Comment History for Ben Cruachan
The Forum > User Index > Ben Cruachan > Comment History
» 16/11/2011 7:36:37 PM Which terrorists were you referring to 579? Bin Laden wasn't piloting the planes on 9/11, .....
» 21/07/2011 1:38:52 PM It's interesting that Jan Cameron made her fortune from up-market retailer Kathmandu, and .....
» 27/06/2011 9:19:54 AM Sadly the loopy left is now in control of Australian politics. They are seemingly incompet.....
» 21/12/2010 12:51:40 PM Dear Phil The author doesn't have the space in his original article to cover every concei.....
» 16/12/2010 12:24:35 PM David Lindenmayer is nothing but an anti-logging green activist. He lacks any sense of per.....
» 23/04/2010 9:10:01 PM Wood production in Australian forests is restricted to just 9% of public forests and suppo.....
» 9/04/2010 1:56:33 PM pelican "How are these academics or scientists trading their credibility?" They.....
» 9/04/2010 9:38:41 AM Perhaps, Manorina, you should take your own advice, take a sabatical, do some research on .....
» 20/10/2009 8:05:04 PM Doctors expect and get huge salaries - but are they worth it? Or are they bleeding the sys.....
» 20/10/2009 7:42:32 PM We really have a wonderful system for training doctors in Australia! Only students with EN.....
» 21/02/2009 1:58:21 PM I have no idea about economics - but this article makes eminent sense to me. Intuitively, .....
» 14/12/2008 2:13:39 PM Richard Flanagan's original opinion piece was poorly researched and overly emotive. Before.....
» 11/12/2008 5:43:09 PM We live in a NIMBY society. With increasing urbanisation and affluence people are becoming.....
13 comments in total: 13 article comments, 0 general comments.
Return to Ben Cruachan's user info page
|
