Comment History for franc hoggle
The Forum > User Index > franc hoggle > Comment History
» 20/05/2011 12:53:35 PM [Deleted for abuse.].....
» 18/05/2011 5:33:20 PM [Deleted for abuse].....
» 18/05/2011 5:32:25 PM Nicholas, are you serious? Are you really saying this with a straight face? First, your fo.....
» 18/05/2011 4:06:22 PM Nickosjt: "What is unfair here?" What is unfair Nicholas, is that you avoid all.....
» 18/05/2011 12:48:23 PM R0bert: "I don't think it helps at all to continue to sidetrack the discussion into t.....
» 17/05/2011 1:41:17 PM Trav: "Wow, Franc Hoggle, you sure do a good job of throwing around wild accusations .....
» 17/05/2011 12:44:40 PM Neglected to include link for the breakdown of Access behaviour - http://greylining.wordp.....
» 17/05/2011 12:42:22 PM I have broken the Access abuse of trust and deception down at greater length here - Acces.....
» 17/05/2011 12:41:39 PM Another totally disinterested commentator with no vested interests that deliberately misse.....
» 6/05/2011 12:04:06 PM Houellebecq: "So much fuss over a bit of kumbayah and colouring in pictures of a very.....
» 5/05/2011 8:32:59 PM Shockadelic, playing the "troll" card is an admission of a lost cause. You have .....
» 5/05/2011 5:56:11 PM Marantha, enough with the sophistry. See Chrys's post above. You are reciting the apologis.....
» 5/05/2011 4:17:33 PM @Houellebecq Sudden? It's only in the last decade that folks have begun realising they ca.....
» 4/05/2011 7:05:47 PM Shockadelic: More sophist tape-loopery. This is really scraping the bottom of the barrel, .....
» 4/05/2011 2:22:06 PM Anthm1, there have been enough misleading apologist tapeloops for one day. You are letting.....
» 4/05/2011 12:47:31 PM These articles are repetitive and remind me of little more than a child whining about not .....
16 comments in total: 16 article comments, 0 general comments.
Return to franc hoggle's user info page
|
