areas of the Balkans & around the Dead Sea. Even in the Christian areas. Of course, if you are referring to Fundamentalist Christians in the US then I agree & I put them on a par with the Taliban. My ex next door neighbour paid us a visit a few days ago. She brought her American boyfriend with her. I asked him about the Fundamentalist Christians. He said that he lives close to a town in Kansas where they are all Christian Fundamentalists. He said that it's a scary place. They are also Domsdayists waiting for the Lord to return, "next week." At least they are quite funny, well, they would be if they weren’t so scary. Lord help us & keep us safe from the weirdos. UOG: You still scare the crap outta me. Posted by Jayb, Saturday, 22 September 2012 4:37:18 PM
| |
Rehctub's last post is a good example of what I'm talking about when I refer to uneducated,unworldly, anti Muslim bigotry. Rehctub wrote that good Muslims here have chosen to not follow our leaders. What uneducated rubbish from Rehctub. Good Muslims are JUST as law abiding as good Christians and good atheists and good Jews and good Buddhists etc etc.
"Some" slaves to right wing, shock jock politics in this country need to acquire an actual education and move out of the 18th century. Posted by DiamondPete, Saturday, 22 September 2012 4:39:27 PM
| |
Jayb, hundreds of millions of Muslims were born, bred and live in countries like the USA, Canada, Australia, France, Sweeden, Russia, Germany, Argentina, England, New Zealand, .... the list goes on and on and on and on and on and on. I'm so glad that I could educate you on this important matter. Education is a wonderful thing, and opens one up to the real world.
Posted by DiamondPete, Saturday, 22 September 2012 4:45:32 PM
| |
I have previously read about the Caliphate.
There is an international organisation of islamic countries and it is their policy to introduce the caliphate. Now my understanding is that the caliphate is an international religious government to which all moslems will hold allegiance. The idea as I read it, is that moslems will not be expected to obey the laws of their country of residence but to sharia law administrated by the caliphate. You can see where this is going, and it was the aim of that conference in Bankstown last weekend. Apparently it was declared recently in the middle east somewhere. One suggestion was that it would be an alternative United Nations. It matches with the policy that islam is both religious and political. Watch this space ! Posted by Bazz, Saturday, 22 September 2012 4:47:41 PM
| |
I am sure as we have talked of this subject in dozens of threads for years we will again.
Long after this one comes to an end. And that some LIKE OUG will try to down play the act that bought us here. Pete will not be the last who wants us to talk only about the good not the bad. My states City, so far this weekend has seen three drive by gun injury,s, it some times gets more. Same folk, not mainstream Muslims but yes Muslims. What do it matter how many, why any. Show me any other group that has ever done this. And EVOLUTION! some who truly think it not a god bought us to life, still think we, all of us, should let MIGRANTS following a harsh God, should be respected even when they hate us. I have been shouted at, insulted, by Muslims, by telling me to eat a hamburger! Pigs bottom to those lot, not all just those who love to hate. Posted by Belly, Saturday, 22 September 2012 5:34:15 PM
| |
Jayb,
When have I been belligerent to you? I called one of your responses "pathetic' after you labelled csteele "Ali bin csteel". I certainly haven't been trolling you around for weeks seeking any opportunity to goad you or misrepresent your intentions - which is what I was alluding to in my response to Loudmouth. Nor have I called you, as he did after I posted on the FGM thread, "mealy-mouthed", "half-witted", "craven and gutless", amongst other things. Anyway, I have no idea why I got sucked into this thread, with talk of "garbage" and "pork chops" and whatever else. I'll leave you all to it. Posted by Poirot, Saturday, 22 September 2012 7:14:35 PM
| |
Ah DiamondPete, if only things were as hunkydory as you claim.
Fact is as more muslim asylum seekers and migrants have been flooding to the West, tensions have been rising, as where Islam goes, militant Islam surely follows. So in country after country, from France, Holland, Belgium, Britain, Russia, Spain, we hear calls for a Caliphate, Sharia law and cries about Muslims being the poor victims. Demonstrations and violence follow. So perhaps it makes sense to note all this and realise that the same problems don't occur with say Buddhist migrants. I remind you that the OIC is against free speech as we accept it in the West and they represent all Muslims and Muslim countries. So perhaps its up to Muslims to adjust, if they want to live in the West and not the other way around, as so many seem to think. Posted by Yabby, Saturday, 22 September 2012 7:21:07 PM
| |
Sorry you're so offended, Poirot.
Now back to topic: Eight or nine hundred years ago, substantial progress was made in Western Europe to delineate powers of religious, vis-a-vis, temporal authorities - to separate the management of religious issues from those of the secular, day-to-day management of a state. In fits and starts, for many more hundreds of years afterwards, battles raged, often openly, between those (like Popes and Cardinals and Archbishops) who sought to re-impose a thoroughly reactionary religious rule over society - and those (obviously for their own personal interests and power) in control of armies and treasuries who wanted to exert secular political control over all of society, often fighting each other as well. After many wars, and contemporaneous with the development of science, political philosophy, economic activity and technology, the separate of church and state was more or less managed. We are still living with the remnants of those bitter struggles. But in the Muslim world, those battles have hardly yet begun. It even seems that the most extreme reactionaries, the Wahhabis, al-Qaida, the Muslim Brotherhood, etc., could win there this time around. Perhaps there will have to be a major series of wars between Sunni and Shia - with the destruction of minor sects as collateral damage - before the victors turn their attention to the rest of the world. Us. Enlightenment values were very hard fought, through cycles of revolution and reaction, and bitter fights to introduce and defend issues of freedom and equality. Australia, imperfect as its systems may be, has been part of that long, bitter struggle, with early votes for women and Aboriginal people - including Aboriginal women - in South Australia, for example. I hope people remember that, like Joni Mitchell says, you don't know what you've got 'til it's gone. Joe Posted by Loudmouth, Saturday, 22 September 2012 8:36:37 PM
| |
Poirot: When have I been belligerent to you?
You are right, it’s only been a couple of times in this thread but you certainly have waved some stick around to others & other threads. Mind you we all have waved some stick around at times, including me. Xin loi. (Sorry 'bout that) I just wonder if you looked at any of the Utube Links & the last two links I posted. Would you like to comment on any of them. Anyone for that matter. I have asked for comments before but it seems that the request are ignored & that's not polite, is it. I would like to hear some views from the people posting on this thread. They would be interesting. I'm sure. I know Ali bin csteel won't look at them or comment. (Cheap shot.) No, I think she has shown her colours & she/he would welcome a Caliphate in Australia. All those who think the same please put your hand up. Would you welcome a Caliphate in Australia csteel? Yes or No. Short answer please. Posted by Jayb, Saturday, 22 September 2012 9:03:13 PM
| |
Xin chao, JayB,
Core Islam has always, always been an evangelical ideology, with the aim of either converting the entire world or exterminating those who resist, ever since it burst out of the Hijaz, ultimately invading and conquering more than half of the Old World. It is really a brute-force religion, no two ways about it, except perhaps for its adoption across Indonesia three and four hundred years ago. Perhaps what we are witnessing - without being too melodramatic about it - is the shaping up of a struggle between the Enlightenment and the Khalifate. It's probably going to be far more complicated than that, within and between countries etc. I'm not too optimistic about where various political forces come down on one side of that fight or the other. But at least the Enlightenment has given the world the scientific method, cures for a multitude of diseases and email, so there might be hope for us yet :) Cheers, Joe Posted by Loudmouth, Saturday, 22 September 2012 11:14:06 PM
| |
http://www.news.com.au/national/backyard-preachers-inflame-violence/story-fndo4bst-1226479500978
OK! yes, my reference to pork including chops, has been rude, deliberately so. No way around it I and many others, have gone over the top. BUT not as bad as *behead those who insult the prophet* Nore* our dead are in heaven yours are in hell* And see my thoughts about poirot, Lexi? show me ONE female poster, ANY ONE, who is not one of this sites best. But too show me one who looks past the wish to protect, to see the problem truly exists. Show me another post so determined to protect any person from the middle east, no matter the charge, the facts, than csteele. Hidden behind an IRON LIKE CURTAIN OF PC is a harsh fact, some value only one sides free speech. This link proves a problem has many sides and it warns us, it needs fixing. POIROT left at the hands of one of the most unbalanced posters in this thread. We me included should ignore provocation. But not truth. I remind some who want to send the lot home ban the religion we are never going to be able to do that and should not, but we best progress by not leaving the education to hostile parents we never should have let into our country. Every problem has an answer but this has existed for hundreds of years and is anchored in superstition and control ,for a class of leaders the world would be better without. Posted by Belly, Sunday, 23 September 2012 5:43:31 AM
| |
http://in.reuters.com/article/2012/09/22/pakistan-bounty-anti-islam-film-idINDEE88L04H20120922
And this? A MINISTER! in the Government of Pakistan! offers a reward for? The head of possibly a Jewish Coptic who made a film, one of how many? Tens of thousands of poorly made barely watched hate movies slandering Christ and every God every race. Yet our concerns, our fears, are highlighted as bigoted comments? I remain then a bigot, concerned, convinced we must one day go to war to end this hate. Or? those who target our concerns will be the first victims. Posted by Belly, Sunday, 23 September 2012 5:54:06 AM
| |
Belly, that offer of a head bounty by a Minister of the Pakistan
government is the worse thing that has come out of the whole episode. Our government should ask Pakistan if that is Pakistan government policy and they should either sack that minister or we should sever diplomatic relations, including cricket, with Pakistan. I am amazed that Bob Carr has not already spoken on the matter. Posted by Bazz, Sunday, 23 September 2012 9:39:42 AM
| |
Hi Belly,
I certainly don't think that we will HAVE to go to war, but we all will need to think much more comprehensively about what it means to be 'of the West', post-Enlightenment, oriented to equality and democracy, Australian, etc., because what we may have to 'fight' is a long-term battle of ideas. If Islam has any validity, then it does so in its ideas and principles. If it hasn't, then this will be exposed in the arena of ideas and principles and we can then move on, all of us, together. Yes, I'm assuming that ultimately, it doesn't have validity, so I'm looking forward to what I hope will be a world-wide debate - not morons punching themselves in the face like in Pakistan (big tanties, twenty people killed - who gets killed, for Christ's sake, in Pakistan ?! Other Pakistanis ?! ) but a passionate debate, a sort of on-going Q & A. I guess there will always be those who want to tear down institutions, and those who want to build them and extend them. Some of them might even think of themselves as Left-wing. So we either tear down the world (perhaps in some dumb@rse childish version of John Lennon's "Imagine there's no heaven, hell, religion, countries, possessions, etc.), or build it together. Together. It's our choice. Keep struggling, brother, Joe Posted by Loudmouth, Sunday, 23 September 2012 10:11:30 AM
| |
Every word could have been mine Joe, Loudmouth.
I think the war I speak of has to be fought. At first with our own, in verbal form, to stop the paper surrenders. And with the Militant and just plain lier like the whole country of Pakistan. Our chances of winning that? unknown. But in time we will win, if we do not bend to the PC and uninformed. I question the death of anyone in the name of any God Myth. And the Subjugation of whole peoples by the hierarchy of these non existent Gods. Bazz in fact it is an every day every hour event, a gift of middle ages bigotry. Posted by Belly, Sunday, 23 September 2012 4:54:32 PM
| |
Hi Belly,
A belated happy birthday too, young fella :) I'll be ten in dog years, in a month or so. Feel it too. Cheers, Joe Posted by Loudmouth, Sunday, 23 September 2012 10:06:53 PM
| |
Finally a chance to reply more fully to some of the points raised in this thread.
I spent a delightful day at the Melbourne Show yesterday. The sun was out, spring was in the air, country and city folk were mingling, there were heads adorned with Akubras and hijaabs keeping the sun off, smartly worn RM Williams and saris competed for attention while young Asian students posed excitedly in front of their friend's iphones. So many different faces studying here or making this land home. Made me damn proud to be an Australian. This, according to Yabby, is 'Kumbaya culture', 'paper thin' with the 'laws of the jungle' just ready to pounce. While I sat for lunch on the shaded steps of one of the pavilions there was a Muslim family comprising of three adults and four children who availed themselves of a section just below me. I remarked about the beautiful day and was rewarded with huge smiles all round. These were the people Belly would have me believe would step over my body if I suddenly suffered a medical emergency. These were the people Butcher wants to 'send back'. Indeed these were the children that some idiotic woman would have me believe want to behead me if I were to insult Allah. Ludicrous! I am of the firm belief that we have something pretty special in this country, something worth defending, something we should be proud of and celebrated. The question is from whom does this need defending? Is it a couple of hundred idiots in Sydney or seemingly thousands of scared, often racist, often ignorant people intent on stereotyping and fearmongering? It is hard to escape the overwhelming feeling it is the latter. There would be very few Australians who didn't rightly get angry at seeing police getting assaulted in the manner they did, nor get quite disgusted at the sight of a child holding up that placard. Overt displays of religious fundamentalism in our mainly secular society are always dis-quietening. Runner's world view has few friends here, even among the more pious of OLO posters. Cont... Posted by csteele, Sunday, 23 September 2012 11:50:26 PM
| |
Cont...
Yet I'm not looking to send him anywhere. I have talked to many people about the issue and only in a few have I seen the fear and stereotyping that is so broadly on display here. Butcher, Jayb and Belly may be amongst the loudest trumpeters but look at the likes of Stevenlmeyer writing; “In the not too distant future Indonesia, not Australia, will be calling the shots in this part of the world. So get used to treading carefully when it comes to Islam.” “If I were an Egyptian Christian I'd definitely be making plans to make tracks.” While not as overt in his stereotyping he certainly doesn't hold back on the fearmongering. Anyway what do people really mean when they say Muslims have to learn to adopt our way of life if they want to be welcome in this country? It would seem to many it is only by giving up the 'right' to be offended are we going to afford Muslims another right, that of being permitted to live amongst us. What a crock! As I have said people should be allowed to get offended by whatever they choose. The real truth of the matter is that many here are wanting the right to offend and this is quite different. They are quick to turn it into a question of free speech. But is it? Some of us are old enough to remember a certain unforgettable Logie moment when our own Bert Newton said of Muhammad Ali “I like the boy!”. We may have felt the look on Bert's face when he realised his 'offence' was priceless yet no one questioned Ali's right to be offended. Would exercising that right make him unsuitable to live amongst us as an Australian? Of course not. Danielle claims it is the threat of violence that makes all the difference and of course on a certain level it does, but what do you think would have happened if Bert had said “Suck it up N----r!, I'm standing by my right to offend you”. Cont... Posted by csteele, Sunday, 23 September 2012 11:53:19 PM
| |
Cont...
Another argument we have heard is this has nothing to do with Australia so why protest here at all? Australians have had a long and proud history of protesting at embassies whether it be about illegal whaling at the Japanese consulate, or Pacific nuclear testing at the French Embassy. In fact the French Consulate in Perth was fire-bombed over the issue, incidently one of the two charged was an Israeli-Australian. In fact I would be more than supportive of an action outside the Pakistani mission in Canberra over the Minister's comments. The next line touted is that the US government had nothing to do with the production or distribution of the movie trailer and because of their free speech laws were powerless to prevent its release. Besides which the producer was a Coptic Egyptian. Yet couldn't the former Afghanistan government have made a similar argument about a bunch of Saudi's hijacking some aeroplanes? Ultimately in this case there are two main things we shouldn't be prepared to permit without condemnation, one is protester violence and the other is racists wrapping themselves up in our flag and misappropriate the words 'Advance Australia fair'. Posted by csteele, Sunday, 23 September 2012 11:56:19 PM
| |
http://www.theage.com.au/national/muslim-cult-leader-revealed-20120923-26f7s.html
Thanks Joe same to you when it comes around. Csteele I read every word,still unable to hug you. But yes I understand you do want a better world, so do I but it is not without struggle. My link this morning only reports, it makes no choices just says what it knows. Such is the anti , anything highlighting concerns with the Muslim community, links are left to rot on the vine, after all who wants to hear the other side? There is the guts of the matter. A MUSLIM, CONSTRICTED BY TEACHING WE ARE LESSOR CAN EASILY SEPARATE THEM SELVES FROM OUR WORDS AND THOUGHTS some do. You by your total defense, defeat your self. No race or creed can be defended as a whole. I fear such folk as you, truth has no value, true change has no value, if defense at any price is the only outcome you will except. I do not share rechtubs thoughts, not most of them, and about nothing jayb has or ever will say. You are bright enough to know that. But use the words they do to hide my thoughts. I am unable to differentiate between your style and the worst in the radical Muslim world, truth is the first victim. Posted by Belly, Monday, 24 September 2012 4:45:13 AM
| |
csteele, you are welcome to keep dreaming, it's a free country, but one day you may be in for a rude shock.
BTW, why is it, in your view, that the US is building and manning all these military posts in our top end . Just for something to do maybe! As for your model Muslim family, I am the first to agree that so many, like these, exist. But, the fact remains that the hate and threats of beheading come from the religion, and it is for this reason that I stand where I stand. W have demonstrations all the time, unionists, indigenous, gays, tree buggers, you name it, but not one of them threatens another's life. Posted by rehctub, Monday, 24 September 2012 5:31:11 AM
| |
csteel: US government had nothing to do with the production or distribution of the movie trailer... Yet couldn't the former Afghanistan government have made a similar argument about a bunch of Saudi's hijacking some aeroplanes?
Hijacking a plane is a crime anywhere, free speech is only a crime in dictatorships or Theocracies. csteel: the look on Bert's face when he realised his 'offence' was priceless yet no one questioned Ali's right to be offended. What Bert said wasn't meant as "offence" & Ali realized that was just an Australian saying at the same time Bert realized that "in America" it was offensive. I saw it happen & you're grasping at straws. csteel: Australians have had a long and proud history of protesting. & look at who by. Unemployable Greenie ratbags & Uni students that are told that they won't pass their course if they don't turn up at the protest, not ordinary hardworking Australians. csteel I have politely asked your opinion on a couple of links but you keep avoiding the question. Do you agree with the Imam? & would you like to see Australia to become a Caliphate? Here are two links again. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=maHSOB2RFm4 http://www.hizb-australia.org/events/item/372-khilafah-conference-2012 It's not hard to watch them, just click on the links. Please do the right thing & tell us what your thoughts are on them. I'm sure all the posters here would like to know them. If you refuse to watch them, what are you afraid of? Posted by Jayb, Monday, 24 September 2012 7:48:28 AM
| |
csteele accuses me of "fear mongering"
If warning about possible future dangers is "fear mongering" I plead guilty. In particular I pointed out that Australia's most important neighbour, with ten times its population and a rapidly growing economy, is a Muslim country. If current trends continue it will be Indonesia, not Australia, that calls the shots in this region. Now I don't know to what extent Australians have taken this on board. I think many Australians still think of themselves as an outpost of a kind of Anglo-Saxon empire. They cannot conceive of Australia as a small country in Asia without powerful friends. But that seems to me to be the most likely position of Australia within the lifetime of many posters on OLO. A small country in Asia without powerful friends. So I ask Australians to consider realistically what it may be like when the air force of a Muslim country rules the skies in this region and the navy of a Muslim country sits astride Australia's trade routes. It may be nothing. It may be a non-event. Or a kind of Javanese / Indonesian nationalism tied up with Islam may arise. In that case things could get unpleasant. To repeat, if thinking we should be discussing these scenarios is fear mongering I plead guilty. But is there any one here who thinks we should be ignoring these issues? Posted by stevenlmeyer, Monday, 24 September 2012 7:53:39 AM
| |
"& look at who by. Unemployable Greenie ratbags & Uni students that are told that they won't pass their course of they don't turn up at the protest, not ordinary hardworking Australians."
Oh really? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1996_Parliament_House_Riot Posted by Poirot, Monday, 24 September 2012 7:59:57 AM
| |
csteele, you got it wrong on Afghanistan.
What Alquada was doing there was not freedom of speach. It was in partnership on a worldwide terrorist training program. The Afghans stuck their neck out and got it chopped. Stevenmeyer said; They cannot conceive of Australia as a small country in Asia without powerful friends. Well actually he got that wrong, Australia is not in Asia. Europe is much closer to Asia than Australia. In fact it is not generally realised that Indonesia and the Philippines are not in Asia either. These misunderstandings can be put down to Mercators projection of the world. Did you even realise that a degree of north latitude is 30% larger than a degree of south latitude on school wall maps ? Beijing is closer to Vienna than it is to Darwin. These distortions are affecting our world view. Australia is on the other side of the world to Asia ! Posted by Bazz, Monday, 24 September 2012 8:40:04 AM
| |
*This, according to Yabby, is 'Kumbaya culture', 'paper thin' with the 'laws of the jungle' just ready to pounce.*
Ah, how romantic and very sweet, Csteele. Now turn the power off in any big city for a couple of days and watch the looting and pillaging start. In Pakistan they are killing each other in the street and burning down buildings, because some guy, thousands of miles away, made a video. Our society is indeed paper thin. If you don't understand the massive difference between some guy making a video and AlQueda knocking down skyscrapers in New York, killing thousands of people, having declared war on the USA, then frankly nobody can help you lose your bias Posted by Yabby, Monday, 24 September 2012 9:30:19 AM
| |
csteele,
You write of the Muslims (and others) you saw in the crowd, enjoying the show, but you leave so much out ... I, and many others, are glad that they are able to do so. However, you omitted to add, that they couldn't do this in their countries of origin where endemic and systemic Islamic violence has driven them to seek a life elsewhere; indeed their lives were at stake. Coptic Christians are discriminated against in Muslim countries, and they are fearful ... Yes, here online we have seen some breath-taking comments. There is a great deal of anger that our way of life has been disturbed, even insulted, by something that we are not responsible for. But the difference here, is that it is online and not taken to the streets. We are grateful that we have a our way of life. Many have died to keep this. We also appreciate that others recognise its benefits and security, and despite being part of the Great Satan of the West, our 'great country' attracts those who can 'forgive and overlook' this 'failing'. Posted by Danielle, Monday, 24 September 2012 10:10:13 AM
| |
Folks may I briefly, divert the thread, we feel we know each other.
It is the same in my other hobby Ham Radio. We do not, mostly we are at least supprised to see, in real life each other. csteele would paint me and others as monsters. Yet the real me, ALWAYS picked out the orphan, the one sitting out side the shed, to befriend. Some times, without hesitation, that person could be a Muslim. I always respect their religion and belief,stay very clear of both, talk of friendly things. And hope they have a great life, in what I ALWAYS call OUR COUNTRY! theirs and mine! I know many here are more informed than me, BUT warn csteele speaks as SOME Muslims do. Covering the blood and death hate and bigotry of ANY SINGLE DAY with flowers and accusations we, white Anglo Saxons or any race not Muslim are lessor. Unity can not come until truth is heard and seen. By both sides Posted by Belly, Monday, 24 September 2012 11:55:12 AM
| |
Dear Yabby ,
Of course there is a massive difference. But just as it is deemed acceptable to hold the Afghani government accountable for the actions committed by 'outsiders' why does it then follow it is totally unreasonable for others to call on the US government to act in sanctioning the film's creators? I'm not saying I agree with either proposition just examining the principle. In the case of Afghanistan I see us beating the crap out of a very poor and blighted country in a very expensive war both in terms of Australian lives and resources while the principal funders and perpetrators are Saudi who are getting off totally unsanctioned. Indeed we are literally spending hundreds of millions of dollars combating the poison of Wahhabism in our very own backyard. I would have enjoyed a more nuanced discussion of the issue with stevenlmeyer if he hadn't been intent on coming in here to fan some pretty unsavoury flames. Much of our aid to Indonesia is being directed toward bringing Islamic schools into the national curriculum, in other words we are effectively attempting to counter the influence of Saudi millions. Yet the Coalition would have us slash these funds. Posted by csteele, Monday, 24 September 2012 12:00:37 PM
| |
Dear Danielle,
I can understand your sentiment but would argue that simply the act of 'taking it to the streets' should not be a determinate of whether something is unacceptable. I marched against the inhuman sanctions we imposed against the people of Iraq though it meant having to hand some customers over to my opposition so I could find the time. I have read enough of the Jewish story to know how much ignorance lies in Yabby's statement “The Jews were seen as a race, not as a religion and were despised because of their business practises, more than anything.” If, when judging someone's argument, I replace the word Muslims with the word Jews, and it is obvious it would be deemed untenable by most right thinking people, I know there is a problem. So when I read Yabby as saying 'NO MORE JEWS!' Or Kactuz 'I refuse to believe that Jews in Australia, the US or Europe are any different from their brethren in Israel' Or Banjo 'If we can discriminate about alien cultures in immigration we can then prevent Jews, or any other groups, from coming here.' Or this pearler from Phillip S 'INSTEAD I propose the police have a new recruit PIGS (real ones) now if they are real Jews they will soon run from a pig.' Or butcher 'One solution is to ban the Jewish faith in Australia. If they wish to be practising Jews, we won't stop them, they just have to find somewhere else to do it. Or Jay of Melbourne 'Jews don't believe in "diversity" and how, pray tell does diversity factor into their colonialist military doctrine called Zionism, you're either a Jew or you're not in their view.' I see these sentiment for what they really are. Posted by csteele, Monday, 24 September 2012 12:02:37 PM
| |
Poirot, Stevenlmeyer, Bazz, Yabby, Denielle, Belly, Loudmouth, Indy, & Diomondpete, I implore you to ask csteel to comment & if she supports the ideas of the people in the links I gave her.
The links again. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=maHSOB2RFm4 http://www.hizb-australia.org/events/item/372-khilafah-conference-2012 Of course I would like to hear all your views as well, please. I have implored you all to comment before. Is there a reason for ignoring this request. If so. I would like to hear why, please. Jayb: "& look at who by. Unemployable Greenie ratbags & Uni students that are told that they won't pass their course of they don't turn up at the protest, not ordinary hardworking Australians." Poirot: Oh really? I looked at the link you gave me as I do with all links. I did notice they didn't once mention, Roxby Downs, the Asylum seekers facilities, various World Leaders Conferences, etc. Why is that? A few of my diggers in the Army Reserve in Townsville told me that they had to have time off Reserve Training to attend Demonstrations otherwise they would fail their Courses. These were the ones at Port Hinchinbrook near Cardwell. It got so bad at one stage that the Brigade Commander had to call a conference with the Uni as it was affecting the Officer Training School. My next do neighbour is an Environmentalist Professor at James Cook & his wife is a distant cousin of mine. I asked him about the claim. He told me straight out that it wasn't mandatory, but the papers of students that didn't attend Demonstrations wouldn't be marked in a favourable light, if you get my drift. He said it happens on all Uni Campuses. Unofficially, of course. Posted by Jayb, Monday, 24 September 2012 12:09:20 PM
| |
*So when I read Yabby as saying 'NO MORE JEWS!'*
Well there is the problem Csteele, in your head and not in what I wrote. I pointed out the historical fact as to why the Jews were disliked in Europe and that it was not about their religion. Feel free to shoot the messenger and distort what I actually claimed. I have pointed out that Islam is a problematic religion and that where Islam goes, trouble follows. I have pointed out that its going to be up to Muslims to solve their internal conflicts. I also think that those Muslims who are calling for the overthrow of the West, who want their Caliphate, might as well be offered a ticket home and made to feel unwelcome, for clearly they would be happier living in an Islamic country, under Sharia law. Alot is indeed being done to change things in Saudi Arabia. Even the Sauds understand and acknowledge the problem and are slowly bringing about change. But you are going back into the formation of tribal Saudi Arabia and deals struck between the Sauds and Wahabs. Its indeed happening, and the last thing we want is for revolutionary change, for civil war in Saudi Arabia would be a nightmare. We remain addicted to oil and even your job depends on it Posted by Yabby, Monday, 24 September 2012 12:22:49 PM
| |
csteel: pray tell does diversity factor into their colonialist military doctrine called Zionism, you're either a Jew or you're not in their view.'
Well there ya go. I didn't know that the Jews with Zionism were aiming to take over the world like the Muslims do with their World Caliphate. The Jews just want their country (Israel) back seeing they were kicked out of their Country by the Romans in 66 AD & spread all over Europe, then in 732 ADish by an invading Muslim Army who killed them all & took over their Jewish Temple, or what was left of it, & made it their own. Csteel please answer the questions. Please. By the way. Hi Belly, A belated happy birthday too, young fella :) I guess I won't get to have a next birthday, 29th Dec. I'd be 68. Seeing we're all doooomed on the 21st of December. :( Posted by Jayb, Monday, 24 September 2012 12:57:00 PM
| |
After 49 pages the ignorance still continues from "some" people here who seem to not have the intellectual capacity to comprehend the difference between terrorism/fundamentalist Islam and Islam.
This insular and uneducated world view of "some" here, is clearly informed not by facts, but rather their anti Islam bigotry. A bigotry that "attempts" (unsuccessfully) to taint all Muslims worldwide with terrorism. All religious belief is wrong. Why? Because no deities exist. But, everyone has the right to believe in "their" version of a deity, if they so choose. ALL religions, at various times in their histories (including Buddhism), have attempted to force their beliefs on society. When societies become civilised, this pervasive evil becomes less and less ... till we get the current situation in all modern, civilised regions where forced religious doctrine is not permitted. There's millions and millions and millions of Muslims worldwide, living in such regions, who respect this, agree with this, and who obey the laws of the land like Christians, atheists, Jews, agnostics, Hindus etc etc. Muslims, like ALL other religious people, are born and bred in EVERY country in the world. But these facts are ignored by the bigots, who wish to taint ALL Muslims with the same negative brush of terrorism. The fact that we have such bigots in a civilised country like Australia is sad indeed. But, people have the right to be uneducated bigots, if they so choose. They have a right to "believe" the right wing shock jocks who regularly preach their anti Muslim rhetoric. And other people have the same right to speak out against the bigots. Posted by DiamondPete, Monday, 24 September 2012 2:58:40 PM
| |
csteele,
You draw the parallel with "no more Muslims", "no more Jews". But that is so simplistic. Why don't Arab Muslims take to the streets protesting against beheadings, stonings, collective hangings, amputations, child-marriages, FGM, and other practices; the fact that a woman's voice is half,even a third that of a man's? Because it is part of the collective consciousness of the people. A few lone Arab Muslims raise their voices in protest. They are not heard. Because, as one such intellectual observed, "the high priests of political correctness in the West ignore them." ... thus, further condemning their societies to these horrors. He saw this as just another example of the attitude that his people were again "the white man's burden" ... not up to snuff. Under the Iranian Islamic Penal Code, little girls at the age of 9 yrs, and boys at the age of 12 yrs, are "liable for execution". Many Iranians do protest about the horrors in the Islamic Penal Code. They are not seen again. A few years ago, the Iranians put up a world-wide petition that their country be removed from the UN until the all the horrors of the penal code be changed, and human rights adopted. I signed, did you, steele? Apparently the UN ignored it. No surprises there, looking at the composition of the UN. I too was opposed to entering Iraq. "Democracy" there is not really successful is it, despite the massive loss of life on both sides? Perhaps it has to do with the local Islamic mind set. Yet, Bosnia-Herzegovina is Islamic; they have a secular and democratic society. No horrors there as seen in the Middle East. Incidentally, as the late Hitchens observed, the US wasn't thanked for preventing them being obliterated. Islam does not necessarily equate with barbarity. But in the Middle East ... cont ... Posted by Danielle, Monday, 24 September 2012 4:24:15 PM
| |
Diamond, what you say all seems quite reasonable but-_-_-
The effect of the fundamentalists seems to be that they have the loudest voices and the majority just go along and say nothing unless pressed. The police are running headlong into this problem where even those not directly involved say nothing. The same seems to happen, when what we consider are outrageous statements are made by Immans. I have not heard anything said about the Minister of Railways in Pakistan offering $300,000 for the head of the film maker. Nothing but dead quiet. No, I haven't seen any reason to separate out the loud voices from the rest. Posted by Bazz, Monday, 24 September 2012 4:25:49 PM
| |
Until the PC crowd remove the caul obliterating their vision as to the horrors in the Middle East, these horrors will remain. Whilst the elephants in the room are ignored, no recognition even of what these people have to endure are given them. Surely, these people deserve better.
I don't believe that entire populations there don't yearn for human rights and dignities that they see in the West. Otherwise, why do so many want to be part of, indeed embrace, our society. Their decision to come to this country speaks for itself. The British banning suttee in 1829 was not PC was it? If today it was still practiced, the PC crowd would avert their eyes. csteele, you state your adherence to PC ideology, how does not equate with "freedom of speech"? Posted by Danielle, Monday, 24 September 2012 4:32:31 PM
| |
Danielle, in those fundamentalist regions you mention, the reason why Muslims aren't out on the streets protesting about Sharia law, terrorism etc. is NOT because acceptance of it is in their "collective consciousness", to use your phrase. It's because if they did they'd be brutalised, killed, stoned, raped, perged, beaten .. you get the idea.
In fundamentalist regions, fundamentalism is FORCED on the population. The population is controlled and brutalised, under severe social and legal penalties. Please don't blame ordinary, everyday Muslims for the brutal actions of ** FUNDAMENTALISTS **. Posted by DiamondPete, Monday, 24 September 2012 4:38:26 PM
| |
As I have mentioned before, ad nauseum, I lived in Malaysia for many years. An Islamic country. Islamic observance etc. was not onerous. Now we see public floggings. A young woman was so punished for drinking alcohol. What is happening ... ?
On another OLO discussion, I provided evidence that many Indonesians were becoming concerned that reactionary Islam, as seen in the Middle East, was now being promoted. What is happening ...? Do we simply ignore this as not relevant? Posted by Danielle, Monday, 24 September 2012 4:43:19 PM
| |
DiamondPete,
You have said it all. Fundamentalism = Fear. Posted by Danielle, Monday, 24 September 2012 4:45:57 PM
| |
That's right Danielle. Fundamentalism, related to any religion, is an evil thing. Why? Because for fundamentalism to be in control, it must be forced on populations. Until recent centuries Christianity severely and brutally punished non believers and protesters. Unfortunately, current fundamentalist Islam carries on to this day a similar philosophy.
For freedom to exist, it's utterly essential that religion and State be separated. Should the Christian fundamentalists ever gain "real" governance in the USA we can kiss goodbye to USA freedom, and if anyone thinks the USA is aggressive now, it'll be nothing compared to the nuclear wars that will be waged under the mantle of the Christian fundamentalists in the name of their god. The big difference between a fundamentalist controlled USA and a fundamentalist controlled Middle East, is that the USA has an absolutely HUGE weapons arsenal and military capability. And they'll use it, under fundamentalist leadership. Posted by DiamondPete, Monday, 24 September 2012 5:42:34 PM
| |
Hi Danielle. I lived in Malaysia for two years, in Malacca on Klebang Besar. I had a wonderful time. I went back recently & met up with the children of the people I knew there. They remembered me. They were little children at the time. I travelled all over the place From Kota Baru, Mersing, Kluang, Muar, Charles Town (Penang), Port Dickson (The Whirlpool),but Malacca is still my favourite, There is so much history there.
Posted by Jayb, Monday, 24 September 2012 5:53:04 PM
| |
Dear Bazz,
So the $100,000 he offered has now magically grown to $300,000. Will it be $3,000,000 by the end of the week? Why do you lot continually get caught hyping this issue? As to the silence perhaps it is because you have your ears blocked. The Pakistani Prime Minister's spokesman has said the government "absolutely disassociated" itself with the minister's comments which were his own views and not that of the coalition. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-19690210 Bob Carr has also come out strongly condemning the bounty. Dear Danielle, I spent over a year and a half in Singapore and around Malaysia. My favourite was the Tioman Islands off the East coast. Marvellous diving. Went to school at United World College. Some fantastic years. Not as formative as living in the Southern Philippines for over two and a half years. The Muslim population were not treated very well when I was there. Dear DiamondPete, They certainly did use it under the fundamentalist leadership of George W and we have been reaping the rewards ever since. My grave fear for the future though is the exponential growth of fundamentalist Christianity in China. There are now far more members than in the Communist Party. I think South Korea is a worrying example of where it will potentially lead. I am of the opinion that fundamentalist religion is incompatible with democracy without strict separations of church and state. There is just too much temptation to race to the bottom. Rhetorical preaching from the pulpit translates too easily to the lectern. Present day Malaysia is a shining example. Posted by csteele, Monday, 24 September 2012 6:18:55 PM
| |
jayb you will not get the answer csteele ignores you, and me, you should be happy.
