Comment History for Richard Castles
The Forum > User Index > Richard Castles > Comment History
» 20/08/2016 2:31:16 PM I think the questions you raise regarding the adjustments to these complete data sets are .....
» 10/11/2008 1:36:19 AM I hope you will allow me to quote from the opinion I cited: "As John Stuart Mill arg.....
» 10/11/2008 1:35:47 AM xoddam, Perhaps I am failing to understand you, but there seems to be some confusing doub.....
» 8/11/2008 6:32:19 PM xoddam, You ask for names. I can start by referring you to: http://www.guardian.co.uk/co.....
» 4/09/2008 3:04:41 PM ...and once again the discussion descends into nasty abuse and mud-slinging. It would be n.....
» 12/08/2008 5:06:24 PM Thanks too, bennie, I think. I guess 2 out of 3 ain't bad. I'll try to find a new barrow......
» 11/08/2008 9:25:00 PM Beautifully put Jon J. I know that I feel pretty small and uninfluential most of the time,.....
» 31/07/2008 9:13:33 PM How strange the times. Everybody wants to do something about the weather; nobody wants to .....
» 30/07/2008 1:53:57 PM Meanwhile, snow falls in...Sydney. ?.....
» 25/07/2008 4:53:33 PM Sams, thanks for reminding me about something that used to be called the scientific method.....
» 24/07/2008 9:40:32 PM Looks like a few folks commented on Brisbane's weather a couple of days too early. How are.....
» 13/07/2008 10:10:40 PM Janama, I think you raise an important point. The question of whether man is part of, or o.....
» 13/07/2008 9:23:37 PM Porphyrin: "All they [sceptical 'experts'] ever do is make unsupported statements abo.....
» 13/07/2008 12:04:26 PM For "such an obscure on-line forum", Q&A, you seem to spend a lot of time slummi.....
» 11/07/2008 12:40:49 AM Yes Pericles, there's a man in my neighborhood who should be thanked by us all for keeping.....
» 9/07/2008 10:27:21 PM A lot of words and still avoiding the point, spikey. Your agility in evasion is impressive.....
» 9/07/2008 10:55:19 AM Dear Elizabeth, I can sense you are furious and wishing that I was hit by a bus. I shal.....
» 8/07/2008 6:43:26 PM Dear, oh dear spikey, What a tangled web we weave... I am writing again to address your .....
» 7/07/2008 10:32:29 PM Spikey (Elizabeth I see now), your words, as cut & pasted from your post, are: “Which is.....
» 7/07/2008 2:03:53 AM Spikey, my apologies for assuming you are male. I can only say I did assume Spikey to be a.....
» 6/07/2008 12:08:31 PM rstuart, I know the feeling. I apologise if I made too much of your idle comment, or read .....
» 5/07/2008 6:51:16 PM Onya Country girl. What a lovely comment. I haven’t read your articles but I’m interested .....
» 3/07/2008 11:56:07 PM Sadly, it seems to me that the debate, at least in this forum, IS over. Not because it is .....
» 1/07/2008 10:30:18 PM Sams: "Name these individual climate change scientists that are "sitting on thei.....
» 22/04/2008 7:38:21 PM T Sett, I’ll give you the benefit of the doubt that what you’re saying is your gut reacti.....
» 21/04/2008 8:43:42 PM Unfortunately, Mark, I doubt sceptics will have their day. Rather we should be prepared fo.....
» 13/04/2008 7:09:58 PM It's all too clear what you trade in, mac......
» 13/04/2008 12:36:48 PM mac, you don’t want to hear from politicians or economists. Presumably, then, you have no .....
» 10/09/2007 7:41:33 PM According to a quick review of Peter's prolific output, Mark Latham should be our Prime Mi.....
» 8/07/2007 7:01:46 PM From ninemsn: "Gore made a live video appearance from Washington to open the first sh.....
» 8/07/2007 6:54:29 PM Hardly know where to begin, davsab. I disagree with many of your basic assumptions - that .....
