Comment History for Richard Bramhall
The Forum > User Index > Richard Bramhall > Comment History
» 5/10/2009 7:21:00 AM Shadow Minister, you claim (4 October 7:47p.m.) there is a major flaw in a Green Audit ana.....
» 4/10/2009 6:42:33 PM The forest plot Geoff Russell presents is for studies up to 16 kilometres from NPPs. In an.....
» 4/10/2009 6:34:15 PM Shadow Minister, I asked you to support your attacks on Green Audit with logic. You respon.....
» 1/10/2009 11:39:41 PM Shadow Minister, your Guardian link simply recycles opinion about the Chernobyl Forum repo.....
» 1/10/2009 12:20:05 AM Even if Spindoc's arithmetic were correct, his French challenge is a blind, partly because.....
» 29/09/2009 8:34:18 PM "Purleeeze" is no answer. It is a symptom of a discussion degenerating into sarc.....
» 28/09/2009 8:49:09 PM Spindoc (your post of Monday, 28 September 4:48), Taking no notice of the abuse, everythin.....
» 27/09/2009 9:13:02 PM Spindoc. You misquote me. No-one can take "data as “informed scientific evaluation”&q.....
» 26/09/2009 10:03:05 PM Could Spindoc tell us whether the source quoted provides any detail of how the risk figure.....
» 25/09/2009 9:41:16 PM Shadow Minister "… little evidence for … adverse pregnancy outcomes [from] ionising r.....
» 24/09/2009 8:26:52 PM People seem to be missing the point of what I have written on this blog. Exercises to comp.....
» 23/09/2009 11:13:59 PM It's not my knee that's jerking. Risk comparisons need to be revised. New theory and much .....
» 22/09/2009 10:26:11 PM Dear Shadow Minister, The paper on comparative risks which you cited appeared in an IAEA p.....
» 19/09/2009 9:34:29 PM antiGreen - "agreeing to disagree" Ok, we can. And thank you for conducting this.....
» 18/09/2009 10:27:48 PM AntiGreen; Contrary to what you say, CERRIE voted twice to include the dissenting material.....
» 17/09/2009 10:04:51 PM Replying to anti-green; a hypothesis like LNT may be simple and easily understood, but tha.....
» 16/09/2009 9:56:00 PM AntiGreen seems not to have understood the clear message to be inferred from the arguments.....
» 15/09/2009 8:43:03 PM The significance of Kaatch et al (leukaemia near German nuclear plant) is that it confirms.....
18 comments in total: 18 article comments, 0 general comments.
Return to Richard Bramhall's user info page
|