Diamondpete knows every thing so only comes to inform us not to hear other views. Trouble with me? Ham radio operators are constantly building and inventing things. My latest is a thing that detects the by product of the southern end of a north bound bull instantly. Constantly going off here, its warning is a bull roaring. Must warn the issue will not go away, so wounding what inventions are comeing to blame us next time. Posted by Belly, Monday, 24 September 2012 6:31:38 PM
| |
Dear Belly,
We had better get something straight my friend. My decision to only rarely engage with you is different to why I am keeping Jayb at arm's length. He and Loudmouth took a belligerent approach to Poirot which saw her walk away from the thread. I didn't appreciate it but rather than make a song and dance about it I just cut them loose. No biggie. You on the other hand have called me among other things a liar, unbalanced, and on a par with the worst Muslim fundamentalist, and that is just on this thread. Each time we engage you ratchet it up further. Normally I would be on you like a ton of bricks. But here is the truth, I feel sorry for you and have for quite a while. I see in you fears that just shouldn't be there especially after the life you have led. My only hope is that I can resist the path you have taken and retain the ability to see all sides of an issue. Perhaps age will defeat that hope but for now I intend holding on to it with both hands. Meanwhile for me to respond fully to what you throw at me would just be bullying on my behalf, therefore I choose to mostly refrain. Posted by csteele, Monday, 24 September 2012 9:09:02 PM
| |
Quote from Belly, "DiamondPete knows everything".
TRUE. Posted by DiamondPete, Monday, 24 September 2012 9:25:32 PM
| |
Dear Danielle,
The execution by the state of any of its citizens is completely abhorrent to me. The toll in Iran deserves our utter condemnation. Until recently there were nine countries cited by Amnesty International for executing people who had committed their crimes while juveniles. They were the US, Iran, China, Yemen, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, Democratic Republic of Congo, Nigeria and Sudan. Only two of these did so on a regular basis, the US and Iran. Neither of these are Arab Muslim nations. The US finally abandoned the practice in 2005. The only redeeming feature of the US system was that thanks to the appeal process most of the executions occurred when the victim was in their 20s. The other two strong reasons for condemning the Iranian government is the treatment of women and minorities in their country. Posted by csteele, Monday, 24 September 2012 9:42:26 PM
| |
Hi CSteele,
'Belligerent' approach ? Did anybody call for Poirot to be beheaded ? Or did they merely say something a bit nasty ? And try to get her to stay on-topic ? Or obliquely accuse her of - perhaps intentionally - straying off-topic ? Horrors ! Would an apology help ? Cheers, Joe :) Posted by Loudmouth, Monday, 24 September 2012 9:43:39 PM
| |
Poirot If it was I who offended you & the reason you have left the thread I am deeply sorry. Sometimes I do like to push a point when I feel I have a point to push. If I pushed you too far as csteel has said, I apologize.
Csteel the reason you keep me at arm’s length is because I've pinned you down to be a Fanatic Muslim Sympathizer. Your continued silence on the links I gave you confirms that because of that I feel that you agree with the Mufti in England. I also feel that you would like to see Australia as a Muslim Caliphate, whether we like it or not. Your refusal to answer my questions show that you are afraid you would have to “out” yourself. Tell me I'm wrong. Actually I am in a quandry as to why no one else will comment on them. Strange that. Posted by Jayb, Monday, 24 September 2012 10:51:51 PM
| |
Jayb,
You got caught in the crossfire. Just to explain: I'm generally not thin-skinned on the forum (as you know) and usually give as good as I get. Interplay between myself and Loudmouth on this thread is only the latest in heated exchanges, and my seemingly unreasonable sensitivity stems from his penchant of recent times to specifically target and goad me whenever he happens upon me in a thread. In fact, it's fairly clear in this thread that was entirely his purpose in engaging me, as in this one, where for no particular reason he refers to me throughout his discourse: http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?discussion=5377&page=0#146491 It's been my mistake to respond to his persistent provocation, and clearly it's my responsibility to cease to do that, which is the main reason I chose to leave this thread. So when Loudmouth laments along the lines of "..Or did they merely say something a bit nasty..." etc, he omits to mention that he has been, over quite a few weeks now, tireless in his "enthusiasm" in my direction. There's a difference between honest engagement and the practice of consistently winding someone up. No problem - I know what to do : ) csteele, You're a rare bird. I'm honoured to share a forum with one such as yourself. Posted by Poirot, Tuesday, 25 September 2012 12:50:33 AM
| |
Diamond Pete.....After 49 pages the ignorance still continues from "some" people here who seem to not have the intellectual capacity to comprehend the difference between terrorism/fundamentalist Islam and Islam.
You seem to forget one very, very important thing, THIS IS AUSTRALIA! We should not have to distinguish between any of these, not in our country, as we are a peace loving nation, and it is not our fault that the Islamic religion fosters all three categories you mentioned. The hardest part for us, is to distinguish the difference between these groups, as they all look the same, and they all follow the same religion, but then again, why should we have to, as this is our country after all and (they) should leave their baggage behind when invited here. This is why I will stick to my guns and say the religion should be banned here, as the only way to get rid of the extreemists is to remove (from our country) what it is they follow, the religion. After all, it is not our fault that the religion fosters all of the above. We tried, it has failed. Posted by rehctub, Tuesday, 25 September 2012 6:24:12 AM
| |
@ CSteele
<<My grave fear for the future though is the exponential growth of fundamentalist Christianity in China>> ROFLMAO (and the MAO part has nothing to do with Mao Zedong) Now I'm convinced, you have no idea of what you're talking about. <<My grave fear for the future though is the exponential growth of FUNDAMENTALIST Christianity in China>> Total and utter nonsense! And you are the one who has been preaching the need to distinguish between fundamentalist Muslims and the rest--you haven't got a clue about what fundamentalism is! Posted by SPQR, Tuesday, 25 September 2012 6:45:46 AM
| |
Rechtub give diamondpete and csteele a break.
They have difficulty's with sight. Both failed to see the nature of the RIOT, and neither saw the signs held there or world wide by these poor victims of western oppression. The film, well one in ten thousand saw it, demonstrators I mean. And the transferring its sound track from English to Arabic was done only to help others hear it,so they too could be offended. Heard of wolf in sheep,s clothing? On the net the early works of Joseph Goebbels has been built on. Refined. And like an AK47 used to try to make us bend. Not me mate! Posted by Belly, Tuesday, 25 September 2012 7:42:20 AM
| |
csteele wrote:
>>Indeed we are literally spending hundreds of millions of dollars combating the poison of Wahhabism in our very own backyard. I would have enjoyed a more nuanced discussion of the issue with stevenlmeyer if he hadn't been intent on coming in here to fan some pretty unsavoury flames. Much of our aid to Indonesia is being directed toward bringing Islamic schools into the national curriculum, in other words we are effectively attempting to counter the influence of Saudi millions. Yet the Coalition would have us slash these funds.>> LOL Feel free to be as nuanced as you like. For the record: I think trying to combat Wahhabism by funding Indonesian schools is worth trying but I would like to see some follow-up studies of its effectiveness. Come to think of it, I would love to see some robust studies on the effectiveness of all educational initiatives, domestic as well as overseas. When it comes to education I feel the same way John Wanamaker felt about his advertising spend. He knew half of it was wasted but he didn't know which half. Posted by stevenlmeyer, Tuesday, 25 September 2012 8:01:01 AM
| |
quote..""He knew half of it was wasted
but he didn't know which half."" and thus was at a point of balance content to do nuthing..as long as the topic goes 52 pages there is no concenus..concept is disputed and disputable in the main by the lack of evidence and miss direction yeah i tried wassavbi once burnt my mouth..just like mosus burned his to confirm a lie true thus lisped his law..to the small tribe of yore where 144,000 semed to be fair ammoung the same family tribe but how did the star of david ..subvert the levie of the lampstand how did gods 122 laws become the noahtide mosaic law that has the same vile stuff in it as in this thread read it sometime..the bible says if you kid is bad eat him so stop this ANTI christ attack..our histiory is just as black but politricks of colonisation..wants new blood as the last slave class is too clean to do the dirty stuff! or want new wealth to plunder but lest we forget..he who cast stones..is revealed by the stoning just as jesus prevented the stoning by scribing into the dirt the law thou shalt not murder* but heck the bible stonned them condemed them to serrvitude...forces them to take a mans name..WHATS WITH THAT PATRIRACHAL slavery? bah grow up let the racist riot rot lie let old dogs die..its opinion and we each now know where we stand on foundations of clay let ye with clean hands..not gainsay dirty minds Posted by one under god, Tuesday, 25 September 2012 8:33:43 AM
| |
Dear All,
Here we have something of a wake up call. Please peruse the CNN photo of the riot in the streets of Athens, Greece. What are the odds that those in the forefront of the affray come largely from the thousands of “asylum seekers” who have *fled* to Greece: http://edition.cnn.com/2012/09/21/world/anti-islam-film-protests/index.html And of more relevance to OZ, since we either officially or unofficially source many of our “asylum seekers “ from such venues, here’s a similar account from Pakistan: <<Afghan refugees have staged protest demonstration the anti-Islam film and anti-Muslim policies of US at two separate venues here on Wednesday…The Afghan refugees of the Gandaf camp assembled at market of Gadoon Amazai Industrial Estate. They were holding placards inscribed with the anti-US slogans while demanding that the Muslim World to awaken from the deep sleep and forge unity in their ranks to confront the anti-Islam policies of US and its allies>> http://www.thefrontierpost.com/article/182541/ More evidence that it is NOT our values that attract many “asylum seekers Posted by SPQR, Tuesday, 25 September 2012 8:55:28 AM
| |
SPQR as we both understand, you and I rarely agree.
On this subject we rarely disagree. Stevenmyer seems unimpressed with my views yet is nearer middle here,as he is in fact normally, he has not been seen as extreme, ever. Yes some got heated, some even went too far. But we have got this many posts, BECAUSE of underlying, truly held concerns. Those concerns come from world wide happenings, beheading on film of innocent captives. Both asking and receiving US help to get Russia out of Afghanistan, then the Taliban taking it over. Using sporting grounds to MURDER folk. Cherry pickers to lynch others. The unforgivable cruelty of 9/11. The pettiness of the first Cartoon marches and mayhem, this film, the second run of cartoons. Why not us,piss Christ, the last temptation of Christ? OUG, Mate sorry, your poetry? is it that? increasingly make your post impossible for me to under stand, yet you post clear and interesting stuff the get back to spelling as bad as mine ever was and more? Any chance of spell checking. Posted by Belly, Tuesday, 25 September 2012 11:58:31 AM
| |
Dear Poirot,
Really just returning the favour, though as I was certainly less overt than yourself when you were defending me so the credit is all yours. This thread has been a pretty lonely place for people of our thinking and I have appreciated the support, thank you. Dear stevenlmeyer, Both Israel and Saudi Arabia are the delinquent foster children of the US. Both are spreading mayhem, Israel by sowing settlements and Saudi Arabia by sowing Wahhabism. Both conduct themselves in a manner that is completely antithetical to the values the US purports to stand for. Like any foster parent the US sees its duty as ignoring the most egregious of their faults and supporting them, whatever it takes, when they get hauled up before the law or the court of public opinion. It is this support that serves to so damage the US and its message of tolerance, democracy and justice, a message that many countries still so badly need to hear. While I certainly agree the effectiveness of our expenditure needs to be gauged, especially against the cost of doing nothing, effort really has to be directed at getting the US to take a more strident position on Saudi Arabia. Perhaps banning weapons manufacturers from donating to politicians in the US might be a start. Posted by csteele, Tuesday, 25 September 2012 1:02:41 PM
| |
Dear SPQR,
Actually that was my initial response too, though I didn't lose my arse over it. It was initially raised with me by two Han Chinese students and I was rather dismissive. A later, rather booze impacted, discussion with a visiting Chinese national and further discussions with my fundamentalist in-laws reinforced the impetus to research the topic. Fundamentalist Christianity (FC) and capitalism are natural partners, each complimenting and progressing the other. FC is a version that allows people to ignore Christ's condemnation of the rich, to disguise but facilitate the quixotic notion that greed is a divine commandment, and give a form of spiritual nourishment to those who are disturbed by the emptiness of hyper-capitalism but aren't prepared to give it up. The 'Free Church' movement in China is an interesting development. We have seen a progression from the 'house churches' into office buildings where FC and business networking is thriving. A decade ago a writer for the journal Foreign Affairs wrote; “A similar pattern can be seen in China today, where there may be more than 60 million Protestant Christians (compared with 700,000 in 1949). Some Chinese sociologists have noted the "coincidence" that the most significantly Christianised city, Wenzhou, where some 14 percent of the population is now Christian, is also one of China's top performers in domestic commerce and foreign trade.” A more recent BBC report claims “There are already more Chinese at church on a Sunday than in the whole of Europe.” http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-14838749 I am very familiar with this form of Christianity and while it undoubtedly helps some people better manage some of problems life throws at them its capacity for evil shouldn't be dismissed. Dear UOG, I did like “politricks of colonisation” and the 'stonning' bible. Posted by csteele, Tuesday, 25 September 2012 1:04:55 PM
| |
Oh I think all this is fairly easily explained. Csteele is a
romantic at heart and he is going to create that Nirvana. Sadly the real world does not work that way. Now lets say that we realists listened to the likes of Marylin, Csteele etc, what would be the outcome? All those millions of Muslim migrants would soon be a political number not to be ignored. Forget Islam as a timid religion, the first thing that would go would be free speech. The result would be a disaster. No more freedom to openly talk about religion. Even Runner could preach to his heart's content about Jesus and the moment anyone wrote anything, out comes the blasphemy charge. That is exactly how it is in nations with Muslim majorities, so the claim that Islam is just like any other religion, is a crock. Fact is it is a divisive religion, that is just what is written in their holy book. Even bin Laden was a Muslim, before becoming a fundamentalist. But of course the likes of Csteele are so carried away with their emotional dreams of Nirvana, that the law of unintended consequences is totally overlooked. A bit like the Greens party really. All very sweet and it even impresses the girls, but all unrealistic Posted by Yabby, Tuesday, 25 September 2012 1:21:59 PM
| |
Yabby,
"All very sweet and impresses the girls..." My admiration of csteele emanates from his world view...here is a guy attempting to utilise his intelligence over his instinct. We do that sometimes in civilised life - that's how we came up with notions like democracy, etc. I understand what you are saying about the propensity of Islam to violence. Yet, I'd be interested to know the numbers of Muslims who have been killed and maimed by the glorious West in its history of colonisation and triumph in the region. I also admire "your" knowledge of instinctual human behaviour, but it's not a matter of you impressing me because I'm a "girl". I think that is a cheap shot. Posted by Poirot, Tuesday, 25 September 2012 2:07:56 PM
| |
*Yet, I'd be interested to know the numbers of Muslims who have been killed and maimed by the glorious West*
So Poirot, how far do you want to go back in history. How many people were killed by Muhammed's invading armies, which started in Medina and eventually took over most of the Med area ? Fact is that wars have been fought and once the West developed superior technology, that was the end of the Ottaman empire. Now you think I should cry tears. I thought that we had moved on from that, in terms of how Islam affects countries now and today and what would happen if Australia accepted 15 million Muslim migrants, as the likes of Marylin, the Greens and others are encouraging us to do. Sorry, but no nirvana there. Posted by Yabby, Tuesday, 25 September 2012 2:23:33 PM
| |
Yabby, you're lying. If you say you're not lying,then back up your silly claim that the Greens want "15 million Muslim migrants". Back it up with documented **PROOF** that the Green's position is that we should have "15 million Muslim migrants".
(Yabby is now furiously googling, trying to find his "proof" ....hilarious). Posted by DiamondPete, Tuesday, 25 September 2012 3:15:33 PM
| |
Yabby,
Even if we ignore the relatively recent history of Western forays into the middle-east in the last couple of centuries, we only need to glance at Iran where the US through the CIA overthrew heir democratically elected government and installed the Shah....more so in the US-led invasion of Iraq this century. As if Western technological superiority negates its equivalent penchant for violence, domination and bloodshed. Shock and Awe is a label. Beneath all the chest-beating, embedded journalists, smart bombs, etc, innocents were being slaughtered. Yes, intra-specific warfare is a peculiar feature of homo sapien's behaviour, but let's not pretend advanced "Western" culture is somehow removed from that behaviour in its dealings with the rest of the world. Posted by Poirot, Tuesday, 25 September 2012 3:20:06 PM
| |
No need to Google at all, Pete. Show me where the greens have put
a limit on the number of asylum seekers that we should accept. They refuse to answer the question. They swear by the UN Convention and given that it is full of loopholes and the ME is full of people who would qualify to be "persecuted, I could charter a sheep ship tomorrow, make a small fortune and bring them in by their tens of thousands. Fact is, we cannot take them all. Posted by Yabby, Tuesday, 25 September 2012 3:23:34 PM
| |
Yabby I owe you a very large beer!
All the years we have been on the same side or different have seen me owe you one but never like this! You have done it bloke! I have not been aware just why I can not find common ground with DP. HE IS A GREEN! Court evidence given in Melbourne today. Bloke on terrorist charges. Police found evidence he put this banner up on highway over pass *Get your troops out of Muslim lands you convict pigs* Nice bloke, came here at age 7 now 22. Do not give in! PC is wrong any time it wants free speech stopped by us, and the filth like that banner not stopped. Ah hem, Abbott is buying more drones agree with that, say ten thousand? 100 lashes in Afghanistan, for a rape victim for? being raped! Then we saw the machine gunning of a wife by her husband, crowds of men watching and? cheering. A sick religion! Posted by Belly, Tuesday, 25 September 2012 3:43:05 PM
| |
IM sorry belly..[i think thats the 3 rd time someone has said sorry
thjen stuck the boot right back in..but mate we go back a decade i dont write in poem style many couldnt understand me so i copied your line style of writing except i space it take out the spacing and the spell check im you [ps just as you with cut paste=me with spell check i type with one finger..type faster if i get angry..mostly re read it as i go..but occasionally simply push post..and just post it.. knowing most people all ready said they wont read it..and those who really tried gave up so i think why bother..yet still need to resist the flow of what i know is spin..its the only thing sustaining me once i go silent..know i gone to the happy place content i left some karmic things i got eternity to correct no one is allways right i know im half wrong ..but no one knows which half i only post that i feel in this moment..reacting to the words regardless of the man thus my friends thinbk i attack them..when im just being honest as i can..statying as calm as i can..cause agro dont fix this upcomming genocide of two thirds of us.. al that extra money needs a place where it retains the most value so watch food oil silver etc go up..as industry globally slows down in the end..we poor have allways been poor because unions didnt run govt..but now they run the states broke i know even the union..dont really do nuthin and like previous posters before me have said..your too good a person.,..to be truelly brutally honest about these things.. im so afraid you will take it personal.. things need to be spoken.. but for you its your life its not for me to speak Posted by one under god, Tuesday, 25 September 2012 3:43:08 PM
| |
csteele,
'The execution by the state of any of its citizens is completely abhorrent to me. The toll in Iran deserves our utter condemnation.” And execution death and mutilation toll in Arab states ...? “The other two strong reasons for condemning the Iranian government is the treatment of women and minorities in their country.” Is that all you have say … ? Iran is a sophisticated country. It presents 1% of scientific developments. Yet … during the war with Iraq it had an army of 50,000 child soldiers, informed in the use of weaponry, but utilized for walking across mine-fields to clear the area of Iranian tanks and heavy weaponry. Each child soldier had been given a small plastic key for entry into heaven. They apparently needed these ... 36,000 child soldiers died. Where was the outcry from the public? Suicide bombers … so very often young people. An infamous photograph circled the world a few years ago of a small tot garbed as a suicide bomber. The Arab mother, who dressed the baby, looked on proudly. Then there were the videos of kindergarten children emulating suicide bombers in school plays ... even to the 'boom'. Watched on my adoring parents. Minorities? Arab states also discriminate against minorities … to the point of even killing them. You often raise the issue of Palestinian refugees. Held in camps in Arab states they are denied citizenship, education beyond the most basic; denied just normal benefits. To survive, they have to take on the most menial jobs, such a selling second-hand clothing by the roadside. This while, the same states import overseas workers offering lots of perks. Australia admitted refugees in the 1950's. The children, grandchildren … are Australians, not refugees. Yet, Palestinian refugee status is passed on from father to son … Of course, these refugees attract considerable overseas monies, which the relevant Arab states hang onto. Only in Jordan do Palestinians have some decent quality of life. Although the majority of the population, yet Palestinians remain second-hand citizens, who pay higher taxes (on everything it seems) and are further disadvantaged. Posted by Danielle, Tuesday, 25 September 2012 4:07:47 PM
| |
I know you will mention Israel. Oddly enough you are never PC about Israel. You rush in to present perceived and even imagined sins against Palestinians. No even-handed enquiry ...
For the record Palestinians (Arab Israelis) are found in every level of society. Academics, ambassadors, scientists, doctors, university students, even in the Knessset; as are all other minority groups. Both the Druze and Bedouins are in the IDF; the Druze make up much of the border security, the Bedouin prefer the paramilitary. I referred to the “collective consciousness of the people.” When people are raised in societies where they know no difference than what is presented to them as normative, they accept these as such. Social Anthropology 101. Yes, there are always exceptions to the rule – independent thinkers. A gift of a football oval was built in Saudi Arabia, it is used for beheadings. The populace flock to see these … standing room only. There are Americans who support the death penalty; I would hazzard many grew up when the death penalty was the norm. A very cultured, educated and intelligent poster, an Arab Muslim, on OLO in response to condemnation of amputations for stealing, remarked that in such places, one could leave the keys in the car and know it wouldn't be stolen. Mohammad was a warrior, not a man of peace. I had it explained to me that “the religion of peace” means spiritual peace to its adherents, not the practice of peace. The Q'uran is prescriptive. The Old Testament Bible is descriptive (albeit what is occurring in the Middle East now, nothing's changed). That is the difference between the Q'uran and the Bible. I have stated before, and I repeat, and repeat: I know many gentle, warm Muslims, who are appalled at any sort of violence. They condemn what they see in the Middle East. I also know a Muslim who is an apostate of Islam, which he states is violent and inhumane. If he lived in the Middle East he would be executed for his belief, even if he recanted and showed remorse. Posted by Danielle, Tuesday, 25 September 2012 4:52:50 PM
| |
I think you need another tin whistle, Poirot, all this plays is "Tu Quoque!" and " Non Sequitur!"
So is it a cheap trick or not, to drag up the Crusades as some sort of "nyah-nyah, well, you did too!" argument whenever somebody has the effrontery to mention an Afghan woman being machine-gunned (see article by Yalda Hakim in today's paper, or watch her on Dateline tonight), or Pakistanis killing Pakistanis in some sort of imbecilic rage (and then burying Pakistanis, demonstrating angrily against their deaths, killing more Pakistanis in retaliation, bashing cars with sticks - gee, that might work), or terrorist groups blowing up defenceless wome nand children. Can we please stick to the topic ? What are the root-causes of Muslim anger, ostensibly over some dopey film, but over what really ? Frustration that the West got there first ? That they hate the West, but want what it provides ? Is it not much more than that - envy ? And please don't give us any more about nasty Americans doing terrible things - al Qaida bombs are going off every single day somewhere and usually across the Muslim or peri-Muslim world, in Nigeria, Mali, Kenya - bits of bodies are being collected as I write, and as you read, day and night. A lot of them in Pakistan too, where Shia and Sufis and Christians and their shrines are being bombed constantly. So is it that people feel their religion is so manifestly superior to any other body of thought, but are utterly frustrated that they can't impose it freely on the rest of the world ? That even a campaign of terror doesn't seem to be working too well ? (well, ecept on the Left, it would seem). That they want so much, SO MUCH, to impose their will on the world, but don't have the means, and it is really pissing them off ? Are they also utterly outraged by the notion of questionability, especially of their prophets and gods ? Do you have a better explanation, Poirot ? Cheers, Joe Posted by Loudmouth, Tuesday, 25 September 2012 5:13:06 PM
| |
So when do we start seeing Australia listed? Will it be another ten years or twenty maybe? They hate their own people so how much imagine how much they hate us! this religion of peace.
This is only 12 days & have the complete list for the last 30 days if anyone wants to see it. Date Country City Killed Injured Description 2012.09.12 Somalia Mogadishu 8 10 Eight people are blown apart by a suicide bombing at a hotel. 2012.09.11 Yemen Sanaa 12 12 Twelve people bleed out following a suspected al-Qaeda blast. 2012.09.10 Iraq Mussayib 3 2 Sunni bombers take down three Shiites near their shrine. 2012.09.10 Pakistan Parachinar 14 45 Sunnis murder fourteen members of the minority Shiite sect with a car bomb that rips through a packed market. 2012.09.10 Afghanistan Kunduz 21 15 A Holy Warrior blows himself up at a demonstration, sending twenty-one other souls to Allah. 2012.09.10 Syria Aleppo 17 40 The FSA claims a bombing outside a hospital and school that leaves seventeen civilians dead. 2012.09.09 Iraq Amara 16 100 Dedicated Sunni car bombers massacre sixteen Shiites outside their shrine. 2012.09.09 Thailand Narathiwat 2 1 Two men are killed and a 9-year-old boy loses his leg to Muslim 'rebels'. 2012.09.09 Iraq Kirkuk 8 17 al-Qaeda car bombers slaughter eight oil company employees. 2012.09.09 Iraq Dujail 11 7 A Shahid suicide bomber sends seven Iraqis to Allah. 2012.09.09 Iraq Kirkuk 7 70 Two Islamic Army of Iraq bombs tear apart seven people outside of a police station. 2012.09.09 Iraq Nasiriyah 2 3 Mujahideen bomb a hotel, killing at least two. 2012.09.09 Iraq Baghdad 7 21 A Mujahideen bomb targeting a market seven dead bodies. 2012.09.09 Iraq Basra 3 24 A vicious bombing along a city street kills three. Posted by Jayb, Tuesday, 25 September 2012 5:28:38 PM
| |
2012.09.09 Afghanistan Farah 1 16 A 12-year-old boy is disassembled by a Taliban bomb.
2012.09.09 Iraq Maysan 5 40 Five Shiites are blown to bits outside theirown mosque by Sunni bombers. 2012.09.09 Iraq uz Khormato 4 41 Four shoppers at a market are flattened by an al-Qaeda blast. 2012.09.09 Syria Homs 4 24 Sunni terrorists are suspected in a bus bombing that leaves four dead. 2012.09.08 Pakistan Shalobar 2 0 A Religion of Peace blast sends two highway patrolmen to the morque. 2012.09.08 Iraq Qaim 1 0 A 5-year-old girl is killed instantly by an FSA rocket. 2012.09.08 Afghanistan Kajaki 5 2 Five Afghans are taken down by Taliban roadside bombers. 2012.09.08 Afghanistan Kabul 6 4 Six civilians, mostly children, are torn to shreds by a Fedayeen suicide bomber. 2012.09.07 Pakistan Quetta 1 0 A policeman investigating Sunni sectarian killings is sprayed with bullets. 2012.09.07 Syria Damascus 5 6 Five security personnel are killed by a bomb blast as they leave a mosque. 2012.09.07 Philippines Sumisip 1 35 Seven Abu Sayyaf fire into a crowd of plantation workers on their lunch break, killing one. 2012.09.07 Iraq Kirkuk 9 80 Sunni bombers take out nine Shias near their mosque. 2012.09.07 Lebanon Ain al-Hilweh 1 0 Jund al-Sham terrorists are accused of assassinating a local official. 2012.09.07 Afghanistan Kabul 0 3 Three actresses are stabbed by religious hardliners for appearing with 'immodest' outfits. 2012.09.07 Lebanon Damour 1 0 A man is stabbed merely for belonging to the 'wrong' religious sect. 2012.09.07 Libya Rajma 3 3 Three people are killed when Islamic fundamentalists attempt to blow up a rival shrine. 2012.09.09 Iraq Baghdad 5 21 A restaurant blast by the Islamic Army of Iraq kills five patrons. 2012.09.09 Afghanistan Mula Khel 6 0 Religion of Peace extremists pull six civilians out of a vehicle and execute them. 2012.09.09 Iraq Baghdad 3 14 Holy warriors detonate a bomb outside a pet market, killing three people. Posted by Jayb, Tuesday, 25 September 2012 5:33:02 PM
| |
Dear CSteele,
<<Actually that was my initial response too … and I was rather dismissive>> Well you would have been better served sticking with your initial response – it was closer to the mark. << there may be more than 60 million Protestant Christians (compared with 700,000 in 1949).….yada yadda yadda”>> Sorry to break you the news, but it does not follow that because there are now X number of card carrying Christians in China that the country is headed for a Iranian-like theocracy (appealing as that might be to you –on many levels!). The forms of Christianity we see in China are a very long, long way removed from the fundamentalism we see expressed in Islam in other parts of the world. And it is rather mischievous of you to try and equate the two. Posted by SPQR, Tuesday, 25 September 2012 5:34:15 PM
| |
2012.09.07 Philippines Sumisip 1 35 Seven Abu Sayyaf fire into a crowd of plantation workers on their lunch break, killing one.
2012.09.07 Iraq Kirkuk 9 80 Sunni bombers take out nine Shias near their mosque. 2012.09.07 Lebanon Ain al-Hilweh 1 0 Jund al-Sham terrorists are accused of assassinating a local official. 2012.09.07 Afghanistan Kabul 0 3 Three actresses are stabbed by religious hardliners for appearing with 'immodest' outfits. 2012.09.06 Iraq al-Sharqat 1 1 The leader of an Iraqi anti-terror unit is killed by a bomb. 2012.09.06 Pakistan Sipah 3 8 A child is among three crushed to death by a Lashkar-e-Islam mortar shell slamming into their home. 2012.09.05 Pakistan Quetta 1 0 A Shia doctor is murdered in his clinic by Lashkar-e-Jhangvi. 2012.09.05 Ingushetia Datykh 6 1 Mujahideen ambush and kill six Russians. 2012.09.07 Lebanon Damour 1 0 A man is stabbed merely for belonging to the 'wrong' religious sect. 2012.09.07 Libya Rajma 3 3 Three people are killed when Islamic fundamentalists attempt to blow up a rival shrine. 2012.09.06 Pakistan Gulistan Colony 1 0 An Ahmadi school teacher is gunned down in a targeted attack. 2012.09.06 Nigeria Yobe 16 0 Boko Haram Islamists murder sixteen people in a series of attacks. Posted by Jayb, Tuesday, 25 September 2012 5:35:14 PM
| |
2012.09.06 Iraq al-Sharqat 1 1 The leader of an Iraqi anti-terror unit is killed by a bomb.
2012.09.06 Pakistan Sipah 3 8 A child is among three crushed to death by a Lashkar-e-Islam mortar shell slamming into their home. 2012.09.05 Pakistan Quetta 1 0 A Shia doctor is murdered in his clinic by Lashkar-e-Jhangvi. 2012.09.05 Ingushetia Datykh 6 1 Mujahideen ambush and kill six Russians. 2012.09.04 Iraq Fallujah 1 0 Suspected al-Qaeda members machine-gun a judge in his own home. 2012.09.04 Pakistan Karachi 1 0 Wahhabis shoot a Shia traffic cop three times in the head. 2012.09.04 Iraq Kirkuk 1 0 A 16-year-old victim of 'insurgents' is found with his head, hands and feet cut off. 2012.09.04 Iraq Tuz Khurmatu 6 2 Terrorists massacre six Iraqis with automatic weapons. 2012.09.05 India Kerala 1 0 A Hindu activist dies from a stabbing attack by Muslim 'activists' at a university campus two months earlier. 2012.09.05 Iraq Tikrit 2 0 Two Sunnis are ambushed and killed by al-Qaeda gunmen. 2012.09.05 Pakistan Quetta 1 0 A Shiite dentist is taken out in a Sunni drive-by. 2012.09.05 Iraq Khalis 1 8 Jihadis kill one person with a car bomb blast near a clinic. 2012.09.05 Pakistan Karachi 2 0 A 75-year-old Shiite is murdered along with his 17-year-old grandson in a targeted shooting by Sunnis. 2012.09.04 Thailand Pattani 1 0 A 28-year-old Buddhist villager is slain by Muslim gunmen. 2012.09.04 Nigeria Gwange 4 0 Four people are shot and stabbed in their own homes by suspected Boko Haram. 2012.09.04 Somalia Barawe 2 0 al-Shabaab Islamists tie two men to a pole and open up on them with automatic weapons. 2012.09.04 Pakistan Pirabad 2 0 Sunnis shoot two Shiites to death. Posted by Jayb, Tuesday, 25 September 2012 5:37:01 PM
| |
2012.09.04 Afghanistan Dor Baba 25 35 Over two dozen mourners at a funeral are blasted into bits by a Fedayeen suicide bomber.