» 6/07/2007 9:09:17 PM We as a species must converge to one common goal? Whose goal davsab? Yours? Mine? My house.....
» 4/07/2007 1:44:56 PM Thanks gecko for at least giving me 15 years before I'm brought before your Climate Though.....
» 3/07/2007 4:23:26 PM There is, arguably, a greater threat: "The most successful supporters of tyranny are .....
» 29/06/2007 5:56:45 PM Not a nit pick, SHONGA. A correction of a grossly misleading claim. Of our 787 winners, ab.....
» 29/06/2007 4:07:16 PM Wrong SHONGA. Only 787 Nobel Prizes have been awarded in all fields since 1901......
» 23/06/2007 2:02:14 AM Yeah, dunno if we can trust this Kininmonth bloke, what with his links to those evil organ.....
» 19/06/2007 12:22:45 PM Fed up with dirty politics? Tired of greasy PR flaks? Had it up to here with stubborn bake.....
» 19/06/2007 1:01:51 AM Way too many of you, just the right amount of me......
» 16/06/2007 12:40:09 AM "It means everyone will need to pay more attention to their daily lives. Health, dome.....
» 1/06/2007 3:09:28 PM Gotcha......
» 31/05/2007 1:49:19 PM Bruce Haigh, perhaps you could tell us your definition of a nasty chemical?.....
» 30/05/2007 6:48:19 PM alanpoi, could you tell me how the problem was manageable?.....
» 30/05/2007 3:38:00 PM You say I am uninformed, Liam, yet my comment only referred to your statement and the link.....
» 29/05/2007 12:23:27 AM Of course, the hilarious thing about all the animated anti-human Hollywood cartoons is tha.....
» 28/05/2007 11:58:52 PM You didn't mention, Liam, that cancer is now the leading cause of death because of a reduc.....
» 18/05/2007 10:04:28 AM And it's a lovely story, southerner. Sleep well......
» 17/05/2007 12:05:49 PM Thank you southerner. I think I agree with you in one area. Some animals are probably way .....
» 16/05/2007 10:46:07 AM It's "the biggest collaborative science project in human history" part that worr.....
» 15/05/2007 11:14:51 PM Liam's "just don't get it" is, of course, the giveaway expression of the fundame.....
» 15/05/2007 10:20:33 PM southerner, could you elaborate on how birds leaving and ants climbing before the '74 Bris.....
» 15/05/2007 7:24:00 AM Thank you, I'd rather be free to question God and Climate Change than permitted the small .....
» 14/05/2007 10:01:53 PM sorry, dickie, your false assumptions make it impossible for me to reply in any meaningful.....
» 14/05/2007 12:33:52 AM I wasn't seeking an apology, dickie. The comment wasn't directed at me. But if it was, I w.....
» 13/05/2007 7:14:09 PM Re name calling, dickie, let me remind you who it was who called one commentator on this s.....
» 10/05/2007 5:20:08 PM Yes, we're all in this together, but some of us are more in this together than others......
» 10/05/2007 11:09:20 AM "There is no way he [Gore] could be as effective as he is if he was not wealthy and u.....
» 4/05/2007 6:50:02 PM Seems there's more profit in prophecy than dinero in denial......
» 3/05/2007 11:07:46 PM Snake: "In fact the lack of grammar and spelling coupled with conspiritorial reasons .....
» 22/04/2007 1:28:13 AM Ah, "die-offs" is it now? Paul Ehrlich called them "die-backs", and th.....
» 21/04/2007 3:21:43 PM Yeah, that's the problem with prophesiers. There's usually something they don't "anti.....
» 18/04/2007 11:58:36 PM Divergence, I'm not sure I understand your post enough to comment, so I apologise if I am .....
» 11/04/2007 12:28:00 AM Snake, was that the Paul Erlick (sic) whose best case scenario predicted that in 1974 Amer.....
