Comment History for Gadfly
The Forum > User Index > Gadfly > Comment History
» 14/12/2005 12:13:19 PM Duncan Kerr is one of too many in Australia who do not comprehend that racism is fundament.....
» 31/10/2005 10:10:46 AM Several contributors to this thread have made comments along the lines of 'Noel Pearson sh.....
» 30/10/2005 11:58:02 AM Rancitas, Your beginning statement appear defeatist. You seem to be arguing that, because.....
» 28/10/2005 7:22:48 PM sneekeepete, I respect your views. In this forum it is inevitable that there will be pola.....
» 28/10/2005 2:34:40 PM Church leaders are in no way qualified to speak about the real world. In order to become a.....
» 28/10/2005 1:43:50 PM Noel Pearson is to be highly congratulated for this intelligent and potentially productive.....
» 27/10/2005 4:31:41 PM White Wombat, sneekeepete et al You speak of the need for 'public debate' of proposed leg.....
» 26/10/2005 1:43:31 PM Kit D and SHONGA, Please tell me more about the "closed doors" of which you com.....
» 26/10/2005 1:24:29 PM Con, (Con George-Katzabasis) I read your article, but with some difficulty because you ar.....
» 26/10/2005 12:09:23 PM Mr Michaelsen alleges 'secrecy' by Government (as do many journalists). Readers of this t.....
» 21/10/2005 5:07:36 PM Lots of interesting points being argued, some rational some not; the one and only thing fo.....
» 21/10/2005 4:24:09 PM Rainier, You are being very presumptious when you say I have not read the draft legislatio.....
» 20/10/2005 12:11:38 PM To Terje, Irrelevant to the above. What happened to IP ? Gadfly ( geoff33g@yahoo.com.au).....
» 20/10/2005 12:08:49 PM To Leigh, Terje, sneekeepete, borofkin, rossco, maracas, Chris Shaw & Ranier, Two questio.....
» 20/10/2005 11:28:30 AM Peter Tucker's paper is refreshingly objective. For the record I support the principle of .....
15 comments in total: 15 article comments, 0 general comments.
Return to Gadfly's user info page
|