2012.09.04 Kenya Mombasa 2 0 Two more people are reported killed by rioters whipped into frenzy by a radical imam. 2012.09.03 Nigeria New Marte 3 0 Two civilians and a cop are murdered by Boko Haram gunmen. 2012.09.03 Nigeria Maiduguri 2 0 A lecturer is among two people murdered by Islamist assassins. 2012.09.03 Syria Jaramana 4 12 Sunni rebels are blamed for a car bomb blast in a residential neighborhood. 2012.09.03 Pakistan Peshawar 2 25 Two civilians are killed in a suicide car bomb attack on a U.S. Consulate vehicle. 2012.09.02 Mali Gao 1 0 A kidnapped Algerian diplomat is executed in captivity by al-Qaeda. 2012.09.02 Pakistan Bazarak Khwar 1 4 Muslim radicals ambush a police vehicle and kill the driver. 2012.09.02 Pakistan Quetta 1 0 Another Shia minority dies from injuries suffered in a targeted attack by Sunni. 2012.09.01 Thailand Narathiwat 0 2 Muslim bombers tear off the legs of two plantation workers. 2012.09.01 Pakistan Hazar Ganji 5 0 Sunnis pull five Shia vegetable seller off of a truck and calmly shoot them to death. 2012.09.01 Pakistan Quetta 2 0 Two Shias walking along the side of the road are taken out by Sunnis on a motorbike. 2012.09.01 Afghanistan Wardak 13 78 Twin suicide bombers incinerate over a dozen people including a child and two women. 2012.09.01 Iraq Basra 1 1 Knife-wielding 'insurgents' stab a judge to death in this home. 2012.09.01 Pakistan Quetta 2 10 Two demonstraters are killed when Sunnis fire on Shias protesting an earlier murder. 2012.09.01 Syria Damascus 15 3 A Sunni group is blamed for a car bomb attack near a rival mosque. 2012.09.01 Syria Deir al-Zour 1 2 A Shahid suicide bomber takes out one other person. 2012.09.01 Iraq Baghdad 2 11 Terrorists set off a bomb outside a coffee shop, killing two patrons Posted by Jayb, Tuesday, 25 September 2012 5:38:12 PM
| |
Dear SPQR,
“Several days before the annual Buddha’s Enlightenment celebrations, the Taejôkkwangjôn, the main Dharma Hall, a large building of ancient origin at Kûmsansa Temple is completely burned to the ground in an event which makes top news throughout the nation. The Hall is listed as National Treasure Number 476, and is the central hall in a temple which is a regional headquarters and major monastic training center for the Chogye Order. A man active in a local church is apprehended at the scene” “Although he admitted to the crime, he is released without being charged.” “A fundamentalist Christian by the name of Yang Shinha from the Tamna Church on Chejudo Island is apprehended after setting fire to two temples – Kwanûmjôngsa and Taegaksa – completely burning them to the ground.” “In the early morning hours, a fire is set at Pômôsa Temple in Pusan, a major monastic training center of the Chogye Order and regional headquarters. The fire completely destroys the Myôngbujôn (Chijang Bodhisattva Hall- a funeral hall), taking with it 16 priceless altar paintings of the Buddha.” “Several days before the annual Buddha’s Enlightenment celebrations, the Chônggagwôn, the main Dharma Hall on the Kyôngju campus of Dongguk University is completely burned to the ground. Arson is suspected but no one is apprehended.” “The huge main Dharma Hall and a temple dormitory at Potasa Temple, Oksudong, Sôngdonggu, Seoul are completely burned to the ground. A 23-year old follower of the Taesônjillihoe (Great Conversion Truth Church) is arrested at the scene.” “The Yôngdo Church in Pusan organizes to prevent a temple from being built beside them, claiming that they “cannot accept the construction of a place of idol worship” near them.” “At Hyundai High School, all students are required to attend church services, and their attendance at these services is reflected in their school records.” All this in one of the most peaceful, affluent countries in the world, (did you know South Korean males buy over 20% of the world's male beauty products?) and it is getting worse. Only took a few short years. Posted by csteele, Tuesday, 25 September 2012 6:54:52 PM
| |
*we only need to glance at Iran where the US through the CIA overthrew heir democratically elected government and installed the Shah....more so in the US-led invasion of Iraq this century.*
Ah Poirot, you mean that Govt which had nationalised the oil industry in Iran, after it had been built, developed and financed by the West. I remind you that it the role of Govt to protect the interests of it citizens and if third world Govts think that it is their right to steal assets because they can, they should not be surprised when other Govts respond. Holding hands with Csteele and singing Kumbayah, won't do it, I am afraid :) As to Iraq, I remind you that a no fly zone had to be introduced over the Kurds, to avoid Saddam gassing anymore of them. The Kuwaitis asked the West to interfere, after he invaded them. Saddam went out of his way to pretend that he had nuclear weapons, for he assumed that if he could call their bluff, they would never invade. Remember the weapons inspectors being hoodwinked at every turn? Remember Saddam refusing to let them inspect many buildings? Where I agree with you is that George W got it very wrong in how he went about things. A couple of targeted missles could have taken out Saddam and his boys, without the collateral damage. But then I never did claim that George could actually walk and chew gum at the same time. It shows the limits of democracy. Belly old mate, if you and I ever meet, there will be lots of beers to drink ! Posted by Yabby, Tuesday, 25 September 2012 8:00:12 PM
| |
Yabby,
All is flawed it seems. The US didn't seem too perturbed with the knowledge that Saddam was gassing the Iranians, while they were doing deals with him during the Iran-Iraq conflict....but then it wasn't in their interests to make too much noise over that particular fact. I have to agree that it was damn impertinent of those Iranians to want a fair share of the profits from their own resources - and then they had the hide to democratically elect a government. Surely that sort of behaviour isn't what we enlightened Westerners expect from that part of the world. (perhaps you should change your "Kumbaya" line. It's way past it's use-by date, and I think you've kept it beside the computer so long it's gone a little stale : ) Posted by Poirot, Tuesday, 25 September 2012 8:12:41 PM
| |
*The US didn't seem too perturbed with the knowledge that Saddam was gassing the Iranians*
Well the Iranians were already busy killing Iranians, as Danielle pointed out. The US is dammed if they do and dammed if they don't, as somebody always complains. *I have to agree that it was damn impertinent of those Iranians to want a fair share of the profits from their own resources* Ah, so that justifies stealing all the assets and investments! *perhaps you should change your "Kumbaya" line* Oh no way! Its an evergreen and it suits you, the Greens and Csteele to a T. so I will keep using it. Posted by Yabby, Tuesday, 25 September 2012 8:31:58 PM
| |
Dear Danielle,
The whole damn world is incredibly PC about Israel. If it were any other country it would be regarded an apartheid state of terribly racist, brutal occupiers, flouting International Law and UN resolutions, and led by war criminals. And I am certainly not immune. I still find it frustrating that I continually feel the need to use Jewish voices to make my point. At some stage I will have to be brave enough to start quoting Palestinian voices though I am sure it will bring greater condemnation on my head. I am not there yet. Dear Jayb, Thank you for your post addressing Poirot. I have looked at your numbers from the site www.religionofpeace.org. I was about to chide you for not including the source but realised I have made the same omission with my Korean list. Glen Reinsford is certainly thorough and I'm not about to challenge his figures without good cause though you seemed to have doubled up a few times unless there are triumvirates of immodestly dressed actresses wandering the streets of Kabul. Of all the countries he covers and all the hundreds of millions of people in so many war-torn areas he seems to have delivered a rate of around 23 per day going on your figures. These are indeed shocking. What I find a little presumptuous is that Mr Reinsford comes from a country where the murder rate is at least 10 times that on any given day. Indeed there are many young Americans who are safer doing a tour in Iraq or Afghanistan than they would be in their own neighbourhoods. Posted by csteele, Tuesday, 25 September 2012 8:34:45 PM
| |
375 dead, 798 injured in 12 days. Not bad for Blue on Blue in the Muslim World. I haven't added up the 30 days.
Can you imagine what they would do to Non-Muslims in a World Caliphate? One thing about it, we wouldn't have to worry about World overpopulation or Green House Gasses would we? The world would plunge back to the 7th.Century overnight solving that problem. Well csteel, I'll have to agree with you on that lot. It's mostly those Weirdo Baptists & their offshoots along with SDA's & JH's. Christian Fundamentalist Taliban & just as bad as Islamic & Jewish Fundamentalists. All Fundamentalists of any description, including Greenie & the Politically Correct ones are the source of many big problem in today’s World. Posted by Jayb, Tuesday, 25 September 2012 8:49:56 PM
| |
Thank you csteel. Yes the statistics for Denver alone are horrific. There were more murders in one year than American dead in the whole time the US was in Iraq.
My wife is travelling to the US for 3 weeks in the New Year. Our Granddaughter is competing in a few invitational Gymnastics Competitions. I have refused to go. The reason. I've already been to a War Zone & I'm not interested in going to another. Even though it's Blue on Blue. Posted by Jayb, Tuesday, 25 September 2012 9:01:40 PM
| |
Dear Jayb,
Yes fundamentalists certainly can be a different breed. Danielle's post on child soldiers had me reflecting on the notorious Charles Taylor, one of the few the world has managed to bring to justice on the charge of “Conscripting or enlisting children under the age of 15 years into armed forces or groups, or using them to participate actively in hostilities”. The verdict was announced in The Hague earlier this year. Guilty! He was also found guilty of, amongst other things, terrorism, rape, sexual slavery and murder. In 2003 when congress offered $2,000,000 for Taylor's capture Pat Robertson, who is arguably the most well known, powerful, fundamentalist Christian leader in the United States, responded by accusing President George W. Bush of "undermining a Christian, Baptist president to bring in Muslim rebels to take over the country." Why? It turns out that “Taylor had extensive business dealings with American televangelist Pat Robertson during the civil war and gave Robertson the rights to mine for diamonds in Liberia's mineral-rich countryside. According to two Operation Blessing pilots who reported this incident to the Commonwealth of Virginia for investigation in 1994, Robertson used his Operation Blessing planes to haul diamond-mining equipment to his new mines in Liberia, despite the fact that Robertson was telling his 700 Club viewers that the planes were sending relief supplies to the victims of the genocide in Rwanda. The subsequent investigation by the Commonwealth of Virginia concluded that Robertson diverted his ministry's donations to the Liberian diamond-mining operation, but Attorney General of Virginia Mark Earley blocked any potential prosecution against Robertson, as the relief supplies were also sent.” http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Taylor_(Liberia)#Verdict Dealing in 'blood diamonds' and with war criminals and he yet has the gall to lecture other Americans on moral behaviour? Now whenever I hear Robertson bang on about Muslims I wonder what personal interests is he trying to protect? Taylor later converted to Judaism. May your wife and granddaughter have a safe and uneventful trip. Posted by csteele, Tuesday, 25 September 2012 9:49:31 PM
| |
Csteele,
The PC crowd and Israel ... Hardly! It is very safe to criticise Israel without discussing the issues in context, isn't it? Your rider is uninformed as anyone who bothers to do the minimum of research knows. As demonstrated in the past, your arguments are not sustainable. Israel is not perfect, but it is certainly not the way you love to present it. Two words, steele: “Taqiyya” and “Kitman.” You write .... "Taylor later converted to Judaism." Hardly “converted. ” “Taylor's wife said that he still believes in Christ and hoped to embrace both religions simultaneously. " When, where and by whom did this 'conversion' take place... ? You really have an issue with Jews don't you? It is not surprising that you “drop” this into the discussion. But more importantly, what relevancy does it have? One can only assume that it is intended to be malicious. It bears out Martin Luther King observation that those who are anti-Israel, are anti-Semites. But ... you are using diversionary tactics to move away from the issue … The discussion is about Islam of the Middle East. Posted by Danielle, Tuesday, 25 September 2012 11:11:56 PM
| |
Yabby,
"...you mean the Govt which had nationalised the oil industry in Iran, after it had been built, developed and financed by the West....if third world Govts think that is their right to steal..." Well that's a biased take on the greed and control the Brits exercised over Iranian resources. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anglo-Persian_Oil_Company Posted by Poirot, Tuesday, 25 September 2012 11:53:26 PM
| |
Dear Danielle,
Thank you for making my point so eloquently. My post was pretty much entirely devoted to kicking the bejeepers out of fundamentalist Christanity, particularly one of its most highly regarded leaders in the US and I mention one small thing about Judaism and suddenly I'm a malicious Jew-hating demigod. You really need to dial it down a touch. At the very beginning of the Wikipedia article I posted was a summarized bio for Taylor stating "Religion - Previously Christianity, now Judaism". Should I not have referred to it at all because it may have caused offense? You have been more than happy swanning about this thread pouring buckets over Muslims and Islam but it is hardly edifying to then react in that manner to something that innocuous. It is bullying behaviour. Posted by csteele, Tuesday, 25 September 2012 11:57:37 PM
| |
back to topic, C. Steele :)
There is always somebody worse. You don't 'disprove' one thing by 'proving' another. I remember complaining to a friend about corruption in some organisations I was trying to do something for. He said, "Well, what about X City Council, they're pretty corrupt." Not being too bright, it took me a long time to realise that I should have said something like, "Yeah, but if I wouldn't want to work for X City Council because they are corrupt, why the hell should I want to work for Y organisation, which is just as corrupt ?" Fundamentalism, Schmundamentalism - this thread is about Muslims, and not all Muslims, rioting, with the suspicion that those who did are dedicated to bringing about the Khilafa, the Caliphate, the rule of the Book over all humans on Earth - that or be put to the sword. When Korean fundamentalist Christians reach out to butcher this atheist, I will give a toss about Korean fundamentalists. But I haven't heard anything about their desire to take over the world, as the notion of Caliphate explicitly directs. But of course, if you want to be a useful idiot in an extreme right-wing cause, feel free. The thing about democracies, imperfect as they may be, is that idiots can do as they please. Just reflect for once, what might happen if your particular lot of right-wing fundamentalists had power over you, as a sort of pseudo-Leftist, would they let you live ? or would you be sitting down on that river-bank waiting for some brave b@stard with a machine-gun. A real man, in a male-dominated world. Isn't culture wonderful ? Cheers, Joe Posted by Loudmouth, Wednesday, 26 September 2012 12:13:39 AM
| |
Csteele,
Please enlighten us as to where we have been wrong about Middle Eastern Muslims? If I have been wrong, then I will admit to it. But one can't ignore herds of elephants galloping round the room. This does not help them if they want to be a viable alternative religion. We are discussing Middle Eastern Islam in the 21st century. Many would like to know what, and if, this means something to the rest of the world. They are not innocuous, they have strong beliefs, they are, like Christianity, a proselyting religion. I personally believe that many of the problem practices evident in the religion pre-date Islam. Do you think that they will go through a period of enlightenment as seen in the West? Do they have the necessary latitude? They seem to be hitting the wall in Europe. If Islamic Boznia-Hertzegovina can have a secular and democratic society, free of certain practices, why can't Islam of the Middle East? This is a valid anthropological question. Posted by Danielle, Wednesday, 26 September 2012 12:55:56 AM
| |
OUG I read every thing you post mate, and you did very well there.
Jayb you put a lot of work in to your posts. But unfortunately will be able to post such lists forever. In this thread just read the links. Both sides of politics, world leaders, just about everyone agrees, with the MAJORITY VIEWS HERE. A primitive captured view of the west, driven by a religion that preaches death and hate. From where if not, does all this hate in defense of a God our very history proves came long after others . In a world teaching evolution we let some insist we let fables control us and twist many who follow it. It is even claimed no riot took place, it was peaceful? Such are the verbal ak47,s aimed at us who express concerns. Posted by Belly, Wednesday, 26 September 2012 5:16:22 AM
| |
Dear CSteele,
You’re a tricky fellow CSteele. We’re talking about China and suddenly you jump across to South Korea. When Poirot made the quip above that you were, quote: << a rare bird>> I had the image of a booby or a penguin (not that either of then are rare). But considering your propensity to drop on the field from above, a seagull might be a better fit. But, hey, we’ll run with South Korea. I hope you are not serious suggesting that your little account of the happenings in South Korea (which you trot out at every opportunity) equates with what Islam inspires in Nigeria, Pakistan ,Indonesia, South Thailand, and from those (“not treated very well”) Moros in Mindanao –are you? I mean, just take a look at the list that Jayb has provided – surely not even you could be that obtuse? Posted by SPQR, Wednesday, 26 September 2012 6:36:59 AM
| |
Belly: Jayb you put a lot of work in to your posts.
But unfortunately will be able to post such lists forever. In this thread just read the links Thanks Belly. Unfortunately I didn't have a link, just a list at the time. If I did have a link would anyone her looked at it. Not going by my last lot of link postings as they have been completely ignored, by everybody, which is quite frustrating. At least a list of 12 days out of 30 got a look at. I did have trouble with the 385 word limit that's why there were some double ups & a couple missing. It would be nice of all of you to comment on those links. I just wanted to show that the middle Eastern problem has little to do with the West. The West cops the blame for anything that happens anywhere in the ME. (The Shiite & the Sunni go head to head, then they demonstrate against the West claiming that it our fault. Eh!) My questions are: Do we want their problems spilling over into Australia? I don't think so. If we upset the Muslims that are here, will Indonesia get offended & start a war with Australia in defence of Islam? A good possibility. Australia defacto provides for Indonesia Social Welfare which allows them to spend more on their Defence Force? Do Australians have to change their happy go lucky nature & culture to accommodate Islamic beliefs? I don't think so. Posted by Jayb, Wednesday, 26 September 2012 7:49:34 AM
| |
*D'Arcy hired geologist George Bernard Reynolds to do the prospecting in the Iranian desert. Conditions were extremely harsh: "small pox raged, bandits and warlords ruled, water was all but unavailable, and temperatures often soared past 50°C".[3] After several years of prospecting, D'Arcy's fortune dwindled away and he was forced to sell most of his rights to a Glasgow-based syndicate, the Burmah Oil Company.*
So let me see, Poirot. The Brits go out and take all the risks, reach a 60 year agreement with Iran if perchance they should find oil and find nothing for years. Eventually they do and develop the industry, only to have the Iranians throw out the agreement. Sorry, but if Iran agreed to the deal, they should stick by it. Otherwise it is quite reasonable to try and overthrow the Govt who breaks it. Posted by Yabby, Wednesday, 26 September 2012 1:07:03 PM
| |
Csteele,
"You have been more than happy swanning about this thread pouring buckets over Muslims and Islam" No, just that as practiced in the Middle East. This strain has reached Malaysia. Being harsh, it has not increased the happiness of the Muslims there. Many Indonesians are concerned about its influence occurring in their country. Are they wrong? You do not hesitate to screech about perceived wrongs elsewhere. Why the silence about Islam of the Middle East, specifically in Arab states? Many would have noticed such a glaring bias. You condemn executions (generally); why not the raft of horrors committed in Islam's name in the Middle East? Your silence is deafening about this. Do you think that the majority of Muslims in our country applaud these; or do you think that they have come here to escape them? Years ago I undertook the subject Feminist Studies at university. On raising the issue of FGM was told it couldn't be discussed (let alone condemned) due to cultural sensitivities. Horse feathers! This is the most basic human rights abuse. To wilfully ignore such abuse, and others, as you do so, is to be complicit in such practices. Also something about ... "evil occurs... when good people do nothing". I respect Islamic intellectuals who openly condemn such atrocities committed in Islam's name. They believe that changes could be achieved ... BUT for the PC crowd in the West. You appear urbane, sophisticated and educated. Is this more apparent than real? I increasingly feel so. You state you believe in freedom of speech. Again I ask, how does this sit with being PC ... your stated position? Posted by Danielle, Wednesday, 26 September 2012 1:29:54 PM
| |
Danielle,
Thank you for your breath of fresh air. i wonder if Feminist Studies, and feminism generally, hit a wall early on when it had to confront notions of culture, while simultaneously at universities, it was being touted that 'all cultures were equal', and so they buckled. Instead, perhaps students should have had the courage to confront the possibility that 'culture' was almost invariably male-dominated, -centred, even male-written - and had been for millenia. After all, 'culture' reflects and justifies - 'normalises' - social relations, and these have generally (maybe always) been male-dominated (at least, since Wicca). Perhaps yes, we could say that all 'cultures' were equally compromised, but perhaps not - maybe some 'cultures' are more male-dominated than others, more hidebound, more reactionary. Certainly Islamic societies tend to be structured along those lines, with particularly reactionary cultural practices vis-a-vis women. But Cultural Studies couldn't reflect this, that would be ethnocentric, neo-colonial. So the sub-set of Feminist Studies, Women's Studies, had to soft-pedal the place of women in other 'cultures', for fear of offending, and committing the sin of ethnocentrism. Hence something which was central to societies, (and surely to Women's Studies ?) had to be ignored. Hence relativism doomed Women's Studies to irrelevance. Just a thought :) Cheers, Joe Posted by Loudmouth, Wednesday, 26 September 2012 1:47:40 PM
| |
jays jab/quote..""If I did have a link would anyone her looked at it.""
your missing what the majority is here to do not look for info..ok maybe a few..but whats a link..i prefer an actual quote..that highlights what you think everyone else is just here watching or getting paid not to click on dangerous info..in links ""Not going by my last lot of link postings as they have been completely ignored, by everybody, which is quite frustrating"" yeah it is..but if the link stays up..you wil be surpised how many click on it...in time/lotta people got ready written articles just in the post replies but most importantly..its not what 'they' do but what we chose to do....so saying i share my link..for the week http://whatreallyhappened.com/ its what we do or reject doing..that builds or destroys our souls Posted by one under god, Wednesday, 26 September 2012 1:48:04 PM
| |
Well, of course, Yabby, yours are the ethics of imperialism : )
Note that the workers lived in humpies fashioned from flattened oil drums - no doubt quite a fitting metaphor for the whole operation. There's nothing like slowly roasting alive inside a tin box on 50 cents a day during an Iranian summer to make you realise how lucky your country is to gain 16 percent of the royalties on your own resources. Posted by Poirot, Wednesday, 26 September 2012 1:53:44 PM
| |
Loudmouth,
You have made very interesting observations. When I was studying, it was the 'white male' who was the enemy. One of the more amiable students had a tattoo on her arm of two testicles hanging from a sickle. Ironically, many of these students emulated the worst aspects of male behavior, which they were condemning. So anti-white-males were these women, that many feminists, notably in the US and Britain, were deliberately 'exploiting' coloured men (using them for sex). I imagine that many of these men would have been deeply hurt, believing that they were in genuine relationships. Incidentally, I was looked upon with grave suspicion as I was married with children. Posted by Danielle, Wednesday, 26 September 2012 2:09:00 PM
| |
*Note that the workers lived in humpies fashioned from flattened oil drums*
Note that people all over the world still live in humpies. Note that only 20 years ago, some farmers in WA were still living in the back of their shearing sheds, in the WA heat. Note that millions of Africans live in humpies, because nobody is prepared to risk capital investment, in case its expropriated, just like in Iran. Note that the Brits in the Iranian desert were not exactly living it up, when they searched for oil. Note that you Poirot, should get out more to see how the world really works :) Posted by Yabby, Wednesday, 26 September 2012 2:23:57 PM
| |
Yabby,
Note that the Brits were "investing in capital" only as far as their own interests were concerned...if you think housing workers in humpies made from flattened oil drums is perfectly fine, emanating from a "deal" which woefully disadvantaged Iranian sovereignty over its resources, and which the Brits flatly refused to "fairly" renegotiate is right, then so be it. I'd hasten to add that the shelters built by Africans are at least suitable to their environment. Even in this day and age I would expect any company investing in capital in order to undertake profitable resource extraction in developing countries, is beholden to look after its workers. The imperial mindset didn't hold to such ethical considerations - and it seems you're in full agreement with that. Posted by Poirot, Wednesday, 26 September 2012 2:38:35 PM
| |
*Note that the Brits were "investing in capital" only as far as their own interests were concerned*
Well of course. Do you think they were walking around the desert, being threatened by local bandits etc, for the fun of it? The world was a tough place, 100 years ago. *I'd hasten to add that the shelters built by Africans are at least suitable to their environment* Wow, so the three bits of tin and cardboard in some of the slums are suitable to their environment? This whilst African leaders live it up in splendor. Think again. *Even in this day and age I would expect any company investing in capital in order to undertake profitable resource extraction in developing countries, is beholden to look after its workers.* Well yes, we have moved on by 100 years. Most Western companies do. Most Chinese and third world companies still don't bother. Posted by Yabby, Wednesday, 26 September 2012 2:58:08 PM
| |
I lived in more than one hut made out of kero tins flattened out.
Poirot bit surprised you need to look back at Imperial England to defend Muslim hate. Doubt it will convince anyone. Csteele yes but seems to me in an effort to blind the debate we are clutching at straws, that never existed in any case. Around the time you speak of few if any transportable houses existed, for any race or color in such places. Arabs lived in tents, quite happy to too. Posted by Belly, Wednesday, 26 September 2012 2:59:30 PM
| |
Yabby,
"Three bits of tin and some cardboard..." I really don't know why I bother sometimes : )...I was referring to traditional shelters - not those fashioned from cast-off bits of industrialisation by people often forced off the land and onto the outskirts of urban centres. Belly, So I'm "defending" Muslim hate am I? Where have I defended Muslim hate? (link please) I'm seeing a considerable amount of hate and fear on this thread to counter that seen in the riot, but I can't remember defending it, from either side. Another case of Belly fashioning something out of nothing..... Posted by Poirot, Wednesday, 26 September 2012 3:43:27 PM
| |
On second thoughts, Belly, don't bother.
I think I've now definitely had a belly-full of this thread. Posted by Poirot, Wednesday, 26 September 2012 3:50:21 PM
| |
http://freethoughtnation.com/contributing-writers/63-acharya-s/479-richard-dawkins-islam-is-one-of-the-great-evils-of-the-world.html
I do not post this link to inflame. I post it as I have with every link, to add to the debate. Add too evdence the views that see most, repeat most of us, branded are minority ones. Of interest is this, the author is well known not to believe in Christianity, But I doubt his life would be threatened. A long but informative link, it backs early posts from Kactuz, in simply pointing at? the holly book of these folk, to find reason to be concerned. Posted by Belly, Wednesday, 26 September 2012 4:15:31 PM
| |
Belly, an interesting link and I like the quote below:
*I think in a way we are being too nice. I think that it's possible to be naively overoptimistic, and if you reach out to people who have absolutely no intention of reaching back to you, then you may be disillusioned.* Perhaps that is what will one day happen to some of our presently naively overoptimistic posters.It seems that people need pain to learn the hard way. Posted by Yabby, Wednesday, 26 September 2012 5:36:29 PM
| |
Oh, Poirot. You haven't said anything about Muslim hate ? No indeed. I think most of us have twigged that you will twist and turn, go on about British oil companies in Iran, or shoe sizes, or anything except the topic.
Which is about Muslim riots. At bottom, about the Sixth Pillar - jihad against the West, the Renaissance and the Enlightenment - and the Caliphate. Versus free speech, equality and the rule of law. You've shown what side you are on, dear. Is this what the left has sunk to, the uncritical support of reaction ? What a pity. Obfuscation 0, Freedom of Discussion 1. Cheers, Joe Posted by Loudmouth, Wednesday, 26 September 2012 6:08:32 PM
| |
Yes indeed yabby.
I have clashed with many over the years, some true hard days around the animal welfare debates. I greatly respect and like Poirot and Lexi, have fallen out with both over boat people. But never before questioned myself this much, over Poirot, I like her. But no, can not see the abuse she claims she is getting. I do you know, review my words, know some are sharp, but think she is holding her breath and stamping her feet, because I refuse to back away on this issue. Well over half our country agrees with me. csteele, well the threat to shout at me, is are here in print, as has some true gutter tactics aimed at my honestly held views. We can not avoid our fate, we are indeed as a result of our kindness going to suffer greatly. No way around it, hundreds of such threads exist,the western world, given a chance, would in time take back its efforts to be too kind to some who would not do it for us. Posted by Belly, Wednesday, 26 September 2012 6:13:58 PM
| |
Hi Belly,
I fully agree. Slightly off-topic, somebody sent me a list of Nobel Prize winners, Muslim and Jewish. On the Muslim list, I noticed the name of Sir Peter Medawar, colleague of Sir MacFarlane Burnett, pioneers in transplant research. I checked him out on Wikipedia and lo and behold: "Medawar was born on 28 February 1915, in Petrópolis, Brazil (a town 40 miles north of Rio de Janeiro) of a British mother (née Edith Muriel Dowling) and a Lebanese father, Nicholas Medawar, who was a Maronite Catholic." So no, he wasn't Muslim. Okay, what did he say about religion, as a scientist ? "... I believe that a reasonable case can be made for saying, not that we believe in God because He exists but rather that He exists because we believe in Him... "Considered as an element of the world, God has the same degree and kind of objective reality as do other products of mind... "I regret my disbelief in God and religious answers generally, for I believe it would give satisfaction and comfort to many in need of it if it were possible to discover and propound good scientific and philosophic reasons to believe in God... "To abdicate from the rule of reason and substitute for it an authentication of belief by the intentness and degree of conviction with which we hold it can be perilous and destructive... I am a rationalist—something of a period piece nowadays, I admit..." Wow, that would get him beheaded, if he really had been a Muslim at some time. Lovely man. Maybe it doesn't fit on a placard, but I'd go with it. Joe Posted by Loudmouth, Wednesday, 26 September 2012 6:31:50 PM
| |
Belly I agree with you. I am sure that both Poirot and Csteele are
lovely people, but clearly they are not the first Australians to be naive about how the world works. We live in a fairly protected society here. I remember a friend signing a contract to buy fertiliser from the Chinese. The world price then went up and he thought he had been clever, until he wanted delivery at the agreed price. Which contract? Reading "23 Years", which is about Muhammed's life, you get an idea of what Islam is really all about. Whilst the early Muslim army raided camel trains, a couple of Jewish tribes were farmers in the area and considered the Arabs lazy. Muhammed eventually wiped both of them out. When asked by his followers to justify his actions, down from the heavens came a verse basically implying that the end justifies the means. So I think that Dawkins is pretty spot on in his analysis. Posted by Yabby, Wednesday, 26 September 2012 9:49:13 PM
| |
Belly, Yabs
Thanks for the support, blokes. I can take abuse, Belly. I can take disagreement. I wasn't specifically complaining about that. I was, however highlighting the weird and persistent trolling behaviour over many threads by one poster who I've now decided to ignore. Apparently to raise such an issue is ".....holding my breath and stamping my feet..." Okay, I get it. You blokes appear to think it's acceptable for someone to repeatedly wind up another poster just for their own cocky entertainment. Perhaps you're right and I should accept that kind of thing on this forum. (Anyway, I'd still share a beer with you two guys if the opportunity ever arises) Posted by Poirot, Thursday, 27 September 2012 12:34:03 AM
| |
Thanks Poirot, in fact I do say sorry if I offended you it is not my wish to do so.
Let me say this, my concern and yes fears come from real life one on one contacts. I have NEVER before seen such unfocused anger and out right racism, as I did from one group of youths under my care, Muslim youth. They openly excepted me as a friend, until they got drunk! very drunk! A magnet to country girls these young men, wrecked rented rooms, defecated on floors and beds,and bashed the girls, not once but three times. While drunk they insulted every one, and made threats about our fates after they took over. I often, had to walk the streets of the main enclave that brings Sydney's drive by shootings. As usual I started every conversation with Gday mate, and more often than not got pure hate in return. I would warn looking at the mounting world problems following some of these folk from afar, is not a true measure. And that reading the links, all of them, shows we face a bigotry , yes right word, from within a creed that teaches we are less than others. Posted by Belly, Thursday, 27 September 2012 5:47:54 AM
| |
http://www.themuslimtimes.org/2012/09/uncategorized/hate-speech-limits-of-freedom-of-speech-let-the-discussions-begin
I offer this link, from the heart of Americas Muslim population. As? evidence we do need to be concerned. See we would and have ignored such a flea, as this film, it is was and always will be of little interest. It at least in part, if not all, could be a constructed weapon, used to? Think about it. But too give thought to the very thin veneer of truth, over out right lies. The request to lie, to us. No better evidence can be found than in the links within links to this page, including? *coming victory of Islam* Posted by Belly, Thursday, 27 September 2012 6:04:43 AM
| |
So we are talking a lot about this topic, but it appears all is now calm on the governments front, so I guess it's just another case of 'sit back and wait for the next outburst'.
It's not rocket science, as the more muslims we allow in, the more we increase the risks of violence, as the violence comes from within this culture. It just doesn't make sense to me. Posted by rehctub, Thursday, 27 September 2012 6:21:16 AM
| |
three groan men against our girl
shame on you..three on one..so sad..but if ya got the numbers well lets go bom the towel heads.. just like them xtian soul-diers before ye..how much personally has this cost you how much in trust how much in loving other the 'make-up' seexxx..should be interesting its only a tiff between lovers right..? we with opinions..hold them firm we are sure of our ground..so step off this sure ground..at our peril and the haters that hate you really want the lot of you gone and that aint no protester or boast people in time they come for you..then you will say oh..yeah i said that ...then but hevk i didnt really think that i just joined the links..that will inevitably..lead to the *global hollow/cost.. while we fought the petty thing's..money.fear hate the real..and omnipresent danger.. went to war..went to muder 2/3rds first it set off the haters..next it set up censure then the pres declared ,marshal law..it had its roots in our past but we had to go picking on the scab [if you know what that encompasses..hint it cover a lot of poisen puss do not point..spin wurd it wasnt a riot it wasnt eurika stockade..it wasnt sydney first people in crone nullanulla they might be called rightly riotous/rightious but its the impressive over calling of rot as riot that catches the haters and rioting in the streets..by 'towel-head arabs..suits the red flag..long enough to go the black flag ..on iran gee up the hate ..to a fever pitch yeah mass murder,,by fair means m ostly foul its like an itch..a scab you just wanna scrrrr attccchhhhhhh at ick at..pick on..its like demons children yelling feed me hate feel good does it? yeah man..like energy..we love sukking others inner enner-gee/chi Posted by one under god, Thursday, 27 September 2012 10:16:37 AM
| |
Rechtub in all things moderation.
This country can never stop Muslim Migration, unless we are formally at war with that religion. And we should not ever contemplate it. We would be compared with Nazis. And trade sanctions could bankrupt us forever. If, and we will not, we did, our internal problems would exist still. From third fourth and subsequent generations of Australian born Muslims, many, maybe most, of those rioters are such. The teachings, not unlike early or SOME Christianity today, is based on exclusiveness, we are better. But far more restricting far more elitist,the religion of peace is a front, it never was or will be such. Time can not change it, our quite time now, the words of peace, rattled by A SINGLE INDIVIDUAL who put together a film few saw, even less wanted to, is a warning. Are you aware a United Nations move to outlaw BLASPHEMY is being pushed? That in truth is nothing less than an insult to free speech, Darwin's theory may be silenced next. We must ask why. Why has the western world seen not integration but the building of? ENCLAVES. Muslim Migration separatism we would be despised for if it was us enforcing it. Some will assimilate, in time, some never, and our problem is not going away. I have a question, this lie, this failure called MULTICULTURALISM, is it Social engineering? An experiment in one world? And another, as cultures indeed blended in the post ww2 refugee flows, did some one honestly think inventing a different form, the MC lie was worth the pain if it in the end made us one? Posted by Belly, Thursday, 27 September 2012 12:56:24 PM
| |
*three groan men against our girl*
Sheesh Poirot, sounds like you have us all groaning :) Perhaps one day Belly can spread his wings and fly to WA for a holiday, then we can all have a beer... Posted by Yabby, Thursday, 27 September 2012 1:36:17 PM
| |
Three dozen posts since my last offering, I'm seriously having trouble keeping up and I'm even feeling guilty about stealing time away to post this therefore apologies if it seems rushed.
Dear Danielle, You wrote; “You appear urbane, sophisticated and educated. Is this more apparent than real? I increasingly feel so.” So you should. Unlike your good self I have no degree to my name, in fact I did fifth form three times and sixth form twice (failing English meant no HSC pass back then). My only saving grace is I have travelled a bit, developed a propensity to think about what I read, and love having my ideas and preconceptions challenged. As to being sophisticated and urbane please don't be fooled, it is only through an enjoyment of word-smiths such as Conrad, Banjo and Twain that I managed to knock together a few words but the effect is often muddled and any semblance to the higher graces is purely illusionary. I however tend to be pretty protective about what we have managed to build in this country which includes our multiculturalism and our levels of tolerance, but recognise it has not been done without some heavy work by many people. If I can manage to do my little bit here on OLO and a few other places I inhabit then all to the good. Just as a small aside, if the US beats us to legalising gay marriage, especially after us, along with New Zealand, having lead the world on issues like voting rights for women or working folk's rights such as the 8 hour day, it will be a sad day. As to the Middle Eastern peoples I firstly acknowledge they have been subject to the whims of others, especially Western powers for an extended period. Some claim it is the region that breeds people with violent tendencies, yet one only has to look a Europe during both of the wars to see the lie. The same might be claimed of the religions and the same answer given. Cont... Posted by csteele, Thursday, 27 September 2012 3:10:05 PM
| |
Cont...
Some like yourself claim more specifically that intolerance and violence are innate qualities of the Muslim Arabs, but like Jayb, who includes in his list condemning Islam bombings, those in Syria which is currently mired in a civil war, you make little account of some of the dictatorial regimes that have so brutalised their peoples. I found quite interesting the Israel Democracy Institute (IDI) Peace Index results after this years self described pogrom against African migrants where Likud members stirred up a crowd which subsequently started attacking innocent Africans, destroying cars, businesses and other property. “Most reports said the rally turned nasty after the crowd was whipped up by several racist speeches by right-wing MPs, several of them from the ruling Likud party of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. "The infiltrators are a cancer in our body," Likud MP Miri Regev told the crowd, as fellow MP Danny Danon shouted: "The infiltrators must be expelled from Israel! Expulsion now!" Police spokesman Micky Rosenfeld said 20 people had been arrested on suspicion of vandalising shops and attacking cars driven by Africans, but added that there were no reports of anyone being injured. The police have also extended the remand of seven Israeli minors accused of attacking African immigrants earlier this week, he said.” http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/world/tel-aviv-race-riots-shock-israel/story-e6frg6so-1226366536966 “Fifty-two percent of Jewish Israelis identify with the statement by MK Miri Regev last month that African migrants are “a cancer in the body” of the nation, and over a third condone anti-migrant violence, according to the Israel Democracy Institute (IDI) Peace Index for May 2012.” “Only 19% of Arab respondents agreed that the migrants were “a cancer.”” http://www.timesofisrael.com/most-israeli-jews-agree-africans-are-a-cancer/ Calling illegal immigrants 'infiltrators' and 'a cancer' certainly ratchets up the rhetoric. Cont... Posted by csteele, Thursday, 27 September 2012 3:12:30 PM
| |
Cont...
Thankfully we have not seen such demonising from our own politicians but it is important that at least in this country we encourage restraint from them. I will give kudos thus far to Mr Abbott on this point. So I'm asking the question why would Jewish Israeli's be showing two and a half times the intolerance toward African immigrants as the Arab Israelis? Why don't the figures support the argument you are making that the issue is purely with middle eastern Arabs? I would like to leave you with a portion of president Obama's speech at the UN yesterday. “I know there are some who ask why we don’t just ban such a video. The answer is enshrined in our laws: our Constitution protects the right to practice free speech. Here in the United States, countless publications provoke offence. Like me, the majority of Americans are Christian, and yet we do not ban blasphemy against our most sacred beliefs. Moreover, as President of our country, and Commander-in-Chief of our military, I accept that people are going to call me awful things every day, and I will always defend their right to do so. Americans have fought and died around the globe to protect the right of all people to express their views – even views that we disagree with.” “We do so not because we support hateful speech, but because our Founders understood that without such protections, the capacity of each individual to express their own views, and practice their own faith, may be threatened. We do so because in a diverse society, efforts to restrict speech can become a tool to silence critics, or oppress minorities. We do so because given the power of faith in our lives, and the passion that religious differences can inflame, the strongest weapon against hateful speech is not repression, it is more speech – the voices of tolerance that rally against bigotry and blasphemy, and lift up the values of understanding and mutual respect.” I hope to be counted as one of those voices. Posted by csteele, Thursday, 27 September 2012 3:15:12 PM
| |
Yabby it could happen if so you will know.
