In Australia, a cursory investigation into the product information guide from the ‘official Eli Lilly’ website for Zyprexa (Olanzapine) in the USA informs uses and patients of side effects such as “Increased Mortality in Elderly Patients with Dementia Related Psychosis”; “Suicidality and Antidepressant Drugs”; “Clinical Worsening and Suicide Risk” and amongst others – “Life-threatening Serotonin Syndrome which include symptoms of Akathisia”. (Eli Lilly, Zyprexa Olanzapine. (2010) <http://www.zyprexa.com/Pages/index.aspx> at 20 September 2010 see also P.D Whitehead, ‘Causality and Collateral estoppel: Process and content of recent SSRI Litigation’. (2003) Journal of American Academy Psychiatry and Law 31,(3) 377, 377).
Indeed, the information at the bottom of the official website states, “This site is intended for US residents aged 18 and over”.( (Eli Lilly, Zyprexa Olanzapine. (2010) <http://www.zyprexa.com/Pages/index.aspx> at 20 September 2010 see also P.D Whitehead, ‘Causality and Collateral estoppel: Process and content of recent SSRI Litigation’. (2003) Journal of American Academy Psychiatry and Law 31,(3) 377, 377).
Equally important from an Australian context is the same drug (Zyprexa) and its product information leaflet is being sold without the warnings of suicide, and associated risks listed above.

I have a question: does Australia have libel laws?

As a student of internet libel law, I would suggest moderators here check out their risk in publishing comment #1

Dr Lucire has identified an important area of concern.

Dr Lucire has more courage than the sum total of those persecuting her.

It is very easy to stand up for all that has become accepted as good and right, we can all do that - it makes us feel happy, a part of a whole in a great society. In some cases standing up for, and even promoting the idea of, what is good and right brings far greater benefits. Higher positions in life. Billions of dollars profits. And the rest.

However, it takes one brave person with idealism, altruism and a lot of guts to speak out when serious flaws are seen - particularly where the evidence shows that by taking a stand to protect others, life is going to become very hard indeed.

There is plenty of evidence out there to support Dr Lucire. Some of it comes from previously hidden documents from clinical trials.

Where there are documents proving that deception and fraud have been flying under the banner of science, there are always going to be people who want it kept under wraps for their own sake. The same goes for all kinds of fraud - its done because it WORKS and it brings a benefit to those who commit the fraud.

Dr Lucire is doing what everyone who has responsibility for the health and safety of patients should be doing. Why are those persecuting her not doing so too?

One of very many documents that evidence dishonesty in clinical trials. Dated 1983.
http://www.ssri-uksupport.com/PfizerZoloft1983.pdf

It takes quite some courage to challenge the crimes committed by psychiatry and the pharmaceutical companies. Yes we can definitely say CRIMES considering everything that has been revealed in the US the last two years. A recent report by Public Citizen tells it all: overcharging government health programs; illegal promotion; anti-trust violations; kickbacks; concealing clinical trial findings; poor manufacturing practices; environmental violations; financial violations and illegal distribution.overcharging government health programs; illegal promotion; anti-trust violations; kickbacks; concealing clinical trial findings; poor manufacturing practices; environmental violations; financial violations and illegal distribution.

We can expect that Dr. Lucire's data about the lethal psychiatric drugs will be accepted as very true in the near future.

The simple question is, what genuine SCIENTIST would look at documents like this:

http://www.ssri-uksupport.com/PfizerZoloft1983.pdf

and say

Hey man, they listed a guy who was dismissed from a trial because he became HOMICIDAL and SUICIDAL after less than 2 weeks on a drug as actually being dismissed from the trial for "treatment failure and nausea" - but hey, thats OK, we have no scientific problem with that, bring on the drug as efficacious and safe regardless of how many patients that may kill ??

NO GENUINE SCIENTIST would agree to that.

So who is the scientist here?

Dr Lucire isn't happy about that kind of dishonest 'science'. But apparently the people who are supposed to be protecting patients who take the drug cannot be bothered to question it and want to make some kind of example of a genuine scientist who actually does care about the patients that the drug might harm, in order to protect them ?

A GENUINE scientist CARES about scientific integrity. Without it there is no science and, in medicine, lives are put at risk.

Give me a doctor any day that actually cares about what any drug might do. A doctor with integrity will be aware that there is a problem for some people and keep an eye out for symptoms of problems arising and know how to avoid it.

But I suppose that is it because I prefer SCIENCE to fraud and deceipt.