Comment History for Poll Clerk
The Forum > User Index > Poll Clerk > Comment History
» 24/08/2010 7:12:16 PM this one looks like it will go on forever. but a few late random thoughts, the electrical.....
» 15/08/2010 3:44:12 PM Yes Examinator. We understand that 10-15% of the voters might choose a third party. And th.....
» 13/08/2010 9:55:55 PM It is the suggestion that the Greens could "have" the balance of power that faze.....
» 20/01/2010 12:00:25 PM I wasn’t suggesting that life in China is better than life in Australia Mr Lewis, just tha.....
» 20/01/2010 9:17:08 AM Doesn't sound like you have lived in Shanghai, Manorina. There is a little craziness to Ch.....
» 4/11/2009 4:58:41 PM Wasn't Magna Carta @ Runnymede largely about "no taxation without representation".....
» 23/10/2009 10:17:39 AM Mr Holden perhaps doesn't have any friends, or their lives might have shown him that views.....
» 17/08/2009 5:28:13 PM quite a few "pie in the sky" ideas in the above comments. Good ideas, sure. But .....
» 14/08/2009 10:18:39 AM I appreciate this is not the point of John Roskam's article, but the concentration on the .....
» 12/08/2009 7:07:17 PM This member of 'the public' knows nothing but the extracts shown on ABC TV of this and oth.....
» 7/08/2009 10:08:24 AM I agree. The Senate, especially since the Murphy reforms in the 1970s, has made a signific.....
11 comments in total: 11 article comments, 0 general comments.
Return to Poll Clerk's user info page
|