In need of a beer or two just to sort out how the Sydney riot was started by the acts of the old British Empire, America, and the Jews. Then finding a link to the world wide ones, this lot not the many others has me baffled. Just about got my head settled and have to confront the film, still not seen it, why bother? surely ANY RELIGION bar this one knows ignoring such things, turn the other cheek? is best. Muslim faith seems to not have that saying, or the Golden rule, do un to others. It reminds you not to betray other Muslims, but advises you to rip of non believers? Could be killed for this, but a question. Is the problem the people or the religion? Would we live together if no belief separated us? Posted by Belly, Thursday, 27 September 2012 4:09:26 PM
| |
csteele,
Your Archilles heel is the Arab Muslim territory. Many will have noticed this. It is not rational, it is emotional at root. Yes, Israel has problems, many of which have to be seen on context - a state at siege; others are problems - like any country. Have you seen the latest figures on anti-immigration in Britain? Incidentally, what is the policy on immigration into Arab territory? I understand that to gain citizenship in any territory, one has to prove relationship to the relevant tribal groups. I believe in a two-state solution, I do not agree with settlements in Palestinian territories. The rest of the Arab world are Judenfrei, forcibly often violently so; why shouldn't Palestinian territories enjoy the same status as its brethren. In the Palestinian civil war, more were killed, Palestinian by Palestinian, in the first ten months, than had been killed in conflicts with Israel. Thousands upon thousands fled, or tried to flee. If Israel is such a terrible state for Palestinians to live in, why are so many desperately trying to enter Israel? Why not an exodus instead? Every other area that has witnessed 'persecution' of a group, has seen the group leave and not wish to return. Thousands of Palestinians enter Israel daily to work. Why? They receive an equitable income with Israelis, including social benefits, such as medical, etc. With the $millions, indeed $billions having been poured into Palestinian territories, why do these people want, or indeed need to work in Israel? Yes, everyone admits that the US, and certainly colonial countries, such as Britain before it, has made mistakes, criminal mistakes. However,for whatever the reason, the US pour $billions annually into these territories, which the territories don't refuse - at any level. You can't blame the US for everything ... I do not believe in body counts in history; I feel it is unfair, however http://www.politicalislam.com/tears/pages/tears-of-jihad/ Posted by Danielle, Thursday, 27 September 2012 5:56:49 PM
| |
Csteele,
I admire enormously your personal self-development, it would put many graduates to shame. Most agree with a tolerant, multi-cultural society. BUT this has to be mutual and extended in all directions. Posted by Danielle, Thursday, 27 September 2012 6:27:13 PM
| |
Csteele,
" Some like yourself claim more specifically that intolerance and violence are innate qualities of the Muslim Arabs" No, I don't think that intolerance and violence are innate of ANY group - although certain evolutionary theorists would contest my opinion. But when people live in societies where certain practices are the norm, it is understandable they many, perhaps most, accept these as normative. I stated that most practices pre-date Islam, are tribal in origin. It is a shame that these have continued, instead of being weeded out. Islam of the Middle East seems to be fossilized. We have seen pretty ghastly practices in Christianity of the past, but Christians don't burn people at the stake now; at least I don't think so. Also, I wrote of cultured Muslim who accepted amputation as a form of punishment, because keys could be left in cars, and not stolen. Posted by Danielle, Thursday, 27 September 2012 7:10:48 PM
| |
The seed of the Sydney riot, one no gardener would plant, came from an act others, in another country started.
It will be our fate for such to be the case, for a very long time. While the seed seemed to be one better discarded, of no worth, it grew world wide in fertile ground. Others, so small Christianity would have turned the other cheek, while maybe grinning at the feebleness of it all, came that way. And a speech this early morning in the UN a warning and a plea, from Israel, about a mad man and a country pledged to wipe them out? IF/WHEN no other action but a lightning strike against the Nuclear installations of that country comes? A unity Muslim against the rest, will again briefly, see our streets filled with the signs and voices, OF SOME who will in time, be told to stop. By leaders who say how wrong it was to do that here in the country that gave them shelter BUT! yes again and again BUT. Posted by Belly, Friday, 28 September 2012 4:57:14 AM
| |
Belly! Get to the Doctor straight away. I think you caught whatever Under One God has got.
Posted by Jayb, Friday, 28 September 2012 7:21:14 AM
| |
Interesting view from a Pakistani Muslim.
http://www.masada2000.org/Powerful-Jews.html Well worth the read. Posted by Jayb, Friday, 28 September 2012 11:05:56 AM
| |
Let's play a hypothetical.
The Gillard government are defeated by a landslide at the next election and lo and behold the Liberals are elected in their own right. Unshackled from the Nationals they set to work, dropping the Mining Tax, getting rid of mining royalties those pesky states had imposed, allow open slather on foreign investors and appoint John Howard as Governor General. A cashed up Chinese state enterprise jumps creating Sino-Ore, snatching up a faltering Fortesque, flashing serious cash in front of Gina ('For the children's sake') and getting a controlling interest of BHP. The Liberals impose a small federal royalty and a long term contract. Awash with funds Sino-Ore gets to work tripling iron ore production, importing much of the work force from China, and employing only Chinese companies to build and maintain the infrastructure leaving the more menial tasks to Australians. There is a strike by the Australian workers for 'better housing, decent health care and enforcement of' Australian 'labour laws.' Chinese management brings in Filipino strike breakers. Deep concern and anger in the Australian population quickly ensures that Abbot is just a single term Prime Minister. Once elected Greg Combert calls a meeting with Sino-Ore to discuss a renegotiation of the long term contracts signed by the previous government. He is totally rebuffed. He asks to see audited productions figures to ascertain if Australia was getting the correct revenue owed and is shown the door. Sentiment for nationalisation quickly grows within Australia and the parliament passes legislation creating Australia-Ore. Combert tries again to negotiate with Sino-Ore proposing a 50/50 ownership and profit share between the two entities based on what had been negotiated between the Chinese and the South Africans. He is again rebuffed despite advice from India, a Commonwealth nation, to the Chinese to accept the deal. Further strikes and riots ensue and China sends gunboats to protect Chinese property and personnel. They ban all exports to Australia, strip most of their personnel from the mining sites and close all production. They further freeze Australian investments within China. Cont... Posted by csteele, Friday, 28 September 2012 11:35:16 AM
| |
Cont...
Combert travels to the UN seeking some form of ruling on the impasse. While strong pressure is exerted by China the Security Council decides to indefinitely postpone discussion on the issue. Combert then visits India to try and get them to mediate. Australia attempts to commence shipping its own ore, but the first bulk carrier is intercepted by the Chinese navy claiming the ore is stolen and escorted instead ship to Hong Kong. The blockade and sanctions start to bite deep. China approaches India for help in getting rid of the Labour government but is rebuffed. Large amounts of money start flowing in to the Liberal Party coffers having been siphoned through local Chinese enterprises. Extensive media campaigns are launched against the Labour party and trying to oust Combert. Abbott approaches the Governor General John Howard and gets him to agree to dismiss the government. Howard then appoints Abbott as Prime Minister. Five days of mass demonstrations see Howard back down and ask Combert to form government. Because of the crisis gripping his nation Combert asks to be given "emergency powers for six months to decree any law he felt necessary for obtaining not only financial solvency, but also electoral, judicial, and educational reforms.". China again appeals to India who have recently elected a right-wing government and this time India comes out in support of China. Combert moves to limit the Governor General's power and stymie Chinese attempts to influence Australian Generals. He steps up efforts to curtail anti-government groups. China gives its embassy $100,000,000 to work toward getting rid of Combert. Money is funnelled to anti-Combert forces who kidnap and kill the Federal Police Chief. Abbott is implicated. Combert expels the Chinese embassy and strips Howard of his powers. China responds by again appealing to the India government who this time agrees to organise a coup but only after agreeing to divide the iron ore mining rights. A black and grey propaganda campaign is commenced designed to fan the flames of discontent and hasten an economic collapse. Cont... Posted by csteele, Friday, 28 September 2012 11:38:36 AM
| |
Cont...
The head of the Indian secret service meets with John Howard's daughter and the former Chinese ambassador to Australia in Switzerland and the plot is discussed. Howard, as the constitution head of the armed forces orders a small contingent, armed with a decree from him sacking Combert and installing Abbot as Prime Minister, to arrest Combert at Kirribilli. Other members of the armed forces are tipped off and foil the attempt. Howard flies out of the country that night. Unrest and rioting, feed with Indian funds, intensifies with supporters of the Monarchy decrying the removal of Howard. Through the ensuing days they gain substantial followings, some from ordinary people tired of the sanctions and violence but much from mobs financed by Indian money. During the unrest and confusion a General leading a tank division surrounds Combert's Canberra residence and he is arrested. Howard returns but instead of handing any real power to Abbott he assumes the leadership of Australia. He strengthens the power of ASIO allowing 'enhanced interrogation techniques' financed and taught by Indian and Chinese secret service agencies, hunts down and imprisons those who had supported Combert, and deepens the relationship with India who now want concessions on Uranium mines and to install an airbase. Finally in order to keep a disgruntled Abbott on side he declares Catholicism as the official religion of the country. Combert is sentenced to three years in prison and Australians spend the next two decades under a brutal dictator. Thirty years on people wonder why Australian demonstrations still shout 'Death to India'. The most often heard response from Indians is 'They just hate our freedoms and our way of life'. This is what some call a justifiable response to 'stealing'. (Primarily taken from this sequence of events; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abadan_Crisis_timeline ) Posted by csteele, Friday, 28 September 2012 11:41:59 AM
| |
Hans Christian-Anderson could not have done better csteele!
Let us look in another direction. Goggle news has a photo and brief story. About the man said to have made that film. Then posted it on the net. An insignificant type of bloke. Petty thief, no links other than his parole board to the government. In that country,apart from Assange, freedom of speech lives. Sure as I am no one, even knew about this childlike effort, and did not consider taking it down. So why kill Americans? why burn Embassy, bash police? Is freedom to Live and develop some thing this religion fears. Can it be a fear of people seeing the real bones of the chains this creed has on whole nations need such hatered aimed at? ANYONE NOT OF THEIR FAITH! Posted by Belly, Friday, 28 September 2012 12:28:06 PM
| |
Lets play another hypothetical, Csteele. I offer you millions for
the right to see if there are any minerals under your land. I might find nothing and you still cash in. You agree that if I find something, you will be paid 16% of any profits, with no risk to yourself, I accept all losses. Finally after years I discover something and spend mega millions developing it all. So you blackmail me. "I want half or you can get stuffed, forget the agreement, it means nothing" you say. Is that how you do business? Posted by Yabby, Friday, 28 September 2012 12:35:13 PM
| |
Csteel: Howard, as the constitution head of the armed forces orders a small contingent, armed with a decree from him sacking Combert and installing Abbot as Prime Minister, to arrest Combert at Kirribilli. Other members of the armed forces are tipped off and foil the attempt.
Flaw in the works. You are assuming the Australian Armed Forces are like other countries & can take control of the Country in some sort of Coup. They can't. Like Church & State the Armed Forces of Australia are separate & can never be used to usurp any Australian Government. Not only is in the Constitution it's in the Military Law Manual Book 5, Section 7. If I remember correctly. Great story though. It would make a good Movie. Let's do it. Posted by Jayb, Friday, 28 September 2012 12:38:16 PM
| |
Yes, enquiry and education is the key to Jewish success; nothing more.
Many people, including Jews, see problems with Netanyahu, however, his speech at the UN was valid. http://www.pmo.gov.il/English/MediaCenter/Speeches/Pages/speechUN270912.aspx Posted by Danielle, Friday, 28 September 2012 1:11:55 PM
| |
Yabby,
Revisiting the D'Arcy deal which you appear to be alluding to in your last past - this from wiki: "...The overarching argument for revisiting the terms of the D'Arcy Agreement on the Iranian side was that its national wealth was being squandered by a concession that was granted in 1901 by a previous non-constitutional government forced to agree to inequitable terms under duress." Further to that, and after decades of stonewalling by the British company: "In late December 1950, word reached Tehran that the American-owned Arabian American oil Company had agreed to share profits with Saudis on a 50-50 basis. The UK Foreign Office rejected any idea of a similar agreement for AIOC." Like I said, the imperialist mindset didn't include "equitable" terms for former colonised/third world countries. The Americans at least, in this instance, concluded there was more to be gained in fairer dealings with the Saudis. That's how they did business. Posted by Poirot, Friday, 28 September 2012 2:37:27 PM
| |
please tonight when you watch the news
watch the dude in the un with a bomb and a red coal..he puts very near the fuse burn this image into your minds please ignore the words see the fire in his hand..who stands there with 500 plus *_* bombs *@* and his red marker will be first hint of 'the black flag dont say your too busy to watch the lead up to end ytime hate mate hate its great* grrrr-eat! our seeds now bare its fruits while we sqabble and name call we got til dec 25 folks merry xmass* happy harvest time..that the comfortor come 'you will hear of wars and rumours of wars' it looks the darkest before the dawn [pre dawn a black thread and a white thread both LOOK grey the times make the men and im ashamed Posted by one under god, Friday, 28 September 2012 2:46:42 PM
| |
*by a previous non-constitutional government forced to agree to inequitable terms under duress."*
Duress? Nobody even knew if any oil existed. In fact for 7 years they found nothing. Iran could have waited 10 years, for the contract to expire. Or they could have applied an export tax, increasing their revenue. Stealing the lot is hardly the only option. *Like I said, the imperialist mindset didn't include "equitable" terms for former colonised/third world countries.* Sounds like Australia must be a third world country. When the NW Shelf was developed, nobody wanted to buy the gas. You need to invest billions, just to unload the gas. The NW partners signed initial agreements, basically giving the gas away for around 2c/litre, just to get it going, for the next 30 years. Some smart Chinese and other companies signed on the dotted line and Australia kept its agreement. Should we have told those customers to get stuffed, we would now raise prices to what was now fair? That is not how business works, believe it or not. Our royalties on iron ore are around 5-7%, so 16% was hardly a crook deal. Posted by Yabby, Friday, 28 September 2012 3:10:07 PM
| |
Those rock throwers in Sydney must be well informed.
To take those actions because Britain once is said to have ripped an Arab nation off. Posted by Belly, Friday, 28 September 2012 3:55:18 PM
| |
Yes, Belly, very droll.
Apparently one isn't allowed to divert to related topics at all on this thread. There is a series of contiguous links here connecting these events that lead to the Iranians overthrowing the US installed Shah and opting for a theocracy. (btw, I'm fairly sure Iranians are technically "not" Arabs....) Posted by Poirot, Friday, 28 September 2012 6:01:39 PM
| |
I am very near sure Iran is not a safe country to be in post the American election.
Just another thing to blame the west for. Taking their Lunatic leader at his word, and stopping him. More street riots world wide. And the opportunity to flog more burning cars with sticks. Posted by Belly, Friday, 28 September 2012 6:30:30 PM
| |
Interesting tactic, Poirot: when you can't come up with anything to cover the nakedness of your argument, divert.
So this thread is about what ? 'what are the underlying purposes of the Islamist attacks on police in Sydney a couple of weeks back' ? So let's see, how can we divert attention from this blatantly conservative, somehow-anti-US, reactionary bunch ? I know, let's talk about how evil the US was in its dealings with Iran sixty years ago. Yeah, that should do it. Nasty US, democratic Mossadegh. From there, we could, if necessary, rabbit on about the Iranian film industry. Then from there, about innovations in film generally. Or about the Turkish film industry - it doesn't matter, as long as we stay away from talking about Islamism and its reactionary agenda, and why sections of the Left are opening their legs to it. So, from Turkish film, we can go on to talk about what ? The role of Turkish expatriates in artistic work around the world; the place of film in a post-post-modern world; what Foucault might have said about Turkish film; how Turkish films might have dealt with a film-biography of Foucault - no, keep away from that one. Foucault's shoe size ? His favourite ice-cream ? Contemporary Uzbek poetry ? But the key is: to find anything that might divert attention away from the core issues, when one has no idea how to rally to the support of a bunch of ractionaries and their Trot followers. Congratulations, Poirot, you almost got away with it. Brilliant ! Cheers, Joe :) Posted by Loudmouth, Friday, 28 September 2012 6:40:15 PM
| |
Yabby,
Sorry for leading you astray into taking about non-core stuff. Apparently when I bring anything up outside the core issue of this thread, it's called "diversion". So apologies for "diverting". I note that when others do it, it's referred to as being "slightly off topic"...and apparently being "slightly off topic" is just fine and dandy. http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?discussion=5377&page=0#146749 Posted by Poirot, Friday, 28 September 2012 7:00:35 PM
| |
*Sorry for leading you astray*
Sheesh Poirot, you can lead me astray anytime :) Posted by Yabby, Friday, 28 September 2012 7:30:42 PM
| |
Dear Danielle,
The Middle East has been poorly served by their leaders and the effort required to oust them is often enormous and costly. They usually are supported by outside interests much to the detriment of their people and deals with the more stridently religious is a price ruling elietes are prepared to pay. It would be difficult to call any of the Abrahamic faiths progressive. All, when given largely untempered power, do themselves great disservice. In a piece for the ABC's The Drum Ben Knight makes the point; “If you think Israelis and Palestinians don't see eye to eye, the gulf between secular Israelis and the ultra-orthodox religious is probably just as wide.” He continues; “Secular couples have, on average, around two children per couple. Haredi couples have closer to eight or nine. And it's changing the very identity of Israel – away from the secular, socialist civil society it was created as in 1948 – to something quite different. To see it in action, you only need to take a peek inside an Israeli school. Israeli's government funds three streams of education; regular state schools, ultra-orthodox religious schools, and Israeli Arab schools. Back in 1960, only around 15 per cent of Israeli children were enrolled in religious or Arab schools. That figure is now around 50 per cent. In 30 years, it will be almost 80 per cent. That is a frightening statistic for the nation of Israel. Arab Israelis have long had lower education, and higher unemployment levels. But the real problem is in the religious stream. In religious schools, children don't learn mathematics, science, or English; only the Bible. All day, every day. And Haredi men are expected to - and do - continue that Bible study for the rest of their lives.” http://www.abc.net.au/news/2011-09-23/knight-make-no-mistake-israels-existence-is-under-threat/2935080 In what ways do you see this impending version of Israel (still nuclear armed) different from other regimes in the Middle East? Posted by csteele, Friday, 28 September 2012 10:21:53 PM
| |
Dear Danielle,
As an aside I was thinking of those many of Americans living out life sentences in horrendously overcrowded prisons, sometimes without the chance of parole, for minor offences because of the 'three strikes and your out' rule currently operating in many states, Both are punishments are incredibly inhumane and I can't help wondering how many would be prepared to lose a hand to be free and with their families? Dear Jayb, If Military Law Manual Book 5, Section 7 is the best that can be thrown at my hypothetical then I think it makes its point. Posted by csteele, Friday, 28 September 2012 10:27:14 PM
| |
Csteele,
You are absolutely correct about the corrosiveness of Jewish fundamentalism. The majority of Jews in Israel, perhaps are even secular, recognise the problems with this particular group. They have large families, their education does not fit them for life beyond their insular existence. The men devote their lives to study, they do not work, and they do not bear arms. In fact, they contribute nothing to their society ... they would argue that by prayer and study they are preserving the state of Israel. They are a drain on the public purse. From what I understand, any disapproval is quite mutual. Posted by Danielle, Friday, 28 September 2012 11:04:47 PM
| |
Israeli Arab education has not be equal to that of Israeli Jews, but there have been moves to redress this.
Negev Institute for Strategies of Peace and Development (NISPED), Israel’s Arab and Jewish citizens won’t merely live side by side but will cooperate fully as equals. http://www.nisped.org.il/ The Jewish-Arab Center - University of Haifa http://research.haifa.ac.il/~jew-arab/about.htm Central Bureau of Statistics Higher Education in Israel (search 'Arabs') http://www.cbs.gov.il/webpub/ In 1999 in attempt to close the gap between Arab and Jewish education sectors, the Israeli education minister Yossi Sarid announced an affirmative action policy, promising that Arabs would be granted 25% of the education budget, more than their proportional share in the population (18%). He also added that the ministry would support the creations of an Arab academic college.[ Middle East Contemporary Survey, Volume 23; By Bruce Maddy-Weitzman. p. 329;http://books.google.ca/books?id=zs57d0logH8C&lpg=PA329 In 2007 the Israeli Education Ministry announced a plan to increase funding for schools in Arab communities. According to a ministry official, "At the end of the process, a lot of money will be directed toward schools with students from families with low education and income levels, mainly in the Arab sector." http://www.haaretz.com/news/israeli-arabs-to-get-greater-school-funding-settlements-less-1.214753 The Education Ministry prepared a five-year plan to close the gaps and raise the number of students eligible for high school matriculation http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3958211,00.html In 2010, the number of computer science teachers in the Arab sector rose by 50%. The Arab sector also saw a rise of 165% in instructors teaching technology classes and a 171% increase in the number teaching mathematics. The number of physics teachers in Arab schools grew by 25%, those teaching chemistry by 44% and in biology by 81.7%. http://www.haaretz.com/business/number-of-computer-teachers-at-secular-schools-fell-42-in-decade-1.453704 Israel21 (provides a good overview of Israeli developments including exchange with Arab states) http://israel21c.org/ Social action (includes articles relating to Israeli Arab/Israeli Jew collaboration. One example below) http://israel21c.org/social-action-2/ Ben-Gurion University of the Negev launches special program preparing Bedouins to fill a dire need in their community’s schools. http://israel21c.org/social-action-2/wanted-bedouin-school-psychologists/ Posted by Danielle, Saturday, 29 September 2012 12:57:17 AM
| |
Lets go back to 2 Saturdays ago.
Social media and mobile phones had called the clan to action. Few of us knew, even less it stark truth expected, that afternoons actions. We had seen so very much worse, aimed at us, even LUNATIC American Church members heckling the family of dead American troops, at their funerals. So why would any one, truly anyone, from any country, think a stray idiot, Not even American by birth, would represent us? Australians? Or America, any country? We see here attempts to blame just about every thing, ten wheely bins full to the top with reasons for such? unreasonable acts. Good honest and respected posters, just a few, ignore the thread, or complain about it. Strangled by PC. Infected by its intrusion on open discussion, of some events. That man, flogging that burning car, he expressed the real reason for these events. He flogged on non existent enemy, one who only he can see wrong in. Yet, SOME see a racism, a hate, in us the people who had nothing to do with the whole sad but descriptive event, education focused on hate will in the end bring only more hate. Posted by Belly, Saturday, 29 September 2012 6:27:55 AM
| |
csteele, Danielle,
Many thanks for your civil and informative comments. Although they appear to detour from the core focus of this thread, they are of course relevant to issues emanating from the Middle-East. I notice that neither of you have been berated for deviating from the core issue of this thread (a good thing!) - but then your name isn't "Poirot". Posted by Poirot, Saturday, 29 September 2012 9:29:11 AM
| |
Sorry, Poirot, it's just that you're so good at it :)
And I apologise for not realising that this thread is really all about you. Back to topic: is it getting too pompous to suggest that what we may be witnessing - not just on one day in Sydney, but across the entire 'Arab Spring' - is a confrontation between Enlightenment and pre-Enlightenment values ? The Enlightenment wasn't an event, it's been a very long (and very much unfinished) process, perhaps going back to the Agricultural Revolution. Notions of law and rights and equality have been painfully built up, almost layer by layer,bit by bit, over thousands of years, but some societies have not been involved in that process. And characteristically, those who have not been involved, or who stand to lose from progressive developments, react against any changes in the direction that that unfolding has been taking - a sort of Newton's Fourth Law, that for every progressive step forward, there is something like an equal and opposite step backwards, as the powers in reactionary societies reinforce their domination, and suppress any signs of revolt. Conservative societies have developed extremely powerful social mechanisms for maintaining existing power structures, 'culture' for example. In a sense, Islam is a sort of ideology par excellence that systematises and strengthens so much that would have been reactionary even back in the seventh century: a sort of blueprint for anti-progressive societies. So Arab/Muslim societies have, over the past century, had to grapple with the multitude of complexities of nationalism vs re-Islamisation, totalitarian vs democratic pathways. In such a morass of conflicting values and 'solutions', nothing is certain and perhaps no form of government can be expected to last for long without very major challenges. Steps towards something like an Enlightenment are always in danger of being swamped by nationalist-totalitarian, and Islamist-totalitarian, oppositions. It's going to be a messy century. Just a thought. Joe Posted by Loudmouth, Saturday, 29 September 2012 11:47:13 AM
| |
Poirot it may be worth mentioning this.
csteele and I are unlikely to agree the sun will rise in the morning. He, I execpt it is he, has said he can not talk to me without expressing some views I may find unacceptable, so is avoiding me. I think that wise, for me too. I respect you, always, but consider this, other men may pretend to agree with your comments, crawl. I value my opinions as they are, based on honestly held views. Women, to their credit, see the human pain in issues such as this. I see, truly, an impending clash of cultures. A war true war, world war, based in my view on nothing more than that man flogging the burning car. Not unfocused hate, targeted bigoted hate. Transfered from teachers of hate to followers of a God. That we are asked to bend to, or die. So while you get upset with me, never forget, it is in the west my right to say what I want to, as it is yours. And I am too honest to pretend I think other than I do. Posted by Belly, Saturday, 29 September 2012 12:29:19 PM
| |
As sure as the sun will rise, my fears will be proved right.
We can ignore the extremely silly thing that ignited this thread. But it is an every day thing in parts of my states city. Hate schools nestle in enclaves and plans are made. How very well served this country has been by those who protect us against terrorism. But not always, not forever. Look at the hate that saw our troops murdered by those they tried to help. READ the Koran, truly read it. See the near enslavement of women in the home country,s and increasingly ours. Find me one, a single opponent of the views those of us showing concern, show me our verbal combatants concerns for the machine gunned wife. The girl in India set up by a man of faith, to die for a lie. Tell me about the suffering and death of the Syrian conflict. And in time, tell me our concerns are baseless Posted by Belly, Saturday, 29 September 2012 12:40:17 PM
| |
You are of course quite correct Csteele, fundamentlist judaism is
indeed an issue which the Economist wrote about in some detail, some years ago. It sounds to me that secular Jews and Arabs might just get on a great deal better, without religious fanatics from both sides. Fortunately for us, Judaism is not a proselytising religion, unlike Christianity and Islam. So they are going to cling to their little patch of Israel, but leave the rest of us alone. That is sadly not the case with Islam and that is the problem. Every religion has its gurus and with fundamental Islam, Sayyid Qutb has had a huge influence. Salafists, bin Laden, Zawahiri and the rest see his interpretation as the way to go, that is why bin Laden so badly wanted war with the West. The problem now is that Islamic nations, through the UN, are trying to prevent free speech across the globe. What a disaster that would be, if we could not freely express the reasons why we should not be part of the planned Caliphate. So this is about far more than a small patch called Israel. Posted by Yabby, Saturday, 29 September 2012 2:28:35 PM
| |
Dear Csteele,
You asked me about the Haredim and the atom bomb. Stevenlmeyer would be better placed to discuss this. However, I will give it a shot. As you know the Haredim do not fight; they believe that by prayer and study they can stay the hand of the enemy; save Israel. Also, as they have no maths of any real value in their education system, they would be useless deployed in the IDF - not being able to understand co-ordinates, nor other requirements. There has been strong suggestions that they should be employed in auxiliary positions, presumably canteens, nursing, etc. However, personally, I don't think they would be of great value. They wouldn't work on a sabbath, and I can't see them taking orders from women. I don't believe Haredim are among settlers. I would think they would be concentrated round the Wailing Wall as a necessary part of their devotion. Israel and the atom bomb. They have never admitted to having it, but we know they do. They certainly have never threatened to use it, even when situations looked very grim. The Israelis are only too aware of what the scenario would be if deployed. It has been, however, a very successful deterrent - up until now. Iran is a theocracy. The regime believes that a Holy War will usher in their Apocalyptic vision. Having the atom bomb ... They certainly have placed their cards on the table about Israel. If Iran did deploy it against Israel, all bets would be off. Israel would surely retaliate. Why wouldn't it? Realistically, if Israel did not retaliate, and with Iran armed with the atom bomb, no western country would be safe. Emboldened, Iran would look to taking its Holy War to western infidels. As already seen Arab states are siding with Israel to prevent Iran getting the bomb. They do no share Iran's Apocalyptic vision. Posted by Danielle, Saturday, 29 September 2012 2:28:37 PM
| |
Thank you, Poirot :-)
Yes, we have strayed off topic. However, I would like to add: There is a problem also if terrorist organisations, such as Hezbolah and Hamas, et al, supported by Iran obtained nuclear material. The problem would not just be Israel's. The issue of freedom of speech and proposed blasphemy laws are a slippery slope. In certain Islamic texts blasphemy against both Christianity and Judaism is clearly evident. Whilst Muslims perhaps would not see Mohammad 'consorting' with the Virgin Mary in Paradise as blasphemy, many Christians would. I don't believe in blaspheming any religion ... apart from being insulting, it is pointless. However, any ideology and that includes religion should be open to discussion, debate and criticism. What if the public had ignored the issue of child sexual abuse in the Catholic Church? The Church tried to avert this, but freedom of speech prevailed. It will be interesting to see what Islamic intellectuals have to say. Posted by Danielle, Saturday, 29 September 2012 3:08:57 PM
| |
Ah! ... But, Poirot ... they love you!
Posted by Danielle, Saturday, 29 September 2012 3:17:00 PM
| |
IMAGINE*..All disagreements are forever resolved -
from where the borders of the two countries will lie, to how they will share Jerusalem as their capital. Let's also assume that all Muslim and Arab nations will keep their promise to recognise Israel – and that the militants of Hamas, Hezbollah, and Islamic Jihad are consigned to the dustbin of history. Israel is finally free to realise its full potential as a nation. Or, to put it another way – Israel is finally free to let its own internal divisions and hatreds tear it apart. If you think Israelis and Palestinians don't see eye to eye, the gulf between secular Israelis and the ultra-orthodox religious is probably just as wide. http://www.abc.net.au/news/2011-09-23/knight-make-no-mistake-israels-existence-is-under-threat/2935080 Photo: Israel's ultra-orthodox Jews don't work, don't pay taxes and don't serve in the army. Not surprisingly, it's a pretty sore point. (Reuters: Gil Cohen Magen) Posted by one under god, Saturday, 29 September 2012 5:14:04 PM
| |
These are comments attracted by Knight's article, presenting more detail.
“Israel's economy is growing at three times the rate of the rest of the developed world. The country has about 60 companies traded on the Nasdaq, more than any nation outside North America after China and is also home to the largest number of startup companies per capita in the world.” - Sandy “Haredi women have always worked and paid taxes. Currently, many Haredi men are entering the work force. “- Shmuel Nagid “Even if Israel has this issue it still far out-produces its neighbours. It may in fact be the only sustainable economy in the Meditteranean and ME where the problem is the exact opposite - countries with very big youth bulges and virtually zero quality education and economic hope. In fact in a different way Turkey faces the exact same problem Israel does with overly religious Islamists from the Anatolian regions vastly out-reproducing the more secular westernised regions which are actually the productive regions.” - Joel “I have two sisters living in Israel. One is heradi (literally, G-d fearing). She and her 8 adult children and their families all work and pay tax like any other Israeli citizen. Most of her boys did some limited form of military duty. … The other sister is secular and lives on a kibbutz as does her two adult children. Through their kibbutz, they too pay tax. Her children and husband were required to serve longer in the military.” - watching from the sideline However, we have definitely gone off-topic and should return to it ... Posted by Danielle, Saturday, 29 September 2012 7:17:40 PM
| |
The thread diverted but ready to stall, may halt.
But it will return time and again, and be diverted yet again. While insistence that migration worldwide is not in any way integration, it can not be , read Muslim texts. We will come back, some to flog burning cars, some to plant flowers on the dead body's, to avoid open discussion, not allowed by this creed. And we western hosts of a people who sometimes hate us, will again be blamed for their actions. NOTE the constant talk of * The Crusades* Nearly a full thousand years ago! Why then should we not forever, and ever, CONDEMN Germany, Japan,England for sending our ancestors here, Spain for the Amarda, it goes on. Why? Christianity has words like turn the other cheek, not cut the head off! Posted by Belly, Sunday, 30 September 2012 5:38:37 AM
| |
belly you wrote/quote..""Christianity has words like turn the other cheek, not cut the head off!""
so i went looking.. https://www.google.com/search?q=repulsive+bible+noahtide+law#hl=en&sclient=psy-ab&q=repulsive+exodus&oq=repulsive+exodus&gs_l=serp.12...4557.13810.0.21448.18.16.0.0.0.0.0.0..0.0.les%3B..0.0...1c.1.Ylu10OpaKEE&pbx=1&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_qf.&fp=41e31085700f818&biw=1280&bih=672 and looking https://www.google.com/search?q=repulsive+bible+noahtide+law#hl=en&sugexp=les%3B&gs_nf=1&tok=WHmtyIREWD3tpq3L-WtWkg&pq=repulsive%20exodus&cp=16&gs_id=2k&xhr=t&q=repulsive+law+in+exodus&pf=p&sclient=psy-ab&oq=repulsive+law+in+exodus&gs_l=&pbx=1&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_qf.&fp=41e31085700f818&biw=1280&bih=672 and nearly all vidio's but all that searching brings up typical union/alp principle?.....policy ''“If you buy a Hebrew servant, he is to serve you for six years';' Exodus 21:7 says it's OK to sell your daughter into slavery. Exodus 21:10), "if he appoint her as his son's wife, he shall act towards her ..according to the rights of daughters," lol womans rights? or barbaric xtian noahtide bull but lets really try reading belly ""21/23..the punishment must match the injury: a life for a life, 24..an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth, a hand for a hand, a foot for a foot, ..25a burn for a burn, a wound for a wound, a bruise for a bruise.."" turn the other cheek is in the NEW law the old law ..old test..is saying some really insane things belly and the torah even worse..like taking a 4 year old as a wife is ok for a jewish rabbi..is totally kosha..with noahtide law's evolutions..creating perversions in law governance and those claiming a higher standing we all stand on feet of clay and its a comfort to know..you can eat bad kids..it says so in the bi bile....you must know that vile seeks to do its vile..so anything we can comeup with[like commandments..will be adulterated thus see how a warning to the scribe's to....NOT TO ADULTERATE THESE WORDS became lol adultery as in the banning of the fleshy joys just cause ya[genericly..not specificly.. nbecause we got a ringing in our ears and a ring in our nose..and we didnt actual read the whole rule book..cause your too busy working..just like it was planned.. by those loving lies...knowable by their works.. not their too many words...or love of other..as THE way to good [god]. Posted by one under god, Sunday, 30 September 2012 7:18:36 AM
| |
Some of your best work, OUG : )
Posted by Poirot, Sunday, 30 September 2012 8:51:04 AM
| |
OUG,
We need to be careful which rock we pick up to beat the modern world around the head with - b@stards ! - since some of those Old Testament strictures were adopted, usually in a garbled form , by the Koran: slag those four-thousand-year-old rules and you might be slagging Islam, and that's not permitted on the Left, it's not culturally sensitive enough. So ..... we're going back, not just a thousand years or so (Crusades ! ptuh ! ptuh !) but four thousand years ? Is there any particular time-limit on any of this ? Why not ten thousand years, and then I can gripe about my Neanderthal ancestors being cruelly picked on by those Cro-Magnon b@stards. Hey, this is fun :) Posted by Loudmouth, Sunday, 30 September 2012 10:00:18 AM
| |
OUG,
Just a note: - Neanderthals weren't our "ancestors" - they were our "cousins". I appreciate, OUG, that you were replying to Belly's comment regarding words in the Koran compared to words in the Bible....therefore, your "going back so far" was in reply to another poster "going back so far". (It seems criticism of straying off core focus in this thread is selectively targeted : ) Posted by Poirot, Sunday, 30 September 2012 10:11:45 AM
| |
You're right, Poirot - what about we stick to more or less contemporaneous actions and words and principles - say, over just the last century or so ?
'By their words and actions, roughly about now, shall ye know them.' That should give us all plenty to complain about :) Cheers, Joe Posted by Loudmouth, Sunday, 30 September 2012 10:24:40 AM
| |
OUG OK I agree.
