Comment History for Kephren
The Forum > User Index > Kephren > Comment History
» 22/03/2006 4:39:39 PM As I see it, the thrust of this article is that while there is no evidence that Iran is at.....
» 10/02/2006 9:41:27 AM I would like to add something I found in the Jyllands-Posten (English version) website htt.....
» 9/02/2006 10:29:55 AM Good for you, Juanita. Perhaps all single women of child-bearing age (except for the rich .....
» 19/01/2006 2:10:09 PM Yes, Scout, I agree with what you have said. There seems to be a tendency on the part of m.....
» 18/01/2006 10:28:20 PM Those people complaining about the 'baby bonus' payment might like to recall its predecess.....
» 18/01/2006 10:25:23 PM Thanks R0bert for explaining C$A. It was the $ sign that confused me. I can now see it is .....
» 18/01/2006 10:50:21 AM I read with great interest this article and the accompanying comments. However, I would l.....
» 13/01/2006 2:58:30 PM Hello R0bert, Excuse my ignorance, but what on earth is C$A? It looks like 'Commonwealth .....
» 13/01/2006 12:14:40 PM I would like to comment on Wre's post of January 12, specifically the point that his mothe.....
» 11/01/2006 3:29:50 PM I would like to question the theory that single mothers on Government benefits have more c.....
» 10/01/2006 2:21:48 PM There is a saying (I can't remember its author unfortunately) to the effect that 'history .....
» 4/01/2006 12:59:31 PM I have only just joined this forum and have been reading members' comments with interest. .....
12 comments in total: 12 article comments, 0 general comments.
Return to Kephren's user info page
|