» 5/04/2007 11:49:48 AM David, it is simply not possible to have a meaningful or fruitful discussion with someone .....
» 4/04/2007 11:11:41 AM David's golden rule is called fundamentalism. It is also a defense mechanism that Freud ca.....
» 2/04/2007 10:28:38 AM DL: "Richard Castles says that he is not misinforming people. But one person posted t.....
» 1/04/2007 11:00:57 PM DL: "Richard Castles is not informing people about Canberra's climate with any accura.....
» 31/03/2007 2:37:03 PM David, you accuse me of "lies" but have not yet once successfully pointed one ou.....
» 24/03/2007 6:27:46 PM Apologies: the above was posted to the wrong thread but, then again, does it matter?.....
» 24/03/2007 6:23:39 PM Model of David Latimer's thinking: People are out to trick me --> Locate 'trick' throu.....
» 20/03/2007 4:26:10 AM Thank you SoS. There is a touching comment in there somewhere. I think the question of why.....
» 19/03/2007 2:06:35 AM PS. The cut & paste function is very handy. "Was any thought given to the reputatio.....
» 19/03/2007 1:08:57 AM An apology David. My last response was written in haste, and on reflection, I realise that.....
» 17/03/2007 4:33:45 PM David, You say: "By including climate sceptics like Bjorn Lomborg later in the list,.....
» 17/03/2007 3:28:34 PM Apology gracefully accepted, SoS. I have enjoyed the discussion, but don't have time to re.....
» 15/03/2007 6:26:08 PM SoS, the ground on which you stand is getting shakier by the comment. Where do I start? Y.....
» 14/03/2007 11:24:57 PM Dewi, What obsfucation? What drama? How vague? How misleading? Substantive arguments, plea.....
» 14/03/2007 6:16:24 PM So, SoS, you don't see Flannery's exaggeration as scaremongering? You say "we must .....
» 11/03/2007 10:23:49 PM A (smoke) alarmist response? Seeing how you mention it, my smoke alarm often goes off when.....
» 11/03/2007 11:07:14 AM SoS, I am aware of the greenhouse effect. I understand Venus's "runaway" effect .....
» 10/03/2007 7:09:12 PM David Latimer: "We do not know these answers..." Well, not through lack of tryi.....
» 8/03/2007 5:50:21 PM S of S, thanks for mentioning the 4th report policy summary. You say: “In the 70s there wa.....
» 7/03/2007 6:43:55 PM Dewi, I provided the link to the IPCC graph only to show the cooling which David denies. N.....
» 7/03/2007 5:07:54 PM David, that is a desperate response. Clearly, when I said "your figures from the BOM&.....
» 5/03/2007 9:54:55 AM An amusing article. The threat of terrorism is exaggerated - you are more likely to drown .....
» 4/03/2007 9:03:41 PM Skeptical, I mean no disrespect to you, your age or your memory, when I say that your lack.....
» 3/03/2007 11:59:20 AM Thanks for your comment Skeptical. You say that "In the 70s, the 0.2 degree cooling w.....
» 1/03/2007 5:52:16 PM David: “Why do you overlook the official reports, in preference to your anecdotal storytel.....
» 28/02/2007 10:51:07 PM Yes, David Latimer, climate is not about one or two days (although the 1968 Canberra heat .....
» 28/02/2007 5:43:21 PM Thanks jeremy29......
» 16/02/2007 2:06:21 PM Thanks for the links, Ev......
» 9/02/2007 1:34:28 PM Johnj, to be quite honest, I don't even understand your comment, but given that you seem t.....
» 8/02/2007 9:53:59 PM So billie, Lavoisier is criticised for being small and lowly-funded, while other organizat.....
» 8/02/2007 11:01:38 AM Panaitan, You say "The consistent message of [the US House of Reps] enquiry is best .....
» 7/02/2007 2:16:44 PM Mr Morgan, you say "we have a minority of mostly non-scientists who are promoted by s.....