Your point was ALL RELIGIONS ARE POISON WASN'T IT? Lets get back to our true belief brother,you and I EVOLUTION. Just keep in mind some of these others have not evolved very far OK. Going out to flog my car now. Not able to set it on fire total ban here, but I will teach the B&gger Posted by Belly, Sunday, 30 September 2012 12:21:30 PM
| |
We've discussed that one before, OUG, like when I asked Runner if
I should kill my neighbour for working on the Sabbath. The Christians have given themselves an escape clause, saying that the old testament is how things used to be and that it does not really matter, as its not God's literal words. So they worship Jesus and the New Testament instead. The problem with Islam is that they still claim that the words of the Koran are literally God's words as divulged to them by Muhammed, when he heard those voices. Now if you claim that not to be the case, ie many people hear voices, just ask the schyzophrenic and heavy dope smokers, you land up with a blasphemy charge and its time for off with your head. Posted by Yabby, Sunday, 30 September 2012 1:45:56 PM
| |
Dear Poirot,
I have a rather sore head at the moment so this will not be expansive but I don't think you need to be too concerned with the preoccupation of some for 'staying on topic'. This thread is well over 400 posts long and the OP dropped off at least 200 posts ago. I have often found some of the best OLO offers is a hundred plus posts into a topic. Most of those who fire in gratuitous remarks have left and those who are interested enough to keep kicking the issue around generally start posting more thoughtful and reasoned responses. Granted it has taken a little longer here but there is some measured and interesting stuff coming through. If someone takes a topic in a different direction then it is up to others if they want to follow. If they do then often calls to 'return to the topic' can become diversionary in themselves. Dear Danielle, Good to see some hopeful links thank you. What I was exploring was how different a future Israel might look if demographics have their way and the fundamentalist/orthodox/settler communities are in the majority. Actually to really cut to the chase how different from a more forcefully Islamic country might it would look? I obviously feel not a lot but am open to a dissenting argument. “Israel is the only democratic society that prevents its Jews from living as they wish. The stranglehold of Orthodoxy deprives Jews of what they’ve been granted in all other democracies.” “Only in Israel, as in Nazi Germany, are Jews prevented from marrying non-Jews, or Jews who are considered insufficiently “Jewish.” “Rabbi Yaacov Perin declared: “One million Arabs are not worth a Jewish fingernail.” http://www.wrmea.com/component/content/article/175/1866-growing-intolerance-threatens-the-humane-jewish-tradition.html So we need to ask is it the brand of religion or religion itself, given enough unfettered power in a society, that causes the issues we are seeing in the Middle East? Perhaps the degree of religiosity in the Abrahamic faiths that is the ultimate arbiter of a propensity to do violence against others. Posted by csteele, Sunday, 30 September 2012 3:48:08 PM
| |
Dear Yabby,
This is pretty easy. Ask any Christian fundamentalist why they have a problem with homosexuality the will quote Leviticus. Ask them to show where Jesus condemned homosexuality and they again refer you to Leviticus then to Jesus' words in Matthew "Don't misunderstand why I have come. I did not come to abolish the law of Moses or the writings of the prophets. No, I came to accomplish their purpose.” Ask runner if he would like to see a return to blasphemy laws and I think you will get a truer picture of intent. Posted by csteele, Sunday, 30 September 2012 4:02:54 PM
| |
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/God_in_Islam
An interesting read, only a start once read surely the Koran comes next? With eyes and heart open, no other way to take it in. A story of absolutes, total absolutes . And if taken as read? Surely no room exists to question why we see clashes on the streets. Posted by Belly, Sunday, 30 September 2012 5:02:27 PM
| |
http://wiki.answers.com/Q/Why_do_Muslims_hate_Christians_so_much
This link will take some reading, maybe half an hour. But in the first 2 minutes, yes only that. You will see both the lie exposed and the term live within, can not be sure of the word, controlled by Islam! Some, on both sides of this debate have never read any thing about it. This link is worth the time. Posted by Belly, Sunday, 30 September 2012 5:12:15 PM
| |
*Ask runner if he would like to see a return to blasphemy laws and I think you will get a truer picture of intent.*
Ah Csteele, but of course Jesus said "turn the other cheek, whilst Muhammed said "off with their heads", as he led his army. So Runner would have to follow his gurus advice, unless he wanted to become a muslim :) Posted by Yabby, Sunday, 30 September 2012 5:22:43 PM
| |
csteel: New Living Translation (©2007)5:17
"Don't misunderstand why I have come. I did not come to abolish the law of Moses or the writings of the prophets. No, I came to accomplish their purpose.” King James Bible (Cambridge Ed.)5:17 Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil. The KJB is the given recognized standard. These others like the NLT have been done by these American Christian TV Evangelists who like to do their own interpretations on things to suit their own agendas, like making people part with their money & give it to them. The interpretation I grew up with is somewhat different to what you are making it out to be. Jesus in saying that meant that what the Law & the Prophets had said was correct, so he couldn't destroy that, because HE is the fulfilment of what they said. In the NLT the phrase, "No, I came to accomplish their purpose.” could be interpreted as HE was there to continue the old Law on. Now you see the problem we have with American Evangelists. They are rewriting the scriptures to serve their own ends. As the Old Law & the Prophets predictions had been fulfilled by HIS coming then that was finished & a new Law was created. Love the lord thy God with all the heart etc. & Love thy neighbour as thy self. Posted by Jayb, Sunday, 30 September 2012 9:03:46 PM
| |
Now it's interesting to note that the first record of the,” love thy neighbour,” bit was from Confucius, then Guatemala Batavia (The Budda or enlightened one) then some guy in Babylon, long before it came to be written into the Bible. Then Joshua (Jesus) said it. There is also a tradition that Joshua travelled to India in the 21 years he disappeared, & studied Buddhism & Hinduism. There was also a large Buddhist Temple in Capernaum, within a few hours walking distance of Nazareth. The Romans had a habit of accommodating the religions of all their lands, Buddhism was just one of them that had been brought to the West by Alexander. Alexander had a Buddhist Monk for an Advisor, because he knew that the Monk wouldn't flatter him like his normal countrymen did. Hence the term Grand Visor in that part of the world.
Sorry I just love History. Posted by Jayb, Sunday, 30 September 2012 9:04:14 PM
| |
Dear Steele,
Whilst Israel under fundamentalist Judaism would not be a fun place to live, I don't think it would be quite like fundamentalist Islam. There are three factors, possibly more, which should be considered. The High Court would retain its independence. This organ is sober, fair and impartial. Scientific and high-technological innovation is the bedrock of Israel's economy. These areas could not withstand an exodus overseas of firms, nor indeed of specialist Israelis, Arab, Jew or other. This is an economic reality. Progressive (liberal) Judaism is gaining traction and attracting concessions. This changes the face of 'who is a Jew'. I think a convulsive backlash against fundamentalism by other Israelis would occur before this group gained too much ascension. There are already rumblings ... The situation will be interesting to watch. Posted by Danielle, Sunday, 30 September 2012 11:53:37 PM
| |
Dear Jayb,
I have a great deal of affection for the King James Bible but to call it definitive is just silly. There are far more accurate translations but all without the poetry of the magnificent KJB. In any event you are wrong as any reading of the chapter will illustrate. Jesus was about putting the law on steroids not casting it aside. “For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled.” “Ye have heard that it was said of them of old time, Thou shalt not kill; and whosoever shall kill shall be in danger of the judgment: But I say unto you, That whosoever is angry with his brother without a cause shall be in danger of the judgment.” “Ye have heard that it was said by them of old time, Thou shalt not commit adultery: But I say unto you, That whosoever looketh on a woman to lust after her hath committed adultery with her already in his heart.” He was actually pretty typical of the faith and the era. “Give not that which is holy unto the dogs, neither cast ye your pearls before swine, lest they trample them under their feet, and turn again and rend you.” and But he answered and said, I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel. Then came she and worshipped him, saying, Lord, help me. But he answered and said, “It is not meet to take the children's bread, and to cast it to dogs.” Even the best efforts of Paul can not disguise the fact that Jesus thought the Gentiles (us) were dogs. We seem able to put that aside but refuse to do the same for Muhammad's words? Posted by csteele, Monday, 1 October 2012 12:06:00 AM
| |
The difference between the Bible and the Koran is that adherents of the Bible see it as descriptive, whilst those of the Koran see it as prescriptive. Not all, but enough to be a "worry".
Below are a few extracts from an interesting article regarding blasphemy/religious defamation written by Raymond Ibrahim (a Muslim apostate to Christianity). All his references are linked. The article in its entirety can be read online. How 'Religious Defamation' Laws Would Ban Islam by Raymond Ibrahim (September 26, 2012) http://www.meforum.org/3345/islam-religious-defamation-laws “What, then, do we do with Islam's core religious texts—beginning with the Quran itself, which slanders, denigrates and blackens the reputation of other religions? Consider Christianity alone: Quran 5:73 declares that "Infidels are they who say Allah is one of three," a reference to the Christian Trinity; Quran 5:72 says "Infidels are they who say Allah is the Christ, [Jesus] son of Mary"; and Quran 9:30 complains that "the Christians say the Christ is the son of Allah … may Allah's curse be upon them!" … “Similarly, consider how the Christian Cross, venerated among millions, is depicted — is defamed —in Islam: according to canonical hadiths, when he returns, Jesus supposedly will destroy all crosses; and Muhammad, who never allowed the cross in his presence, ordered someone wearing a cross to "take off that piece of idolatry." … “Here is a particularly odious form of defamation against Christian sentiment, especially to the millions of Catholic and Orthodox Christians. According to Islam's most authoritative Quranic exegetes, including the revered Ibn Kathir, Muhammad is in paradise married to and having sex with the Virgin Mary.” Posted by Danielle, Monday, 1 October 2012 12:23:54 AM
| |
Dear Csteele,
Many scholars who trace the places where Jesus traveled, and he did seem to teach within a specific area, will argue that Jesus was preaching to 'Jews' who had been coerced into converting - not Gentiles as such. Posted by Danielle, Monday, 1 October 2012 12:31:03 AM
| |
Paul at places can be a bit “ify.” He had never met Jesus. In his letter to the Galatians:
“ I would have you know, brethren, that the gospel which was preached by me is not according to man ... but came though a revelation of Jesus Christ”. Posted by Danielle, Monday, 1 October 2012 12:51:47 AM
| |
I have looked up Islam in Japan. It appeares that there are some Muslims but not many so I don't really know how true the following is. It is a policy that Australia would do well to adopt.
Japan, a Country keeping Islam at bay. Have you ever read in the newspaper that a political leader or a prime minister from an Islamic nation has visited Japan? Have you ever come across news that the King of Iran or a Saudi Arabia prince has visited Japan? Japan has put strict restrictions on Islam and ALL Muslims. The reasons are: a) Japan is the only nation that does not give citizenship to Muslims. b) In Japan permanent residency is not given to Muslims. c) There is a strong ban on the propagation of Islam in Japan. d) In the University of Japan, Arabic or any Islamic language is not taught. e) One cannot import 'Koran' published in Arabic language. f) According to data published by Japanese government, it has given temporary residency to only 2 lakhs Muslims, who need to follow the Japanese Law of the Land. These Muslims should speak Japanese and carry their religious rituals in their homes. g) Japan is the only country in the world that has a negligible number of embassies of Islamic countries. h) Japanese people are not attracted to Islam at all. i) Muslims residing in Japan are the employees of foreign companies. j) Even today visas are not granted to Muslim doctors, engineers or managers sent by foreign companies. k) In the majority of companies, it is stated in their regulations that no Muslims should apply for a job. l) The Japanese government is of the opinion that Muslims are fundamentalist and even in the era of globalization; they are not willing to change their Muslim laws. Posted by Jayb, Monday, 1 October 2012 7:39:19 AM
| |
m) Muslims can not even think about getting a rented house in Japan.
n) If anyone comes to know that his neighbour is a Muslim then the whole neighbourhood stays alert. o) No one can start an Islamic cell or Arabic 'Madarsa' in Japan p) There is no personal (Sharia) law in Japan. q) If a Japanese woman marries a Muslim then she is considered an outcast forever. r) According to Mr. Komico Yagi (Head of Department, Tokyo University) "There is a mind frame in Japan that Islam is a very narrow minded religion and one should stay away from it." s) Freelance journalist Mohammed Juber toured many Islamic countries after 9/11 including Japan. He found that the Japanese were confident that extremists could do no harm in Japan. Posted by Jayb, Monday, 1 October 2012 7:39:57 AM
| |
Danelle: “ I would have you know, brethren, that the gospel which was preached by me is not according to man ... but came though a revelation of Jesus Christ”.
I have problems with quotations like this. The word "gospel" is a modernish English word taken from the Dane. Go "God", Spel "word" so Paul would not have used the word Gospel. The other. "Jesus Christ." a name not found anywhere before the Nicene Conference called by Constantine. Constantine, being Roman, but born in York, England with a Welsh wife descendent from John the Younger followed his father’s religion, Mithraism. Constantine liked name of the God of Britain , Husus, The Sun God also the Indian God Krishna. Krishna, Hindu, Christos, Greek, Christ, English. The name Jesus Christ was imposed by Constantine at Nicaea. Now that'll put the cat among the pigeons. I think we better continue this in another thread, don't you. Posted by Jayb, Monday, 1 October 2012 8:11:39 AM
| |
Rehctub,
A little memento: http://twitpic.com/azxhmh Your topic has now attracted the all-time record number of comments to a General Discussion topic. Free Islamic Riot! Posted by Forrest Gumpp, Monday, 1 October 2012 9:46:25 AM
| |
JayB: Now that'll put the cat among the pigeons. I think we better continue this in another thread, don't you.
I think that "Islamic Riot" Topic has Morphed into a discussion on the peculiarities of Christianity & therefore I think if we wish to discuss the Origins of Christianity we should create another Thread. See; the Origins & Peculiarities of Christianity. Posted by Jayb, Monday, 1 October 2012 10:19:57 AM
| |
Todays headlines include
KENYA Christian Church bombed 9 year old killed. MOMBASA five Buddhist temples set on fire. Rechtubs thread has many more comments to be added, if not now in future versions. Not using other sites but looked, seems most got past the thousand, short message board stuff. jayb went to your new thread maybe it needed posting here,but thought it a worth while subject. Posted by Belly, Monday, 1 October 2012 12:34:37 PM
| |
Dear Jayb,
You write; “I have looked up Islam in Japan. It appeares that there are some Muslims but not many so I don't really know how true the following is. It is a policy that Australia would do well to adopt.” This is exactly the kind of crap that really gets my goat. I don't care who you are, if you are going to post things on a thread where a good proportion of the contributors are intent on fanning intolerance then it is a basic duty to at least get things right. I have only looked at a few of the claims you have posted and each one has either been demonstrably false or a perversion of the facts. Your claim; “Japan is the only nation that does not give citizenship to Muslims.” Completely wrong. Here are the criteria spelt out in Article 5 of the Nationality Act: ; 1. Continuous residence in Japan for five years or more 2. At least 21 years old and otherwise legally competent 3. History of good behavior generally, and no past history of seditious behavior 4. Sufficient capital or skills, either personally or within family, to support oneself 5. Stateless or willing to renounce foreign citizenship No mention whatsoever of religious affiliation. Your claim; “Japan is the only country in the world that has a negligible number of embassies of Islamic countries.” Rot! Here is a list of embassies from around the world. List the Muslim countries not represented. http://www.mofa.go.jp/about/emb_cons/protocol/i-p.html Your claim; “In the University of Japan, Arabic or any Islamic language is not taught.” Perversion of the facts! The only university that even comes close to this name is the privately run International University of Japan. Located in a rural setting it offers only masters degree programs with a primary focus on business studies. Japan's major university is the University of Tokyo has an Islamic Studies course which includes teaching the Arabic language. http://www.tufs.ac.jp/english/education/ug/studies/arabic.html You are either too lazy to do basic fact checking or are too determined to bang on with this unseemly agenda. Posted by csteele, Monday, 1 October 2012 3:02:43 PM
| |
The news that Muslim rioters who trashed a Hindu temple in Pakistan during demonstrations against the film will face blasphemy charges is an interesting development.
http://tribune.com.pk/story/444669/attackers-of-hindu-temple-charged-with-blasphemy/ The question is will Pakistan's legal system stand up to the political pressures that will be sure to follow. Posted by csteele, Monday, 1 October 2012 3:15:27 PM
| |
Csteel, what part of, " I don't really know how true the following is." did you miss.
However, I do believe, "It is a policy that Australia would do well to adopt.” This has nothing to do with race. It does have to do with Muslim intolerance. That is, all Muslims, because deep down regardless of how much they claim they are a peace loving people, it is only towards fellow Muslims that that peace is truly focused. (It's in the Book." For Infidels, like me & those like me, there is only the option to convert or death. Would you like to discuss "The Origins & Peculiarities of Christianity?" I have posted a new topic for discussion. It should be fun. Check it out. Or, being a Muslim, do you only have a Basic knowledge of the Christianity. But you could still contribute. I would like to discuss the mythology behind the religion. Posted by Jayb, Monday, 1 October 2012 4:57:10 PM
| |
"I don't really know how true the following is..."
But you decided to post it anyway because it aided in the prosecution of your view. Posted by Poirot, Monday, 1 October 2012 5:03:13 PM
| |
Poirot: But you decided to post it anyway because it aided in the prosecution of your view.
Yes, of course. You do exactly the same with any of your posts. We all do, otherwise there would be no reason to post. Would there, Duh! It's a view shared by most Australians. However, not a view shared by, Muslims, the Academia, Loony Greenie, & the Anti-Social PC crowd. They are unAustralian anyway. So I don't really give a R@T$ @r$3. Build a bridge. Posted by Jayb, Monday, 1 October 2012 5:21:44 PM
| |
There is a difference between mere personal opinion and failing to check the veracity of information chosen to support one's argument.
But, no sweat, Jayb....accuracy is seen as overrated by some.(as is the use of the term "unAustralian") Posted by Poirot, Monday, 1 October 2012 5:35:39 PM
| |
Thanks, Jayb… There hasn't been much in 75 pages to raise a smile or (pun intended) the spirits, but – "because deep down regardless of how much they claim they are a peace loving people, it is only towards fellow Muslims that that peace is truly focused" – did it for me.
Whatever we feel justified in fearing is as nothing to the concept and practice of *collective punishment* inflicted by some groupings of Muslims upon others of the same religion – it's a similar bloodsoaked history and reformation as we saw with Christendom – aided and abetted by ignorance, vendettas, regional population pressures, inequalities both imagined and real, modern technology and particularly the Internet. Posted by WmTrevor, Monday, 1 October 2012 5:50:04 PM
| |
Yes, Wm, I'm trying to work out if Islam is 500 years, 1000 years, or 1300 years, behind the rest of the world.
As for a religion of peace, that's wearing a bit thin: it appears that it's not sufficient to attack Christians and Christian sites, and Hindus and Hindu sites, but also - most unpardonable! - Buddhists and Buddhist sites: http://au.news.yahoo.com/a/-/world/15006058/mobs-attack-bangladesh-buddhists-again/ Either the entire world is involved in a conspiracy against peace-loving Muslims, OR there is a slight paranoid, even psychotic, streak in some - but probably not all - Muslims, wherever they are. One thing is for sure - it must be extremely difficult trying to be a secular-oriented Muslim, let alone a left-wing secular-oriented Muslim, in a Muslim country these days. Incredibly brave people. Not even the Left elsewhere would stick up for you :( Posted by Loudmouth, Monday, 1 October 2012 6:01:00 PM
| |
32 Muslims died at the hands of other Muslims in Iraq last night our time.
I saw a different thread than some others here. Sydney,s infamous act let the boil bust. It is more than apparent many thought about our increasing troubles long before it. And while the PC crowd convinced many to forget YEARS of taunts that lead to Crunulla, we did not let it stop mainstream voices being seen here. Posted by Belly, Monday, 1 October 2012 6:09:07 PM
| |
Thanks, Belly - that's Christians, Hindus, Buddhisits, Muslims of other secs 0, the pure and peace-loving Muslims 1.
Okay, what have we learnt so far, from the news, and from this thread ? Firstly, let's agree that Muslims are as intelligent, and potentially as kind-hearted to their fellow-humans as anybody else. But: * Islam is NOT a religion of peace, except towards followers of one's own sect; * Islam is NOT a religion which promotes equality, for Muslim women or for non-Muslims generally: slavery still exists in Mauretania - presumably only for non-Muslims - (but they could vote at the last elections); * Islam is not a religion which fits easily into the framework of a separation of chruch and state, religious and secular authority. * It is now 2012. What the hell happened in 1100 AD, or 323 AD, or 10,000 BC. is neither here nor there. Hopefully, we can stay on topic, but some can feel free to divert, obfuscate, chat about shoe-sizes, film, etc. The rest of us will plough on, trying to make sense of the actions and attitudes of our fellow-Australians. Joe Posted by Loudmouth, Monday, 1 October 2012 6:19:56 PM
| |
Dear Jayb,
So when we find you handing out copies of The Elders of Zion saying to the pundits "I don't really know how true the following is..." you don't deserve to be challenged? Get real. You had one of two choices here. You could have acknowledge what you posted was blatantly incorrect and apologised or you could decide to admit nothing and go on the attack. You chose the latter and responded with “It's a view shared by most Australians. However, not a view shared by, Muslims, the Academia, Loony Greenie, & the Anti-Social PC crowd. They are unAustralian anyway. So I don't really give a R@T$ @r$3. Build a bridge.” There are some lines on this site you really should not cross. When the rest of us engage you in debate it is with the general assumption any evidence you are posting has a degree of veracity. The rubbish you posted served to remove that assumption. The only real remedy was an apology and a commitment to be more careful in the future. As these have not been forthcoming you then become the type of poster that is not worth the effort. I now recall you have previous form with this kind of thing. http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?discussion=5123&page=0#138110 The common theme would seem to be snopes.com, it really is time to give that rubbish up. Once was bad enough, this second effort has effectively labelled you as an untrustworthy, serial offender. Not a good look Posted by csteele, Monday, 1 October 2012 11:01:45 PM
| |
Good onya Loudmouth, Joe .
Comes down to as you say Islam farms difference builds fences not links between us and them. Posted by Belly, Tuesday, 2 October 2012 6:21:28 AM
| |
It's funny you should say that, Belly...seems this thread is full of people "farming difference and building fences" - not so many highlighting links between us and them.
Posted by Poirot, Tuesday, 2 October 2012 6:46:17 AM
| |
csteel: You had one of two choices here. You could have acknowledge what you posted was blatantly incorrect and apologised or you could decide to admit nothing and go on the attack.
I have nothing to apologize for Ali bin csteel. I said at the outset that I didn't know how true it was. You are trying to make front page headlines out of Page 3. You chose the latter and responded with “It's a view shared by most Australians. However, not a view shared by, Muslims, the Academia, Loony Greenie, & the Anti-Social PC crowd. They are unAustralian anyway. So I don't really give a R@T$ @r$3. Build a bridge.” I stand by this. Most Australians (not the vocal unAustralian gaggle,) don't like what Islam is doing to our country. Posted by Jayb, Tuesday, 2 October 2012 8:22:00 AM
| |
*if you are going to post things on a thread where a good proportion of the contributors are intent on fanning intolerance*
Well there is the rub, Csteele. Personally I have become intolerant of the intolerant and for good reasons. Turning the other cheek is a dismal failure. This is exactly where the West has run into a problem. Let's face it, both in Australia and in Europe, our cultures have indeed become far more tolerant over the last 50 years or so. That has all been good news. But that tolerance has been abused by the intolerant. We have seen that unfold in places like the UK, Holland, Belgium and elsewhere. The flood of asylum seekers which they accepted over the decades, has gone badly wrong. Next we had claims of muslims being victims, calls for sharia law, terrorist attacks, global Caliphate calls and all the rest. Our societies have become far more divisive due to the influx of Islam. That is the reality. So I don't think it is up to us to adjust, but up to Muslims to adjust to our tolerant societies, otherwise to return to muslim countries where sharia law rules. Stating the bleeding obvious and being intolerant of the intolerant, makes perfect sense. Posted by Yabby, Tuesday, 2 October 2012 9:39:11 AM
| |
POIROT my well respected friend yes, but I see you standing in the middle of the ONLY TRUE ROAD toward a better world on this issue.
See Islam needs no defenders from out side, for them the truth is your head would and on top of mine if they had their way world wide. The crimes and sins of both sides must be uncovered to proceed. Yabby has, for me, put the best line in this conversation! weary of being tolerant to the intolerant! Good stuff. The dutch politician is coming, he has every right to be heard in our democracy, his opercite came so should he. Death toll increased 22 dead,target police and military in a market place. More children more Muslims, murdered by Muslims. More toll news from the people of peace next and everypost. Posted by Belly, Tuesday, 2 October 2012 12:30:27 PM
| |
Dear Yabby,
I'm in furious agreement that we should be intolerant of intolerance since that is exactly what I have endevoured to do here. What I am defending is this country's great legacy of accepting large immigrant groups and working through the issues that have arisen. There are many wrongs that can be laid at the feet of immigrants. The killing of Donald McKay by the 'Italian mobsters' in Griffith certainly had reverberations in my school yard at the time with plenty of anti 'Wog' sentiment flowing. All Greeks and Italian immigrants were painted with the criminal brush and from memory questions about the wisdom of continuing to allow further migration from the region were raised in parliament. The Vietnamese immigrants were the next to be tarred with the brush of criminality, particularly after the death of John Newman who was the victim of Australia's first political assassination. He had been under threat from Asian gangs for quite a while. Just as we didn't load up boats full of Italians or Vietnamese when a small group did wrong nor should we be talking about doing to same to Muslim Australians. So yes you should be intolerant about intolerance but not in a way that breeds more of what you are claiming to combat. By all means Muslim intolerance, when it presents itself, needs to be challenged strongly, not only from us but particularly within that community and I see every sign this is happening. However the last thing we need is an Australian Anders Breivik yet the path many on this thread have advocated steers us toward rather than away from such a possibility. Posted by csteele, Tuesday, 2 October 2012 12:37:07 PM
| |
*Just as we didn't load up boats full of Italians or Vietnamese when a small group did wrong nor should we be talking about doing to same to Muslim Australians.*
Did it ever occur to you Csteele, that perhaps because Australians kicked up a stink about violent Vietnamese and Italians, that their countrymen had every reason to do something about the problem? In a way you are comparing apples and oranges here, because a religion actively preaching violence and doing so in the streets, is a whole other ballgame. But its only with enough pressure from the general community, that muslims will realise the urgency to address the problem of their fellow believers. There is nothing wrong with Australians calling a spade a spade. Calls for deportation will even do some good and make those fanatical Islamists realise that Australian tolerance cannot be abused and that Australians mean business. Pussyfooting around gently, can be a dismal failure. Posted by Yabby, Tuesday, 2 October 2012 1:50:42 PM
| |
http://www.smh.com.au/it-pro/security-it/islamic-hackers-deface-emergency-web-pages-20121002-26wix.html
I am proud to have been a member of the State Emergency Service SES. And to know many who still are very active. Almost every one is an unpaid volunteer, no pay but there 24/7. From roof blown off to flood no group should ever be less of a target. No group more unworthy of this gutless over reaction,a deliberate insulting attack on innocents. Like every human bomb, usually an innocent sent to die for a cause. The thread demands the culprit be caught, and helped,his/her target? would not even be aware of this act. And who? other that this fool and his like, can see the film as a intended insult to his/her God. Posted by Belly, Tuesday, 2 October 2012 5:41:24 PM
| |
Yabby very true.
And an open door for real change. Without a religion that seems bigoted, has not changed with the times, we would not have this trouble. I too think room exists for other views, Islam does not. Never can, it draws lines that can not change. And lets its followers, advises them, to lie,yes lie. AVALANCHES OF WORDS INCRIMINATING us telling me and others we are racist hide true problems in trying to defend the undefendable, and ignoring the need for change. Posted by Belly, Tuesday, 2 October 2012 6:03:16 PM
| |
Csteel: What I am defending is this country's great legacy of accepting large immigrant groups and working through the issues that have arisen. There are many wrongs that can be laid at the feet of immigrants.
I, too can defend this country's great legacy of accepting large immigrant groups. Yes, we have had our problems. Here is my list. British, Irish, French, Germans, Dutch, Scandinavian, Poles, Spanish, Swiss. Protestant & Catholic, hard workers, fitted into Australian society. Kiwis, same as us, except, keen on sheep. Yanks, same as us, except full of ‘em selves. Italians, drugs, Mafia, great food, Catholic, hard workers, fitted & assimilated into Australian Society. Greeks, Well, Greeks, great food, if one likes squishy grape leaves, Orthodox, Well almost Catholic, sort of, hard workers, fitted & assimilated into Australian society. Vietnamese, drugs, great food, Catholic & Buddhist, hard workers, have fitted & assimilated into Australian society. Chinese, been here forever, Triad, drugs, great food, Buddhist mostly, hard workers, most have fitted & assimilated into Australian society. Indian, con-men, great food, Hindu, have for the most part fitted in to Australian society, whinge worse than Poms. Lebanese, drugs, extortion, violence, rape, gangs, great food, Muslim, have not fitted into Australian society. Horn of Africa, gangs, violence, rape, crap food, Muslim, very few have fitted into or assimilated into Australian society. Middle East, drugs, gangs, rape, violence, crap food, Muslim, have not fitted or assimilated into Australian society. In fact want Australians to change & fit in with their society (Religion). Posted by Jayb, Tuesday, 2 October 2012 11:20:36 PM
| |
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2012-10-03/christian-students-targeted-in-nigerian-massacre/4292224
Jaybe, well you, I and all level headed folk know, this country prospers still from migration. We too understand while these folk you name have integrated,they still have their own cultures if they want them. To try, yes try, to convince ANY ONE Muslim Migration is multiculturalism, is waste full. IT NEVER WILL BE Constricted by a faith that has determined we are lessor, it has no chance. My link informs of yet more heartless murder of innocent unarmed youth, murdered for being Christian. This thread could be ten thousand posts long,just by reporting international crimes committed in the name of this God. But maybe it is time to consider leaving it on the shelf, till our world is rocked again by SOME from the extremes of a faith that seems intent on highlighting our differences . Posted by Belly, Wednesday, 3 October 2012 5:24:09 AM
| |
Thanks again belly. I just reread not last post & thought, there's a certain few that will savage me like a rabid dog shortly. I get accused of saying all the members of the groups I have named are into mafia, drugs, rape & violence etc. I thought, I'd better fix that quickly before I lose a leg.
The normal association I made with these groups is like certain peoples (see rabid dogs) would make with the following; Men; wife beaters, paedophiles. Clergy; paedophilic Catholic Priests, . Australians; homophobic, drunks, yobbo's, lack respect for others who aren’t Australian. Police; demonstrator beaters, radar operators, prisoner killers. Women; sweet, innocent, always right, beaten wives, poor, barefoot & pregnant, left destitute. Unemployed; dole bludgers, drunks, druggo's, house wreckers. Wacko's; Greenies, Politically Correct, homos. Polititians; Well, Polititians, eh. That's enough. I could go on. I read of a Study by some Sociologist once saying that 12.5% of people give the rest a bad name. I do believe that is true. I hope, that will sate those who would ravage my very being. I doubt it though. So, lay on your wrath. I don't really care. It'll give me a good laugh to start the day. Thank you & thanks for the fish. Posted by Jayb, Wednesday, 3 October 2012 7:05:15 AM
| |
Jayb,
It serves no purpose to over-dramatise the situation. Generalisations aren't helpful when discussing certain subjects. Humility, on the other hand, is irresistibly attractive. What is the problem with any of us (including moi) admitting we may have posted in haste, something that supported our argument, that upon further investigation was found to be erroneous? To blow a raspberry and accuse one's detractors of being "rabid dogs" isn't helpful to us understanding each other - amidst all the strong emotions flung around on threads like this. Posted by Poirot, Wednesday, 3 October 2012 11:46:07 AM
| |
Dear Yabby,
So a riot by some idiots in Sydney is more egregious than the assassination/murder of an Australian politician and the contract killing of a drugs campaigner? Man you do have it bad don't you. When someone’s views are that entrenched it is seemingly a futile exercise to call for reason. Plus your Tonto is doing his best Paul Revere impression. ’Ring the bells’, ’Go to DEFCON 1!' I had one of my sites hacked the other day. I didn't run screaming from the building calling it an ’attack on the innocents’ and equating it to a human bomb. More likely than not the person responsible for the SES hack is an overseas opportunist. Calls for the thread to have ’the culprit arrested’ is just inane. Dial it back chaps. Posted by csteele, Wednesday, 3 October 2012 11:59:01 AM
| |
poirot: It serves no purpose to over-dramatise the situation.
Is it an over-dramatization? I espoused what I said is the general feeling of the identities in Australia. Though, like claiming to be a Christian, when less than 25% of Christians in Australia go to church. No even gives it much in the way of heavy thought. More of innate passing comments. Poirot: To blow a raspberry and accuse one's detractors of being "rabid dogs" isn't helpful to us understanding each other - amidst all the strong emotions flung around on threads like this. So are you saying that it's OK for my detractors to savage me, as long as I don't try to present a logical arguement in defence. csteel: So a riot by some idiots in Sydney is more egregious than the assassination/murder of an Australian politician and the contract killing of a drugs campaigner? We know who is responsible for the McKay Murder. It was the Italian Mafia with the support of some very high up Law type people. This was a one off warning not to expose them. The problem with "the few idiots in Sydney" is that they are calling for the death of all "infidels" (us), Well, not you, & they mean it, & whether you agree or not those of the same faith agree with them behind closed doors. Posted by Jayb, Wednesday, 3 October 2012 12:39:16 PM
| |
*So a riot by some idiots in Sydney is more egregious than the assassination/murder of an Australian politician and the contract killing of a drugs campaigner?*
In this case absolutaly Csteele, but you would need to think beyond the tip of your nose to understand why. A death here, a death there, they are frankly insignificant in the bigger scheme of things. Ideology can be a far bigger threat, if its followed. Hitler was an ideas man, the troops did the rest. If you trace back the Neocons, it all comes back to a professor who taught most of them. If you follow back militant Islam, much of it which we presently see, leads back to the beliefs of Sayyid Qutb. Thousands have been killed and tens of thousands have been indoctrinated that they should be out there killing. From 911 to the Bali bombings, its all part of it. Some of those same fellows are now in our local streets, calling for the heads of Australians. If you can't see the difference between the odd murder and the threat that a dangerous ideology poses, then frankly I can't help you. Your nose tip seems to be your limit.Interestingly enough I think that you are far from stupid, more like just confused. Posted by Yabby, Wednesday, 3 October 2012 2:27:38 PM
| |
Yabby me Tonto hold own crimson horse white man!
You old mate are in debate with a slippery customer here. Not going to win, but go back and see the post history, near hysteria around Drones and such. I am getting a grin out of it but it remains pointless. I do like the stuff, in my garden, but not five feet deep. Dry over here very much so, did not take long for ground to turn to dust, cracks are widening here not far from the coast. Posted by Belly, Wednesday, 3 October 2012 4:19:51 PM
| |
Hi C. Steele,
You make an interesting comment which has already garnered some comment: "So a riot by some idiots in Sydney is more egregious than the assassination/murder of an Australian politician and the contract killing of a drugs campaigner?" First, they weren't idiots, they were possibly dedicated ideologues. And yes, you're right, throwing bottles at police and beating them with poles is not up there with murdering anti-drugs campaigners or Australian politicians. But then again, nobody is calling for those 'idiots' as you call them to be jailed for twenty years or so. But credit where credit's due: as Yabby points out, this is a different order of incident, a forerunner of, I suspect, a lot more to come in demands for recognition of shari'a, differential laws for Muslims, especially for Muslim women, and [secular] state-funding of mosques, madrassas, Muslim schools with Islamic curricula, etc. What we have in Australia should not be belittled; as an ongoing product of the Enlightenment, of union struggles, and equal rights campaigns for women and Indigenous people, we have achieved a level of equality, freedom of expression, opportunity, open society, and the other bits and pieces which make us Australian which we should be careful to guard and defend. As far as I am concerned, wand without being too dramtaic about it, we are witnessing the shaping up of an ideological battle between Enlightenment values and pre-medieval, Islamist values. And it is by no means certain which will win. Perhaps it's a new form of'Left' and 'Right'. Yabby's point should be argued and debated: this silly little 'riot' was an expression of an ideology which goes beyond the very broad and loose bounds of Australian ideology. Discuss. Cheers, Joe Posted by Loudmouth, Wednesday, 3 October 2012 6:53:38 PM
| |
csteel: I had one of my sites hacked the other day.
