Comment History for For Choice
The Forum > User Index > For Choice > Comment History
» 15/06/2020 12:47:57 PM David, Fact checking is becoming even more necessary in this world we live in. Those who .....
» 2/05/2017 9:13:59 AM Good to see recognition of the real costs of the gas extraction and piping to farmers with.....
» 4/11/2013 1:00:35 PM Hi mathew, When you want to start scare mongering your defense is to accuse those with th.....
» 15/11/2010 1:23:20 PM Dear CJ Morgan You can't dress up the premis these groups (the Murray-Darling Basin Autho.....
» 5/07/2010 1:59:49 PM The author's outlook is a defeatist view. The world has a long history of "doom sayer.....
» 12/04/2010 1:22:20 PM Those that criticize measuring performance are the last to implement testing and regularly.....
» 13/07/2009 10:36:03 AM The previous poster highlighted the fact that correlation is no evidence of causation and .....
» 16/02/2009 7:59:48 PM Fires require dry fuel, wind and ignition. The only part of that list that can be reliably.....
» 10/08/2008 10:51:26 PM Re non-gm farmer and testing of GM canola oil. The analysis of the constituents of GM c.....
» 5/08/2008 5:28:25 PM Several correspondents in this debate seemed to see many of the studies for more than they.....
» 28/07/2008 11:55:40 AM Greg, your assumption that the the pool of genes in nature is closed is wrong. Change is t.....
» 12/06/2007 1:11:24 PM Katherine, Farmers have to manage daily a large number of specialised decisions. These inc.....
12 comments in total: 12 article comments, 0 general comments.
Return to For Choice's user info page
|