» 5/02/2007 11:05:33 PM dickie: "Exxon are sponsers (sic) of the Think Tank who are offering $10,000 to scien.....
» 5/02/2007 2:56:03 PM kang, are you saying that you regard terrorism as "philanthropy"? If so, I'm qui.....
» 4/02/2007 10:16:57 PM At a public seminar on climate change I attended a couple of years ago, IPCC chair Rajendr.....
» 3/02/2007 9:27:32 PM Shonga: "The world was told in 1992 in a document signed by 1,600 scientists half of .....
» 1/02/2007 1:51:37 PM That's 'Jennifer Marohasy', billissey......
» 30/01/2007 1:44:06 PM Nice twist, Tim. I did not say I didn't care that the Stern critique science was wrong, or.....
» 28/01/2007 9:09:49 PM Tim, you say the science in the critique is badly wrong. Then provide a link to a blog tha.....
» 26/01/2007 3:27:51 PM A dual (scientific and economic) critique of the Stern Review can be found in the current .....
» 11/12/2006 1:37:59 PM Johnj, thank you for acknowledging your nonsense. dickie, I would be happy to try to answ.....
» 8/12/2006 7:24:00 PM dickie: "And most of us refrain from making claims which we cannot substantiate.".....
» 8/12/2006 3:59:29 PM Oh, Johnj, you really are tying yourself up in knots. You started by being quite convinced.....
» 7/12/2006 4:23:18 PM Sir Vivor, I refer you to Brendan O'Neill's piece - linked from my opinion - which descri.....
» 7/12/2006 11:17:53 AM ronnie: "Why can't we just be ordinary folks who look around and see the smog getting.....
» 6/12/2006 2:03:11 PM Sams: Richard Castles wrote: "Here are a couple of other inconvenient pieces of evide.....
» 4/12/2006 10:16:09 PM I don't feel hurt, Liam. How have I acted "hurt"?.....
» 4/12/2006 5:55:05 PM I agree Perseus. It would be impossible in this forum to respond to all the errors of fact.....
» 3/12/2006 3:59:24 PM dickie, could you please help me by pointing out the "lies and misinformation" i.....
» 3/12/2006 9:24:00 AM Thank you Ben G. I am glad to read someone who has at least responded to the actual point .....
» 2/12/2006 1:23:05 PM Johnj: "Perhaps Richard Castles might care to explain why his article is not "fu.....
» 1/12/2006 12:27:53 PM Ho Hum: "...has anyone ever noticed that most of the so called "conservative&quo.....
» 23/10/2006 11:12:16 AM Ah, Skellett, I can't resist. Are you seriously suggesting that anyone who quotes from any.....
» 19/10/2006 4:25:27 PM ...continued from above: For someone so keen to impute dishonesty and deceit in everythin.....
» 19/10/2006 2:50:56 PM ...Continued from above: The quote is representative of my reading of the report. Briefly.....
» 18/10/2006 4:19:48 PM My last comment on the Great Elipsis Debate 2006. Apologies to all who want to read more i.....
» 18/10/2006 10:51:08 AM No, Skellett. Go back. Count. One elipse in the quote itself. There are more important thi.....
» 17/10/2006 1:20:53 PM Skellett, you're reference to my "constant" use of elipses when, in fact, I used.....
» 13/10/2006 5:15:42 PM Yes, Skellet, quite real. You might have continued the quote from the report summary. &quo.....
» 13/10/2006 4:39:20 PM Thank you Bob, even just for drawing attention to events that a layperson like myself woul.....
» 8/10/2006 10:45:15 PM Thank you David. In a shameless bid to make my article appear more important than it is, I.....
» 6/10/2006 5:02:13 PM Thank you Working Granny and Katier. I am touched by your comments. I don't normally like .....
» 5/10/2006 6:48:24 PM In answer to your question, Tony, no, the writer does not think that there aren't things t.....
126 comments in total: 126 article comments, 0 general comments.
Return to Richard Castles's user info page
|
|