You have sites? Can I have a look at them please. Talking about sites. A little time back I found a Muslim site that explained to Muslims how to answer questions & accusations. Politicians in Australia must also read the same site. It explained how to talk around the question & blame it all on the values of the unbelievers. It was all very detailed. I watching those Utube Videos of Radical Muslim Clerics being interviewed on TV & it was the exact same formula that they followed. Much like our Politicians do also. Someone asks a question. Talk about everything else but the question, denigrate the other view. Do everything but answer the question. Then tell everyone that you have answered the question. See I do watch "insight." Now csteel, I have noticed that you, also, seem to use that exact same formular. Now csteel I have asked you before & you have played the above game. Are you a Muslim? Please dispense with the above scenario & answer the question directly, Yes or No. Posted by Jayb, Wednesday, 3 October 2012 9:25:05 PM
| |
jayb you have described the very reason I compare an ak47 to Muslim lies.
No way around it, it is part of the invasive culture to LIE. Avoid truth. Try to take us back to the middle ages, using our freedoms to do it. Posted by Belly, Thursday, 4 October 2012 5:52:50 AM
| |
Dear Yabby,
The same scared little men where at it back then, saying the same things, bellowing the same overhyped warnings about Calabrian mobsters buying our politicians or Triad gangs assassinating all who stood up to them. The same types got themselves into a lather about post war Jewish migration into this country. Little has changed. This later lot are even saying Muslim fundamentalism is the greatest thread to our way of life this country has ever faced. Never mind the Japanese on our door step or the Cuban missile crisis. And for some reason these scared little (invariably) men are middle aged or older. All one can hope for is they one day find a way to grow a backbone though I'm not holding my breath. Posted by csteele, Thursday, 4 October 2012 12:06:42 PM
| |
csteele,
What do you think of this comment by Baden-Württemberg's Integration Minister, Bilkay Öney, a Muslim, who stated: "Islam tolerates no criticism." She also said it was easier to dialogue with Muslims in Germany because they are relatively well educated. "In other parts of the world," she said, "some take to the streets and set fire to embassies." http://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/3379/muslim-riots-europe Posted by Danielle, Thursday, 4 October 2012 1:38:59 PM
| |
Danielle you are a breath of fresh air.
I have watched your posts and that is the truth. I know it is not worth breaking a rule both I and another poster made. But it is both insulting and frustrating to see the age bias flung around, along side the view if you do no think like them your thoughts do not matter. As charming as a sidewalk pizza out side a pub on Sunday morning. My work life started full time at 13 years of age. In a Sydney suburb day one I meet my first Italian, within a week Greek. Maltese followed Yugoslavian, German, I learned and grew up because of them. Stayed 18 months in Sydney, then went bush, cane cutting corners by hand train of siding then driving, what ever I did I did with Migrates. SOME showed me how to eat, every one showed me something. As my self education got rolling, my HUNGER TO READ AND LEARN they too, mainly wonderful Italians, showed me what to read. I remain what I always have been, a matey but some what in-ward looking person. And ALWAYS seek out the orphan, the lonely the neglected. My attempts to reach out to SOME MUSLIMS have unleashed pure hate. I will remain forever aware not all are like that. BUT TOO MANY ARE. And that a holly book that preaches separation is the reason. A great day will come, maybe post a war, not one won by Islam, when we can be one. Without Gods we already would be. Posted by Belly, Thursday, 4 October 2012 3:22:01 PM
| |
*And for some reason these scared little (invariably) men are middle aged or older.*
Well luckily for us Csteele, those men and women around the world have acted, as they run Govts around the world. Unlike yourself, they clearly realise that explosions going of in numerous countries killing thousands and buildings toppling over in New York after being hit by human bombs, is a bit more serious than your fob off. Let's not forget that since the increased security measures globally, the number of attacks that have been thwarted in the nick of time, or the damage would have been far greater. Now if it was your wife or child who was blown up in Bali, you might take a bit more notice and bother to inform yourself. But feel free to stay ignorant. The rest of the world has acted, even if without you. Posted by Yabby, Thursday, 4 October 2012 5:18:33 PM
| |
Wow! csteel, you have just proved the point on my last post. Thanks, mate.
Now instead of deflecting the Question, "Are you a Muslim?" could you please answer it directly. A single word post would be fine. Yes or No. & could you give us your Web Sites for us to have a look at please. Posted by Jayb, Thursday, 4 October 2012 6:16:39 PM
| |
yabby jayb, note our verbal combatant uses pure bias and negativity against us.
Too that some questions are ignored. I have a good memory, can report on much defense of the undefenseable from this poster. Some who found common ground should spend a hour re viewing post history/hysteria of the person. Posted by Belly, Friday, 5 October 2012 5:25:42 AM
| |
Wow!....this thread is going on for five hundred posts, and for the most part has been one long paranoid rant.
Surely that says something about fear-based human reactions. Jayb and Belly's last posts respectively are typical devices often employed in the service of baseless innuendo. Posted by Poirot, Friday, 5 October 2012 8:38:00 AM
| |
Poirot: Jayb and Belly's last posts respectively are typical devices often employed in the service of baseless innuendo.
How so? Please explain. By your silence we shall know you. A small liberty, never-the-less an accurate one, I'm sure. So, csteel, you are a Muslim. See that wasn't so hard was it. Now we know where you are coming from. Now, the question is. Are you an immigrant, born here or a convert? This will just aid us with psyche & help us understand who you are in relation to your stand on certain subjects. It will cut down on our frustration when dealing with your posts & hopefully make things a little more pleasant. I’m sure we would all like to be a lot more pleasant towards you & I’m sure we would be, if we all knew just who you are & where you are coming from. Posted by Jayb, Friday, 5 October 2012 9:13:03 AM
| |
"How so? Please explain."
"So csteel, you are a Muslim. See that wasn't hard was it. Now we know where you are coming from. Now, the question is. Are you a immigrant, born here or a convert?" Your following paragraph is arrogant and your post is provocative....that's "How so". It's fascinating. One intelligent poster attempts to go beyond visceral reaction, and the best you can do, Jayb, is invent a scenario to provoke continuing disaffection in the debate. One doesn't have to be a Muslim (or of any religious persuasion) to glean that this discussion is tribal in nature, and that many of those contributing display the same sort of closed-minded arrogant and defensive attitude that they are criticizing. Posted by Poirot, Friday, 5 October 2012 9:45:30 AM
| |
Dear Danielle,
This may seem a little trite but isn't the sentiment “Islam tolerates no criticism” a criticism? I would love to find the context in which the remark was made but my efforts to find the original interview have failed. Germany is taking a thoughtful approach, one Australia might learn from. An Integration Minister seems like a good idea. That there are challenges that would benefit from a more focussed approach is undeniable. The quote; “She also said it was easier to dialogue with Muslims in Germany because they are relatively well educated. "In other parts of the world," she said, "some take to the streets and set fire to embassies." is stating a given which could be said of any race or religion. 'it was easier to dialogue with fundamentalist Christians in Australia because they are relatively well educated. "In other parts of the world," she said, "some take to the streets and demand their governments hang homosexuals.' http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PsDbaRknWXs The Gladstone Institute's report quotes Abu Assad al-Almani who is apparently a German Jihadist calling for the murder of those associated with the film. Outside this article I can not find any other references to him. We have some virtually anonymous jerk doing a rant in the German language and it is referenced by the Gladstone Institute? Why? When a jerk from a far right wing Christian organisation like the KKK gets up and calls for the 'killing of all the Jews but only after they are tortured first' why isn't there the same reaction? Or; “In 1980, three KKK members shot four elderly black women ... following a KKK initiation rally. A fifth woman ... was injured by flying glass in the incident. Attempted murder charges were filed against the three KKK members, two of whom … were acquitted by an all-white jury, and the other ... was sentenced by the same jury to nine months on lesser charges. He was released after three months” I don't consider the views of extreme Christian groups reflect the values of the faith nor do I consider the same for Islam. Posted by csteele, Friday, 5 October 2012 11:12:19 AM
| |
Dear Yabby,
You wrote; “Unlike yourself, they clearly realise that explosions going of in numerous countries killing thousands and buildings toppling over in New York after being hit by human bombs, is a bit more serious than your fob off.” I take these issues and threats very seriously but I don't fob them off as an us vs them debate because while it would be easy it isn't smart nor in keeping with the facts. Osama Bin Laden was not originally a hater of the US. He fought on its side in the war against the Russians in Afghanistan opening recruitment centres in the States and receiving CIA funds. What turned him was the deployment into Saudi Arabia of thousands of American troops who did not leave after the first Gulf War. On the seventh anniversary of their deployment Osama organised a series of embassy bombings which killed hundreds. The troops remained. After the towers came down the troops were removed. Just as the Jewish people respond to the notion of Israel I think it is obvious that the Islamic faith with rituals likes the Hajj serves to heighten empathy between Muslims perhaps more so than the Christian faith would between its own adherents. This is why events in the Middle East have a far greater impact on Jewish and Muslim Australians than we Australian secularists are able to appreciate. Usually when I see geopolitical issues being dismissed then it is obvious other agendas are at play. As I said fobbing this off as an 'us and them' issue is lazy, ignorant and corrosive to our society. Dear Poirot, Whenever I describe someone as having “become the type of poster that is not worth the effort” I have found it is fairly normal behaviour for them to ratchet up the vitriol in an effort to get me to respond. The only interest left for me is seeing how far they will go. As you said at times it can be fascinating. Sometimes I have not been above giving a surreptitious little prod when they have gone quiet. As-Salamu Alaykum Posted by csteele, Friday, 5 October 2012 12:27:37 PM
| |
*What turned him was the deployment into Saudi Arabia of thousands of American troops who did not leave after the first Gulf War.*
Oh if only it were that simple, Csteele. Fact is that bin Laden thought that he could protect Saudi Arabia against Saddam and the Saudi Govt wisely thought that the Americans had a far better chance of doing that, so invited them to establish a base there and paid for the costs. At the same time bin Laden was receiving religious instructions from Sayyid Qutb's brother, all about radical Islam. When the Taliban finally ran Afghanistan, with photos, music, tv, schools for girls etc all banned, bin Laden described it as the closest thing to a perfect muslim state. For Qutb's ideology had also affected Zawahiri and other radicals who formed the basis of Al Queda. Qutb despised the West and campaigned for a global overthrow, to turn the whole world into a Caliphate, with the Koran as its constitution. So you completely ignore the change in ideology which bin Laden underwent during his lifetime, but then I expected no more of you, as your posts show. Posted by Yabby, Friday, 5 October 2012 2:58:03 PM
| |
I have been giving my contributions to this thread, and the forum some thought.
Here in this thread, and ones about my party, my thoughts are different than some. People I respect, BonMot, Lexi, and poirot, seem to have very different thoughts than me. I except this, without hurt. But how can others not share a view free speech, even if you do not like it is worth while? What places other views at higher value than mine. Poirot and the other, CONSTANTLY, from a lofty castle, declare me wrong, but is that so. Why then has this thread, unlike any its author ever started, become our longest one in history? Thieving another,s saying here, but it fits, an inconvenient truth is on display here. The majority, vastly, agreed with me yabby kactuz and others. Prior to ww2 warnings met with do not be silly from well meaning folk. I do not claim one contributor is well meaning, but most who oppose me are. Time will tell. I also have never before seen so much uninformed and one sided debate , my threads may not bring big numbers but I intend to try to get a bit away from politics for a while. Posted by Belly, Friday, 5 October 2012 4:22:31 PM
| |
Hi Poirot,
Nice to see you've got over your huff. You write, " .... many of those contributing display the same sort of closed-minded arrogant and defensive attitude that they are criticizing." Apart from the obvious comment that one should be circumspect about living in glass houses, etc., I like to think that some of us try not to :) But congratulations anyway, that after 500 posts on this thread, you have successfully avoided touching on any of the issues. What are they, you may well ask ? * freedom of speech (which applies to Islamists as much as the rest of us non-Islamists), and recognition of the boundaries (i.e. incitement, violence) of those freedoms * respect for the rule of law in a bourgeois and post-Enlightenment society * the right to offend, whether the offendees are Christian (cf. Life of Brian), atheists ( much of the entire corpus of religious dogma), Hindu, Buddhist, OR Muslim. I don't mind whatever dreadful things are said about us atheists, by the way - even comments by Pericles sort of honour the rest of us. Once upon a time, some women had the temerity to push for equal rights - they called themselves feminists, but of course they know now that they should stay in the background, walk five paces behind with eyes cast down, supporting their men's rights to call for beheadings, as long as the bruises don't show. If you talk like a duck, and waddle with ducks, Poirot, ..... Cheers, Joe :) Posted by Loudmouth, Friday, 5 October 2012 6:00:21 PM
| |
Yes, Loudmouth, it occurred to me that your mutterings weren't worth the vexation : )
And you, Mr oh-so-enlightened, have failed to offer anything of substance yourself. You get most of your kicks from attempting to belittle fellow posters...in your well-rehearsed and long-plied style. Now if someone I respected pulled me up for a reason other than their own snide entertainment....that would be a different story. "If you talk like a duck, and waddle with ducks, Poirot,...." I suppose that's Loudmouth's version of scintillating wit. Ho hum...... Posted by Poirot, Friday, 5 October 2012 6:40:48 PM
| |
Dear Csteele,
Your responses are not worthy of your intelligence. You are clutching at straws. Also, you tend to drift from the issue … these can only be seen as diversionary tactics. “...Americans living out life sentences in horrendously overcrowded prisons, … prepared to lose a hand to be free and with their families” This statement automatically brings a cool comparison to conditions with Islamic prisons. Do you really want to go there? A report by the eminent Dr Reza Ghaffari on women in Iranian prisons. http://www.iran-bulletin.org/witness/ghaffar2.html Bilkay Öney, a member of the Green-Social Democratic Party (SPD) in Germany, is a Muslim, of Turkish origin. “The Gladstone Institute's report quotes Abu Assad al-Almani … I can not find any other references to him. We have some virtually anonymous jerk doing a rant in the German language and it is referenced by the Gladstone Institute? Why?” I would not disregard reports by Soeren Kern, a person of impressive background and experience. http://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/biography/Soeren+Kern Kern's own site http://soerenkern.com/web/ There are many references online to Abu Assad al-Almani http://maalamfiltariq.wordpress.com/tag/abu-assad-al-almani/ Jihadology http://jihadology.net/2012/09/21/the-global-islamic-media-front-presents-a-new-article-from-abu-asad-al-almani-a-reckoning-with-germany/ Jihad: News of Terrorism, Jihadism, and International Politics. (in different languages) http://ojihad.wordpress.com/tag/anschlag/ An unfortunate aside of looking for this individual online, is that it leads to other jihadists. “Christians ... "some take to the streets and demand their governments hang homosexuals.'” Dear Csteele … In Islamic states they do so. It is not the majority of Muslims, perhaps a minute minority who trumpet violence and calls for death. However, it is these people who are changing the face of the West in different ways. Divisiveness within communities worldwide, where no evidence of this occurred before. Often laws changed to accommodate Muslims. Such niceties have never been extended to other sections of society. The constant need for worldwide security and vigilance, even at sporting events ... including the invasive security needed at airports (body scans, etc); understandably this is also causing problems with ordinary Muslims. The self-censorship of British media. Posted by Danielle, Friday, 5 October 2012 6:45:53 PM
| |
As a supporter of Islam, I would have thought that you would be the first to condemn not only the draconian and inhumane practices enacted at state level by Islam of the Middle East, but also those Islamic groups who riot destructively, and the terrorists. Bearing in mind, that this form of Islam in not practiced everywhere.
I suspect many Muslims of the Middle East would like to see separation of religion and state … Until this occurs, atrocities at state level will be perpetuated. Muslim intellectuals apportion blame, stating and iterating ad nauseum, “the high priests of political correctness in the West ...” Is this yourself, Csteele? It would be useful if you could cite with references, Muslims who condemn the above. (You so readily cite other lone, wayward individuals, ie Jews, who have no real influence in their society … and are not relevant to this discussion) You have stated that you are a proponent of political correctness (certainly in regard to Islam) and also freedom speech. You have not clarified how this works. Posted by Danielle, Friday, 5 October 2012 6:52:43 PM
| |
G'day Belly, know what you mean. Like I said way back, it's been very ugly ... still is. But hey, that's the price for freedom of expression, right?
What really is the value of so many divisive OLO opinions, and to what end? So we can sleep well at night? So we can thump our chests? So they can thump their chests? So we/they can ... (fill in the dots). Thing is Belly, it all depends on ... from who's perspective. I think you would agree: problems and tensions in a society can be sorted if we respect each other. We don't. We don't even respect ourselves. The race to the bottom means it will be hard climbing our way back. Given what's gone before, I'm not optimistic. Posted by bonmot, Saturday, 6 October 2012 12:02:18 AM
| |
bonmot gday, well blowing my own trumpet here.
But I was not too bad at dispute resolution. Over my shoulder in a frame, is a state government award. For leadership, yes Bruce too many hats! Most important one? I am proud to say I am mates still with both sides, unionists and very top levels of management from every dispute I took place in. So what do we expect/want/ need here. First thing leave the very blind out of negotiations, they imped answers. Find common ground, and openly talk of the seeming imposable to resolve ones. We want? mutual respect for all faiths, agree that every time a cartoon or single act some other place takes place we meet, not riot. Hard isn't it? Continue talking, we need to, any day war may come to Iran, and to our streets. bonmot, this can go no further. Unless all sides agree,to sit and find away every school and every church, can teach every human, we are one single race. With equal rights. And equal duty to remember that. I can build a ten story house of fine words but it will not work, not yet, both sides must fall into the others arms post ww3 then? Posted by Belly, Saturday, 6 October 2012 7:38:33 AM
| |
@Bonmot,
<<think you would agree: problems and tensions in a society can be sorted if we respect each other…>> LOL Says he whose repertoire of retorts include –but are by no means limited to: http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?article=14089#243703 : “ puke” http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?article=14019#242523: “And unlike another here, I don't have ADHD either” http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?discussion=5280#143614: “So our flim-flam man, Mr Wiggle-Waggles” http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?discussion=5291#143489: “[Deleted for abuse.]” http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?article=13951#241663: “Hey r'shole” Come now Bonmot, your reluctance to criticize Islamic extremism has little to do with not wanting to engage in a race to the bottom! Posted by SPQR, Saturday, 6 October 2012 7:49:36 AM
| |
>> @Bonmot,
"think you would agree: problems and tensions in a society can be sorted if we respect each other…" LOL << . See what I mean Belly, SPQR laughs yet failed to quote my very next sentence: "We Don't" (respect each other) Ok, he thinks it's a laughing matter - we know where he stands. For the benefit of SPQR and others, I deplore extremism on all sides - have said it before and given SPQR is a follower (if not stalker) of me, he would know that. Nope, SPQR looks for quotable quotes that confirm his biases and motivates his reasoning and taken out of context he thinks it's a fair game. Well, it's not. . Hey Joe (good title for a song) Loudmouth - Did you really take offense for me calling you an r'sole after you rebuked me for not replying to you quickly enough after a very dear and close friend of mine suffered a major heart attack? Seems SPQR did. Posted by bonmot, Saturday, 6 October 2012 8:26:50 AM
| |
steel: When a jerk from a far right wing Christian organisation like the KKK gets up and calls for the 'killing of all the Jews but only after they are tortured first' why isn't there the same reaction?
Or; “In 1980, three KKK members shot four elderly black women ... Yes, well America 32 years ago. It wouldn't & doesn't happen now. It did get headlines back ten. I vagely remember the piece. Csteel: Whenever I describe someone as having “become the type of poster that is not worth the effort” I have found it is fairly normal behaviour for them to ratchet up the vitriol in an effort to get me to respond. I hardly think asking you politely to say whether you are a Muslim or not is vitriol. Is that why you seem to have deflected the answer my question. I ask you again politely. Please, csteel. Are a Muslim or not a Muslim? Posted by Jayb, Saturday, 6 October 2012 8:44:09 AM
| |
bonmot,
I well remember that episode....Loudmouth had spent considerable time asking questions on climate - and you respectfully responded to his inquiries: http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?article=13951&age=0#241436 He then replied to you and when you failed to respond, he said this to me of you: http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?article=13951&page=0#241476 referring to you as my "constipated friend"....this after you had replied sincerely to his questions. SPQR, - we're only human, and sometimes it's difficult not to retaliate in kind to those who seek to continually wind us up. bonmot is correct in his assertion that we fail to respect each other. I've been pasted with all sorts of derogatory epithets by a certain poster during the last few months (under the guise of courteous inquiry), and I admit that I've tended to respond in kind. I feel I could do better, rise above it in future...but as I say, we all react to deliberate taunts, especially if they are repetitious in nature. It's human nature to react in this way, as this thread demonstrates, but it doesn't negate that we all tend to react psychologically in similar fashion no matter where our loyalties lie. Posted by Poirot, Saturday, 6 October 2012 9:29:14 AM
| |
@Bonmot ,
I don’t want to get bogged down in some back & forth with you on this fine Spring morning –let alone risk feeding narcissistic fantasies that I am your “follower” or “stalker” (LOL) –so this will be my last comment on this issue. <<SPQR laughs …he thinks it's a laughing matter >> Your post talking of the need for respect implies that other posters –who had posted earlier, and taken a harder line about Islamic extremism – were lacking respect. And seeing that coming from someone whose own posts are often less that respectful – it strikes one that your comment was either intended as a joke or was an example of blind hypocrisy– I gave you the benefit of the doubt and chose to laugh. << SPQR looks for quotable quotes…taken out of context …>> Out of context--not so! Your linked contributions were to say the least, less than *respectful*, and it would appear that others saw them as less that respectful too since, at least one of the posts I linked to --and a much larger number i didn't have the time/space to link to are no longer there to be read! Cheers and over and out Posted by SPQR, Saturday, 6 October 2012 9:38:10 AM
| |
@Poirot
<<SPQR, - we're only human>> Speak for yourself! Posted by SPQR, Saturday, 6 October 2012 9:40:17 AM
| |
All this crap they were protesting about didnt even happen in our country so why come to our contry and treat us like crap
Posted by jessek, Saturday, 6 October 2012 9:55:27 AM
| |
Hi Poirot,
Yeah, at least I still get a laugh out of it. I wonder if one can catch constipation: I suppose, until you start facing up to the issues on this thread, Enlightenment vs ultra-conservative values, and someone can explain why sections of the Left seem to go down on their knees to extreme right-wingers ('as long as they're not American'? Is that it?), we'll never know. Cheers, Joe :) Posted by Loudmouth, Saturday, 6 October 2012 11:49:51 AM
| |
"Nothing" has been solved on this thread.
It's merely been a vehicle for people to vent and rant - and for you, Loudmouth - "Yeah, at least I still get a laugh out of it." - to engage in your little game of baiting. What a man! Posted by Poirot, Saturday, 6 October 2012 12:10:48 PM
| |
My last rant: 500 & still nothing's been solved
: ) Posted by bonmot, Saturday, 6 October 2012 12:48:20 PM
| |
Poirot: It's merely been a vehicle for people to vent and rant - and for you, Loudmouth - "Yeah, at least I still get a laugh out of it." - to engage in your little game of baiting.
No-one have vented or raged Poi rot. There have been people here looking for answers as to why the Riot happened in Australia & should it happen in Australia. No one here has called on anyone’s head to be lopped off, or burnt to death, or beaten. There have been some suggestions that these people should be sent home or deported which is fair enough. Australia, being a free country, you can do that. No one went out into the streets, demonstrated, or destroyed things, or beat a car to death, & called for these people to be sent home. This is a game of deflection again. Shifting the blame for the riots to us because we're unbelievers. Seems to me that if anyone says, "I don't like what Muslims do." then they are made out to be Racist, Blasphemers, insulting & on & on. But if Muslims do it then that's excusable & proper. In Australia, we can do that with out being threatened, because we have the freedom to do so. Now let me ask you, dear Poirot & I'll try to be as polite as I possibly can. Are you a Muslim? Do you have Islamic sympathies’? It seems that your esteemed friend csteel is venting & raving at me because I have asked her to verify just who she is & where she stands. Not very nice & I think I'll throw a hissy fit & cry a lot. Posted by Jayb, Saturday, 6 October 2012 1:24:58 PM
| |
Jayb,
You're as puerile as Loudmouth. "Are you a Muslim?" No, I'm not an anything. Silly, silly tactic! Posted by Poirot, Saturday, 6 October 2012 2:00:46 PM
| |
Hi Bonmot,
Sorry, I'm a slow reader. No, I didn't take offense when you called me an @rsehole. But I would have preferred your responding to the issues on that particular thread, i.e. what had been the actual rises in sea-level and temperature over the last century or so, in actual cms (or inches, or cubits, or li) and degrees (F, C or A). As long as you stick to the topic and come up with something constructive, you can call me whatever you like. But I'm really glad that you eventually found relief and squeezed out those figures: from memory, 8 cm, and 1.8 degrees, is that right ? Hi Poirot, Yes, it sounds like we'll never know what you think the crucial issues are. But keep having your say, whatever it is. Have you tried Milk of Magnesia, sweetie ? Cheers Joe :) Posted by Loudmouth, Saturday, 6 October 2012 2:52:01 PM
| |
I am feeling a bit better.
See others are getting the ribs kicked not me. For? having views other than some. So can we find common ground? no But how many think no God exists. If it is a majority why do we pander to ANY OF THEM. What is the heart of this issue if not religion? I am left of center, but agree with Joe, the true lost left hate everything American. And will support any thing against them. Poirot, you know I respect you always, how can you be so sure I am wrong and you right? Posted by Belly, Saturday, 6 October 2012 4:09:23 PM
| |
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/opinion/the-painful-last-gasp-of-islamic-hate/story-e6frg6zo-1226478858085
From Australia's only National news paper, the link is telling. Not just the words. The photo shows clearly the hate. jayb you will not find poirot to be a Muslim. I find it strange, the tight bond in this case between csteele and poirot. But doubt csteele is Muslim. That the time, worth it I promise, to read csteeles posting history, just hit on the little man under a post. Answers will come, and that is the only way you will get them. Posted by Belly, Saturday, 6 October 2012 5:20:12 PM
| |
Dear Danielle,
I have no trouble acknowledging the Kohomeini regime was several orders more brutal even than the Shah's infamous SAVAK. If the is one thing the 20th century has shown us is that revolutions are often far more savage than simple coups. It often seems to matter little what the ideology is, left, right, Muslim, Jewish, Christian etc. While nations like the pre-revolutionary Iran can seem to be adopting Western democratic power structures they are often far less enthusiastic about adopting and defending the institutions that prevent abuses of that power. When the Iranian people voted overwhelmingly to install an Islamic state they had little to protect them from its ensuing excesses. Throughout this thread I have worked to counter the notion that there is something inherently untoward about the Muslim faith in comparison to other ideologies. All are capable of the grossest violations of human dignity and freedoms. It is instructive to know that the man who oversaw the worst of the Ayatollah's prisons had been severely tortured within the same walls under the Shah's regime. Often brutality be-gets brutality. Yet in comparison to other dictatorships it is nothing special. Similar numbers of 'disappeared persons' occurred under the Argentine Junta with the express support of the US. “State Department documents obtained by the National Security Archive under the Freedom of Information Act show that in October 1976, Secretary of State Henry Kissinger and high-ranking U.S. officials gave their full support to the Argentine military junta and urged them to hurry up and finish the "dirty war" before the U.S. Congress cut military aid.” Wikipedia I see quite positive moves within Iran to move away from the all encompassing straight jacket of conservative Islam. Also some of the institutional balances have been maintained. There are still Jewish and Christian members within its parliament. There does seem to be a brighter future ahead for the Persian people. Let us hope it is not ripped away from them by others from within or without. Cont... Posted by csteele, Saturday, 6 October 2012 6:32:21 PM
| |
Cont...
You inform us that “Bilkay Öney, a member of the Green-Social Democratic Party (SPD) in Germany, is a Muslim, of Turkish origin.” then point us to “Soeren Kern, a person of impressive background and experience.”. Now I don't know what Mr Kern's origin or religion are though I suspect he may be Jewish, not only because he studied for a time at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem but because of the tone of his writings. Do you think it is important that we know? I do because it would help us determine his agenda. I went to the link of his you provided and picked the fifth piece down as it was about Australia. Here is what I found. “A recent study titled "Secret Saudi Funding of Radical Islamic Groups in Australia" found that Saudi Arabia is spending billions of dollars to promote radical Islam in the country, including through the construction of mosques, schools and Islamic cultural centers." A key Saudi objective is to prevent Muslim immigrants from integrating into Australian society in order to promote the establishment of a parallel Muslim society in the country.” No they are not. I might need you to tell me why I should persist. You wrote; “The Gladstone Institute's report quotes Abu Assad al-Almani … I can not find any other references to him.” It was a truncated version of my sentence which read; “Outside this article I can not find any other references to him.“ Your links are all dated within the last three weeks and all refer to the same article. One of them states; "Reckoning with Germany" is a German paper, written by a German author allegedly named "Abu Assad al-Almani". How do they know he is German? Therefore permit me to say my contention stands unless you have links to other instances of this fellow. Next can I address to two of your statements together. Cont... Posted by csteele, Saturday, 6 October 2012 6:33:45 PM
| |
Cont...
1. “Often laws changed to accommodate Muslims. Such niceties have never been extended to other sections of society.” 2. “You so readily cite other lone, wayward individuals, ie Jews, who have no real influence in their society … and are not relevant to this discussion” Both are demonstrably wrong. Possibly the most powerful argument I can find for supporting some version of Sharia law in this country is because we have seen fit to 'extend such niceties' to the Jewish community. So much so that we allow legal opinion from a Jewish body in another country to subsume Australian law. http://www.jwire.com.au/news/london-beth-din-decides-gutnick-does-not-have-chazuka/3977 How this nation has acted toward Jewish people and their religion is vitally relevant to the question of how we treat Muslims and their religion. The claim that Judaism is not a proselytising faith so should be treated differently just doesn't cut it. As I had done earlier in this thread transposing one for the other is a legitimate and informative exercise. I will make a concession though. The support for the privatisation of our schools, which has lead to their proliferation far exceeding other comparable Western nations, has undoubtedly dealt a blow to our capacity to manage integration of different migrant communities. Christian, Jewish and Islamic schools all disturb me. A dinner with friends revealed the story of one mother having to spend considerable time and money to become a Catholic in order to get her child enrolled in a private school of her choice. When I visit a local state school in my area the number of different ethnic groups present playing, learning and growing together gives me a vision of what I thought this country was about. It is sad to see it being under assault by people demanding we fund their 'choices' and State governments seeking to save a buck. Posted by csteele, Saturday, 6 October 2012 6:35:52 PM
| |
Thank you, Belly: as Ayaan Hirsi Ali's article concludes:
"As the latest wave of indignation sweeps across the Muslim world, we should not be despondent. Yes, this is a setback for the Arab Spring. Yes, it is bloody, dangerous, and chaotic on the streets. Yes, innocent people are dying and their governments are powerless. But this too shall pass. Utopian ideologies have a short lifespan. Some are bloodier than others. As long as Islamists were able to market their philosophy as the only alternative to dictatorship and foreign meddling, they were attractive to an oppressed polity. But with their election to office they will be subjected to the test of government. It is clear, as we saw in Iran in 2009 and elsewhere, that if the philosophy of the Islamists is fully and forcefully implemented, those who elected them will end up disillusioned. The governments will begin to fail as soon as they set about implementing their philosophy: strip women of their rights; murder homosexuals; constrain the freedoms of conscience and religion of non-Muslims; hunt down dissidents; persecute religious minorities; pick fights with foreign powers - even powers, such as the US, that offered friendship. The Islamists will curtail the freedoms of those who elected them and fail to improve economic conditions. After the disillusion and bitterness will come a painful lesson: that it is foolish to derive laws for human affairs from gods and prophets. Just like the Iranian people have begun to, the Egyptians, Tunisians, Libyans and perhaps Syrians and others will come to this realisation. In one or two or three decades we will see the masses in these countries take to the streets - and perhaps call for American help - to liberate them from the governments they elected. This process will be faster in some places than others, but in all it will be bloody and painful. If we take the long view, America and other Western countries can help make this happen in the same way we helped bring about the demise of the former Soviet Union." [TBC] Posted by Loudmouth, Saturday, 6 October 2012 6:54:46 PM
| |
[continued]
This amazingly brave woman continues: "We must be patient. America needs to empower those individuals and groups who are already disenchanted with political Islam by helping find and develop an alternative. At the heart of that alternative are the ideals of the rule of law and freedom of thought, worship, and expression. For these values there can and should be no apologies, no groveling, no hesitation. It was Voltaire who said: "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." As Salman Rushdie discovered, as we are reminded again as the Arab street burns, that sentiment is seldom heard in our time. Once I was ready to burn The Satanic Verses. Now I know that his right to publish it was a more sacred thing than any religion." I live in hope of a Left which can go beyond its prejudices, and have the courage to defend human rights once again. Even against ideologies which are not pro-American. It's a complex world out there. Perhaps it always has been. Joe Posted by Loudmouth, Saturday, 6 October 2012 6:58:20 PM
| |
Dear Csteele,
The Jewish matter to which you refer is internal, the concessions to Islam in England are widespread – least of, all media self-censorship You write: “...one mother having to spend considerable time and money to become a Catholic in order to get her child enrolled in a private school of her choice. “ I am sorry, but this is utterly inaccurate. Catholic and non-Catholic schools (including top ranking) have children from other religions. Also, converting to Catholicism does not entail any expense, unless you are referring to a bible, catechism and missal, perhaps a couple of instruction booklets. Being a Catholic does not automatically make one's child Catholic. To be Catholic, all children (or converts), whether their parents are Catholic or not, have to be baptised in the Catholic church. Yes, your friend would have had to spend considerable time studying with a priest. It also appears that he also was wasting his time (being taken for a ride). I asked you for names of Islamic intellectuals, thinkers and others who oppose Islamic fundamentalism. You would have us think there were none. However ... Sayyid Al-Qemany is an opponent of Islamic fundamentalism, supporting separation of religion and state, and tolerance. Awarded Egyptian Culture Ministry's 2009 prize for achievement in the social sciences resulted in the demand for its withdrawal. A fatwa was issued against him “"which are tantamount to incitement to murder" and accused him of "deconstructing Islam using eloquent sugar-coated attacks [...] more fatal than Salman Rushdie" http://globalvoicesonline.org/2009/07/15/egypt-the-egyptian-apostate Farag Foda, a human rights activist, was also critical of fundamentalist Islam. He was murdered, and other bystanders seriously injured by Islamic fundamentalists. Muhammad Sa'id al-'Ashmawi "one of the most influential liberal Islamic thinkers today," who "has had to rely on round-the-clock police protection due to death threats from Egyptian militants." http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/176114?uid=3737536&uid=2&uid=4&sid=21101286365567 And … there are many other Islamic liberal thinkers and intellectuals (and supporters), of whom most live abroad. Where is the support of these people from those like yourself? cont ... Posted by Danielle, Saturday, 6 October 2012 9:45:45 PM
| |
I sadly conclude that if you had witnessed a period of Western Enlightenment, also a period of witch-burning, you would have brought similar arguments against the former, whilst giving tacit approval to the latter.
I would suggest that you read the following two works by Wayne Cristuado, an Australian philosopher and academic. "Religion, Redemption and Revolution: The New Speech Thinking Revolution ..." Cristuado offers a‘new speech thinking’ paradigm against the radical liberalism that has dominated social theory for the last fifty years. "Power, Love and Evil: Contribution to a Philosophy of the Damaged" “... Thus has tolerance itself become a phantasm in the West, a phantasm which disarms its followers against intolerance [of evil].’ (P.79) perhaps also ... "The Betrayal of Liberalism: How the Disciples of Freedom and Equality Helped to Foster the Illiberal Politics of Coercion and Control." (Hilton Kramer and Roger Kimball, eds) Posted by Danielle, Saturday, 6 October 2012 9:48:11 PM
| |
Yes, C. Steele, Moshe Gutnick's case was internal to a Jewish organisation, nothing very unusual about that:
"Rabbi Moshe Gutnick does not have life-long security of tenure at Sydney’s Mizrachi Synagogue….... "The London Beth Din has handed down its long-awaited decision stating that the synagogue must not be sold to satisfy a redundancy claim by its rabbi who has served the congregation for 21 years. "Working on the figures given to it by the synagogue as to a managable amount which would ensure the continuation of the kehillah, the Beth Din has ordered the payment of $200,000 when the Rabbi officially leaves the congregation....." You cited that URL, so you can't really complain that I've quoted it out of context :) Clearly, this has nothing to do with the State, and quite properly - certainly here in Australia - the State has stayed out of this matter. It is not a bending of the law to favour Jews, as you must know recognition of Shari'a would be to favour Islamic dogma. As well, you surely must know that one does not have to be Catholic to be enrolled in a Catholic-run school. One does not have, probably has never had, to be of a particualr religion to enrol in a religious school. My mum, an atheist (well, Callathumpian by religion) enrolled at a St Joey's school in inner Sydney in the thirties. I tutored a Sudanese kid at a Greek Orthodox school a few years back - he spoke Dinka, Arabic (from years in an Egyptian camp), English and passable Greek. Perhaps a couple of other languages too. There were many Sudanese and other Africans at that school, as well as Asians and a couple of Aboriginal kids and none of them had to be Greek Orthodox. But in Muslim schools? No, I don't fully support the notion of Church-run and State-funded schools either, as an atheist. But as long as they stick to the State-designed curriculum - in other words, the kids are getting the same education, more or less, as other kids - that's okay with me. Joe Posted by Loudmouth, Saturday, 6 October 2012 10:13:21 PM
| |
Belly: jayb you will not find poirot to be a Muslim.
I find it strange, the tight bond in this case between csteele and poirot. But doubt csteele is Muslim. Maybe so. But I'm sure they can say so themselves. I'd like to look at csteels websites. She hasn't posted link, so I can't. Just interested in what she is about, that's all. Maybe she's a nice lady. I don't know. There is an anger in there that's eating her heart. That's just so sad. Posted by Jayb, Saturday, 6 October 2012 10:39:49 PM
| |
Csteele,
“How this nation has acted toward Jewish people and their religion is vitally relevant to the question of how we treat Muslims and their religion.” Why? We have had Muslims in this country as long as we have had Jews. Neither groups made waves. We also have other non-Christian religions. Does how we act towards Sikhs relevant to how we treat Muslims? you state: “Now I don't know what Mr Kern's origin or religion are though I suspect he may be Jewish, not only because he studied for a time at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem but because of the tone of his writings. Do you think it is important that we know? I do because it would help us determine his agenda.” http://soerenkern.com That is quite a leap you have made … Also, you intimate that if he were Jewish, he would be anti-Islamic. That does not naturally follow. Perhaps what does follow is that he is writing about terrorism, and if Islam tends to be prominent at the moment, it is not really surprising, is it...? But then again, you asked me on another thread if I were Jewish. I thought that quite rude … But, then again, you haven't responded to the question whether you are Muslim. Personally, I don't know, and don't really care … (many Muslims - unlike yourself - are intolerant of the Middle Eastern brand of Islam). However, you are not rational, and so emotional and defensive about Islam … I would hazard a guess … and I don't really care, nor do I want an answer … that you are closely related to Muslims of the Middle East. Posted by Danielle, Saturday, 6 October 2012 10:59:00 PM
| |
First of all, my premise on this thread was not to take sides. It was always that humans are bickering, tribal, territorial beings who are one of the few species that practice intra-specific savagery. I still see no sign of any useful dialogue in this debate that takes us beyond that fact. I see that behaviour in the Bali bombings, 9/11, the Iraq invasion, Syria, Yugoslavia, the pounding of Gaza - it's everywhere sometime or other. That's all I was saying, and for that I've been pasted with all sorts of accusations.....
Loudmouth, You say things like - "Once upon a time women had the temerity to push for equal rights - they call themselves feminists but..."blah, blah... Your pronouncements on the feminist cause come across as noble and altruistic...right up until you say things like "Have you tried Milk of Magnesia, sweetie?" "sweetie".... I'm sure it won't surprise you that I find you only employ your feminist leanings when it suits your argument, because that sort of patronising tripe above spoken to a women surely does not add up to a respectful dialogue. Perhaps respectful dialogue with women is only something that's has reality for you in theory. You troll, you taunt, you are patronsidng. I don't believe you've sent a post my way in a long time that didn't contain some sort of underlying insult. How does that sit with your so-called respect for women? I don't expect any special treatment on this forum because I'm a woman, but then I find it difficult to imagine you would refer to one of the blokes here as "sweetie" in an attempt to put them in their place...you did it to me simply because I'm a woman. Truly, I find it fascinating that you criticize me for not defending "my sisters" and yet you pull the old patronising macho trick out of the hat when it suits you. Posted by Poirot, Sunday, 7 October 2012 12:23:39 AM
| |
Dear Poirot,
You indicated you felt 'nothing has been solved on this thread.', but if you find to time to do so it is worth returning to the first 50 or so posts. I understand it might be a little difficult to see past some of the current recalcitrants but to me a rather ugly tone has definitely changed for the better and you have played a considerable part in making that happen. Dear Danielle, You are going to have to forgive me for not getting to all of your questions. I am attempting to give decent replies but if after a thousand words I haven't managed to address everything you have put to me then that is just how it is I'm afraid. To the question of me being a Muslim or being directly related to Muslims of the Middle East. If you were to ask me directly then I would be more than happy to provide you a fulsome answer. I think it is a little disingenuous of you to be insinuating that I am ducking the question when it is being put to me by someone I have repeatedly and clearly indicated I deem not to be worth the effort. As to Mr Kern what I am surmising is, given both his over-hyped anti-Islamic pronouncements and his overly enthusiastic support for the actions of Israel, that on the balance of probabilities he is likely to be Jewish, but admittedly I currently can't find an answer either way. Do you consider it to be an unreasonable guess on my behalf? And yes I would be less critical and more understanding of him adopting his position if it turned out to indeed be the case. Being well past midnight I will have to attend to the other matters you have raised later. Just as an aside I note antagonism is again entering into the tone of your replies. If you are getting frustrated and would prefer a slanging match or disengagement I would totally understand, just let me know, until then I will press on as I have been. Posted by csteele, Sunday, 7 October 2012 12:57:18 AM
| |
Dear Csteele,
I don't think we are achieving anything on this thread; either we are misunderstanding each other's position, or discussing at cross-purposes. This will be my last posting on this thread. I have no problems with Islam. I do have grave problems, however, with the way it is presented and practiced in the Middle East, particularly at state level. It can't be denied it is moored in the middle ages. This is an example that never should have happened. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/1874471.stm Many Muslims – I have mentioned three - see the problems and advocate that Islam be reformed in accordance with the 21st century. Is this so bad? Ironically, it is in the West that Muslims can, and are able to, live this way. Indeed this is the reason many have migrated. Agreed? I only wish the voices of Islamic reformers be heard, respected and supported not only be fellow Muslims, but also, and very importantly, by the wider society. Such reformers need to be heard above the din of radical Muslims; such as the British imam who wishes to see the crescent flag flying over both Downing St and Buckingham Palace. These are the people who do untold damage to Islamand not the joe blow who vents Posted by Danielle, Sunday, 7 October 2012 2:36:16 AM
| |
A hard slog this morning
http://www.smh.com.au/national/terrorist-cell-may-still-be-active-20121006-2763c.html No not the link. It could have been one of ten, twenty if I had searched. Not the daily surf in to the papers. After my usual look at the weather radar, hoping for rain, goggle news, quick browse at UK NZ USA, and Canada English. Nine MSN, 7 NEWS SITE, ABC end [no locals today] Sydney Herald. So why the struggle? Well not the reading, waters fine, enjoy with the BS warning turned on, the updates. But over night I have tossed and turned. A good thing for any one CLAIMING TO BE INFORMED. Why have so very few, stood so very firmly AGAINST ANY CONCERNS we hold about this subject. On both sides of this debate, yes both sides, I have seen blind racism, uninformed comment, and a special blindness, even a refusal to look at links answer questions. I this morning found a foundation stone. A reason why we can not expect to avoid a day of horror. Nigeria, no small country. Its door to door MURDERS of students. Do my detractors know why those kids died? do they care? They murdered in their homes, died because the murderers want to warn no western influences will be tolerated! A hatred of? western influences! a chance to? free people from a faith of hate and intolerance. I rest my case. Posted by Belly, Sunday, 7 October 2012 5:27:09 AM
| |
http://www.smh.com.au/world/indonesias-jihad-factories-uncovering-nurseries-of-terrorisms-next-generation-20121006-275wh.html
Well there is another one, which makes my point about the problems of Islam. One of the teachers mentions that there are over 60 verses in the Koran about Jihad, should they delete those verses? So they keep pushing out new graduates, year after year. That is why Islam is not just like any other religion. Csteele ignores all this. No, he is not a muslim, simply confused. Posted by Yabby, Sunday, 7 October 2012 5:40:34 AM
| |
Hi Poirot,
At last ! A stance ! Well, sort of: "First of all, my premise on this thread was not to take sides." i.e. 'I refuse to take a stance on such crucial issues.' And why not ? Because " .... it was always that humans are bickering, tribal, territorial beings who are one of the few species that practice intra-specific savagery." So it's all much the same, one side or the other ? Serbia vs Bosnia and Kosovo ? Bali bombers vs victims ? What, if you'll forgive me - Nazis and Jews ? And there I was, thinking that the aim wasn't just to - world-weary - observe the nasty world, but to try to find ways to change it for the better. Sorry, Poirot, I think you may find that, regardless of your best efforts, there are not going to be any neutrals in the long, long struggle between hard-fought Enlightenment values, with all their wrinkles, and reactionary, pre-medieval values. So where does feminism fit in, in that schema ? With reaction ? I hardly think so. Is feminism 'neutral', 'doesn't take sides', in the battle for equal rights for women in Islamic societies, and respect for the rule of law, equally ? I think you know the answer to that one. Posted by Loudmouth, Sunday, 7 October 2012 8:36:06 AM
| |
Loudmouth,
Where did I state that "...it's all much the same one side or the other..."? I stated no such thing. I did say that humans are bickering, tribal and territorial. Which "Enlightenment values" gave the green light for imperial powers to subjugate Arab lands and peoples - (that includes women)? Or is it okay for whole peoples to walk five paces behind with eyes cast down deferring to their more "Enlightened" brethren? (I'd appreciate it if you'd resist constructing a strawman resting on my last two questions. I do not endorse radical Islam) Posted by Poirot, Sunday, 7 October 2012 9:16:41 AM
| |
"Where did I state that "...it's all much the same one side or the other..."? "
Didn't say you did, Poirot. It was framed as a question. And I am certainly not saying that the Enlightenment was all sweetness and light, perfect and unimproveable. Somewhere above, I suggested it was a long-term and unfinished project. I should have added that it was world-wide, with many, many societies contributing to it - that it wasn't and isn't by any means only a Western invention. After all, in what universe should only 'Western' women have equal rights with 'Western' men ? Shouldn't equality be a universal rights ? Should the impartiality of a legal system apply to all within a jurisdiction, equality before the law ? Or do you actually believe that - in some societies, because after all, it's part of their 'culture' - women should walk five paces behind their fathers/ big brothers/ husbands, eyes cast down ? After all, it's 'cultural' ? Is that it ? Simple questions, Poirot, not assertions, or mis-quotes. Here's another one: Should there be a separation of church/mosque/temple and State ? Yes ? No ? i.e. should we go back to the twelfth century ? Or should we keep working to try to remove the remnants of 'church' in the workings of the State, to the extent that there still are any ? Should we keep trying to improve the lot of our fellow-humans, male and female, by exposing reactionary philosophies where we see the, and refusing to allow them to influence our legal system, in the slightest ? There are NO neutrals, Poirot. Which path - progress or reaction - do we choose ? It's one world, and we're all in the same boat. If you don't want to be, then stop putting your oar in. Remain an observer. Cheers, Joe :) Posted by Loudmouth, Sunday, 7 October 2012 9:55:55 AM
| |
"..stop putting your oar in. Remain an observer..."
So Loudmouth is the arbiter of who can or cannot contribute in whichever way they please...? "....It was framed as a question." No it wasn't. It was constructed as a strawman. As is this: "Or do you actually believe that - in some societies, because after all, it's part of their 'culture' - women should walk five paces behind their fathers/big brothers/ husbands eyes cast down ? After all, it's a cultural thing. Is that it ?" That's quite a construction, full of disingenuous innuendo. (hint - if you're going to construct a strawman while pretending it's a question, don't make it quite so elaborate : ) And while your idealism of Enlightenment values is laudable...the reality is that places like Egypt, once drawn into the fold were taken to the cleaners by a partnership between their dictator and orgaisations such as the World Bank and the IMF. Women suffered as much as men and children by Egypt attaining the mantle of "Top Reformer" for the World Bank. The uprising and consequent disruption in that country is directly attributable to human greed, much of it emanating from "Enlightened" corporate values. Posted by Poirot, Sunday, 7 October 2012 10:30:30 AM
| |
Didn't say it was perfect, Poirot, simply better than whatever came a distant second. And i would include in that 'distant second', perhaps even further back still, all the various forms of revolutionary 'socialism' and Stalinism put into practice so far.
And if not Enlightenment values, what then ? Shari'a ? Feudalism ? Back to burning witches ? Suttee ? Stoning ? Every person for themselves ? Power to the strongest ? Voodoo ? What ? No, sweetie, there are no neutrals here. Cheers, Joe :) Posted by Loudmouth, Sunday, 7 October 2012 1:00:05 PM
| |
poirot: Or is it okay for whole peoples to walk five paces behind with eyes cast down deferring to their more "Enlightened" brethren?
They tell me that in the Middle East now Married women have earned some Rights. Now the husbands walk five paces behind his wives. Isn't that great. It has something to do with land mines, I think. ;-) Posted by Jayb, Sunday, 7 October 2012 7:46:32 PM
| |
Poirot,
Speaking of straw-men, "Or is it okay for whole peoples to walk five paces behind with eyes cast down deferring to their more "Enlightened" brethren?" they don't come much better than that one. Do you realise how appalling - and utterly misplaced - your faux indignation about the Enlightenment seems ? Do you even understand what it was about ? Do you seriously believe that the long, long struggle for human rights, for a better world, for justice and equality, was nothing, neither here nor there, worth bugger-all ? That all value-systems are 'equal' ? Because 'all cultures are equal' ? Christ, even an atheist like me has some notion that 'beat your swords into ploughshares' is a better outlook than 'behead all unbelievers'. Or a Stone Age notion of 'bash their heads in with a rock.' Some systems ARE better than others. Seriously, if you don't have a dog in this fight - if you want to stay 'neutral', you 'don't want to take sides' - then stay out of it. If you can't see any difference between rights and no-rights, between the domination of one group, men, over others, women, rather than equality - and walking along hand-in-hand, not one behind the other - that any struggle for improving society, for painfully protecting the gains in justice and rights for oppressed groups, (including non-believers), for all people, then you have abdicated your right to stick your oar in. Is this what sections of the Left have degenerated to ? An utterly amoral 'stance', i.e. non-stance, i.e. make no judgments whatsoever, about ideologies which would exterminate non-believers, if their adherents had half the chance ? Surely you don't really believe what you are condoning ? 'Taking no sides' indeed. Joe Posted by Loudmouth, Sunday, 7 October 2012 8:17:19 PM
| |
Condone what?
I haven't stated anything about condoning anything. I've made a few observations concerning human nature and pointed out that the Enlightenment was a wonderful thing if you happen to live in a country that calls the shots. Sorry, Loudmouth. You are not the arbiter of who may or may not contribute to threads, as much as you hold yourself aloft as a morality personified. Cheers, Chaps : ) Posted by Poirot, Sunday, 7 October 2012 9:08:30 PM
| |
Dear Danielle,
Thank you for the conversation. It has afforded me a chance to work through and solidify my thoughts on the issue. Sometimes that is the best each of us can hope for. Cheers. Posted by csteele, Sunday, 7 October 2012 9:50:35 PM
| |
Loudmouth/Joe we inhabit different sides of the fence.
Yet my trip started just about as left asyou can go. I still wounder what took me there, hunger and lack of opertunity was it I think. I like to think the new left is about a hair width from the center, at least that is my home. Not sure poirot is much further from that. But understand in general, and agree, with your comments. See I found my days in the real left built on lies. And left because I truly believed in equality and many of the things they used like a ladder but did not, in the end, believe in. Todays true left has a virus, like the greens, hidden within are many things many thoughts, but untruths still drive them. True left idealist would still want an end to the slave like existence of woman in the Muslim world. Those Bra burning Feminists of my youth would want the Burka and other dress on the fire. Some of todays left? holding hands with any anti western group,just to look active,would forget to take the Bra off before burning it. Do not look for an evolving left,that once was the greens, true left must shout to be heard, its numbers are few. Greens? thankfully have a plan,to dig their own grave, it is working. You are aware, as am I , lost groups form bigger but still lost groups. Strange bedfellows but in the end? New left is going to refuse them entry. Posted by Belly, Monday, 8 October 2012 5:03:12 AM
| |
csteel & poirot, just because someone disagrees with your ideology does not make it a personal affront. I disagree with your ideology. I have nothing personal against either of you personally.
I know that turning everything into a personal issue is particularly specific to women if they are disagreed with, however that may only be the case in female to female conversation not male to female. Posted by Jayb, Monday, 8 October 2012 7:11:44 AM
| |
poirot: Or is it okay for whole peoples to walk five paces behind with eyes cast down deferring to their more "Enlightened" brethren?
And this is the subject of this 89 page thread. Do what ever floats their boat over there, BUT THIS IS AUSTRALIA and this custom should be left at the door when they arrive, along with any baggage they may wish to bring with them. I think it's time re had a serious rethink about immigration, as multi cultuarisim has been a failed experiment in most other places, so why should we wait to find out the hard way. Let's face it, they (Muslims) come here, they don't like our rules, in fact, many don't like us abiding by our own rules, they take our handouts, then many of them have not respect for us, even hatred, albeit just a small percentage. Now given some of those who hate us were born here, just goes to show the religion is the problem, moreso than the people. We can keep kidding ourselves as much as we like, but this experiment will never be without serious consequences. Call me racist by all means, but I don't hate Muslims, I simply hate what their beliefs bring to our country,as we are a peace loving country, happy to welcome anyone who respects us for what we are, but unfortunately this is one race that simply can't control the violence within. That's why I say they should either toe the line, or leave. After all, I am not asking them to stop following their religion, I am simply asking that they don't follow it here. Is it too much to ask that we keep our great peace loving nation free from radical extremism for us and our generations to follow. Posted by rehctub, Monday, 8 October 2012 8:24:59 AM
| |
Jayb,
"csteel & poirot, just because someone disagrees with your ideology does not make it a personal affront...I know that turning everything into a personal issue is particularly specific to women..." For a start...csteele is "not" a woman - although he does display particularly level-headed argument (which is probably why he's taken for a lady : ) Secondly, my beef about a certain poster tottering around OLO with a curious penchant to bait me was not related to the subject matter of this thread...and has nothing to do with my gender per se. Posted by Poirot, Monday, 8 October 2012 10:53:04 AM
| |
This is the type of Country some people think is fine for Australia to become.
Children killed as policeman father refuses to quit Date October 8, 2012 - Two schoolchildren, including a nine-year-old girl, have been shot dead by militants in Afghanistan after their father refused to quit his job as a policeman, officials say. Henna and her 16-year-old brother Zelgai were killed by two gunmen on motorcycles late on Saturday while in their father's car in the Edgah area of Ghazni province, in the south of the country. "They were playing inside my car, and the Taliban maybe thought it was me in the car. They opened fire at the car and killed my children," the father, Zalmai, who uses just one name, said on Sunday. He said the Taliban had warned him several times in the past that his family would be at risk if he did not leave his job. "The children were killed by Taliban because their father is a policeman working for Ghazni's municipality," provincial spokesman Fazil Sabawoon said, blaming hardline Islamist insurgents for the attack. "They had warned him to leave his job as police and join them," he added. A witness, Hamidullah, said two gunmen on motorcycles opened fire at the vehicle the children were in and fled the area. Can't have been Mislims. They are a peace loving people. Posted by Jayb, Monday, 8 October 2012 11:09:53 AM
| |
Some people wear a sign over their heads that flashes, "Bait me." & some people like to fish, especially when the biting is so good. I do it all the time with #u<&w|t$. They make it so easy. :-)
I've tried to stay away from it in this Post. Some people make it sooo hard. Posted by Jayb, Monday, 8 October 2012 11:28:48 AM
| |
Ooh, that was so hurtful, Poirot.
But I'm glad that you can come off the fence and have a go at me. It shows that you really do have principles, of a sort. Now, would you like to have a go - get off the fence - at people who give kids signs about beheading non-believers, and calling for the Sixth Pillar, the Jihad against non-believers ? i.e. atheists like you and me ? As for the Enlightenment, what I have been trying to say, perhaps not very well, and against your misinterpretation, is that the rights and wisdoms fought for so bitterly, and won, over the past millenium (well, since before Pericles and ancient Athens, actually) should be available to every person in the world. The Enlightenment doesn't belong to any one particular group, or society, or country, or (Christ help us) 'culture'. It, with all its faults, is a human achievement. Criticising what might have been done implicitly under its aegis, is an easy and very cheap trick, a luxury which should be reserved for kids in junior high school, trying to show how clever they are. And for Jihadists, who are ultimately so viciously opposed to everything, every right, every step forward, that it stands for. So which side are you on ? Joe :) Posted by Loudmouth, Monday, 8 October 2012 11:58:18 AM
| |
I just love Pat Condell & I do believe he's right.
http://www.youtube.com/user/patcondell I'm putting on my - tin hat, buttonin' up my - flak - jac. Now the tapdance routine. Tappity tap, tap, tap. So obscene. :-0 Posted by Jayb, Monday, 8 October 2012 12:36:42 PM
| |
Jayb,
"Some people wear a sign over their heads that flashes, "Bait me".....I do it all the time with #u<&wlts..." Oh, that's all right then : ) I think you'll find that baiting is the mark of an immature personality attempting to supplement some lack or other in their perception of their own importance Posted by Poirot, Monday, 8 October 2012 1:09:09 PM
| |
Poirot: I think you'll find that baiting is the mark of an immature personality attempting to supplement some lack or other in their perception of their own importance.
Or, conversely, There perception of their own importance is justified & they are trying to nudge some #<(&W|t into getting a grip on reality. The sugarplum fairies should only come out at Xmas. Posted by Jayb, Monday, 8 October 2012 2:32:32 PM
| |
rehctub: Why in the hell do we have this garbage here, in our country.
If they (Muslims) dont like what's hapening, GO HOME and protest all you like, but don't bring this crap to our country. THIS IS AUSTRALIA! Now, let's get back to looking the problem of this garbage in Australia & what should be done about it. Posted by Jayb, Tuesday, 9 October 2012 9:34:19 AM
| |
Well done, Jayb, for proving my point that this thread was designed as nothing more than a vehicle to vent and a rant.
540 posts in and you are still spewing rehctub's original the "garbage" line.....displaying absolutely no progress and espousing none of Loudmouth's faith in Enlightenment values. Posted by Poirot, Tuesday, 9 October 2012 9:47:13 AM
| |
Poirot: 540 posts in and you are still spewing rehctub's original the "garbage" line.....displaying absolutely no progress and espousing none of Loudmouth's faith in Enlightenment values.
Poi rot it is not garbage. Do you want these people here? They are calling for your head. Do you think it's OK to threaten to kill anyone who disagrees with their ideology & religion? Is this what you want Australian Culture to morph into? You only see the tip of the iceberg with that lot. 7/8th of that iceberg is supporting the part you can see, even if verbal they do not. Those that do not will be forced into supporting whether they like it or not by the religious police in their community. They have them, remember the convert who had a couple of beers & got bashed up for his sin. Please don't say it will never go that far. Once there are over 10% Muslims in Australia that's what will start to happen. There will be no Multi-culturism I'm afraid. The Islamic Community will DEMAND Shari a Law for their enclaves & from there, it's downhill all the way, as has happened in other countries over 10%. Posted by Jayb, Tuesday, 9 October 2012 11:25:38 AM
| |
"Poi rot"
Yes, yes, Jayb, very mature...keeping in line with your theory regarding the perception baiters have of their own importance as justifying the baiting. Carry on. : ) Posted by Poirot, Tuesday, 9 October 2012 11:42:31 AM
| |
Poirot: "Poi rot"
Sorry about that. I have tracked it down to the spellcheck in Word. I just typed Poirot in & it auto corrected it to Poi rot. Xin Loi. (sorry 'bout that.) Posted by Jayb, Tuesday, 9 October 2012 12:11:57 PM
| |
Well, in that case, I retract my last post.
: ) Posted by Poirot, Tuesday, 9 October 2012 12:24:40 PM
| |
Poirot,
Have you by any chance run your 'name' through a Word document with the spell-checker set to auto-correct yourself? This is a genuine question, as I am unable to do this myself, not running Windows as my operating system. The spell-checker in my text editor, Gedit, even if I had it turned on and it had any tendency to auto-correct my typings, could well operate slightly differently to that in Word. Its just that I got an uncontrollable urge to want to check such system behaviour for myself. I'm sure you'll understand. Of course, if this is a burden to you, I'm only too happy to retract my request. Oh, and BTW, only seven more posts after this one will see this topic become the all-time most-posted-to topic in the General Discussion area of the Forum. Can we do it? Yes we can! (Sorry about that.) Posted by Forrest Gumpp, Tuesday, 9 October 2012 2:20:08 PM
| |
Hi Forrest,
I'm not all that savvy on settings, etc...but I just had a go with "Poirot" and spell-check underlined it in red. When I split the word apart as in "Poi" and "rot" it didn't underline it....although I'm not sure how the word "Poi" gets through? ................. ...okay, I just googled an online dictionary and apparently "poi" is a Hawaiian food made from the tuber of the taro, pounded into a paste and fermented. Fascinating : ) Posted by Poirot, Tuesday, 9 October 2012 3:52:04 PM
| |
I wish I knew as much as you Forest G.
Got rid of Internet ex, running fire fox, spell check is giving trouble but getting there. Unfortunately any Friday, prayer day, could see the thread charge past that. Some are in to 3.000 posts, very crude mostly, no way to sell a thought. I find our efforts not worth concern compared to what I saw elsware. Not posting just reading. Posted by Belly, Tuesday, 9 October 2012 4:18:27 PM
| |
Poirot,
You rubbish the Enlightenment. What would you propose as a better foundation than this admittedly imperfect, human-derived and -bitterly-fought-for one ? Stalinism ? Shari'a ? Living in caves with crystals, saying "om," sacrificing boy-children to Wicca ? Deferring to feudal lords - no, that's too advanced for Islamists, they're happy with non-Muslim slaves, it still works like that in Mauretania, so why not everywhere ? Yeah, it's a lot easier just to pretend to sit on the fence and slag one side, but never the other. So at least we know what side you're on. I guess jihadists need useful idiots just like the fascists and Stalinists used to. Not that there's much difference, come to think of it, they all learnt so much from each other. Cheers, Joe :) Posted by Loudmouth, Tuesday, 9 October 2012 5:54:45 PM
| |
Joe,
Where have I rubbished the Enlightenment? I merely pointed out that just because a society aspires to the values contained therein, it doesn't preclude their using their collected heft to dominate other peoples and subjugate them. Because they're human, and humans are bickering, tribal and territorial - not to mention greedy and liable to apply indiscriminate values as they go along, depending on who they're dealing with. "..useful idiots..." why thank you, Joe, for bestowing your hackneyed insult, although, I'll add that you're beginning to sound somewhat like a pounded and fermented taro. : ) Posted by Poirot, Tuesday, 9 October 2012 6:18:05 PM
| |
A mate just sent this to me.
IN MT WARREN PARK SHOPPING CENTRE, (QLD) NO ANZAC BADGES WERE ALLOWED TO BE SOLD, BECAUSE THE OWNER OF THE COMPLEX IS FROM THE MIDDLE EAST, AND REFUSED PERMISSION , COLES (BI Lo ) PUT UP A BIG FIGHT BUT HE OWNS THE LAND AND THE BUILDINGS AND HAD COMPLETE CONTROL OVER THE BUSINESS PEOPLE RENTING FROM HIM. Is this what you Islamist supporters want for Australia? Posted by Jayb, Tuesday, 9 October 2012 7:25:49 PM
| |
Jayb,
I've just googled the appropriate words and noticed that all the pages listed came up written exactly like yours - shouting in upper case - about the issue...as if trying to whip up a bit of hysteria. Nevertheless, not a good look if it's true. I'm wondering if you can provide some proof or validation for this claim, apart from something your mate sent you. At the moment it appears as typical facebook and social media fodder. Posted by Poirot, Tuesday, 9 October 2012 8:07:06 PM
| |
No, I only have what my mate sent me.
Mt Warren Park is anly about a 20 minute drive from here if I go into Brisbane via Beenleigh. I'll print it out & talk to the Coles Manager about it. Nothing like the word straight from the horses mouth. I'll see how I go & I'll get back to you. Posted by Jayb, Tuesday, 9 October 2012 9:00:05 PM
| |
Perhaps contributor's would like to make comment, after accessing the links to the following, especially Muhammad Sa'id al-'Asjawi. Of particular interest:
The debate involving two issues – Islam's 'complete way of life' and accommodation of 'foreign moral and ideological ideas' (Enlightenment ideals). A debate given voice by al-'Asjawi Sayyid Al-Qemany is an opponent of Islamic fundamentalism, supporting separation of religion and state, and tolerance. Awarded Egyptian Culture Ministry's 2009 prize for achievement in the social sciences resulted in the demand for its withdrawal. A fatwa was issued against him “"which are tantamount to incitement to murder" and accused him of "deconstructing Islam using eloquent sugar-coated attacks [...] more fatal than Salman Rushdie" http://globalvoicesonline.org/2009/07/15/egypt-the-egyptian-apostate Muhammad Sa'id al-'Ashmawi "one of the most influential liberal Islamic thinkers today," who "has had to rely on round-the-clock police protection due to death threats from Egyptian militants." http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/176114?uid=3737536&uid=2&uid=4&sid=21101286365567 Regarding MT WARREN PARK SHOPPING CENTRE, (QLD), it may be that the selling of badges for any charity is not permitted in the complex. I believe that this is part of conditions of lease with certain centres. Posted by Danielle, Tuesday, 9 October 2012 9:05:39 PM
| |
Dear Danielle,
Just to inform you that I have been in contact with Soeren Kern. As I had no other way of contacting you, nor wanting to be seen as 'baiting' you to continue here after you indicated your previous post was to have been your last, I had not posted his reply. He was kind enough to answer my query about his background and he informs me he is a Christian, not Jewish. He has studied Middle Eastern politics at Hebrew University, reads and writes Hebrew, and loves Israel. He describes himself as a “German-American gentile”. Just wanting to set the record straight and acknowledge my assumption was erroneous. No need to reply. Posted by csteele, Tuesday, 9 October 2012 9:39:17 PM
| |
Dear Csteele,
Thank you so much for your comment ... and generosity of spirit. Posted by Danielle, Tuesday, 9 October 2012 10:09:47 PM
| |
So can someone explain to me what the problem is with wanting to keep Australia as a peace loving nation, free of extremist views and threats against us.
After all, this is all this thread is about. I personally don't hate Muslims, but the problem is Muslim leaders simply can't control the extremists within their so called communities, so that's why I say we must take action ourselves, simply to preserve the very nature of our peace loving nation. Posted by rehctub, Wednesday, 10 October 2012 7:31:45 AM
| |
“A 14-year-old Pakistani girl who campaigned for children's rights is fighting for her life after being shot in the head on her school bus by a Taliban gunman.”
“Taliban spokesman Ehsanullah Ehsan told AFP the Islamist group carried out the attack after repeatedly warning Malala to stop speaking out against them.” “"She is a Western-minded girl. She always speaks against us. We will target anyone who speaks against the Taliban," he said by telephone from an undisclosed location.” http://www.abc.net.au/news/2012-10-10/schoolgirl-campaigner-shot-in-head-by-taliban-gunman/4304370 “Charlie Fuqua, the Republican candidate for the Arkansas House of Representatives who called for expelling Muslims from the United States in his book, also wrote in support for instituting the death penalty for "rebellious children." “ He claims; “The maintenance of civil order in society rests on the foundation of family discipline. Therefore, a child who disrespects his parents must be permanently removed from society in a way that gives an example to all other children of the importance of respect for parents.” http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/10/08/charlie-fuqua-arkansas-candidate-death-penalty-rebellious-children_n_1948490.html Lost for words I'm afraid. Posted by csteele, Wednesday, 10 October 2012 9:36:10 AM
| |
Yup! That's what ya get from Religious Fanatics of any description.
I did note that he required it to be done with due all the judicial requirements, which would definitely change the behaviour of most disrespectful & socially deviant children, wouldn't it? It's not the same as just turning up & killing them on the street, is it? Which is what you get from Muslim Fundamentalists. Posted by Jayb, Wednesday, 10 October 2012 10:10:25 AM
| |
Oh excellent, Jayb...
So the case of disrespectful and socially deviant children is not a matter of societal introspection at all? Because such social anomalies can usually be traced back to a fundamental failing of society. To differentiate on the matter resting on the (judicial or not) method of disposal is rather irksome, don't you think? It's certainly at odds with Enlightenment values - or any civilised values that I'm familiar with. Why did you hold up the judicial aspect as some sort of mitigation for such a loathsome proposition? Posted by Poirot, Wednesday, 10 October 2012 10:53:28 AM
| |
Regarding the Mt. Warren Post.
It's crap. I have just spoken to Centre Management about the matter & one of the Directors confirmed that ANZAC Badges have been sold at Mt. Warren for the last two years that he has been involved with Centre Management. They have been trying to find the originator of the eMail with out any luck. Posted by Jayb, Wednesday, 10 October 2012 11:06:37 AM
| |
Thanks for that, Jayb.
I was inclined to conclude right from the moment I saw it that it was an instance of hysterical social media hype, designed to inflame feelings toward Muslims. Not helpful to broader dialogue, I think you'll agree. Posted by Poirot, Wednesday, 10 October 2012 11:25:51 AM
| |
I thank you too arjay.
Are posts deleted without a note telling us so? I posted right under that one jayb, warning it was a lie. Willing to think I did something and failed to post. But in that post, might have been a reference to another poster, did I offend csteele? Back on subject such lies that is what it was, are dangerous and crafted by every side be aware of them, do not feed hate machines on any side. But be aware too, SOME are intent on covering up true issues. SYRIA. Every news broadcast tells the story children, even dead Holly men laying in the street dead to be used as bait! for snipers! Russia and China are acting against humanity. Posted by Belly, Wednesday, 10 October 2012 12:21:27 PM
| |
Sorry slip jayb
Posted by Belly, Wednesday, 10 October 2012 12:25:11 PM
| |
poirot: Why did you hold up the judicial aspect as some sort of mitigation for such a loathsome proposition?
Well I suppose it was calling for some rule of Law. As opposed to some Religious Fundamentalist deciding that a person must die because they said something that that particular Fundamentalist Group disliked. But you never know with any Religious Fundamentalist. No, I don't agree with it. But it would sure put the wind up the arse of some very unruly kids, wouldn't it. ;-) If the American Southern Baptist & other weird "wave your arms in the air" types gained any sort of power we'd see people being burnt at the stake for not being in the preferred Christian Religion again. My wife is the Vice-president of our local Women’s RSL Group. I'll get her to get in touch with the Beenleigh Group & see what they have to say on the Mt. Warren matter. Mt Warren Management may have just deigned the accusation because of the bad publicity. You never know if you don't ask. Posted by Jayb, Wednesday, 10 October 2012 12:36:13 PM
| |
Csteele, personally I see a huge difference between somebody who might
express outrageous opinions, especially if it will help sell a book, and a bunch of men shooting a 14 year old for expressing her opinion. It might be a subtle difference in your eyes, I know, but to me the difference is like chalk and cheese. As to Poirot on this thread. She'll probably have the last word, as in Australia, women usually do :) Posted by Yabby, Wednesday, 10 October 2012 1:44:53 PM
| |
Yabby,
That's not fair : ) I think you and I are pretty even in the last word stakes. I once described you as one of those weighted inflatable things that you bob over - which always rebound again, so much did I expect you to pop up again every time I attempted to finish you off. Great exercise : ) Posted by Poirot, Wednesday, 10 October 2012 1:54:00 PM
| |
*I think you and I are pretty even in the last word stakes.*
Well Poirot, that is just my contribution to the fight against sexism. You girls can't win all the time :) Posted by Yabby, Wednesday, 10 October 2012 2:08:50 PM
| |
Well there's hardly any girls here now - Danielle - me. Suse pops in occasionally, as does Pelican - and where the bloody hell is Lexi?
Posted by Poirot, Wednesday, 10 October 2012 2:43:09 PM
| |
I too am concerned about Lexi, know she is unwell.
Also that she gets a bit uptight about some thoughts. Hope she is ok we have had a lot of lady posters some are our best. Still not now or ever to hide my concerns or except I am wrong for disagreeing with a few Posted by Belly, Wednesday, 10 October 2012 3:43:10 PM
| |
jayb it is not true!
If it was ten thousand like me would be on your doorstep asking you to come with us to sit in every Isle. Do not bight at hate messages. Question, remember not true, IF we had a ban on the Koran being sold, in any bookshop you wish to name. First it would be wrong and a crime, second it would be challenged and beaten. Posted by Belly, Wednesday, 10 October 2012 3:49:13 PM
| |
Hi C. Steele,
Sorry, I'm confused - are you saying that a Republican blowhard shot this wonderful girl in the head ? Or that it is just as bad to flap your lips as to actually shoot a young girl in the head ? But who was it who actually shot this poor fellow-human being, our sister and our daughter, in the head ? Can you say it ? "It was the Taliban". Yes ? No ? Gosh, I'd like to sit on the fence about this one like Poirot - it's so hard to choose. Should a young girl be allowed to campaign for schoolgirls' rights, or should she be put in her place - kinder, kuche, kirche ? It's so hard to be even-handed, isn't it ? Oh well, time for another Soy Latte. Joe Posted by Loudmouth, Wednesday, 10 October 2012 5:02:58 PM
| |
Blow it out yer ear, Loudmouth.
It's shame you need to use Poirot as a prop to get your message across. (I've never actually ordered something called a "Latte" - sorry to disappoint : ) Posted by Poirot, Wednesday, 10 October 2012 5:25:49 PM
| |
Gud onya piorot, throw a little humour back & no one will gee ya up.
Well done. Now if we can convince csteel to do the same things would be a lot more pleasant round here. Ya know, not long ago before Political Correctness stuck its ugly beak in & stuffed things up, one could have a gee up & no one looked take offence. Nowadays it seems that nearly everybody is looking for any excuse to claim that they have been offended in some way. That way they can claim the high moral ground. Sad..., so sad. Posted by Jayb, Wednesday, 10 October 2012 6:00:57 PM
| |
Dear Yabby,
A very brave 14 yo girl lies fighting for her life so of course there are differences between the two realities. However in my post I was expressing my despair about older so called religious men seeing fit to deem the taking of the lives of 'rebellious' children acceptable. Of course there are many other differences, particularly in the parties delivering the sentiment. One was made from a rebel force in the Swat Valley where the the literacy rate is in the single digits and a male dominated tribal society still holds sway. The other was made from a member of the ruling class in a country that would have us believe was a standard bearer for Western enlightenment values, and a freedom loving, democratic, upholder of human rights. If you think Mr Fuqua (wildly appropriate name) was making those statements just to sell a book then you do not know fundamentalists like I do. The only thing keeping his particular belief system from gaining an ascendency is its current inability to take power either through the ballot box or at the point of a gun as the Taliban did. Posted by csteele, Wednesday, 10 October 2012 11:24:22 PM
| |
csteel: The only thing keeping his particular belief system from gaining an ascendency is its current inability to take power either through the ballot box or at the point of a gun.
I'm not a religious man, but thank God for that. Csteel: as the Taliban did. Yes they did & look what they did with that power for the time they were there. Mass hangings, shootings, setting on fire, banning everything that wasn't 7th Century. Killing girls for going to school. wasn't that just wonderful of them. Maybe we should introduce their system here in Australia. I know there are some people that would just enjoy the peace they bring. I'm sure the feminists would love it to. I can just feel the outpouring of love & kum-by-arh from every quarter. That was a bit of a gee up. kick it back mate. ;-) Posted by Jayb, Thursday, 11 October 2012 12:40:43 AM
| |
Loudmouth Joe.
Yep taleban, and uneducated to the extent they think a God wants them to do this evil act. I forever, stand against such filth. Brave little girl may you live. And may you be part of leading your sisters to a better free-er life. Posted by Belly, Thursday, 11 October 2012 4:58:17 AM
| |
Yep, it looks like it took a bullet to the head of a 14 year old Muslim girl to bring some of the people in this Forum to their senses about this terrible religion & how it acts.
Strangely, I haven't seen any wild demonstrations threatening to kill all & sundry for this atrocity. It just goes to show where we're at. Doesn't it? Posted by Jayb, Friday, 12 October 2012 10:51:19 AM
| |
Hi Jayb,
For a brief misanthropic moment, I was thinking "Yeah, behead all those who shoot 14-year-old girls in the head for wanting to go to school." And who threaten to do it again when/if she recovers. But then I thought, no, I'm an imperfect product of the Enlightenment, and we shouldn't think like that - we have developed, after a multitude of setbacks and special favours, the notion of the rule of law, under which punishments are supposed to be set dispassionately for such vile acts without fear or favour. If the 'authorities' ever get around to catching the b@stards who did this, I'll shout everyone on this thread a Soy Latte. Cheers, Joe :) Posted by Loudmouth, Friday, 12 October 2012 12:35:38 PM
| |
*If the 'authorities' ever get around to catching the b@stards who did this, I'll shout everyone on this thread a Soy Latte*
Far more likely Joe, that it will be the Americans and one of their drones, despite Csteele's protests. As we know, the Pakistani authorities are quite two faced, jailing the doctor who helped catch bin Laden. Without Pakistani Govt support, the Taliban would not exist. Posted by Yabby, Friday, 12 October 2012 2:11:31 PM
| |
EMAIL arrived yesterday, we all get them good funny bad awful.
This one anti Muslim,whole pages of photos , usual signs calling for our death, the bottom of the gene pool stuff. Know what hurt. Still does? makes me ache all over. Under a photo men in their 20,s in suits, little brides maids in western wedding dress? 300 militants from the west bank ,their wedding shots, girls? 7 to 9. This is called pedophilia in my world. Is this religion a cover for sexual enslavement of women? Try telling me it is not. Posted by Belly, Friday, 12 October 2012 3:57:29 PM
| |
Well Belly, Loudmouth, Yabby etc. It looks like we shoved the truth about this lot down the dissenter’s necks.
Belly: 300 militants from the west bank, their wedding shots, girls? 7 to 9. The original reason for marrying girls this young is that they were virgins & didn't have VD/STD which was rife in the Middle East & most of them didn't have fathers or family as they had been killed in various wars. Shocking, but true. Come on csteel & apologists, etc, why aren’t you defending your friends now? Cat got your tongue? Posted by Jayb, Saturday, 13 October 2012 1:59:11 PM
| |
Interesting site for you Yabby.
http://www.yourjewishnews.com/Pages/20553.aspx Example; Muslims cut of the head of a Christian in public ceremony in Tunisia. Kinda graphic, maybe too much for the squimish like csteel, etc. Posted by Jayb, Saturday, 13 October 2012 2:29:44 PM
| |
Just want to register my revulsion at the actions of the Taliban - in general - and particularly in the case of the young girl.
Jayb, - I don't think it's necessary, or in good taste, to thump your chest at so-called "dissenters" using this girl's horrendous situation as a glove to slap in our face. In no way was I defending the despicable actions associated with religious fundamentalism. My despair was always at the propensity for humans to formulate belief systems and/or hierarchies of power that promote savagery amongst humanity as a form of control - especially employing group-think and hysteria as a tool to attain it. Posted by Poirot, Sunday, 14 October 2012 9:18:40 AM
| |
Hi Poirot,
At last: "In no way was I defending the despicable actions associated with religious fundamentalism. " Welcome to 'our' side, Poirot. Yes, the Enlightenment will eventually prevail for everybody, equality and justice in all societies. Eventually. But what a b@stard of a century it's going to be in the meantime. Cheers, Joe Posted by Loudmouth, Sunday, 14 October 2012 9:41:11 AM
| |
Well all this just confirms what I have been saying all along, ie
the veneer of society is pretty thin. We are mere walking, talking primates, smart enough to invent interesting new things, not smart enough to use them wisely. In the end we will destroy ourselves. Ah well, there are a few benefits. I just sat here and ordered a new mobile phone and case from Hong Kong on Ebay. Sometimes capitalism is truly grand, Poirot :) Posted by Yabby, Sunday, 14 October 2012 9:47:30 AM
| |
Loudmouth,
I assumed it "went without saying" (ie, was tacitly understood) that the fundamentalist psyche would be rejected by anyone with an ounce of true humanitarian interest. "...our side..." - well there you go. I'm afraid humans are forever condemned to segregate themselves into "sides". Posted by Poirot, Sunday, 14 October 2012 9:50:00 AM
| |
That's right, Poirot:
Yes, there are 'sides': reactionaries on one side, and [relatively speaking] progressives on the other. The world is a complicated place: there are USUALLY more than two parties contending for dominance, in many political situations. Look at Syria: there a secular dictatorship brutally struggles against a democratic opposition, and a reactionary fundamentalist opposition as well. Once the Opposition has 'won', the bigger battle between the democrats and the fundamentalists will start, and it will be more vicious and bloody than the current one. And so it may well be in all of the Arab and Muslim countries: a struggle between dictatorships, democratic forces and fundamentalist forces. Sides, Poirot. Which one will you be on, over the next decades, as these struggles play out ? Posted by Loudmouth, Sunday, 14 October 2012 10:04:42 AM
| |
Loudmouth,
May I refer you to the first paragraph of Yabby's post above yours - I agree with that. Posted by Poirot, Sunday, 14 October 2012 10:24:56 AM
| |
Will also add that my eleven year-old son was watching this story on the news just now (I usually control his news intake quite strictly depending on what I think he can take on board).
I explained to him the methods of the Taliban, but also that not all Muslims adhered to the Taliban's model. We both agreed that it was diabolical and our conversation finished with him saying to me - that it reminded him of the similar fate that befell Martin Luther King - a man silenced while attempting to challenge ingrained societal prejudice. Quite a wise analysis for a youngster, I thought. Posted by Poirot, Sunday, 14 October 2012 10:48:51 AM
| |
Poirot: Jayb, - I don't think it's necessary, or in good taste, to thump your chest at so-called "dissenters" using this girl's horrendous situation as a glove to slap in our face.
Are you saying that I should be Politically Correct? Ain't never gonna happen. Whatever it takes to make the blind see where truth lays. I notice that the Politically Correct complain bitterly confronted with reality. It contributed towards their Mental Illness & Political Correctness is a Mental Illness. You mentioned the young girl with a bullet in her head but you didn't say anything the young man that had his head cut off. Who slowly drowned in his own blood. Is that sexist or, because it was a male, it didn't matter? Posted by Jayb, Sunday, 14 October 2012 10:56:46 AM
| |
Jayb,
Sometimes you sound quite reasonable - and sometimes, as in the post above, you come across as deliberately puerile and incendiary. Do you really believe that I don't give a stuff about the "men/boys" slaughtered in this way? And my criticism of your "manly/walking talking primate" behaviour of beating your chest when you think you're victorious has nothing to do with political correctness - and everything to do with a bloke yodelling about how much kudos he thinks he possesses. Posted by Poirot, Sunday, 14 October 2012 11:06:18 AM
| |
poirot: Jayb, - I don't think it's necessary, or in good taste, to thump your chest at so-called "dissenters"
Dissenters? dissenters? Up until now, those who didn't support this vile religion were the dissenters. Suddenly you are making out like you & your kind are the dissenters?. "BS!" Poirot: nothing to do with political correctness - and everything to do with a bloke yodelling about how much kudos he thinks he possesses. Please don't try & buck your own system. Political Correctness has everything to do with this & not a dam thing about kudos, dear lady. Political Correctness was installed into today’s society to protect the faint hearted who can't handle reality. The proponents have condemned those people who aren't as crude barbarians. It's getting increasing worse since the 70's. Ba Ba rainbow sheep, persons & partners. Then there's Noddy, once banned because he was in bed with Big Ears, now it's in again because "Gay" is "good." Martin Luther King’s assassination was 49 years ago. A hell-of-alot has changed in America since then. What has changed in the Middle East? Nothing, in fact it's got worse. Try Mali, Al Qeada is rounding up all the unmarried mothers & going to kill them. Most of these mothers were raped by their Muslim brethren in the first place, that's why they have children. Posted by Jayb, Sunday, 14 October 2012 1:35:06 PM
| |
Poirot: I explained to him the methods of the Taliban, but also that not all Muslims adhered to the Taliban's model.
Did you explain to him that that was only until the fundamentalist force their way into an area then they all become like that, or else. Did you tell him that the Muslims want to make Australia a Caliph Empire & that we would all be forced to convert, or else. I just bet you didn't. He's too young to understand. Do you realize that 10 year old boys in Syria have taken up arms & are killing people. Yes, 11 years old, in a coddled Western Society, is too young. But you aren’t. I’m sorry if you are offended, but it’s not my problem if you can’t handle reality. Someone has to tell & show the truth & be buggered with Political Correctness. As I said before, Political Correctness is a Mental Illness. Posted by Jayb, Sunday, 14 October 2012 1:35:37 PM
| |
Jayb,
"Dissenters? Dissenters? Up until now, those who didn't support this vile religion were the dissenters. Suddenly you are making out like you & your kind are the dissenters?."BS"" Well now I do think you're a silly moo - puffing out your chest and beating it, for your own self-aggrandisement. I quote "you": "Well, Belly, Loudmouth, Yabby, etc. It looks like we have shoved the truth about this lot down the dissenter's necks..." [Oh yes...very tough, very manly - and so unlike the sort of thing you're criticizing. I note you made sure you gathered the clan together so you'd have an audience, Lol!....and apparently we're the dissenters!!) and: "Come on csteel & apologists, etc, why aren't you defending your friends now? Cat got your tongue." {Brilliant, Jayb, not only are you triumphal, you're also provocative as well. (I'll bet you drive a big bright-red V8 : )] And what sort of a comment is that, when I mentioned my eleven year-old had the nous to see a similarity between Martin Luther King's demise and the attempt on this girl's life. I'm proud of him for having the maturity to see that. It hadn't occurred to me before he mentioned it. I'm not offended by you, Jayb. You display an attitude that will always inflame debate. You seek difference while wise people seek common ground. Off you go, I'm sure you can rustle up another audience to regale them with stories about how you shoved whatever down whomever's necks. Posted by Poirot, Sunday, 14 October 2012 2:10:15 PM
| |
poirot: You seek difference while wise people seek common ground.
And what, dear lady, is the common ground. Peace? Respect for your fellow man? No, not there. Equality for women? Democracy? No, not there either. How about going to the beach in a bikini? How about a woman going home alone without a male relative? No, Not yet. Want to have a glass of wine with your friends & B.B.Q. & a beer in the back yard? No, nothing yet. What about if you don't go to church on your churches day. No, no beating & thrown in jail or murdered. Oh. I know, we've both got a body, two arms, two legs & a head. Finally something in common. & yes, rally the troops around, of course. I hope you have come to realize just what you & you ilk are fervently supporting in the name of Political Correctness, Rose coloured glasses & Sugar Plum Fairies dancing in the summer moonlight Posted by Jayb, Sunday, 14 October 2012 2:44:31 PM
| |
We've been over that, Jayb.
I've already stated that I don't support fundamentalist religion. My last post was about you and your grandstanding - coz ya just found it a bit too difficult to resist taking advantage of the tragedy in Pakistan to rub some salt in. My other point was you doing a little dance because I went with "your" label of calling us dissenters - forgot about that, eh? Like I said, Yabby got it right a few posts back. Posted by Poirot, Sunday, 14 October 2012 2:57:30 PM
| |
I am in two minds we should consider have we done this subject to death, for the present?
It will return time and again, but if we look back are all posts of worth? We yes I think so, how do we know how people think unless they are free to tell us. I saw bigotry, on both sides, and some things that we dare not consider put up to FIX? the problems. They say, with good reason men are from one planet women another. Seems we think differently. And maybe BOTH SIDES need to execpt the others right to think as they wish. But Islam, not me, needs to control its own. Needs to know they came here for a better life, not as Rulers And that our freedom to be us is at least as important as the non-existant God, every one of them, they worship. No real God , no real religion, should demand we get on our knees to a phantom, equality of humanity is strangled by false Gods. Posted by Belly, Sunday, 14 October 2012 3:39:18 PM
| |
Poirot,
Common grounds ? Do you mean going half-way ? Perhaps you could give us some examples ? Half-behead someone for not believing, or converting ? Half-stone some poor girl who's been raped ? Give girls half as much schooling as boys ? Keep women half-in the home for life ? Sixth-pillar Islam is evangelical, with arms. It does not believe in 'common ground' - as the believers see it, 'common ground' is blasphemous, a perversion of the will of Allah. By definition, one must be 100 % true to Islam, to submission to the will of Allah. 100 %. A sort of Stalinism of the Desert. Perhaps what you might have in mind is tekkiah - the Islamic 'principle' that one can lie and dissemble, for the cause. But you may know better ? You may have examples of 'common ground' ? Yes, the world is half-full of useful idiots. Cheers, Joe :) Posted by Loudmouth, Sunday, 14 October 2012 5:52:53 PM
| |
You do talk some rubbish at times, Loudmouth.
But the main reason I'm posting is to take this thread up to 600 posts (which is far more pertinent than replying to the garbage in your previous post) Cheers : ) Posted by Poirot, Sunday, 14 October 2012 6:30:11 PM
| |
poirot: You do talk some rubbish at times, Loudmouth.
See, that's my point. You get shown reality, told where the truth lies. You read it in the papers & see it on TV every day & still we are called dissenters. We are told we talk rubbish because we refuse to toe the Politically Correct line. The Politically Correct, Do-Gooders, Greenie Whackers are so wrapped in cotton wool & falling through cloud they have a white out. They don't even know which way is up for all their Sociologist Uni education. I've told you before. If you are not Muslim you are an animal & can & should be shot. This was told to me by an Imam in Malaysia. He was chasing some Orang Asli out of town. I asked him why & that's what he told me. No Allah, Animal. You can shoot. It's Ok. So it is with all Muslims, even the supposedly tame ones. Are you prepared to change your religion or get one or be killed? Become a Muslim because that's the choice you or your children will get once they get to around 30% of the population. No more going to the beach, No more BBQ's, no more going shopping with the girls on your own with out a male relation escort. Enjoy your life while you can because with you & your ilks’ help it won't be enjoyable for long. Posted by Jayb, Sunday, 14 October 2012 8:18:44 PM
| |
Hi Poirot,
I'm talking rubbish ? How do you mean ? Help me by giving an example. Otherwise your comment is really just an empty ad hominem, isn't it ? Do you have an argument that you can put up against whatever I wrote ? Do you have any principles at all that one can come to grips with, in mutual agreement or otherwise ? Cheers, Joe Posted by Loudmouth, Sunday, 14 October 2012 10:05:24 PM
| |
Jayb & Loudmouth,
Some good incisive questions –I’m impressed It’s not often we see Monsieur Poirot lost for words. Bravo I say, bravo! Posted by SPQR, Monday, 15 October 2012 7:47:52 AM
| |
Sorry to disappoint you, SPQR, but Monsieur Poirot was not lost for words. He was unavoidably detained due to OLO's posting limits : )
Loudmouth, This is what I wrote to Jayb: "I'm not offended by you, Jayb. You display an attitude that will always seek to inflame debate. You seek difference while wise people seek common ground." It was meant (as you are no doubt cognizant) as a general observation on methods humans might employ in an attempt to co-exist peaceably. You, as is your wont, picked up a portion of it and proceeded to run off at the mouth true to form. My reference to rubbish was directed at your style, wherein your first and third paragraphs were comprised of your ACME brand strawmen - and you finished it off with your own ad hom. So my referral to garbage emanates from watching you and Jayb stomping around at the end of a very long thread blowing your horns and massing the hounds (shame - only SPQR turned up : ) For instance, Joe, if you weren't quite so keen to construct strawmen to provoke me, we could probably find some "common ground" to move ahead. But you don't wish to engage in constructive dialogue or you wouldn't employ the tactics you do. I've said that I don't support fundamentalism. Our differences seem to stem from my pointing out that humans tend to engage in odium even under the guise of enlightened values. From that, my initial stance, your have gone out of your way to paint me as a supporter of the most heinous atrocities. That is disingenuous in the extreme. Why would you (or Jayb) expect a civil response when you start out so provocatively? In the realm of constructive discourse - Strawmen + provocation = rubbish.....IMO Posted by Poirot, Monday, 15 October 2012 9:51:35 AM
| |
Poirot,
I'm sorry, I may have misunderstood you - I thought you were talking about 'common ground' with Islamists. I'm sure that you and I can find common ground - we both, after all, claim to be on the Left rather than the Right. And I'm sure that you support women's rights, and young girls' rights, in Islamic societies. I even suspect that you would support the extension as much as possible, of Enlightenment values, and their constant positive modification and improvement, to all people in all societies. And I'm pretty sure that both of us would be executed under an Islamist regime, quick-smart. But the question still is: if there really can be no common ground between position A, women's rights, the rule of law and the right to criticise; and position B, a cramping of women's rights, law derived from some Book, and a consequent prohibition on free speech - do we buckle and give in ? For example, do we, as someone glibly suggested above, ban blasphemous speech, or do we allow speech which some may find offensive (not to mention beheadable) ? Do we support complete equality for men and women, boys and girls ? Or should men rule over women, and, for example, have the right to machine-gun pretty women who won't come across, on bogus grounds of adultery ? Do we observe and implement, without fear or favour, a relatively impartial body of law - as much as possible, in a bourgeois society and capitalist economy and polity ? Or do we give priority to the interpretations of assertions in a book ? No, on those issues, there cannot, in my view, be 'common ground'. What do you think, Poirot ? After more than 600 postings, can we get down to the nitty-gritty ? Cheers, Joe Posted by Loudmouth, Monday, 15 October 2012 12:12:34 PM
| |
Loudmouth,
Thank you for your more measured tone : ) I think your points have merit and ,as you can see, I'm much more amenable when not being provoked. Unfortunately, I'm saturated as far as this thread goes - and need to concentrate on a few things, so I'll decline for now, Joe. (it's a busy life...while I've been posting here, I've also been communicating by walkie-talkie with number one son ensconced in a cupboard looking for wayward parts of a toy. I know you'll appreciate, in that case, my competence in multi-tasking...over and out!) Cheers : ) Posted by Poirot, Monday, 15 October 2012 12:34:55 PM
| |
Poirot,
So that's a 'no' ? Posted by Loudmouth, Monday, 15 October 2012 1:09:54 PM
| |
Poirot: I'm sorry, I may have misunderstood you - I thought you were talking about 'common ground' with Islamists.
I must admit Poirot I thought the same as Joe. Loudmouth: I even suspect that you would support the extension as much as possible, of Enlightenment values, and their constant positive modification and improvement, to all people in all societies. I feel sure that you would support these extensions as well, Poirot. So we do have common ground, between us. I, too, agree with everthing in the rest of Loudmouths Post. Posted by Jayb, Monday, 15 October 2012 5:34:05 PM
| |
Poirot & other apologists this is what you are going to get when you Moderate Islamists friends gain power in Australia. Enjoy you new life. :-(
http://www.meforum.org/3305/muslim-brotherhood-crucifies-opponents Posted by Jayb, Monday, 15 October 2012 5:59:00 PM
| |
"Poirot & other apologists..."
Jayb - have you got a split personality? I mean which one am I talking to at the moment - Jay or b? Have a look at your last two posts and tell me you don't jump from a conciliatory stance to a provocative one for no apparent reason...now I'm sure this thread is over for me. ta ta Posted by Poirot, Monday, 15 October 2012 6:16:39 PM
| |
I vote for a peace loving Australia, now if that means throwing out the rubbish at times, or even preventing it from entering, then so be it.
This whole situation has been allowed to fester, thanks to our politically correct, softly, softly approach. An approach that will one day ultimately lead to our undoing. God help us as a nation if we ever have to defend ourselves in war. Posted by rehctub, Tuesday, 16 October 2012 7:04:32 AM
| |
Jayb,
<<Poirot & other apologists this is what you are going to get when you Moderate Islamists friends gain power in Australia. Enjoy you new life. :-(>> It helps if you know a little background on Poirot.. Poirot is a founding member of Wreck the Joint (a older and much badder version “Destroying the Joint”). Its members believe they can wreck the joint (the joint being the West) by i) Outlawing the use/export of any natural resource we have an advantage in: coal, gas,uranium ( 'cause they cause apocalyptic global warming ), ii) By signing away our sovereignty, ratifying as many UN conventions as they can get their hands and, iii) By allowing into the country -- in the name of compassion and non-discrimination --as many "Islamic riot[ers]" as can bribe passage on (100,000) Indonesian fishing boats. And Wreck the Joint members have one more distinguishing characteristic, they have this fixation with George W Bush (some have speculated its because they think the W in his name stands for well-endowed) But a solution is at hand--a new Malaysian solution. We will send Malaysia 1 Wreck the Joint member. And they will send us 4000 refugees. Not even the high court would object to that! In the meantime, you and Loudmouth are doing a great job of keeping her in check -- keep up the good work. Posted by SPQR, Tuesday, 16 October 2012 7:38:51 AM
| |
SPQR, (can't resist)
Your hero, George W. Bush, dolt that he was, happened to find himself in control of a lot of very powerful weapons and the personnel to deploy them. He and his cohorts are the experts at wrecking joints - or do you consider bombing one of the most advanced middle-east nations back into the middle-ages to achieved dominance over their resources as "not wrecking the joint"? Posted by Poirot, Tuesday, 16 October 2012 8:41:25 AM
| |
and, SPQR, it's difficult not to concentrate on the fact that this rather vacant individual gained so much power.
Here's a great example of Enlightenment values being jettisoned and replaced by "the word of God as justification and righteousness". http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2005/oct/07/iraq.usa So there we have it, the largest invasion of a superpower in modern times, rests on a message from God to the president (and a few other helpful fabrications) - and is undertaken under the guise of altruism. It kills scores, destroys infrastructure and creates a vacuum which rapidly degenerates into a free-for-all between various groups. Which goes to show that even in the advanced West, it's still a game of whoever wields the power and the commentary is the one who gains the kudos. Posted by Poirot, Tuesday, 16 October 2012 9:31:04 AM
| |
SPQR any info on csteele?
I left the loony left behind 49 years ago. And never looked back unless I wanted Laugh Posted by Belly, Tuesday, 16 October 2012 11:26:24 AM
| |
Poirot: I thought you were talking about 'common ground' with Islamists.
So you WERE talking about finding common ground with the Islamists? Poirot: do you consider bombing one of the most advanced middle-east nations back into the middle-ages. Advanced Country? Iraq? They never left the Middle Ages. They had an opportunity for a few years recently but they refused it & have clung tightly to their Middle Ages once again. I agree GWB was an idiot in more ways than one. Ah ha! Common Ground. BTW, hear's a few quotes from that last website I gave you. Just in case you refused to look at it. Muslim Brotherhood 'Crucifies' Opponents, Attacks Secular Media El Balad adds that the supporters of Tawfik Okasha, another vocal critic of President Morsi—the one who widely disseminated the graphic video of a Muslim apostate being slaughtered to cries of "Allahu Akbar"—gathered around the presidential palace, only to be surrounded by Brotherhood supporters, who "attacked them with sticks, knives, and Molotov cocktails, crucifying some of them on trees, leading to the deaths of two and the wounding of dozens." In reality, there is little reason to doubt this crucifixion story. Militant Muslims crucifying their opponents is a regular feature of the Islamic world—recent cases coming from the Ivory Coast, where two Christian brothers were crucified, similarly by supporters of a Muslim president who ousted a Christian; Indonesia, where Islamic separatists crucified a fellow Muslim for being a military informant; and in Iraq, where Muslim militants crucified Christian children. According to Allah, "The punishment of those who wage war against Allah and His messenger and strive to make mischief in the land is only this: that they should be murdered or crucified or their hands and their feet should be cut off…" (Koran 5:33). Posted by Jayb, Tuesday, 16 October 2012 12:16:42 PM
| |
And wait! There's more...
Egypt's First "Sex-Slave" Marriage The owner-husband, Abd al-Rauf Awn, then appeared on the show, identifying himself as an Islamic scholar and expert at Islamic jurisprudence who studied at Al Azhar. He gave several Islamic explanations to justify his "marriage," from Islamic prophet Muhammad's "sunna" or practice of "marrying" enslaved captive women, to Koran 4:3, which commands Muslim men to "Marry such women as seem good to you, two and three and four… or what your right hands possess." Even stripping the sex-slave of her hijab, the way Awn commanded his concubine-wife, has precedent. According to Islamic jurisprudence, whereas the free (Muslim) woman is mandated to be veiled behind a hijab, sex-slaves are mandated only to be covered from the navel to the knees—with everything else exposed. it is certainly not the first call to revive the practice. Earlier, Egyptian Sheikh Huwaini, lamenting that the "good old days" of Islam are over, declared that, in an ideal Muslim society, "when I want a sex-slave [I should be able to go] to the market and pick whichever female I desire and buy her." Likewise, a Kuwaiti female politician advocated for reviving the institute of sex-slavery, suggesting that Muslims should bring female captives of war—specifically Russian women from the Chechnya war—and sell them to Muslim men in the markets of Kuwait. I feel sure you will enjoy your life with your friends. Posted by Jayb, Tuesday, 16 October 2012 12:17:51 PM
| |
Jayb,
I haven't bothered reading the rest of your post/s. Just wanted to say, despite you maintaining that Iraq "never left the Middle-Ages" - that prior to sanctions and invasion, Iraq possessed some of the highest standards and outcomes in education and healthcare in the Middle-East. That's a fact. Posted by Poirot, Tuesday, 16 October 2012 12:32:57 PM
| |
Poirot: I haven't bothered reading the rest of your post/s.
So, are you worried that you might see something that may force you into reality. The usual approach of people who keep their heads in the sand in case they might see something they don't like. Sad, So sad. Remember, A day you didn't learn something is a day you've wasted. I don't dislike you, as a person, Poirot. It's the Dogma I dislike. If Iraq had a high standard of Education it fairs not very well for the rest of the Middle East, doesn't it. A place you admire so much. Posted by Jayb, Tuesday, 16 October 2012 1:32:31 PM
| |
No wonder there is a loss of respect in our society - a very ugly thread indeed.
Posted by bonmot, Tuesday, 16 October 2012 4:33:43 PM
| |
Hi Bonmot,
Gosh, I didn't know the organ-grinder had so many monkeys, to trot one out to do its brilliant dance, once another one has fallen exhausted by the wayside. With respect, what do you mean by your comment ? Or is it yet another way to dodge having to respond to relatively reasonable queries, and having to confront real issues ? But of course, if you have nothing really to say, ...... Cheers, Joe :) Posted by Loudmouth, Tuesday, 16 October 2012 6:03:09 PM
| |
Charmed I'm sure, Loudmouth.
I agree with bonmot - at least he had the sense not to get sucked into it. Posted by Poirot, Tuesday, 16 October 2012 6:13:42 PM
| |
I'm sorry, Poirot, sucked into what ? Do you mean controversial issues ? What might they be in this context ?
Might they have something to do with the problematics of multiculturalism - I'm in favor of MC by the way, but I recognise that its application is always fraught with tensions about whose culture, whose values, whose ideological foundations, and that there may be people who seek to modify those very foundations in a reactionary way. True ? False ? And there is the issue - the rationale for this thread - of how to tolerate the intolerant - the contradiction of welcoming people who turn out to have intentions and agendas which may tend to undermine, or even destroy, the values on which that hospitality is predicated. In a small way, it is possible that that 'riot' was very much like an act of war - to hell with some idiot video, that only provided the pretext for a group to get stuck into police as the representatives of a relatively free and open society. So in a way, when they pelted the police with bottles and smashed up their cars, it was a sort of precursor to what the jihadists intend to do with Australia writ large: convert or go under the sword, all 22 million of us. Wait and see. If you don't agree, don't just slag, but make some attempt to explain your point of view. Don't obfuscate, Poirot, don't try to divert the conversation - grapple with the issues. Don't simply accuse people of having an 'ugly' point of view - explain why you think so, Bonmot. And please, for god's sake, let's not re-live the Crusades. We can all play that silly game till the cows come home. After all, what did the Romans ever do for us ? Cheers, Joe :) Posted by Loudmouth, Tuesday, 16 October 2012 10:15:09 PM
| |
Loudmouth,
"...don't just slag.." Coming from the master strawman constructor and provocateur extraordinaire, that's rich : ) "...sucked into what..."? he asks. I've just hobbled through the first ten pages of this thread, and sped through the next twenty. Sucked into this: "Why the hell do we have this garbage here...." "I wonder if we have any pollies with enough guts to ban men wearing dresses, with rags on their heads?" "With the likes of this rubbish and our peaceful invasion from illegals..." "I think our government should head the warnings coming from "real Aussies" and cease allowing all the world's garbage to fill our country..." "The police should not have used dogs they did not clear them fast enough. INSTEAD I propose the police have a new recruit PIGS (real ones) now if they are real Muslims they will soon run from a pig." NO MORE MUSLIMS & those that have not got citizenship straight back where they came from." "...Ali bin csteel..." (I noted many many more, but you get the drift) That kind of gives you a picture of the sort of mentality alive on this thread, don't you reckon, Loudmouth? And all your blather about trying to get down to the nitty-gritty is always either preceded or succeeded with some sort of petty insult...as in: "Hi Bonmot Gosh I didn't know the organ grinder had so many monkeys..." You're a disingenuous prat, Joe. Why would anyone want to seriously debate you when you consistently treat people with disdain? Here's something Bazz wrote way back at the beginning of the thread. It was aimed at the rioters, but it describes most of the posters on this thread just as well: "People with behaviour problems usually overreact to anything that they don't like or which offends them." How true. Posted by Poirot, Tuesday, 16 October 2012 11:50:17 PM
| |
Poirot and Joe,when it comes to multiculturalisim, this is not your ordinary group of immigrants, as they promote terror and beheading from within.
Of all other cultures, invited to call Australia home, I don't know of any of them who promote and nurture such hatred and harm on humanity. Now while I accept that these hate seekers may be a small percentage, in my view, JUST ONE is simply unacceptable in our peace loving nation. Although I domt expect all invitees to odopt our customs, they must all respect our ways. No ifs, no buts, and there is simply no room for anyone who threatens the life of others. Posted by rehctub, Wednesday, 17 October 2012 6:06:46 AM
| |
I like the pigs idea poirot thanks.
How about we buy the blood from the killing centers and use it to break up riots. Great to see the protests against murder in Pakistan. Posted by Belly, Wednesday, 17 October 2012 7:33:20 AM
| |
Sticks and stones, Poirot: what are the issues here ?
A student of logic and argument could do worse than study your tactics, Poirot, with respect: obfuscation, diversion, abuse, walking off in a huff (and returning a short time later), feigned exasperation - all good. Now this one, of tarring anybody who disagrees with you with the brush of your most extreme antagonists, as in your post immediately above. But what are the issues ? 'Disingenuous prat', know thyself. Cheers, Joe :) Posted by Loudmouth, Wednesday, 17 October 2012 8:23:44 AM
| |
Bazz: "People with behaviour problems usually overreact to anything that they don't like or which offends them."
Re your last post Poirot. This describes you exactly, dear poirot. After going through that list you should get the idea that most Australians do not like what these people are doing & are trying to turn Australia into. Please accept that fact. The fundamentalists & the tame ones have the same goal in mind, just using different methods. And you support them? Well, the tame ones at least. I just don't understand the mentality that wants to go back in time 700 years for the sake of harmony. (See capitulation) Talking about "offends". I have noticed that some people are offended by anything & everything. They go looking for things to be offended by so as to feed their egos. James & Jongewards Transactional Analysis & Gestalt theory seems to explain why this happens. They explain that it has to do with role play. Some people are constant victims & of the three states, Parent, Adult & Child, they live mostly in their "Child Ego State". They alternate between anger & sulkiness to manipulate people. Poirot: That kind of gives you a picture of the sort of mentality alive on this thread, don't you reckon, You see the list of posts you have given as personal insults to your & your ilk’s egos. They are not. You have taken them personally. They offend your personal view on a particular subject & you seem to have a long list of subjects that, if disagreed with, are a personal affront. We, who have an alternate view, are accused of being aggressive & disagreeable. This is not the case. We, just have a different view to you based on our personal life experiences. Please, dear poirot, as they say. Build a bridge. Posted by Jayb, Wednesday, 17 October 2012 9:19:45 AM
|
If they (Muslims) dont like what's hapening, GO HOME and protest all you like, but don't bring this crap to our country.
THIS IS AUSTRALIA!